BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sprinkler Saves - ECPv6.11.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Sprinkler Saves
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Sprinkler Saves
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241028T204800
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241028T220100
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20241121T205108Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241121T205709Z
UID:10000480-1730148480-1730152860@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Nottinghamshire Student Accommodation Kitchen Activation
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nThis the second successful reported student accommodation sprinkler activation reported by Nottingham Fire and Rescues Service (NFRS) within a 3-month period\, on both occasions the fire was either contained/controlled or extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head with no injuries reported. \nDemonstrating the vital role sprinklers play in fire safety arrangements by highlighting real tangible examples of where they have actuated and in doing so saved life and protected property. Providing further evidence of the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems adding further weight to the recent report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe report found that:\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate. \n  \n         \nStudent accommodation is undoubtedly a challenging environment from a fire safety perspective with their own individual challenges. The student’s lifestyle is typically associated with a reduced level of caution when it comes to appreciating risk. Demonstrated on this occasion by the students lack urgency\, understanding of the premises emergency plan (simultaneous evacuation) on the actions that should be taken in the event of the premises fire alarm actuating resulting in a considerable delay evacuating the building. \nIf it was not for the proactive approach of the landlord to install sprinklers within their property portfolio\, we could be discussing a totally different outcome following this fire. It should be remembered that the recent amendments to sprinkler provisions within Approved Document B for a reduction in the height threshold for sprinklers in purpose group 1a (residential block of flats) from 30m to 11m disappointingly this does not include student accommodation. \nEngland’s national building and fire safety regulations trial behind its neighbours\, governments in other UK jurisdictions who have set lower mandatory thresholds for the installation of sprinklers in new purpose-built student accommodation. Following the introduction of new fire regulations within Northern Ireland\, fire sprinklers are now required in within student accommodation with a storey more than 11m above ground level which will come into effect on 6 May 2025. \nIt is the view of British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) and the National Fire Chiefs Council that sprinklers should be installed in all new student accommodation regardless of height\, as well as existing buildings undergoing refurbishment. The Government should be looking to emulate the policies in the devolved governments to support unitary policy across nations by lowering or removing the acceptable height\, floor area\, or occupancy threshold dependent on building type. \nThis incident provides further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential sprinkler system installed\, maintained in accordance with the appropriate codes and standards reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nThe premises \n\nGround floor plus 3 and basement\, office block converted into student accommodation.\n\n The Incident  \n\nDate of incident; 28 October 2024.\nTime of call; 20:48.\nTime of stop; 21:29\nIncident closed 22:01.\nIncident; Fire.\nAddress; Nottinghamshire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen flat\nAFSS; BS9251:2014\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\nFire Rescue Service; Nottinghamshire Fire Rescue Service.\n\nSummary of Incident  \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a confirmed fire.\nThe seat of the fire was identified to be within a flat involving an electrical cooking extractor hood.\nThe fire was extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system in the room of origin before the arrival of operational crews.\nSuperficial fire\, heat\, and smoke damage sustained within the room of origin\n\n\nMajor protracted incident everted allowing FRS resources to be released\, redeployed to attend emergency incidents.\n\nThe images below are taken from the previous fire reported by NFRS involving student accommodation which was successfully contained/controlled by the activation of 1 sprinkler head within a bedroom\, identifying the benefits of installing a residential sprinkler system  \n                              \n Credit Nationwide fire sprinklers                             Credit NFRS                                                                     Credit NFRS\nThe danger of student accommodation fires cannot be underestimated clearly demonstrated following the fire in Bolton involving the premises known as the ‘Cube’ November 2019. The speed with which the fire took hold and the devastating impact it had on the building was shocking. The Greater Manchester Fire Rescue Service (GMFRS) press release states that due to the full and immediate evacuation of the premises many lives were saved. \nFull details on the incident are contained in the GMFRS Cube Incident Report (click the link in the resources section\, sprinklers were not fitted. \nSprinkler System \n\nBS9251:2014\nCategory 2\, 30 min run time\nWater supply boosted cold water mains fed sprinkler system.\nInstalled Sprinkler Heads: RFC 49 74c\nAlarm: Link to fire alarm panel\nSupply Details: Lowara 5SV07 pump set fed by a 32mm mains water supply\n\nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building  \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\nThe system was reinstated within 60 minutes from the time the sprinkler contractor received the call to attend the incident.\n\nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to\n\n\nAssist evacuation when necessary\nEffect rescue when necessary\n\n\nPrevent conflagration\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nNFRS AFSS Position Statement\nSeptember Nottingham Student accommodation fire\nManchester Fire and Rescue Service Cube Fire Report\nNFCC AWSS Policy Statement\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n                 \n  \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/nottinghamshire-student-accommodation-kitchen-activation/
LOCATION:Nottinhamshire
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20241001
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20241101
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20241123T134014Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250103T122151Z
UID:10000483-1727740800-1730419199@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Reported Sprinkler Activations October 2024
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nOur gratitude to The London Fire Brigade (LFB) for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of fire sprinklers by the reporting of sprinkler activations\, rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire rescue services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. Reporting incidents taken from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of October 2024 where sprinklers were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \nRaising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety benefits. \nLondon Fire Brigade  \nLFB Is one of the largest\, firefighting\, community safety rescue services in the world protecting residents and property in Greater London as well as those who work or visit the capital. They report attending 126\,464 incidents of which 16\,120 were fires for the year 2023. \nLondon \nAs the capital of the United Kingdom\, London is also the largest city with a population of just over nine million and is projected to reach 10 million by 2035. It is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world. There are 32 boroughs in Greater London\, except for the City of London which is a county and government district. The risk from fire in the capital is diverse\, ranging from large industrial premises\, complex retail shopping centres\, major transport hubs\, and large high-rise residential developments. The latter is a key area as half of the population of London live in flats compared to less than 20% in the rest of the country. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of October where AFSS were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role sprinklers play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler actuations from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\n\n\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nProviding further evidence reaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\n Incident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the officer in charge of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups. For the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \n Each group contains questions in data fields with associated lists containing the appropriate answer options. Data collected about serious reportable fires include: \n\nTime and date of call\nFire Service or other geographical area\nType of building or vehicle\nMost likely motive (accidental or malicious)\nCause of fire (chip pan fires\, electrical\, etc.)\nSource of ignition (cigarettes\, cookers\, etc.)\nMaterials (furniture\, etc.)\nThe spread of fire (beyond room of origin\, etc.)\nThe nature of fire casualties\nRescue information and method of extinction\nThe effectiveness of automatic smoke detectors\nWere there any active safety systems present?\n\nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training\, experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene. \n The use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n6x Incidents were reported for the above-mentioned period where Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) were present of which 2 activations were reported which extinguished the fire on both occasions. (AFSS) \n\n1x within a Purpose-Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n1x within a boarding house/B&B\n\n \nTable 1\, IRS Primary fire data where sprinklers were present\, having an impact\n\nReference is made within table 1 that the firefighting system impact was either not known or did not contain/control in 4 of the incidents.\nSupplementary Information from the LFB provided further context allowing the rationale for these anomalies identifying 2 areas.\n\n\nSprinkler system coverage was not provided within the fire affected area\nInsufficient heat from the fire to activate the sprinkler head\n\nReported Incidents  \n\nHillingdon Airport Terminal\n\n\nDate of incident; 8 October 2024.\nTime of call; 06:46.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Not known.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0.\n\nThe seat of the fire was identified to involve an electrical consumer unit which was left to burn out with fire spread limited to item 1st ignited. Due to insufficient heat from the fire\, the sprinkler head located in the room of origin of the fire did not activate. \n\nCity of London Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 12 October 2024.\nTime of call; 04:48.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Not known.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0.\n\nA fire involving a private balcony was extinguished using water from a bucket/container with fire spread limited to the floor of origin. Sprinkler coverage was provided within the residential flat(s) which did not actuate as coverage did not include the external balcony. Guidance contained in BS9251 states\, residential external balconies permanently open to the outside may be omitted unless required by a fire strategy or risk assessment. \n\nSouthwark Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 16 October 2024\nTime of call; 13:24\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Bathroom/toilet\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Not Known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nIt is reported that a fire within a bathroom/toilet was extinguished by the tenant using a handheld fire extinguisher to extinguish the fire before the arrival of the LFB\, enquires are ongoing to establish the cause of the fire. Due to insufficient heat from the fire\, the sprinkler head located in the room of origin of the fire did not activate. \n\nHillingdon Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 4 to 9 storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 19 October 2024.\nTime of call; 21:07.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nOn arrival the officer in charge established that the fire was located within a flat kitchen\, involving a chip pan that had caught light which had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of one sprinkler head. No further firefighting was required with total fire damage reported to be up to 5sqm. \nThis incident once again\, debunks the myth\, residential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on chip pan fires. \nIn England cooking fires were the most common type of accidental fires reported for the period 2013/2014 to 2022/2023 with over 1100 fires. \nWe still see reports from Fire Rescue Service(s) that where the occupant is present at the time of a chip pan fire\, efforts have been to extinguish the fire themselves by placing the oil pan under the tap in the kitchen sink or throw water on the pan causing the oil to explode causing serious injury allowing further fire to spread. \nSprinkler Saves UK have reported multiple incidents involving chip pan fires on each occasion the fire was extinguished\, contained/controlled. \n\nLincoln\, 7 August 2021\nTonypandy\, Rhondda\, 29 December 2021\nFlint 3 June 2021\nSouth Yorkshire 26 August 2022\nLondon 21 August 2023\nNewport July 2024\nStockport 26 July 2024\n\nBAFSA have released a comprehensive video that demonstrates the clear benefits of sprinklers involving chip pan fires\, click here to open.   Fire statistical data collated from incidents attended by fire and rescue service involving dwellings for the financial year 2019/20 confirmed that 1494 incidents took place involving chip pan fires \n\nHillingdon Recycling Plant\n\n\nDate of incident; 28 October 2024.\nTime of call; 23:00.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Process/Production room.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control.\nNumber of nozzle heads operated; 0.\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire involving plant machinery/appliance which was contained to room of origin\, extinguished using 1 main jet. The premises sprinkler system did not actuate as there was Insufficient heat from the fire to activate the sprinkler head(s) in the vicinity of the fire. \n\nWandsworth Boarding House/B&B other (Temporary Housing)\n\n\nDate of incident; 31 October 2024.\nTime of call; 21:09.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nThe benefits of sprinklers for protecting our most vulnerable residents of our communities clearly identified following a kitchen fire involving cooking which was contained to the room of origin following the activation of 1 sprinkler head which extinguished the fire with no injuries reported. \nObservations\, comments \nThe two reported sprinkler activations provide further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety.\nFirefighters can operate without due risk\, assist evacuation\, effect rescue when necessary.\nPrevent conflagration.\n\n Advice For Building Managers\, the following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. \nTo achieve this: – \n\nMaintenance\, the premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, the premises emergency plan should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system. Any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nRegulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, it is a requirement of the Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures. \nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n       \n  \n  \n  \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-reported-sprinkler-activations-october-2024/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240901T102800
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240930T145300
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20241003T143234Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241013T193324Z
UID:10000476-1725186480-1727707980@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Nottinghamshire Tall Building Student Accommodation Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit image Nationwide Fire Sprinklers \nIntroduction \nOur thanks to both Nottinghamshire Fire Rescue Service (NFRS) and Nationwide Fire Sprinklers for reporting a fire involving an incense candle within a student accommodation tall building which was successfully contained within a cluster flat by the activation of 1 concealed sprinkler head with no injuries reported. \nThe details of this activation provides further evidence of the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems and adds further weight to the recent report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe report found that:\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate. \nIf it was not for the amendments to sprinkler provisions within Approved Document B (ADB) for a reduction in the height threshold for sprinklers in purpose group 1a (residential block of flats) from 30m to 11m introduced in 2020\, the outcome of this incident could have been so different if sprinklers had not been fitted. \nA fire that spread through the Cube high-rise student accommodation in 2019 is a reminder that our new 11m sprinkler threshold for high rise residential buildings does not apply to student accommodation regardless of height. \nDuring the building process\, the decision was made by the developer to change the use\, occupancy of the of the building to purpose group 2b\, halls of residence which benefitted from the previous decision for the installation of a residential sprinkler system to comply with building regulations. \nStudent accommodation is undoubtedly a challenging environment from a fire safety perspective with their own individual challenges. The student’s lifestyle is typically associated with a reduced level of caution when it comes to appreciating risk.It is the view of BAFSA and the National Fire Chiefs Council that sprinklers should be installed in all new student accommodation regardless of height\, as well as existing buildings undergoing refurbishment\, regardless of height providing a further layer of safety from fire. \nThis incident provides further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential sprinkler system installed\, maintained in accordance with the appropriate codes and standards reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nThe Incident  \n\nDate of incident; September 2024.\nTime of call; 10:28.\nTime of stop; 11:53.\nIncident Closed 14:53.\nIncident; Fire.\nAddress; Nottinghamshire.\nLocation of fire; bedroom within cluster flat.\nAFSS; BS9251:2021.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\nFire Rescue Service; Nottinghamshire Fire Rescue Service.\n\nThe premises \n\nGround floor plus 5 floors\, purpose-built student accommodation building containing cluster flats accommodating up to 60 residents.\n\nSummary of Incident  \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a confirmed fire.\nThe seat of the fire was identified to be within a cluster flat bedroom.\nCause of ignition\, lit incense candle.\nUnknown to the tenant embers from the stubbed-out candle were blown on to clothes within a washing basket which caught light.\nThe tenant who was in the flat at the time was unaware of the fire until the bedroom door containing the seat of the fire was opened.\nThe sprinkler system activated containing/controlling the fire allowing tenable conditions allowing the tenant to make their way to a final place of safety.\nMinimal Firefighting media was required by the Fire Rescue Service (FRS) to extinguish the fire\nSuperficial fire\, heat\, and smoke damage sustained within the room of origin\nMajor protracted incident everted allowing FRS resources to be released\, redeployed to attend other emergency incidents.\nThe system was reinstated within 60 minutes from the time the sprinkler contractor received the call to attend the incident.\n\nThe images clearly identify the benefits of installing a residential sprinkler system \n                   \n Credit Nationwide fire sprinklers                                    Credit NFRS                                                           Credit NFRS \n       1x RFC 49 Concealed Sprinkler Head activated \n      \nCredit Nationwide fire sprinklers \nSprinkler System \n\nBS9251:2021\nCategory 3\nWater supply Dedicated pump and tank\nIsolation valves located on each floor\nCoverage Flats and common ways\n\nGroup Manager Jonathan Holford Head of Fire Protection – \n“Nottinghamshire Fire & Rescue Service supported the 2020 changes to Approved Document B requiring sprinklers to be installed in all residential buildings over 11m. The benefits of these changes were seen at a recent incident in a medium rise residential building in Nottingham.A small accidental fire was contained to the room of origin allowing our crew to extinguish the fire with minimal equipment. This reduced the hazard to our Firefighters whilst also creating a significantly safer environment for occupants to evacuate promptly. NFRS also welcome the publicised changes to ADB coming into force on 2nd March 2025 requiring sprinklers to be installed in all new care homes.” \nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building  \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\nThe system was reinstated within 60 minutes from the time the sprinkler contractor received the call to attend the incident.\n\nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to\n\n\nAssist evacuation when necessary\nEffect rescue when necessary\n\n\nPrevent conflagration\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 5\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nNFRS AFSS Position Statement\nBS5306-0\nBS9251;2021\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n         
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/nottinghamshire-tall-building-student-accommodation-activation/
LOCATION:Nottinghamshire
CATEGORIES:Commercial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Bedroom-view-NFRS.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240901T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240930T000000
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20241010T132325Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250103T122343Z
UID:10000477-1725148800-1727654400@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Reported Sprinkler Activations September 2024 Review
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nOur gratitude to The London Fire Brigade (LFB) for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of fire sprinklers by the reporting of sprinkler activations\, rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. Reporting incidents taken from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of September  where sprinklers were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \nRaising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses. \nLondon Fire Brigade \nLFB Is one of the largest\, firefighting\, community safety rescue services in the world protecting residents and property in Greater London as well as those who work or visit the capital. They report attending 126\,464 incidents of which 16\,120 were fires for the year 2023. \nLondon \nAs the capital of the United Kingdom\, London is also the largest city with a population of just over nine million and is projected to reach 10 million by 2035. It is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world. There are 32 boroughs in Greater London\, except for the City of London which is a county and government district. The risk from fire in the capital is diverse\, ranging from large industrial premises\, complex retail shopping centres\, major transport hubs\, and large high-rise residential developments. The latter is a key area as half of the population of London live in flats compared to less than 20% in the rest of the country. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of September where AFSS were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role sprinklers play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler actuations from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nProviding further evidence reaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\nIncident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the officer in charge of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups. \nFor the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \n Each group contains questions in data fields with associated lists containing the appropriate answer options. Data collected about serious reportable fires include: \n\nTime and date of call\nFire Service or other geographical area\nType of building or vehicle\nMost likely motive (accidental or malicious)\nCause of fire (chip pan fires\, electrical\, etc.)\nSource of ignition (cigarettes\, cookers\, etc.)\nMaterials (furniture\, etc.)\nThe spread of fire (beyond room of origin\, etc.)\nThe nature of fire casualties\nRescue information and method of extinction\nThe effectiveness of automatic smoke detectors\nWere there any active safety systems present?\n\nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training\, experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene. \nThe use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development \nWater as an extinguishing media for sprinkler systems \n The physical properties of water produce a wide range of benefits\, effects in a compartment fire. \n\nDirectly cools the fuel to reduce further generation of flammable gases\nWater is converted into steam in the plume and the hot gases at ceiling level\, absorbing heat\, so cooling them and reducing the radiation heating the fuel\nOnce converted into steam\, water limits the amount of oxygen reducing the flames\, smothering them\nOnce concerted into steam\, water expands rapidly driving the products of combustion out of the compartment\nWater cools the rest of the apartment\, increasing the amount of heat it will absorb from the plume\, so cooling it further\n\nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. The provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n9x Incidents were reported for the month of September where Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS)were present of which two had a impact. \n\n2x Having an impact within Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n4x Did not contain/control the fire\n3x Not known\n\n \n\nReference is made within table 1 that the firefighting system impact was either not known or did not contain/control in 7 of the incidents.\nSupplementary Information from LFB provided further context allowing the rationale for these anomalies identifying 3 areas.\n\n\nSprinkler system coverage was not provided within the fire affected area\nFault in the AFSS\ninsufficient heat from the fire to activate the sprinkler head\n\nReported Incidents  \n\n Havering Purpose-Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 1 September 2024\nTime of call; 00:55\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire within a flat on the 2nd floor of a 10-storey high rise residential building containing 54 dwellings. On arrival fire crews established that a fire within the living room had been extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head although a hose reel jet from the tank was utilised. The cause of the fire was identified to involve a tea light/candle setting light to textiles with fire spread confined to item 1st ignited\, 1 person received minor injuries. \n2. Lambeth Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys \n\nDate of incident; 3 September 2024\nTime of call; 21:37\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nIt is reported that an apartment fire on the second floor was contained/controlled by the activation of 1 concealed sprinkler head before the arrival of fire crews\, the fire was extinguished using a main jet. The seat of the fire was identified to be within a cupboard and thought to be electrical in origin with fire spread limited to item 1st ignited. \n3. Brent Hotel \n\nDate of incident; 4 September 2024\nTime of call; 15:03\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Corridor/hall\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Fire in area not covered by system\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nIt is reported that the electrical supply to a magnetic door holding device fitted to a corridor door was isolated following reports of smoke issuing from the device\, no further firefighting media was required. Sprinkler system coverage was not provided within the fire affected area \n4. Islington Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys \n\nDate of incident; 6 September 2024\nTime of call; 03:51\nIncident; Fire.\nUse of premises; Student Accommodation\nLocation of fire; Bedroom\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Fire in area not covered by system\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nStudent accommodation is undoubtedly a challenging environment from a fire safety perspective with their own individual challenges. The student’s lifestyle is typically associated with a reduced level of caution when it comes to appreciating risk. It is the view of BAFSA and the National Fire Chiefs Council that sprinklers should be installed in all new student accommodation regardless of height\, as well as existing buildings undergoing refurbishment\, regardless of height providing a further layer of safety from fire. \nIt is reported that fire crews were mobilised to a small fire involving audio equipment located within a purpose-built mixed development bedroom housing student accommodation which was out on arrival. \nIRS data references\, the sprinkler system coverage was not provided within the fire affected area which is surprising as guidance within in the specific codes/standards would require sprinkler coverage to include the bedrooms. \nThe benefits of installing sprinklers for student accommodation was clearly identified following a fire within a Nottinghamshire high rise student accommodation block involving an incense candle which was successfully contained\, extinguished within a cluster flat bedroom by the activation of 1 concealed sprinkler head with no injuries reported. The provided images clearly demonstrate the benefits of sprinklers \nClick here for further details \n  \n                               \nCredit images Nationwide fire sprinklers.                      Credit Nottinghamshire FRS                                       Credit Nottinghamshire FRS \n5. Brent Food and drink processing \n\nDate of incident; 12 September 2024\nTime of call; 20:10\nIncident; Fire\nProperty type: Food and drink processing\nLocation of fire; Process/Production room\nAFSS; Water mist\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control (Fault in system)\nNumber of nozzle heads operated; 0\n\n6 pumping appliances were mobilised to a fire within a ground floor commercial kitchen within a purpose-built retail warehouse of 3 floors measuring 80m by 50m. On arrival\, the officer in charge was provided with an overview of the incident by the maintenance manager who confirmed the fire involved a deep fat fryer which was protected by a water mist system. Due to a fault on the water mist system\, the fire was not contained/controlled before the arrival of LFB\, the fire was extinguished by operational crews using firefighting media including a dry powder extinguisher\, hose reel and main jet\, the fire was under control at 22:31. \n6. Bexley Factory  \n\nDate of incident; 16 September 2024\nTime of call; 09:52\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Process production room\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire involving an industrial conveyor belt system which was contained within the system therefore insufficient heat was created allowing the operation of the sprinkler system. The fire was extinguished by firefighters using a hose reel jet. \n7. Towe Hamlets Purpose Built Office  \n\nDate of incident; 16 September 2024\nTime of call; 15:03\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Office\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nSmall fire reported within an office involving an electrical storage heater\, fire spread was limited to item first ignited. Due to insufficient heat from the fire\, the sprinkler head located in the room of origin of the fire did not activate. The fire was out on arrival with no firefighting media required. \n8. Lambeth Student Halls of residence \n\nDate of incident; 16 September 2024\nTime of call; 23:34\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Bedroom\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Not known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nSmall fire within a bedroom confined to an item of electrical equipment as part of the building structure. A small amount of damage occurred\, due to insufficient heat from the fire\, the sprinkler head located in the room of origin of the fire did not activate. \n9. Croydon Specialised housing  \n\nDate of incident; 22 September 2024\nTime of call; 13:20\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a kitchen fire\, no sprinkler heads actuated due to the size of the fire involving a microwave oven no firefighting was required. \nObservations\, comments \n The two reported sprinkler activations within the residential tall buildings provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk\, assist evacuation \, effect rescue when necessary\nPrevent conflagration\n\nAdvice For Building Managers\, The following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this \n\nMaintenance\, The premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, Arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system\, any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, It is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 5\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nLFB Sprinkler activations May 2024\nLFB Sprinkler activations December 2023\nLFB Sprinkler activations October-November 2023\nLFB Sprinkler Activations March 2023 \nLFB Sprinkler Activations April 2023\n\nFurther details on speccific sprinkler activations within the Greater London are available to view on the sprinkler saves main website \nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n               
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-reported-sprinkler-activations-september-2024-review/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Commercial,Residential
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240810
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240811
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240821T095216Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241101T124603Z
UID:10000473-1723248000-1723334399@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Brighton Assisted Living Complex Sprinkler Save
DESCRIPTION:Image Credit ESFR\n\nFire Rescue Service; East Sussex Fire & Rescue Service (ESFRS)\nDate of Incident; August 2024\nTime of call: 03:51\nPremises; Assisted Living Complex\nLocation; Brighton\nType of fire; Electrical fire\nAutomatic Fire Sprinkler System; Wet Pipe (Sprinkler)\n\nStation Manager Louisa Curtis\, of East Sussex Fire Rescue Service\,  Brighton & Hove Fire Safety Team Manager\, said: \n“ESFRS have consistently promoted for the installation of sprinklers\, it is a simple\, cost-effective way to save more lives and reduce the risks to firefighters. Fire sprinklers are the only active fire system which detects a fire\, suppresses a fire and raises the alarm. This incident demonstrates sprinklers provide protection from fire damage but most importantly provide time for people to safely self-evacuate if there is a fire.” \nSummary \nOur thanks to ESFRS for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk allowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK sprinkler firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry. \nIn this case the benefits of \n\nInstalling a residential sprinkler system within an assisted living complex containing 45 flats.\nProviding a further layer of safety from fire as part of a package of fire safety measures protecting our most vulnerable community members.\nIdentifying the fire safety risks of using emollient and skin creams in the home.\n\nThis is the third reported flat fire within the complex in the space of 29 months on each occasion the fire was contained\, controlled or extinguished with limited fire damage\, no injuries reported. \nWe could be discussing a totally different outcome for this  incident if sprinklers had not been fitted following an electrical fire involving a heat pad which came into contact with bedding contaminated with emollient. \nIt is reported 1 concealed residential sprinkler head activated within the bedroom which contained/controlled the fire. Reinforcing that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential sprinkler system installed to the appropriate codes\, standards reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nPromoting further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n The Incident  \n\nFire appliances were mobilised to a flat fire within a six-storey assisted living complex.\nPrior to the arrival of ESFRS the premises emergency plan was implemented.\nThe resident had been evacuated from their flat by a carer\, prior to the arrival of ESFRS.\nOn arrival the OIC committed a breathing apparatus team with firefighting media to extinguish the fire within the flat\, where it was established that the fire was within a bedroom.\nIt was established the fire had been contained/controlled by the activation of 1 sprinkler head.\nThe seat of the fire involved the bed mattress/linen which was still smouldering extinguished by firefighters using firefighting media.\n\nThe fire had been contained\, controlled by the activation of one concealed sprinkler head containing the fire to the room of origin. \n         \nSeat of the fire contained to the bed mattress/linen with no fire damage visible to the surrounding area with minor smoke damage. \n It was established the cause of the fire was due to an electrical fault involving an electric heat pad which caught fire Igniting the bedding /mattress. \nEmollient creams \nNFCC’s/MHRA’s Know The Fire Risk campaign encourages FRS to ensure people are aware of the potential fire risks when using  emollient creams within their local communities. When in contact with a heat source or naked flame fabric with emollients dried on can result in serious or fatal injuries from fire. \n\nIt was identified that the resident used emollients which are easily transferred from skin on to clothing and items such as towels.\nThe risk occurs when they are absorbed into fabrics and are then exposed to naked flames or heat source.\nScientific testing shows that fabric burns quicker and hotter when contaminated with emollients. These fabrics include clothing\, towelling\, bandages or bedding.\nAnglia Ruskin University conducted an experiment to show the effects emollient creams on ignition rates. The following video experiment shows just how flammable materials with emollient residue on them are and how much hotter they cause fires to burn. (link to video can be found in the links/sources section)\n\nBenefit of the sprinkler system  \n\nReduced the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for\n\n\nThe occupants to escape to safety or be rescued\nThe officer in charge crucial time to implement their operational tactical plan.\nAllowing firefighters to complete search and rescue operations by limiting fire development\, which significantly reduces the risk of flashover.\n\n\nFire contained within the compartment of origin.\nIntegrity of the means of escape\, maintained.\n\nThis incident demonstrates that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or in this case extinguish a fire at an early stage of development and activate an alarm. \nImpairment of active fire protection system \n\nWhere buildings and equipment are provided with active fire protection measures such as a sprinkler system protecting life and in some cases property protection.\nIt is essential that the fire protection measures in a building can function effectively in the event of a fire.\nArrangements are in place to ensure the responsible person\, building manager for the premises is aware that following the activation of an active system such as a sprinkler system provisions are in place allowing for the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system following a fire.\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\nESFRS\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 5\nExperiment conducted by Anglia Ruskin University researchers- YouTube\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data In support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\n\n          \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/brighton-assisted-living-complex-sprinkler-save/
LOCATION:Brighton
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Screenshot-2024-08-15-at-18.34.00.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240801T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240801T235900
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240812T204933Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241101T124344Z
UID:10000471-1722470400-1722556740@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Devon Tall Building Bathroom Emollient Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Date of incident; Summer 2024.\nLocation; Devon.\nUse of building; Purpose built block of flats 10 floors and above.\nIncident; fire.\nLocation of fire; Bathroom.\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; Devon & Somerset Fire Rescue Service. (DSFRS)\n\nSummary \nOur thanks to DSFRS for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk allowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK sprinkler firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry. In this case the \n\nBenefits of retrofitting a residential sprinkler system within a residential tall building.\nImportance of sprinkler coverage within bathrooms\, shower rooms and toilets.\nFire safety risks\, if you use emollient and skin creams in the home.\n\nIf it was not for the decision taken by the social housing landlord to retrofit residential sprinkler systems following the tragic events of the Grenfell Fire throughout their high-rise residential blocks of flats property portfolio\, we could be discussing a totally different outcome following an accidental fire involving a naked flame (lite cigarette) which came into contact with a bathroom towel contaminated with emollient. Resulting in the fire burning quickly and intensely activating 1 sidewall sprinkler head within the bathroom which extinguished the fire. \nThe outcome of this sprinkler review will improve fire safety awareness providing further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential sprinkler system reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. Providing further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire following an emergency call received from the remote alarm receiving centre\, resulting in several appliances being mobilised by DSFRS fire control.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment\, key task by the officer in charge (OIC) on arrival\, it was established that the building was fitted with a residential sprinkler system with the fire reported within a flat.\nThe provision of the sprinkler system allowed extra time for the OIC to implement a robust operational high rise tactical plan for the incident.\nUpon entry to the flat operational fire crews established that a fire within a bathroom had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 1 sidewall sprinkler head located within the room of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required\nMinimal fire damage was reported within the compartment of origin\nNo injuries were reported.\n\nIt was established that the cause of the fire was \n\nA lit cigarette that made contact with a bathroom towel which was hanging on the back of the bathroom door which dislodged falling onto the lit cigarette being held in the hand of the resident.\nThe towel immediately ignited burning quickly and intensely\, the resident immediately made their way to a place of safety closing the bathroom door as he left preventing the fire spreading from the room of origin.\nThe sidewall sprinkle head located directly above the inside of the door directly below the seat of the fire activated extinguishing the fire.\n\nEmollient creams \nNFCC’s/MHRA’s Know The Fire Risk campaign encourages FRS to ensure people are aware of the potential fire risks when using  emollient creams within their local communities. When in contact with a heat source or naked flame fabric with emollients dried on can result in serious or fatal injuries from fire. \n\nIt was identified that the resident used emollients which are easily transferred from skin on to clothing and items such as towels.\nThe risk occurs when they are absorbed into fabrics and are then exposed to naked flames or heat source.\nScientific testing shows that fabric burns quicker and hotter when contaminated with emollients. These fabrics include clothing\, towelling\, bandages or bedding.\nAnglia Ruskin University conducted an experiment to show the effects emollient creams on ignition rates. The following video experiment shows just how flammable materials with emollient residue on them are and how much hotter they cause fires to burn. (link to video can be found in the links/sources section)\n\nResidential Sprinkler Specification \nInstalled to BS9251:2014 \n\nCategory 3 system\nCoverage\, flats and communal areas\nIsolation valves installed for each dwelling/floor\nFirefighter inlet valve provided allowing the sprinkler supply to be augmented\nUPS back up power supply\n\nThe decision taken by the social housing landlord to include sprinkler protection for the bathrooms within the flats as part of the specification for the sprinkler system is clearly vindicated following the outcome of this incident despite the guidance contained within BS9251:2014 that bathrooms with a floor area of less than 5m² may be excluded unless required by a fire strategy or risk assessment. \nFollowing the review\, publication of BS9251:2021 Bathrooms\, shower rooms and toilets with a floor area less than 5m2 are now only exempt if they have “linings conforming to BS EN 13501-1:2018 Class A1\, A2-s3\,d2 and B-s3\,d2\, and which are not prepared for white goods\, such as washing machines\, dryers\, electric showers or water heaters;”.Therefore\, bathrooms under 5m2 may now require sprinkler protection based on the updated wording. \nBest practice \nThe social housing provider should be acknowledged for having the forefront focusing on the following areas which allowed a successful outcome for business continuity management. \n\nJoint Working with DSFRS\n\nCompleting joint familiarisation visits to provide the appropriate information to plan and respond to an incident within a high-rise building. The outcome of which allowed DSFRS to identify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems where present such as sprinklers on arrival. \nAllowing a robust onsite emergency response to be immediately actioned. \n\nAssisting in the control of the sprinkler system during the fire incident and following the fire.\nAttendance of the sprinkler company to reinstate the sprinkler system within under 4 hours from time of activation\n\nConclusion \nIf it was not for the sprinkler system\, we could be discussing a fully developed potential major fire within the premises. This incident demonstrates once again the benefits of installing sprinklers within residential tall buildings for both the residents and firefighter safety. \n\nRapidly reducing the rate of production of heat and smoke\nAllowing the fire officer crucial time to implement the operational tactical plan.\nAllowing firefighters to complete search and rescue operations by limiting fire development\, which significantly reduces the risk of flashover.\nIntegrity of the means of escape\, maintained.\nFire contained within the compartment of origin.\n\nDemonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or in this case extinguish a fire at an early stage of development. \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nWesthampsted Square AFSS Activation Case Study\nExperiments conducted by Anglian Ruskin University researches-you tube\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data In support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n  \n       
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/devon-tall-building-bathroom-emollient-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Devon
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240726T025500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240726T031600
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240801T215922Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240801T222952Z
UID:10000468-1721962500-1721963760@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Tall Building Sprinkler Activation Stockton
DESCRIPTION:Credit; Cleveland Fire Brigade \n\nDate of incident; 26 July 2024\nTine of call; 02.55\nTime of stop; 03:16\nLocation; Stockton.\nUse of building; Purpose built block of flats 10 floors and above.\nIncident; fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nNumber of fire appliances; 7\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; BS9251\nFire Rescue Service; Cleveland Fire Brigade (CFB)\n\nThe decision taken by the housing landlord agreeing to install residential sprinklers within their residential tall buildings as part of a package of fire safety measures vindicated following the above-mentioned kitchen fire reported by Cleveland Fire Brigade. The benefits of the residential sprinkler system extinguishing the chip pan fire demonstrated in the attached image of the aftermath of the incident with fire damage sustained in the vicinity of the extractor fan located directly above the seat of the fire only. \nTeesside live reported that Joe Flounders\, head of protection at Cleveland Fire Brigade\, said: “This incident serves as a stark reminder for residents to chuck out their chip pans\, which are major fire hazards\, and switch to safer alternatives like air fryers. We are incredibly thankful to Thirteen Group for having the foresight in installing the sprinkler system which activated\, extinguishing the fire and preventing it from spreading within the flat\, which could have been catastrophic. \n“We believe that sprinklers are a highly effective\, reliable and a cost-effective fire safety measure that can save lives\, reduce injuries\, protect our firefighters who attend incidents\, provide peace of mind for our residents and reduce property damage. Cleveland Fire Brigade is committed to reducing risk to its communities and the installation of sprinklers by residential properties\, businesses\, schools and care homes will help achieve this.” \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a fire\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment\, key tasks by the officer in charge on arrival\, it was established that the building was fitted with a residential sprinkler system with the fire located within a dwelling on the seventh floor\nThe benefit of the sprinkler system allowed extra time for the OIC to implement a robust operational tactical plan for the incident.\nUpon entry to the flat it was established that a fire within a kitchen room had been contained\, controlled extinguished by the activation of one sidewall sprinkler head.\nTwo residents self-evacuated their flat prior to the arrival of Cleveland Fire Brigade with no injuries reported.\nThe cause of the fire a chip pan which was left unattended.\n5% Fire damage\, 100% smoke damage to the compartment of origin.\nInformation was available for CFB to identify the location and provision of key elements of the fire sprinkler system allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be immediately actioned to assist the control of the sprinkler system  following the  fire.\n\n \n\nimage credit CFB\,\nlocation of isolation valve.\n\nSprinkler System  \n\nBS9251\nCategory 4\nCoverage flats/common ways\nDesignated water tank supply with twin pumps\nDedicated power supply\n\nBenefits of a residential sprinkler system  \nIt should be remembered that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system \n\nIs an effective active fire safety measures part of a holistic approach.\nReduces the heat output from fire by reducing its growth\, containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\nAllows more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued\nInitiates the appropriate emergency procedures by sounding a sprinklered local alarm\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not negate the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions\, particularly where occupants of buildings may be at a higher- than-average risk from fire. \nThis incident once again\, debunks the myth\, residential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on chip pan fires \nIn England cooking fires are the most common type of accidental fire reported for the period 2013/2014 to 2022/2023 with over 1100 fires. We still see reports from the Fire Rescue Service (FRS) that where the occupant is present at the time of a chip pan fire\, they have tried to extinguish the fire themselves by placing the oil pan under the tap in the kitchen sink or throw water on the pan causing the oil to explode causing serious injury allowing further fire to spread. \nSprinkler Saves UK have reported multiple incidents involving chip pan fires on each occasion the fire was extinguished\, contained\, or controlled. \n\nLincoln\, 7 August 2021\nTonypandy\, Rhondda\, 29 December 2021\nFlint 3 June 2021\nSouth Yorkshire 26 August 2022\nLondon 21 August 2023\nNewport July 2024\n\nBAFSA have released a comprehensive video that demonstrates the clear benefits of sprinklers involving chip pan fires\, click here to open.  Fire statistical data collated from incidents attended by fire and rescue service involving dwellings for the financial year 2019/20 confirmed that 1494 incidents took place involving chip pan fires \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nCleveland Fire Brigade press release\nWesthampsted Square AFSS Activation Case Study\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n           
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/tall-building-sprinkler-activation-stockton/
LOCATION:Stockton
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20240727_0321201-rotated.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240720
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240721
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240825T080640Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241010T132409Z
UID:10000474-1721433600-1721519999@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:13 Years After Installation\, Welsh Sprinkler System Extinguishes Residential High-Rise Fire.
DESCRIPTION:Credit image Bron Afon\n\nDate of incident; 20 July 2024\nTine of call; 19:22\nLocation; South Wales\nUse of building; Purpose built block flat 10 or more stories\nOwned and managed by Bron Afon Community Housing Association\nIncident; fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; BS9251:2005\nFire Rescue Service; South Wales Fire Rescue Service (SWFRS)\n\n\nOn a regular basis\, I am still challenged at resident meetings in my role as a Sprinkler Ambassador representing The British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association promoting the benefits of sprinklers. “We have never had a fire in the block\, it’s a waste of money” \nIt should be remembered fire is indiscriminate\, it can happen at any time. This reported sprinkler activation puts this myth to bed\, this was the first reported fire within this building following the retrofitting of the sprinkler system over 13 years ago. \nSummary \nFirstly\, our gratitude for the support of Bron Afon Community Housing Association reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk allowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK sprinkler firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry. \nIn this case the benefits of \n\nInstalling a residential sprinkler system within a residential tall building\nProviding a further layer of safety from fire as part of a package of fire safety measures protecting our community members.\nDebunking the myth\,residential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on chip pan fires\n\nBron Afon Community Housing Association should be applauded\, for their vision leading the way in fire safety\, who took the decision to retrofit sprinklers in 2011 in one of their high-rise residential blocks following lessons learnt from fires in high rise residential blocks working closely with SWFRS. The first of its kind in Wales setting an example to others at the time. \n13 years after staying dormant the sprinkler system within the 12-storey residential block of flats activated. It is reported the premises sprinkler system successfully extinguished a kitchen fire involving a chip pan left unattended with no injuries reported. Providing valuable time for the residents to self-evacuate from their flat to a place of safety before the arrival of SWFRS. \nIt is proven that the installation of fire sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures\, saves lives\, prevents injury minimizing property damage. It’s the equivalent of having a firefighter in your premises 24 hours a day\, 7 days a week. \nCatherine Love Bron Afon Director of Operations and Deputy Chief Executive said\, “Sprinkler systems are the most effective way of fighting fire and preventing loss of life. We are proud that this work is setting an example as the most challenging of its kind in the Uk.” \nPromoting further evidence to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\n     \nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n Further details on the background to the installation can be found in the case study report completed by ²Vipond providing an overview of the installation which can be found in the links section. \nThe Sprinkler System  \nThere is no doubt the cost of installing sprinklers is far outweighed by the potential of saving life\, reducing injuries disruption and financial implications of a fire as demonstrated following this fire. \n¹The cost of the sprinkler installation at the time Circa £80K which equated to £1150 per flat\, cost to supplement the water supply approximately £10K\, \n\nBS9251;2005\nCategory residential\n30-minute supply\, designated tank\nCoverage flats/common ways\nDual electric pumps\nFire service infill\n\nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a fire following an emergency call received from the remote alarm receiving centre confirming the activation of the building sprinkler system.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment\, key tasks by the officer in charge on arrival\, it was established that the fire was located within a flat on the first floor.\nThe sprinkler system allowed extra time for the OIC to implement a robust operational tactical plan for the incident.\nUpon entry to the flat operational crews established that a fire within a kitchen involving a chip pan had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of one sidewall sprinkler head.\nTwo residents self-evacuated their flat prior to the arrival of the SWRS with no injuries reported\,  further medical attention was not required.\nNo fire damage was reported with minimal smoke damage within the compartment of origin.\n\nEmergency Plan  \n\nInformation was available onsite for SWFRS to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems.\nAllowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident including consideration to the reinstatement of the system\n\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system which should be included in your emergency plan.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\nFollowing receipt of an alarm activation by the remote alarm receiving centre\, the designated key holder informed the on-call sprinkler engineer.\nThe engineer was on site at 21:30 reinstating the system at 22:03.\n\n Benefits of a residential sprinkler system  \n It should be remembered that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system \n\nIs an effective fire safety measures as part of a package of fire safety measures\nReduces the heat output from fire by reducing its growth\, containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\nInitiates the appropriate emergency procedures by sounding a sprinklered local alarm\nAllows more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued\, protects firefighters\n\nThis incident once again\, debunks the myth\, residential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on chip pan fires \nIn England cooking fires are the most common type of accidental fire reported for the period 2013/2014 to 2022/2023 with over 1100 fires. We still see reports from the Fire Rescue Service (FRS) that where the occupant is present at the time of a chip pan fire\, they have tried to extinguish the fire themselves by placing the oil pan under the tap in the kitchen sink or throw water on the pan causing the oil to explode causing serious injury allowing further fire to spread. \nSprinkler Saves UK have reported multiple incidents involving chip pan fires on each occasion the fire was extinguished\, contained\, or controlled. \n\nLincoln\, 7 August 2021\nTonypandy\, Rhondda\, 29 December 2021\nFlint 3 June 2021\nSouth Yorkshire 26 August 2022\nLondon 21 August 2023\nNewport July 2024\nStockport 26 July 2024\n\nBAFSA have released a comprehensive video that demonstrates the clear benefits of sprinklers involving chip pan fires\, click here to open.  Fire statistical data collated from incidents attended by fire and rescue service involving dwellings for the financial year 2019/20 confirmed that 1494 incidents took place involving chip pan fires \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 5\n¹High Rise Retrofit Pilot Callow Mount BAFSA Steve Seaber Presentation\n²Vipond retrofittinCS10_Fairview case study\nIFSEC Insider\, Bron Afon leads the way in fire safety October 25\, 2011\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom:An Analysis from Fire Service Data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of deaths and injuries in sprinklered buildings was published \n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n         
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/13-years-after-installation-welsh-sprinkler-system-extinguishes-residential-high-rise-fire/
LOCATION:South Wales
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Picture-1-2.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240719T023000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240719T040000
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240729T095144Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240729T102617Z
UID:10000467-1721356200-1721361600@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Hereford Food Factory Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit image HWFRS \n\nDate of incident; July 19\, 2024\nTine of call; 02:30\nLocation; Hereford\nUse of building; Food Processing Factory\nLocation of fire; Plant room\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Dry Pipe System\nFire Rescue Service; Hereford & Worcester Fire and Recuse Service (HWFRS)\n\nHWFRS have reported the following sprinkler activation involving a fire within a vacuum pump used for  processing. \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a fire within a factory plant room following receipt of a 999 call.\nFactory engineers were alerted to a heat detector actuating within the premises vacuum plant room.\nUpon investigation\, it was identified flames were jetting out from the rear of the vacuum pump which was immediately isolated.\nThe main fire alarm for the premises was immediately activated resulting in the full evacuation of the building.\nOn arrival fire crews established that the premises sprinkler system had activated within the compartment of origin extinguishing the fire prior to their arrival.\nNo further firefighting media was required with minimal fire\, smoke damage within the compartment of origin.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by HWFRS\, fire crews directed for the sprinkler system to be isolated.\nThe system was reinstated by 09:00 hours the same morning of the incident\nEnquires are ongoing regarding the cause of the fire.\n\nIt should be remembered.  \n\nThe fire was extinguished\, controlled within the compartment of origin by the sprinkler system.\nMinimal fire damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required.\nImpact on business was minimal\nThe provision of a robust emergency plan allowed the provision of vital information for the sprinkler system to be shared with the FRS on arrival. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be immediately actioned to assist the control/isolation and reinstatement of the sprinkler system\n\nWhen you compare this incident to the massive industrial fire reported by the Business Sprinkler Alliance that destroyed an usprinklered warehouse in Wales which has left a lasting impact on the local business community with over 40 companies affected and 37 unable to resume trading. It reinforces the benefits of installing sprinklers for property  protection/business resilience  preventing a potential major fire and ensured it was only a minor inconvenience. \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nBusiness Sprinkler Alliance; Aftermath of Bridgend Fire: Who covers the costs?\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging the FRS to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n  \n                 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/hereford-food-factory-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Hereford
CATEGORIES:Industrial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/pumpavara-2-e1722248745188.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240705T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240801T000000
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240806T122951Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240806T122951Z
UID:10000469-1720137600-1722470400@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Staffordshire Recycling Centre Lithium Battery Fire
DESCRIPTION:Staffordshire Recycling Centre Lithium Battery Fire \n\nDate of incidents; 5th July 2024\, August 1st\, 2024\nLocation; Burslem\, Staffordshire\nType of business; Recycling centre\nUse of building; Open Warehouse Unit approx. 1\,000m2\nLocation of fire; plant machinery industrial shredder 5m x 3m\nIgnition source; lithium battery\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Bespoke Drencher Type Sprinkler System\nFire Rescue Service; Staffordshire Fire Rescue Service (SFRS)\n\nSFRS have reported the following two fires in a waste recycling centre fires in the space of 4 weeks activating the bespoke sprinkler system involving an industrial shredder\, conveyor belt which had chewed into a lithium-ion battery to explode and catch light. On both occasions fire growth was restricted by the activation of the sprinkler system until the arrival of operational crews. \nGroup Manager James Green\, stated following one of the fires: “Since the fire began this morning\, we’ve managed to get it under control and have since scaled back our attendance at the scene. \n“While an investigation into the cause of the fire is being carried out\, I want to advise people that disposing of batteries inappropriately can not only cause damage to the environment but also increases the risk of fires occurring. \n“Incidents such as this present a real challenge to the waste industry\, and we would urge local businesses and households to ensure that batteries are separated from general waste and disposed of appropriately via one of the many battery recycling schemes in operation. \n“The energy density of batteries has increased significantly in recent years as the technology has developed and even the smallest battery has the potential to cause a serious fire.” \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 5\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging the FRS to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n                 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/staffordshire-recycling-centre-lithium-battery-fire/
LOCATION:Staffordshire
CATEGORIES:Industrial
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240701
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240901
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20250103T122040Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250210T093609Z
UID:10000495-1719792000-1725148799@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Reported Sprinkler Activations July-August 2024 Review
DESCRIPTION:Image Bromley tall building balcony fire\nIntroduction \nOur gratitude to London Fire Brigade (LFB) for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of sprinklers\, reporting real life tangible incidents extracted from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the period July-August 2024 where sprinklers were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \nRising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire rescue services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. Raising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) which save lives\, protects homes and businesses from fire and significantly reduces the risks to firefighters. \nLondon Fire Brigade  \nLFB Is one of the largest\, firefighting\, community safety rescue services in the world protecting residents and property in Greater London as well as those who work or visit the capital. LFB vision is to see a greater inclusion of AFSS in the capital\, nationally supported by LFB AFSS position statement. \nLondon \nAs the capital of the United Kingdom\, London is also the largest city with a population of just over nine million and is projected to reach 10 million by 2035. It is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world. There are 32 boroughs in Greater London\, except for the City of London which is a county and government district. The risk from fire in the capital is diverse\, ranging from large industrial premises\, complex retail shopping centres\, major transport hubs\, and large high-rise residential developments. The latter is a key area as half of the population of London live in flats compared to less than 20% in the rest of the country. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the period July-August 2024 where AFSS were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role AFSS play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating AFSS so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK\, AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the AFSS\, fire industry.\nReaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\nIncident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the officer in charge of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups which is shared with the Home Office for research and statistical purposes.  For the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many sprinkler heads operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training and experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene of the incident. \nThe use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development. \nWater as an extinguishing media for sprinkler systems\, the ³physical effects of water from a sprinkler system can have a detrimental effect on containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire as identified within the reported sprinkler activations contained within this review. \nThe operating effectiveness of a Residential and Domestic sprinkler systems rely for their effectiveness on the wall-wetting effect for the sprinkler discharge as a method of inhibiting fire spread. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. The provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nIncidents reported where sprinklers were reported as present and having an impact for the period July 2024 – August 2024 \nOf the 9 Incidents reported\, purpose-built flats/maisonettes dominated the figures in which sprinklers were reported with 6 incidents which should be of no surprise due to. \n\nRegulatory changes following the Grenfell Tower fire of 2017 reducing the threshold height of sprinklers to a top storey more than 11m in in all new purpose-built block of flats.\nHousing providers\, local authorities and developers voluntarily committing to install fire sprinklers in purpose-built block of flats on a new and retrofit basis.\n\nWhat is interesting is that for 2 of the reported incidents for involving purpose-built flats/maisonettes\, the seat of the fire was recorded outside of the flats on the external private balcony\, sprinkler protection was provided within the flats only. 13 sprinkler heads activated for one of the incidents with fire spread reported to 1 additional floor for both incidents. Disappointingly no reference was made within the press\, social media regarding the positive role the residential sprinkler system played in allowing a successful conclusion to the incidents despite the seat of the fire not in the immediate area protected by the sprinkler system within the building. \nEffective fire protection requires both passive and active elements working in unison and complementing the roles of one another\, details for these incidents are contained in this review reinforcing the benefits of sprinklers. \nBS9251:2021\, The British standard for Domestic & Residential Fire Sprinklers is recognised as a life safety standard which allows fire sprinkler protection to be omitted from certain areas including external balconies permanently open to the outside unless it is required by a fire strategy or risk assessment. \nReported incidents included. \n\n1x Warehouse.\n1x Self-contained sheltered housing.\n1x Airport Terminal.\n3x Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys.\n2x Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 4 to 9 storeys.\n1x Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes- 1 to 3 storeys\n \n\n  \n \n\nBromley Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 15 August 2024\nTime of call; 09:52\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Private Balcony\nAFSS; BS9251:2005\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/Controlled\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 13\n\nBackground \nOpened in 2019 this development included a new public plaza\, nine-screen multiplex cinema\, café and restaurants and a 130-bed hotel. The focal point of the development included a 19-storey purpose-built block of flats consisting of 200 apartments with external private balconies split into 3 cores. A residential sprinkler system was installed within the flats in accordance with the statutory guidance at the time for a residential building over 30m in height. \n This is the second reported external private balcony fire reported to Sprinkler Saves within 25 months for this building on that occasion fire spread from an external balcony fire was contained/controlled within two apartments by the activation of the sprinkler system preventing further fire spread into the common ways compromising the integrity of the means of the escape. Details of this incident can be found in the resources/links section of this review. \nSummary of Incident  \n\nThe fire started on the 10th floor external private balcony spreading vertically affecting the the 11th floor balcony.\nAs The location of the fire was outside the flat\, the sprinkler system was unable to have a detrimental effect on firefighting containing/controlling the fire as sprinkler protection was not provided on the external open private balconies.\nThe intensity of the fire resulted in the glazing for both flats adjacent to the balcony on the 10th/11th floors failing\, allowing internal fire to spread within the two flats activating 13 sprinkler heads in total.\nAll 7 sprinkler heads actuated within the 10th floor flat with 6 of the 7 on the 11th floor flat activating.\nThis is unprecedented in a residential fire at most only one or two heads activate during a fire\, due to the activation of the sprinkler head installed within the room of origin containing/controlling the development of the fire.\nThe Sprinkler discharge from the sprinkler heads resulted in a wide variety of effects on the fire plume penetrating into the two flats inhibiting fire spread containing/controlling the fire.\nThe products of combustion formed a smoke layer within the flats with a clear boundary between it and clean air.\nFire damage was restricted to the balconies constructed of timber cladding\, glazing units/frames and the façade of the building in proximity to the fire floors\nThe fire was extinguished by firefighters wearing breathing apparatus using 3x jets via Wet rising main\n62 persons were evacuated from the building to a final place of safety.\nThe cause of the fire is believed to have been accidental\, caused by an electrical event occurring in an extension lead that was being used on the external balcony.\n\n\nTower Hamlets Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 26 August 2024\nTime of call; 13:28\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Private balcony\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 4\n\nBackground\, This was the second reported external private balcony fire reported by LFB highlighting the dangers of external private balcony fires within 11 days. \nSummary of Incident  \n\nThe seat of the fire was located on the external private balcony of a 5 roomed flat on the 25th floor.\nThe sprinkler system was unable to have an immediate detrimental effect on firefighting as sprinkler protection was not provided on the external private balconies.\nThe intensity of the fire resulted in the glazing adjacent to the balcony failing\, allowing internal fire to spread within the flat resulting in the activation of 4 sprinkler heads.\nThis is unprecedented in a residential fire at most only one or two heads activate during a fire\, due to the activation of the sprinkler head installed within the room of origin containing/controlling the development of the fire.\nThe balcony was destroyed and a small part of the five roomed flat on the 25th floor was damaged by fire.\nThe fire was extinguished by firefighters wearing breathing apparatus using main jets via wet rising main\nThe cause of the fire is believed to have been accidental caused by the unsafe disposal of smoking materials.\n\nConclusion \nThe outcome from these two incidents reinforces the benefits of installing residential sprinklers for tall residential buildings providing further evidence that sprinklers can contain\, control or in some case extinguish a fire even when the parameters of the system have been challenged. \nWithout the presence of the sprinkler system the outcome of this incident may well have been more serious with the potential of fully developed compartment fires within the flats. The fires did not compromise the integrity of the common ways due to both the passive and active elements working in unison\, complementing the roles of one another providing effective fire protection. \nParameters of the sprinkler system\, BS9251\, references that the number of sprinkler heads that are designed to operate simultaneously is 4 and only if the 4 heads reside in one compartment. However\, when a sprinkler system is fed from a cold-water booster supply\, more heads can operate as the cold-water booster supply is far more powerful than required under the standard. \nExternal Residential Balconies  \nAre now seen as an important amenity in modern living now used as a convenient location for storage\, outdoor living area increasing the presence of combustible materials which adds to the potential of a fire starting on a balcony and the possible severity of the fire spreading to the balcony above\, or to the flat above via windows. \n These two incidents clearly demonstrate the potential problem(s)/risks associated with private balcony fires where. \n\nCombustible materials are identified within the balcony construction.\nThe interior of the building (dwellings) protected by a residential sprinkler system; the balconies are not sprinkler protected.\n\nThis will not be the last fire involving balconies\, is there a case for external private balconies to be sprinkler protected which of course raises questions within the AFSS sector once again\, alternatively the risk from balcony fires will not diminish until combustible material used in their construction is removed. Following the Grenfell Tower tragedy in 2017\, balconies are now categorised as ‘Specified attachments’ mandating the use of class A fire-rated non-combustible materials in residential buildings over 11m. \nAt the time of construction for the two buildings\, the threshold height for sprinklers in residential block of flats was 30m which has now been reduced to 11m following amendments to Approved Document B in 2020 \nLFB have acknowledged the danger of balcony fires issuing a safety warning contained in a press release with more than 550 balcony fires across London in the last three years. \nLFB West Hampstead Square AFSS activation case study report \nOne of the most high-profile sprinkler activations in London occurred in the Balcony Fire at West Hampstead on 3 July 2018 involving a purpose-built block of flats of 12 floors. \nIn the space of 19 minutes from the actuation of the first fire sprinkler head\, 5 apartments were exposed to fire and heat activating 12 fire sprinkler heads which is unprecedented in a residential fire. The cause of the fire is believed to have been accidental caused by the unsafe disposal of smoking materials. \nLFB commenced investigations to the incident commissioning the case study report to raise awareness in the residential sector of the beneficial/effectiveness impact that incorporating Automatic Fire Suppression Systems can have in a multipoint residential high-rise fire. \nImages of the incident can be viewed in the LFB report \n\nRichmond Upon Thames self-contained sheltered housing\n\n\nDate of incident; 23 July 2024\nTime of call; 03;41.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Did not operate\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A\n\nComments/observations \nA small fire within an open flat involving a microwave oven was successfully contained within the appliance. Operational crews professionally dealt with the incident with no injuries reported.         The sprinkler system did not operate\, due to limited fire growth within the room of origin. Resulting in the predetermined temperature failing to be reached at the sprinkler head allowing its operation. \n\nLambeth Warehouse\n\n\nDate of incident; 25 July 2024\nTime of call; 03;41.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Did not operate\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A\n\nComments/observations \nA fire involving an industrial dryer located on the roof of a warehouse was extinguished by operational crews using main jets. The premises sprinkler system did not activate as the fire was in a part of the premises not provided with sprinkler protection. \n\nWestminster Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 26 July 2024\nTime of call; 00;51.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Airing/drying cupboard\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nComments/observations \nA fire broke out in the airing/drying cupboard of a 3 roomed flat involving a white goods tumble dryer appliance. Activating the residential sprinkler head which contained/controlled the fire to the floor of origin. The fire was extinguished by firefighters using firefighting media\, enquires are ongoing to establish the cause of the fire. \n\nLewisham Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 4 to 9 storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 2 August 2024\nTime of call; 12:19\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Roof\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Did not operate\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A\n\nThe inverter of a solar array panel on the roof of a residential building caught light\, the fire was extinguished using firefighting media consisting of one main jet. Whilst sprinklers were installed within the building they did not actuate as they were not located in the vicinity of the fire. \n\nBarking and Dagenham Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – Up to 3 storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 11 August 2024\nTime of call; 14:51\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 2\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a kitchen fire in a low-rise residential block of flats\, on arrival it was identified that the fire involving cooking fat on an electric cooker had been extinguished by the activation of the residential sprinkler system. No further firefighting was required. The benefits of sprinklers were clearly demonstrated. \n\n2x sprinklers heads activated\nThe fire was confined to the room of origin\nTotal fire damage reported up to 5sqm\nNo further firefighting was required.\n\nCooking fires in England are the most common type of accidental fires reported for the period 2013/2014 to 2022/2023 with over 1100 fires. \n\nIslington Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 4 to 9 storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 18 August 2024\nTime of call; 07:52\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Living room\nAFSS; ¹Drencher\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; Unknown\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire within a retirement complex following the activation of a telecare system was activated by a vulnerable community member. On arrival it was identified that a fire had been extinguished by the activation of the premises residential sprinkler system. \nThe cause of the fire is believed to have been accidental\, caused by careless disposal of smoking materials with fire spread contained to item 1st ignited. \nIt was noted that the IRS\, recorded the firefighting system type as drencher which must have been entered in error by the fire officer. For a building of this type the sprinkler system would be a residential sprinkler system. (Wet pipe) \n\nHeathrow Airport Terminal\n\n\nDate of incident; 20 August 2024\nTime of call; 05:35\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Did not operate\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A\n\nIt is reported that fire crews were mobilised to a small fire within a kitchen\, on arrival it was established that an electrical fire had been isolated by a member of staff who isolated the electricity supply prior to the arrival of the FRS. Resulting in the predetermined temperature failing to be reached at the sprinkler head allowing its operation. \nComments/observations \nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building \nEmergency Plan  \n\nInformation should be available onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems.\nAllowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident including consideration to the reinstatement of the system\n\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinklers Saves Bromley tall building sprinkler activation\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Winter Update No 6\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data In support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\nLFB Press release\nLFB Don’t be the cause of a balcony blaze\, warn firefighters\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nLFB West Hampstead Square AFSS Case Study\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n    \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-reported-sprinkler-activations-july-august-2024-review/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Screenshot-2024-12-30-at-17.17.23.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240616
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240617
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240703T111231Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240703T111231Z
UID:10000382-1718496000-1718582399@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:London Specialised Housing Bathroom/Toilet Fire
DESCRIPTION:Date of incident 16 June 2024.\nTime of call 03:32.\nLocation: Barnet.\nUse of building: Specialised housing.\nLocation of fire: Bathroom/toilet.\nAFSS Sprinklers\n\nLFB have reported the above-mentioned incident clearly identifying the importance of providing a further layer of protection from fire for our most vulnerable residents of our communities by the installation of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems. \nBAFSA strongly supports the government’s consultation proposing to require sprinklers in all new built residential care homes a change that we have long called for. We would also encourage government to support the mandatory fitting of sprinkler systems in specialised housing as well. Those living in specialised housing can be amongst the most vulnerable to hazards such as fires. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety Automatic Fire Suppression System is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued\, The provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire within a 3-storey specialised housing scheme comprising of 35 flats.\nOn arrival it was identified that the fire was located within a bathroom/toilet of a dwelling activating the residential sprinkler system which had been retrofitted by the housing provider as part of a package of fire safety measures within the premises.\nIt is reported that the sprinkler system head which actuated was installed on the same floor as the fire not in the room of origin.\nThe fire was extinguished by operational crews using 1 hose reel jet.\nOne elderly resident required further medical attention\nThe cause of the fire is pending the findings of the fire investigation team.\n\nEmergency Plan \n\nIt was reported that the provision of vital information for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems where not displayed. It should be remembered that a robust emergency plan will allow the provision of vital information for the Fire Rescue Service to be shared by onsite representatives.\n Clarifying the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems where present such as sprinklers and other forms of AFSS. The outcome of which will allow a robust onsite emergency response to be immediately actioned to assist in the control of the sprinkler system during the fire incident and following a fire so it can be reinstated.\n\nSprinkler coverage\, bathrooms\, shower rooms and toilets \n\nFollowing the review\, publication of BS9251:2021 Bathrooms\, shower rooms and toilets with a floor area less than 5m2 are now only exempt if they have “linings conforming to BS EN 13501-1:2018 Class A1\, A2-s3\,d2 and B-s3\,d2\, and which are not prepared for white goods\, such as washing machines\, dryers\, electric showers or water heaters;”.\nTherefore\, bathrooms under 5m2 may now require sprinkler protection based on the updated wording.\n\n Links/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/24\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nLFB AFSS\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging the FRS to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n        \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/london-specialised-housing-bathroom-toilet-fire/
LOCATION:Barnet
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240609T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240609T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240609T192920Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240609T193044Z
UID:10000379-1717920000-1717952400@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Newport South Wales Chip Pan Sprinkler Save May 2024
DESCRIPTION:                  \n\n\nImage taken from BAFSA video chip pan demonstration          Credit RSP Sprinklers \nOur thanks to RSP sprinkler systems for reporting this incident demonstrating the benefits of residential sprinklers for life safety playing a significant role\, as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures reducing the impact of fire on people\, firefighters\, property and the environment. \nDebunking the myth\, residential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on chip pan fires. \nIt is reported that South Wales Fire Rescue Service were mobilised to a fire within a residential block of flats\, on arrival it was identified that a kitchen fire involving a chip pan within a flat had been successfully extinguished\, contained to the room of origin by the activation of one sidewall sprinkler head. The resident required minor medical attention stating the fire was extinguished by the sprinkler system within 2 minutes \nKey facts \n\nThe fire was extinguished\, controlled within the compartment of origin\nThe activation of the sprinkler system reduced the heat output from the fire by reducing its growth\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nNo further firefighting was required by South Wales Fire Rescue Service\nThe sprinkler system provided vital protection for the residents dwelling\, belongings\, personal processions.\n\nObservations/comments \n\nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety Automatic Fire Suppression System is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued clearly demonstrated following the successful conclusion to this incident.\n\n\nReinstatement of the system\, where buildings and equipment are provided with active fire protection measures such as a sprinkler system protecting life and in some cases property protection. It is essential that the fire protection measures in a building can function effectively in the event of a fire. It is important that arrangements are in place to ensure the responsible person\, building manager for the premises is aware that following the activation of an active system such as a sprinkler system provisions are in place allowing for the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system following a fire.\n\nIt is noted following the successful conclusion of this incident: – \n\nFrom receiving a call via the sprinkler company’s 24-hour emergency line the call out engineer was on site within 30 minutes.\nThe system was reinstated within 1 hour 40 minutes.\n\nIn England cooking fires are the most common type of accidental fire reported for the period 2013/2014 to 2022/2023 with over 1100 fires. We still see reports from the Fire Rescue Service (FRS) that where the occupant is present at the time of a chip pan fire\, they have tried to extinguish the fire themselves by placing the oil pan under the tap in the kitchen sink or throw water on the pan causing the oil to explode causing serious injury allowing further fire to spread. \nSprinkler Saves UK have reported multiple incidents involving chip pan fires on each occasion the fire was extinguished\, contained\, or controlled. \n\nLincoln\, 7 August 2021\nTonypandy\, Rhondda\, 29 December 2021\nFlint 3 June 2021\nSouth Yorkshire 26 August 2022\nLondon 21 August 2023\n\nBAFSA have released a comprehensive video that demonstrates the clear benefits of sprinklers involving chip pan fires\, click here to open.  Fire statistical data collated from incidents attended by fire and rescue service involving dwellings for the financial year 2019/20 confirmed that 1494 incidents took place involving chip pan fires \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/24\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nNottinghamshire FRS Press release chip pan fires\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging the FRS to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n         
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/newport-south-wales-chip-pan-sprinkler-save-may-2024/
LOCATION:Newport
CATEGORIES:Residential
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240529
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240530
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240709T091822Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240807T195906Z
UID:10000386-1716940800-1717027199@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:London Waste Recycling Facility Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:London Fire Brigade LFB have reported the following activation where the Automatic Fire Suppression System (AFSS) was recorded as being present and operated having an impact. The data around the incident provides powerful evidence as to the ability of fire sprinklers and other forms of AFSS in protecting our communities from fire. \n\nIncident; Fire\nWhen; 29 May 2024\nTime of call; 03:39\nWhere\, Sutton\nOccupancy; Waste Recycling Facility\nLocation of fire; Process/Production room\nAutomatic fire suppression System; Sprinklers\n\nIncident  \n\nFire involving batteries\, generators located in a process production room.\nActivating the premises sprinkler system in the room of origin\, raising the alarm\n1 sprinkler head activated.\nContaining\, controlling the fire to the room of origin.\nTotal fire damage 11-20sqm.\nFirefighting action: Main Jet.\n\nThe ¹ National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) have reported that UK Fire and Rescue Services (FRS) attend around 300 significant fires in waste sites each year which are often difficult to extinguish requiring multiple FRS resources for significant periods of time which can have a serious impact on the local community in the short or long term\, including: \n\nThe Environmental Impact\nPublic health impacts on responders and communities\nLarge scale financial loses and disruption.\nRoad closures\nHigh demand on FRS and other agency resources\n\nFRS are fully aware of the environmental impacts of fire publishing sustainability\, environmental reports with further guidance published by the government on environmental protection\, providing further guidance for FRS on preventing and dealing with incidents with the potential to pollute. \nActive fire protection systems\, specifically AFSS should be seen as part of a holistic approach minimising fire damage as part of a greener approach from the fire sector\, which is currently overlooked. The Waste Industry Safety and Health Forum (WISH) published “Reducing Fire Risk at Waste Management Sites” good practice guidance on the latest research and information available to achieve good fire risk management which includes an appendix focusing on suppression/extinguishing/fighting systems focusing on \n\nImportance of seeking competent advice for the installation of a fire suppression system\nThe system should be proportionate to the nature and scale of waste management activities completed and associated risks.\nChoosing the appropriate fire suppression system which may include.\n\n\nSprinklers\nManual open deluge system\nDeluge/water spray systems\nMobile foam trolley\nWater monitors/cannons/curtains\n\n\nThe design\, installation and maintenance of the proposed system is covered by an appropriate UKAS-accredited third-party certification scheme.\nImportance of liaising with insurers who may have specific requirements for fire suppression systems.\n\nThe recent London\, Herne Hill Waste Transfer Station Fire 8 September 2023\, clearly reminds us of the dangers these types of fires can bring to the local community\, if fire suppression had been installed could the outcome of been different? \nIt is reported that. \n\n100% of the building was alight with a partial collapse.\nLFB Mobilised 15 fire appliances requiring 100 firefighters.\n2x 32 metre turntable ladders used as water towers.\nThe fire had a significant impact on the local communities.\nFire suppression was not installed.\n\n           \nImages credit LFB Twitter \nDeputy Assistant Commissioner for the South West London Area\, Nick Davis\, said: “Firefighters have been continually tackling the fire at the waste transfer station in Herne Hill since it started on Friday morning. Controlled demolition on site allowed us to safely make progress and the fire was fully extinguished this morning\, which I know will come of huge relief to local residents. \n“This fire has had a significant impact on the communities in the surrounding area and I know how difficult it has been for people to keep their doors and windows closed during the heatwave. Local senior fire officers and members of our Community Engagement team are continuing to give advice to local residents and provide support. We are carrying out an investigation into the fire and we are fully supporting the Metropolitan Police Service’s investigation. \n“The challenging nature of the fire on site means that firefighters from across London have attended over the weekend. I would like to thank our operational staff\, control officers and enabling teams for their work to maintain our presence on site for over 80 hours and counting.” \n\nSprinkler Saves Uk\, Annual Review 2023/2024\nFire Sprinklers Greater London Review 2018-2021\nWish\, Reducing Fire Risk At Waste Management Sites\nLFB Herne Hill Waste Transfer Station press release\n¹ NFCC. National Operational Guidance\, Fires in waste sites\n\n  \n     
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/london-waste-recycling-facility-suppression-activation/
LOCATION:Sutton
CATEGORIES:Industrial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240528
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240529
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240605T115648Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240605T115648Z
UID:10000376-1716854400-1716940799@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Billingham\, Cleveland Refuse/Bin Store Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Date of incident; 28 May 2024\nTine of call; 16:34.\nLocation; Billingham\, Cleveland\nUse of building; Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\nLocation of fire; Refuse/Bin store\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; Cleveland Fire & Rescue Service (CFRS)\n\nThe premises: – 12 storey purpose-built block of flats of traditional brick-built construction with concrete slab construction with non-combustible cladding containing 66 residential flats. \nThe Incident \n\n5 fire pumping appliances were mobilised to reports of a fire involving a residential block of flats following an emergency call received by CFRS mobilisation control from the remote alarm receiving centre.\nOn arrival operational crews identified that a fire involving a refuse bin within a bin store located below a refuse chute on the ground floor had been extinguished within 5 minutes of the the activation of the premises sprinkler system before the arrival of the fire rescue service.\nIt is reported that the area affected by fire was less than 1m² within the commercial bin.\nThe cause of the fire was due a lite cigarette\n\nCleveland FRS observations\, the prompt action of the sprinkler system prevented further development of the fire limiting fire/smoke damage to the refuse/bin store only. Reducing smoke spread to percolate through the bin chute to the floors above with minimal disruption to the residents. \nDanger of refuse chute/bin store fires. \nIt should be remembered these types of fires can have a dramatic effect on the safety of the residents\, specifically where refuse chutes and access hatches can sometimes be found directly opening onto protected corridors\, lobbies\, and stairs\, so providing the potential for the spread of fire and smoke to the common escape routes. \nIt is therefore best practice in these situations. \n\nAutomatic fire-resisting shutter should be fitted at the base of the refuse chute to restrict the spread of fire and smoke from a fire in the bin room. The shutter should\, as a minimum\, be operated on a fixed temperature fusible link.\nBespoke sprinkler system\, further protection can be provided by the installation of a sprinkler system located over the bins\, with either frangible bulb or fusible link sprinkler heads\, or open sprinkler heads with water discharge controlled by smoke detectors.\n\nThe British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association highlight that refuse/bin stores are a common area of sprinkler operation in areas outside of flats. This is unsurprising as national fire statistics in England demonstrate that for blocks flats the highest number of incidents\, outside of fires in the residential areas themselves\, are recorded in refuse store areas. \n\nBAFSA published a series of reports analysing Incident Recording System data on fires in sprinklered buildings from 2018-2021.\nOne such report focused on where sprinklers were reported and having an impact for refuse store/bin store fires\nIdentifying that the highest number of incidents were located outside the flat with 141 incidents/activations\nFrom the 141 sprinkler activations outside the flats\, refuse fires accounted for the highest number of incidents with 123.\nRefuse store fires sprinklers extinguished 53 (43%) incidents with a further 63 (51%) incidents being contained or controlled.\nFurther interrogation of the data would have to be completed to identify why 7 incidents were not contained/controlled\n\nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2022/2023\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nBAFSA Data reports\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n         
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/billingham-cleveland-refuse-bin-store-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Billingham
CATEGORIES:Residential
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240512T203600
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240512T215200
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240522T130133Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240522T135605Z
UID:10000368-1715546160-1715550720@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Stowmarket open sided basement car park sprinkler activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit BM Sprinklers (image taken following reinstatement of the sprinkler system)   \n This incident provides further evidence on the benefits of sprinklers for car park fires which have become increasingly prevalent as the automotive industry has developed as cars have advanced\, so has the risk of fires. \n\nDate of incident;12 May 2024\nTine of call; 20:36.\nTime of stop; 21;52\nLocation; Stowmarket\, Suffolk\nUse of building; Low-rise purpose-built block of flats\nIncident; Motorbike fire.\nLocation of fire; Open sided Basement Car park\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; Suffolk Fire & Rescue Service\n\nBackground to the installation of the sprinkler system \n\nThe premises consists of two residential low-rise block of flats\, blocks A & B.\nBlock B\, constructed in 2016 with an open sided basement car park\, block A refurbished.\nAt the time of construction\, the developer proposed a fire hydrant within the curtilage of the development to meet the specifications detailed in Part B5 of Approved Document B (ADB)Volume 1.\nThe location of the fire hydrant could not be confirmed at the time of consultation\, it was assumed that the location of the fire hydrant would be located at the rear of block A.\nThe access route from block A was deemed unsuitable for fire appliance access\, preventing a fire pumping appliance to be within 45 metres of all points within the development.\n\nIt was agreed with the developer as a compensatory trade off measure by SFRS that a sprinkler system conforming to the relevant code of practice\, standard would be installed within the dwellings and car park area. \nThe Incident  \n\nSFRS mobilised 4 fire appliances to a fire involving a motor bike which had caught light in an open sided basement car park.\nOn arrival it was identified that the premises sprinkler system had actuated within the car park area containing\, controlling the fire preventing further fire spread.\n6 sprinkler heads activated (VK468) with the water supply provided from a 6000-litre water tank.\nFirefighters wearing breathing apparatus extinguished the fire using 1x hose reel jet.\nAt the time of the fire no other motor vehicles were located adjacent to the motor vehicle with minor fire damage reported to light fittings\, electrics located above the seat of the fire.\nNo injuries or casualties reported\nThe cause of the fire is currently under investigation\n\nImpairment of active fire protection system \nWhere buildings and equipment are provided with active fire protection measures such as a sprinkler system protecting life and in some cases property protection. It is essential that the fire protection measures in a building can function effectively in the event of a fire. It is important that arrangements are in place to ensure the responsible person\, building manager for the premises is aware that following the activation of an active system such as a sprinkler system provisions are in place allowing for the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system following a fire. \nIt should be remembered.  \n\nAt the time of construction\, statutory legislation required sprinklers to be installed in residential block of flats of 30m and above.\nThere is no requirement for sprinklers to be installed in car parks\, instead reliance is place upon smoke ventilation either natural or mechanical.\nIf the requirements of ADB\, B5 had been complied with\, we could be looking at a more significant fire because sprinklers were not installed.\nSprinklers were only installed as a trade-off due to the requirement of B5 not being complied with.\n\nCar parks \nThe British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association fully supports the recommendations made by the National Fire Chiefs Council within their Automatic Fire Suppression System (AFSS) position statement. \n\nRecommend AFSS be required in open sided car parks to protect property\, including the fabric of the building.\nStrongly recommend AFSS be required in\n\n\nEnclosed car parks\, as is common in Europe.\nAutomated car parks\, due to the extra density of fire loading created by stacking cars in carousel or racking systems.\n\nLinks/sources \n  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/24\nBAFSA Sprinkler Focus AFSS should be essential life safety feature in car parks\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nNFCC Position Statement AFSS\nADB Volume 1\nBAFSA Information file Sprinklers in car parks\nProtecting against car park fires-How to prevent and minimize risks\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n     
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/stowmarket-open-sided-basement-car-park-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Stowmarket
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Opensided-carpark-fire.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240506
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240507
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240513T175941Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240513T175941Z
UID:10000464-1714953600-1715039999@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Edinburgh Bin Store Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Date of incident; 6 May 2024\nTine of call; 19:45.\nLocation; Edinburgh\nUse of building; Low Rise Purpose built block of flats of 4 floors.\nIncident; fire.\nLocation of fire; Bin Store\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; Scottish Fire And Rescue Service. (SFRS)\n\nThe Incident \n\n2 pumping appliances mobilised to reports of a fire involving a large recycling bin at the rear of a low-rise residential block of flats.\nOn arrival it was identified that the fire was within a refuse/bin store involving  a large recycling wheelie bin within the front half of the bin store had been extinguished by the activation of the premises sprinkler system (1x sprinkler head)\nNo further firefighting action was required.\nTotal property area damaged by fire 1m².\nNo injuries were reported.\n\nIt should be remembered.  \n\nThe fire was extinguished\, controlled within the compartment of origin by the activation of the sprinkler system.\nMinimal fire damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required.\nThis incident demonstrates once again the effectiveness of sprinkler systems for refuse\, bin store fires.\n\nDanger of refuse chute/bin store fires. \nThese types of fires can have a dramatic effect on the safety of the residents\, specifically where refuse chutes and access hatches can sometimes be found directly opening onto protected corridors\, lobbies\, and stairs\, so providing the potential for the spread of fire and smoke to the common escape routes. \nIt is therefore best practice in these situations. \n\nAutomatic fire-resisting shutter should be fitted at the base of the refuse chute to restrict the spread of fire and smoke from a fire in the bin room. The shutter should\, as a minimum\, be operated on a fixed temperature fusible link.\nBespoke sprinkler system\, further protection can be provided by the installation of a sprinkler system located over the bins\, with either frangible bulb or fusible link sprinkler heads\, or open sprinkler heads with water discharge controlled by smoke detectors.\n\nBAFSA Incident Data Report Focus on Sprinklers \nBAFSA realises that fire incident data provides powerful evidence of the benefits of fire sprinklers and has published a series of reports analysing Incident Recording System data on fires in sprinklered buildings from 2018-2021. The aim of the analyses is to identify trends and gain insight on the use of sprinklers within Great Britain to help effect a change so that sprinklers are the norm\, not the exception. One such report focused on where sprinklers were reported and having an impact for refuse store/bin store fires which accounted for the highest number of incidents with 141outside the flat. \nFrom the 141 sprinkler activations outside the flats\, refuse fires accounted for the highest number of incidents with 123. In refuse store fires sprinklers extinguished 53 (43%) incidents with a further 63 (51%) incidents being contained or controlled. Further interrogation of the data would have to be completed to identify why 7 incidents were not contained/controlled. \n \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2022/2023\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nBAFSA Incident data report\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n  \n                      \n  \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/edinburgh-bin-store-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Edinburgh
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Screenshot-2024-05-13-at-18.55.50-1.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240501T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240529T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20240604T111324Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240607T133251Z
UID:10000373-1714550400-1717002000@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Sprinkler Activations May 2024
DESCRIPTION:London Fire Brigade (LFB) have reported the following incidents for the period 1 May- 29 May 2024 where fire sprinklers were reported as present and having an impact. \n\nProviding further evidence on the vital role sprinklers play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising  awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler saves from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire.\nThe story around the incident provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect life\, firefighters\, and property from fire.\n\nKey Facts \n\n6 incidents were reported within premises\, all sprinkler systems\n5 of the incidents involved Purpose built flats/maisonettes of which 2 involved refuse stores\n4 of these incidents resulted in the activation of the premises sprinkler system\nThe fire was either extinguished or controlled/contained to the room of origin by the activation of 1-2 sprinkler heads\n2 incidents\, the sprinkler system did not activate\, system coverage was not provided in the area where the fire occurred or was recorded as not known\n\nThese incidents provided further evidence\, Supporting the most recent UK research was commissioned by The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC)\, National Fire Sprinkler Network (NFSN) and supported by BAFSA in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Across all premises types: \n \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nIt cannot be stressed how important active systems are\, they should not be viewed as an alternative to passive fire protection systems. Providing effective fire protection requires both passive and active elements working in unison and complementing the roles of one another. Automatic Fire Suppression Systems play a significant role\, as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures reducing the impact of fire on people\, property\, and the environment \nIncidents Reported \n\nHotel Fire-Paddington\n\n\nDate of incident; 3 May 2024\nTime of call; 13;20\nTime of Stop; 15:50\nUse of building; Hotel\nIncident; Fire\nLocation of Fire; Laundry room\nIgnition source; Natural occurrence\, self-heating\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers\n\nA fire within a hotel fourth floor laundry room was successfully extinguished contained to the room of origin by the activation of 1 sprinkler head with firefighters from Paddington\, Euston\, North Kensington and surrounding fire stations attending the scene using smoke blockers in the building to limit the spread of smoke within the premises. The premises emergency action plan was successfully implemented resulting in the evacuation of 170 guests/staff. \nThe fire is believed to have been accidental caused by freshly laundered towels self-heating and catching fire. This is the third reported successful tangible sprinkler save where the fire has been extinguished\, contained/controlled by the activation of the premises sprinkler system where self-heating has been reported. \n\nPurpose built block of flats kitchen Fire-Southwark\n\n\nDate of incident; 10 May 2024\nTime of call; 19:53\nUse of building; Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\nIncident; Fire\nLocation of Fire; Dwelling\, Kitchen\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers\n\nA fire within a kitchen involving a cooker ring/hot plate/deep fat fryer was controlled /contained to the room of origin by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads\, the fire was extinguished by operational crews using a main branch/jet. The occupants self-evacuated the premises prior to the arrival of the LFB. \n\nPurpose built block of flats refuse fire-Tower Hamlets\n\n\nDate of incident; 19 May 2024\nTime of call; 18:11\nUse of building; Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 4 to 9 storeys\nIncident; Fire\nLocation of Fire; Refuse store\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers\n\nA fire within a ground floor refuse store was successfully extinguished by the activation of one sprinkler head containing the fire to the room of origin\, no further firefighting was required following the arrival of operational crews. \n\nPurpose built block of flats refuse fire-Westminster\n\n\nDate of incident; 24 May 2024\nTime of call; 13:15\nUse of building; Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\nIncident; Fire\nLocation of Fire; Refuse store\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers\n\nA fire within a lower ground floor refuse store was successfully extinguished by the activation of one sprinkler head containing the fire to the room of origin\, no further firefighting was required following the arrival of operational crews. \nThe above-mentioned reported refuse fires are in line with previous findings from The British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association that highlight that refuse stores are a common area of sprinkler operation in areas outside of flats. This is unsurprising as national fire statistics in England demonstrate that for blocks flats the highest number of incidents\, outside of fires in the residential areas themselves\, are recorded in refuse store areas. \n\nBAFSA published a series of reports analysing Incident Recording System data on fires in sprinklered buildings from 2018-2021.\nOne such report focused on where sprinklers were reported and having an impact for refuse store/bin store fires\nIdentifying that the highest number of incidents were located outside the flat with 141 incidents/activations\nFrom the 141 sprinkler activations outside the flats\, refuse fires accounted for the highest number of incidents with 123.\nRefuse store fires sprinklers extinguished 53 (43%) incidents with a further 63 (51%) incidents being contained or controlled.\nFurther interrogation of the data would have to be completed to identify why 7 incidents were not contained/controlled\n\n \nDanger of refuse chute/bin store fires. \nThese types of fires can have a dramatic effect on the safety of the residents\, specifically where refuse chutes and access hatches can sometimes be found directly opening onto protected corridors\, lobbies\, and stairs\, so providing the potential for the spread of fire and smoke to the common escape routes. \nIt is therefore best practice in these situations. \n\nAutomatic fire-resisting shutter should be fitted at the base of the refuse chute to restrict the spread of fire and smoke from a fire in the bin room. The shutter should\, as a minimum\, be operated on a fixed temperature fusible link.\nBespoke sprinkler system\, further protection can be provided by the installation of a sprinkler system located over the bins\, with either frangible bulb or fusible link sprinkler heads\, or open sprinkler heads with water discharge controlled by smoke detectors.\n\nLink \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/24\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nBAFSA Data reports\nBAFSA Fire Sprinklers Greater London Review 2018-2021\nLFB Sprinkler Position Statement\n\nIf you hear of a save report it\, it makes a difference. \n                     
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-sprinkler-activations-may-2024/
LOCATION:London
CATEGORIES:Residential
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240501T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241223T000000
DTSTAMP:20260417T054040
CREATED:20250509T070734Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250603T084124Z
UID:10000512-1714521600-1734912000@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Lancashire Reported Sprinkler Activations July-December 2024
DESCRIPTION:Lancashire Reported Sprinkler Activations July-December 2024 \nIntroduction \nLancashire Fire and Rescue Service (LFRS) should be applauded for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of fire sprinklers by the reporting of sprinkler activations\, rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. \nReporting incidents taken from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month(s) of July\, August and December 2024 where Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) were reported as present\, having an impact in Lancashire. \nRaising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of AFSS which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety benefits \nLancashire \nThe county of Lancashire has a resident population of 1.45 million and\, is one of the most populated and urbanised shire counties in Britain comprising of 12 districts within the Lancashire County Council area\, and two unitary authorities in Blackburn with Darwen and Blackpool. \nMajor risks in the county are diverse including. \n\nTransport infrastructure\, The M6 motorway\, West coast mainline\, Blackpool airport\, the seaports located at Heysham and Fleetwood.\nEnergy infrastructure\, two nuclear facilities located at Heysham and Springfields.\nThirteen Industrial sites that require special plans to deal with hazards under COMAH (Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 2025 legislation)\n\nLancashire Fire and Rescue Service \nIs structured into six area commands with 39 fire stations consisting of 18 immediate response stations\, 17 retained and four-day crewed stations providing Lancashire with 24-hour fire cover. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) where AFSS were reported as present\, having an impact in Lancashire for the above-mentioned period \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role sprinklers and other forms of suppression play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler actuations from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nProviding further evidence reaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\nEducating\, informing FRS of the benefits of AFSS allowing the business-as-usual service to be maintained by reducing the impact of major fire incidents allowing the release of resources to provide an effective response to attend other emergencies.\n\nIncident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the Incident Commander (IC)of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups. For the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \n Each group contains questions in data fields with associated lists containing the appropriate answer options. Data collected about serious reportable fires include: \n\nTime and date of call\nFire Service or other geographical area\nType of building or vehicle\nMost likely motive (accidental or malicious)\nCause of fire (chip pan fires\, electrical\, etc.)\nSource of ignition (cigarettes\, cookers\, etc.)\nMaterials (furniture\, etc.)\nThe spread of fire (beyond room of origin\, etc.)\nThe nature of fire casualties\nRescue information and method of extinction\nThe effectiveness of automatic smoke detectors\nWere there any active safety systems present?\n\nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training\, experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene. \nThe use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nKey facts: – 6 Incidents reported. \n\n1 incident\, where the fire was extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system\n2 incidents where the fire was contained/controlled by the activation of the sprinkler system\n2 incidents were reported where the sprinkler system did not operate\, due to insufficient heat to operate the sprinkler system with the remaining incident recorded as not known.\n\n \nThese incidents provide further evidence\, supporting the UK research which was commissioned by The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC)\, National Fire Sprinkler Network (NFSN) and supported by BAFSA in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Across all premises types: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nIncidents AFSS were reported as present\, having an impact.  \nPost the Grenfell tower fire\, regulatory and sector changes relating to fire safety have occurred. One such change has been the increase in installations of sprinklers across the country with housing providers\, local authorities and developers committing to install sprinklers in purpose-built block of flats on a new and retrofit basis. \nOf the 3 AFSS activations reported\, the fire was either contained\, controlled or extinguished by the operation of the sprinkler system\, providing further evidence that the main functional objectives of a sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling or even extinguishing the fire.\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin.\nFirefighters completing operational duties without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation.\nPrevent conflagration.\n\n1.Residential Care Home \n\nDate of Incident; July 2024\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Laundry room\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nResidential care premises present a series of unique challenges with respect to fire safety. The needs of the occupants and the resources required to undertake an evacuation in these types of premises require careful consideration both in the design and ongoing operation of such buildings\, to ensure that an appropriate level of fire safety is provided. \nThe diminished senses that result from the ageing process may ultimately result in the occupants of residential care premises having a slower reaction time to raise an alarm\, and due to the residents’ reduced physical capabilities\, a slower response time to an alarm\, which may result in an increased evacuation time. All the above- mentioned factors combine to increase the risk of injury or fatality in a fire\, especially where assistance from carers may be restricted at night. \nThe Incident \nIt is reported that a fire involving a white goods tumble dryer was contained\, controlled within the room of origin by the operation of one sprinkler head before the arrival of the LFRS. The alarm was raised following the activation of the premises fire alarm system\, upon investigation by staff smoke was observed within the room of origin. \nThe benefit of the sprinkler system allowed the growth of the fire to be contained/controlled\, allowing additional time for \n\nStaff\, to implement the premises emergency plan\, progressive horizontal evacuation.\nIncident commander (IC) to implement an operational tactical plan on arrival.\n\nThe fire was extinguished by firefighters wearing breathing apparatus using 1 hose reel jet\, moderate fire and heat damage was reported within the room of origin. \nAt the conclusion of the incident\, following a dynamic risk assessment by the IC\, \n\nThe sprinkler stop valve was isolated.\nElectrics made safe by isolating the supply.\n\nIt should be remembered.  \n\nThe sprinkler system maintained the care homes continuity of providing care to their residents with minimal disruption\, valuable community asset saved.\n\n2.Industrial Processing \n\nDate of Incident; July 2024\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Recycling plant floor section\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; More than 5\n\nIt is reported that multiple fire pumps were mobilised to a fire involving lithium batteries which self-heated setting light to waste contained within an internal waste storage area involving 7 tons of recycling waste material. \nThe fire was contained\, controlled by the activation of multiple sprinkler heads with slight smoke damage reported within the compartment of origin. \n\n Retail Outlet \n\n\nDate of Incident; December\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a fire within a commercial kitchen\, on arrival it was established that the fire had been extinguished by the activation of one sprinkler head. \nThe fire was determined to be caused by natural occurrence and accidental self-heating¹. A bag containing dish towels impregnated with residue cooking oils had been washed by a member of staff and left to dry in the bag\, which subsequently caught light. \n¹the combination of heat\, cooking fats and oxygenating chemicals from stain removing detergent products can create a chemical reaction\, causing towels to start smouldering and catch fire. When piled\, heat has nowhere to escape\, which can result in the ignition point being reached. \nIncidents where sprinklers were present\, not having an impact \n3 incidents were reported where the sprinkler system did not activate which was due to either: – \n\nInsufficient heat to operate the sprinkler system\nNot known\n\n4. Hospitals and Medical care \nIt is reported that a minor fire involving an electric magnetic door lock electric coil was made safe by the onsite maintenance electrician following the activation of a manual call point. The sprinkler system did not activate due to insufficient heat\, fire damage was reported to item first ignited. \n\nCommercial Premises\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire within a pet food processing plant involving a forklift\, on arrival the IC established that the battery terminal charging the forklift had ignited. The fire was extinguished by firefighters wearing BA using two hose reel jets. \nThe completed Incident IRS identified that the sprinkler system did not activate\, recorded as unknown. Further enquires would have to be completed by LFRS to establish the rationale for this anomaly. \n\nWaste Transfer Centre\n\nFollowing reports of a fire within an open-ended waste transfer warehouse containing a stack of domestic waste\, it was established by firefighters using a thermal image camera that a damaged lithium-ion drill battery contained in the waste had a temperature reading of 40 degrees celsius. \nThe battery was removed\, submerged in a bucket of water with the stack of waste cooled using a hose reel jet. The premises sprinkler system did not operate due to insufficient heat \nAdvice For Building Managers\, the following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. \nTo achieve this: – \n\nMaintenance\, the premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, the premises emergency plan should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system. Any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nRegulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, it is a requirement of the Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures. \nFurther detailed guidance on sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, a guide for responsible persons and duty holder. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lancashire-reported-sprinkler-activations-july-december-2024/
LOCATION:Lancashire
CATEGORIES:Commercial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240501
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240502
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240526T064929Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241112T184338Z
UID:10000370-1714521600-1714607999@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Lancashire FRS Sprinkler Activation December 2023 - May 2024
DESCRIPTION:Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service (LFRS) have reported 5 incidents where sprinklers were present of which 3 activated having an impact for the period October 2023 to May 2024. \nDemonstrating the benefits of sprinklers\, on each occasion the \n\nThe fire was contained\, controlled or extinguished.\nNo casualties or injuries reported.\n\n\nFlat Fire Sprinkler Activation \n\n\nDate of incident; December 2023.\nTime of call; 20:28.\nUse of building; Other Residential Building.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Bedroom.\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service.\n\nThe premises provides a service for adults with learning disabilities and complex needs providing accommodation and personal care comprising of bungalows\, houses\, flats and cottages. \nA small fire within a flat was successfully extinguished by the activation of one sprinkler head with fire damage confined to the room of origin\, (bedroom) involving a bed mattress and bedding. No further firefighting media was required with smoke damage reported within the flat only. No injuries were reported\, the cause of the fire involved a cigarette lighter. \nThis incident demonstrates the benefits of installing fire sprinklers. \n\nProviding a high level of protection for vulnerable residents of our communities as part of a package of fire safety measures.\nThe sprinkler system maintained the buildings continuity of providing accommodation to other residents with minimal disruption\, asset saved.\n\n2 Industrial Waste Processing Sprinkler Activation  \n\nDate of incident; January 2024.\nTine of call; 15:09.\nUse of building; Industrial Processing.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Warehouse.\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service.\n\nOne sprinkler head activated following a fire involving household waste within the single-storey warehouse used for the waste industry. The sprinkler system contained\, controlled the fire allowing time for the onsite operative to implement the premises emergency plan. Removing the waste externally using onsite machinery allowing the waste to be turned over\, extinguished. On arrival LFRS used a thermal image camera to identify remaining hotspots. \nThe National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) have reported that UK Fire and Rescue Services (FRS) attend around 300 significant fires in waste sites each year which are often difficult to extinguish requiring multiple FRS resources for significant periods of time which can have a serious impact on the local community in the short or long term\, including: \n\nThe Environmental Impact\nPublic health impacts on responders and communities\nLarge scale financial loses and disruption.\nRoad closures\nHigh demand on FRS and other agency resources\n\nFRS are fully aware of the environmental impacts of fire publishing sustainability\, environmental reports with further guidance published by the government on environmental protection\, providing further guidance for FRS on preventing and dealing with incidents with the potential to pollute. \nActive fire protection systems\, specifically Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) should be seen as part of a holistic approach minimising fire damage as part of a greener approach from the fire sector\, which is currently overlooked. The Waste Industry Safety and Health Forum (WISH) published “Reducing Fire Risk at Waste Management Sites” good practice guidance on the latest research and information available to achieve good fire risk management which includes an appendix focusing on suppression/extinguishing/fighting systems focusing on \n\nImportance of seeking competent advice for the installation of a fire suppression system\nThe system should be proportionate to the nature and scale of waste management activities completed and associated risks.\nChoosing the appropriate fire suppression system which may include.\n\nSprinklers\nManual open deluge system\nDeluge/water spray systems\nMobile foam trolley\nWater monitors/cannons/curtains\n\n\nThe design\, installation and maintenance of the proposed system is covered by an appropriate UKAS-accredited third-party certification scheme.\nImportance of liaising with insurers who may have specific requirements for fire suppression systems.\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance……\n\n3.Factory Fire Involving Machinery  \n\nDate of incident; May 2024\nTine of call; 03.40\nUse of building; Factory\nIncident; Fire\nLocation of fire; Warehouse\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service\n\nManual sprinkler system activated\, handheld hose reels used by staff following a fire within plant machinery used to produce felt which contained\, controlled the fire. On arrival LFRS used handheld jets to extinguish the fire\, cool remaining hot spots identified using a thermal image camera. The cause of the fire was accidental due to the production process which had malfunctioned producing friction due to the machinery jamming causing smouldering which caught light. Fire damage sustained to 100m by 3m length of felt backed underlay\, no juries were reported \nEmergency plan  \nOn discovery of a fire the: – \n\nFire Rescue Service should be informed immediately\nWhere a sprinkler system is activated\, it should not be turned off until the officer in charge is satisfied the fire has been extinguished following the completion of a dynamic operational risk assessment.\n\nThe Ocado automated food warehouse fire report published July 2019 by Hampshire Fire and Rescue Authority identified that the warehouse operator\, turned off the sprinkler system for 5 minutes in the hope that employees could complete extinguishment. The outcome\, total loss of the fulfilment centre costing the company about £100m\, 370 workers laid off. A sprinkler system can only suppress and contain or in some cases extinguish a fire thus protect a building\, its occupants and assets if it is allowed to operate as designed and installed to do so. \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \nSources/links \n\nHampshire Fire and Rescue Authority Ocado Fire Report\nLFRS Website\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\n\n       
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lancashire-frs-sprinkler-activation-update-may-2024/
LOCATION:Lancashire
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240424T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240524T120000
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240903T151644Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240903T151644Z
UID:10000475-1713916800-1716552000@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Norfolk Domestic Retrofitted Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit image ReCom fire protection ltd\n\nDate of incident; 24 April  2024\nLocation; Norfolk\nUse of building; Dwelling flat/maisonette\nIncident; fire.\nLocation of fire; Living room\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; BS9251:2021\nFire Rescue Service; Norfolk Fire Rescue Service (SWFRS)\n\nThe vast majority of reported sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk are for residential tall building activations\, it is therefore refreshing to be informed of a domestic sprinkler activation which provides further evidence that the installation of fire sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures\, saves lives\, prevents injury minimizes property damage in a variety of occupancies. \nSummary \nFirstly\, our gratitude for the support of both NFRS and Recom Fire Protection Ltd for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk allowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK sprinkler firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry. \nIn this case the \n\nDecision taken by the social landlord to Install a domestic sprinkler system within a dwelling flat/maisonette\, providing a further layer of safety protecting a vulnerable community member from fire as part of a package of fire safety measures.\nImportance of sprinkler coverage within bathrooms\, shower rooms and toilets.\n\nIt is proven that the installation of fire sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures\, saves lives\, prevents injury and minimizes property damage. It’s the equivalent of having a firefighter in your premises 24 hours a day\, 7 days a week. \nPromoting further evidence to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n Sprinkler System Specification \n\nBS9251;2021\nCategory 1\nDedicated tank and pump located within the garage of the premises\nRetrospective install with fabricated boxing in of the sprinkler system\nCoverage dwelling including garage\nGSM autodialer/external sounder/beacon\n1 sidewall sprinkler head\, VK480 activated\n\nThe Incident \n\nPrimary fire within a living room involving textiles\, clothing\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a fire following an emergency call received from the remote alarm receiving centre.\nUpon arrival\, fire crews assisted Mr D from the property\, proceeded to extinguish a small fire in the living room involving textiles\, clothing.\nA further seat of fire was identified within the bathroom\, it was established that the resident had tried to extinguish the fire by removing the textiles/clothing which were alight to the bath tub in the adjacent bathroom.\nFirefighters identified that the sprinkler head within the bathroom had activated.\nThe circumstances regarding the activation of the sprinkler system are not conclusive as limited fire growth was reported within the bathroom allowing the sprinkler head to activate.\nIt is reported that Mr D was physicaly trying to silence the premises fire alarm before the arrival of NFRS\, while carrying out this action Mr D may of mistook the sprinkler head as the fire alarm resulting in the activation of the head.\nThe fire within the bathtub was extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler head\n\n. \n     \nCredit image ReCom fire protection ltd \nEmergency Plan  \n\nInformation was available onsite for NFRS to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems.\nAllowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nIt is reported that the tank was 70% depleted running for 12 minutes before the intervention of NFRS\n\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nBenefits of a residential sprinkler system  \n It should be remembered that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system \n\nIs an effective fire safety measures as part of a package of fire safety measures\nReduces the heat output from fire by reducing its growth\, containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\nInitiates the appropriate emergency procedures by sounding a sprinklered local alarm\nAllows more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued\, protects firefighters\n\nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 5\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data\nIn support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n    \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/norfolk-domestic-retrofitted-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Norfolk
CATEGORIES:Domestic
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Norfolk-2.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240424
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240425
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240514T085748Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240514T085756Z
UID:10000465-1713916800-1714003199@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Isle of Man Apartment Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit Image Isle of Man Fire and Rescue \n\nDate of incident; 24 April 2024\nLocation; Isle of Man\, Onchan\nUse of building; Residential block of flats.\nIncident; fire.\nLocation of fire; Utility Room\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service. Isle of Man Fire & Rescue Service\n\nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a fire within a residential apartment.\nOn arrival it was identified that the fire within the apartment utility room had been contained\, extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head.\nMinor fire damage was reported.\nThe cause of the fire is referenced as a possible electrical fault.\n\nIt should be remembered.  \n\nThe fire was extinguished\, controlled within the compartment of origin by the activation of the sprinkler system.\nMinimal fire damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required.\nThis incident demonstrates once again the effectiveness of sprinkler systems for residential building\n\nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2022/2023\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nIsle of Man Fire and Rescue Service face book page\nThree FM\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link.
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/isle-of-man-apartment-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Onchan
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Screenshot-2024-05-14-at-09.53.33.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240419
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240420
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240419T093252Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240420T073615Z
UID:10000462-1713484800-1713571199@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:City of London Social Housing Tower Block Sprinkler Save
DESCRIPTION:Images credit The City Corporation \nIntroduction \n\nThe British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) is the UK’s leading professional trade association for the fire sprinkler industry.\nOur primary objectives include providing authoritative information on the benefits of fire sprinkler systems and how fire sprinklers can play a significant role in saving life and property from the devastating effects of fire.\nOne way to achieve this is to demonstrate the vital role sprinklers play in fire safety arrangements by highlighting real tangible examples of where they have actuated and in doing so\, saved life and property from fire.\nThe outcome of which will entice others in the housing sector or providing sleeping accommodation to install fire sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures reducing the impact of fire on people\, property\, and the environment.\n\nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. The story around the incident provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect life\, firefighters\, and property from fire. \nThe most recent ¹UK research commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network and supported by British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Key data revealed that across all premises types: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThis post fire sprinkler save supports this evidence. \nThe City of London Corporation (The City Corporation) following the tragic events of the Grenfell Tower made a commitment to review policies\, processes and procedures relating to fire safety precautions across their housing portfolio to reduce the likelihood of a fire occurring in a building\, recognising that the largest number of deaths from fire occur in the home. \nAs part of this directive in May 2018\, the decision was made to install life safety residential sprinkler systems compliant to BS91251:21 as par of a wider scheme of works to improve fire safety for all dwellings in the five social housing tower blocks owned by the city corporation\, providing a further layer of safety from fire for their residents\, tenants. \nMarch 2024\, it is reported that a kitchen fire was successfully extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system within one of the social housing tower blocks with no injuries reported Justifying the decision taken by the City Corporation. \nThe Premises: – The Avondale Square Estate consists of three 20 storey blocks each containing 72 dwellings consisting of studio\, 1-bedroom flats with ancillary areas on the ground floor. Constructed with concrete frame\, floors and stairs with a concrete façade recessed balconies. \nDescription of incident:- The location of the fire was within a 1-bedroom flat on the 13 floor of a 20 storey social housing block. It is reported that a chip pan fire was contained\, controlled\, and extinguished by the activation of 1 sidewall sprinkler head no further firefighting intervention was required with no injuries reported. \n                                    \nActivated\, kitchen sidewall sprinkler head                              Minor smoke\, soot visible above the seat of the fire \n(Images credit The City Corporation) \n The images of the incident clearly demonstrate the benefits of sprinklers as a life safety system. \n\nMinimal smoke\, soot damage visible on the kitchen walls\, ceiling.\nNo direct burning or fire damage located around the seat of the fire or reported following the incident.\n\n Key Facts \n\nThe fire was extinguished\, controlled within the compartment of origin\, no direct fire damage reported within the dwelling.\nThe activation of the sprinkler system reduced the heat output from the fire by reducing its growth\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nNo further firefighting media was required by London Fire Brigade\nThe sprinkler system provided vital protection for the residents dwelling\, belongings\, personal processions.\n\nDebunking the myths: – \n\nResidential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on chip pan fires.\nWhen one sprinkler activates\, they all activate. Fact\, only the sprinkler head(s) directly affected by the fire is activated.\n\n Sprinkler Saves UK have reported several incidents involving chip pan fires on each occasion the fire was extinguished\, contained\, or controlled. \nIn England cooking fires are the most common type of accidental fire reported for the period 2013/2014 to 2022/2023 with over 1100 fires. We still see reports from the Fire Rescue Service (FRS) that where the occupant is present at the time of a chip pan fire\, they have tried to extinguish the fire themselves by placing the oil pan under the tap in the kitchen sink or throw water on the pan causing the oil to explode causing serious injury allowing further fire to spread. \nWhen you compare this incident to a picture taken at a similar dwelling fire reported by Lancashire FRS involving a chip pan fire the difference is clear to see when sprinklers are not present. \n  \n \nImage credit Lancashire FRS \nThis review provides further evidence that a correctly designed and installed life safety sprinkler system. \n\nCan detect and control a fire at an early stage of development and activate an alarm.\nOperation of the system rapidly reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nAssist firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development\, which significantly reduces the risk to firefighters.\n\n It is recognised that the life-saving operating parameters of the sprinkler system requires effective fire protection both passive and active elements working in unison and complementing the roles of one another. The provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nEmergency Plan \nA robust emergency plan will allow the provision of vital information for the FRS to be shared by onsite representatives. Clarifying the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems where present such as sprinklers and other forms of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems. (AFSS) The outcome of which will allow a robust onsite emergency response to be immediately actioned to assist the control of the sprinkler system during the fire incident and following a fire so that they can be reinstated. \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2022/2023\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nLancashire FRS Facebook post chip pan fire easter weekend April 2023\nNottinghamshire FRS Press release chip pan fires\nFire0601: Primary fires by cause of fire and incident type\nCity of London Press release\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging the FRS to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \nsprinkler saves activation posted 19 April 2024
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/city-of-london-social-housing-tower-block-sprinkler-save/
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/IMG_1014-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240408
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240409
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240515T105555Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240526T065047Z
UID:10000466-1712534400-1712620799@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Doncaster Tall Building Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Date of incident;8 April 2024.\nTine of call; 01:05.\nLocation; Doncaster.\nUse of building; Purpose built block of flats 10 floors and above.\nIncident; fire.\nLocation of fire; Hallway.\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; South Yorkshire Fire Rescue Service. (SYFRS)\n\nThe Premises \n\n14 storey residential block of flats containing 65 flats\, retrofitted with sprinklers in 2019 as part of a joint initiative between SYFRS\, St Leger Homes and Doncaster Council. Resulting in all three partner agencies working together allowing residential sprinklers to be retrofitted in all nine high-rise residential buildings across Doncaster.\n\nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a fire\, on arrival it was identified that the location of the fire was on the 11th floor within a two-bedroom flat.\nThe Officer in Charge committed a breathing apparatus team to locate the residents\, extinguish the fire.\nUpon entry to the flat it was established that a fire within the entrance hallway had been contained\, extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head.\nNo further firefighting media was required with no rapid-fire growth reported.\nDue to the location of the fire within the flat the occupants were unable to self-evacuate taking refuge in a room until operational crews arrived.\nNo injuries were reported.\nEnquires are ongoing to establish the cause of the fire.\n\nIt should be remembered.  \n\nThe fire was extinguished\, controlled within the compartment of origin by the activation of the sprinkler system.\nMinimal fire damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required.\nThis incident demonstrates once again the effectiveness of sprinkler systems for high rise tall building fires as part of a package of fire safety measures.\n\nPremises Sprinkler System \n\nBS9251:2014 Category 3 system supplied via pump and tank water supplies\, duty and standby with UPS.\nCoverage: flats\n\nThis is the second reported fire for Shaftesbury House within two years\, on both occasions the fire was fully extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head potentially preventing a fatal fire. The previous incident took place on the 25 August 2022\, involving a chip pan fire which overheated and set light. The resident was alerted to the fire by the activation of the premises smoke alarm. Upon arrival operational crews established that the fire had been extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system\, all persons were accounted for with minor smoke damage sustained within the flat. \n\nRoger Brason\, South Yorkshire Fire & Rescue’s lead sprinkler advocate. \n\n\n“When the sprinklers were installed at Shaftesbury House and other high-rise buildings in Doncaster\, we said we were delighted\, and this is why. \n\n\n“Had it not been for the sprinkler system\, this fire would have spread very quickly and could have caused significant damage to the property and\, potentially\, seriously hurt the occupant. \n\n\n“Credit should also go to the working smoke alarms which alerted the resident who was asleep at the time of the fire. Together\, these are two amazing devices.” \n\nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2022/2023\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nSYFRS Press release Smoke alarms and sprinklers combine to Save Doncaster Resident\nSprinkler Saves\, Chip pan fire\, Sprinkler Activation Doncaster\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/doncaster-tall-building-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Doncaster
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240401T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240630T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240820T195137Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240825T080726Z
UID:10000472-1711958400-1719766800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Lancashire FRS Sprinkler Activations April -June 2024
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nOur thanks to Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service (LFRS) for providing an overview of fire data on fire incidents in Lancashire where sprinkler systems were reported as present and having an impact for the period April to June 2024. The aim of this review is to reinforce the importance of reporting Automatic Fire Suppression System (AFSS) activations to Sprinkler Saves UK\, the outcome of which will \n\nAllow trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK sprinkler firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nAllow The benefits of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems to be promoted to a wider audience\, the outcome of which will entice others to install AFSS.\nProvide further evidence to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted by Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network\nLooking into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94 efficient in their ability to operate\nthat sprinklers do have a role to play in reducing harm and protecting vulnerable people supporting the case for a greater inclusion of sprinklers in purpose built of flats.\n\n         \n6 incidents were reported for the above-mentioned period where AFSS were present of which 4 activated having an impact in a range of commercial and industrial premises within Lancashire. Each of these stories highlight real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated providing powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect life\, firefighters and property from fire. For the remaining 2 incidents\, the AFSS did not operate due to the parameters of the system\, limited fire growth was reported in the vicinity of the fires. Resulting in the predetermined temperature failing to be reached allowing the AFSS to actuate. \nPICTURES SPEAK A THOUSAND WORDS…………… \n           \nCredit Images J&J Fire Engineering \nThe above-mentioned images from for one of the reported sprinkler activations\, demonstrates the power of sprinklers following a small fire reported involving a food hydrator within an entertainment/culture complex kitchen storeroom. The fire was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head containing the fire to the room of origin. Minimal inconvenience for the business was reported with the kitchen offline for 4 hours. \nSummary of fire incidents where sprinklers were reported \n \nIncidents reported \n\nIndustrial Processing Fire Sprinkler Activation \n\n\nDate of incident; 1 April 2024.\nTime of call; 09;39.\nLocation; Lancashire.\nUse of building; Industrial processing\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled.\nNumber of heads operated; Unknown.\n\nThe Incident \n\n02:36\, a fire broke out in the processing area of the premises involving a steam vessel used to heat up wax which caught light activating the commercial sprinkler system which contained\, controlled the fire.\nThe alarm was raised by the activation of the premises automatic fire detection system which was relayed the alarm to the remote alarm receiving centre\, who proceeded to Inform Northwest Fire Control. (NWFC)\nImmediate\, fire response by NWFC was not actioned following changes to policy by ¹LFRS responding to automatic fire alarm systems in non-sleeping premises.\nThe premises key holder was informed at 02:41\, who failed to attend the premises to investigate the source of the alarm\nSubsequently\, LFRS did not attend the incident due to a failure of the buildings fire procedures/protocols namely the non-attendance of the key holder to investigate the source of the alarm\, confirming a fire within the building.\n09:41\, The alarm was raised to NWFC by a member of staff arriving for work who observed the sprinkler system actuating with smoke present in the building.\nOn arrival LFRS observed the remains of a smouldering fire which was extinguished using firefighting media.\n50% fire damage reported contained to the vessel associated electrics.\nInvestigations are ongoing to identify the cause of the fire.\n\n¹FRS throughout the United Kingdom are reviewing how they respond to calls from automatic systems in non-sleeping risk premises. To reduce the number of unwanted fire signals fire crews\, attend which have a major burden on FRS resources that may be needed elsewhere for a genuine emergency. \n\n It is therefore best practice to liaise with your local FRS on how policy change affects you and your business\nReview your premises cause and effect emergency procedures allowing the appropriate emergency response following the activation of an active fire protection system.\n\n\nIndustrial Manufacturing Fire\n\n\nDate of incident; 12 April 2024.\nTime of call; 12;40.\nLocation; Lancashire.\nUse of building; Industrial Manufacturing.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Did not operate.\nNumber of heads operated; N/A.\n\nThe Incident \n\nA minor fire was reported involving electrical wiring during works carried out by operatives.\nFollowing a surge in the electrical current\, which caused the electrical wiring to melt contact was made with a UPS battery pack\, resulting in an arc which set the wiring alight.\nThe battery pack sustained minor fire damage with 1m of wiring\, damaged by fire\nNo injuries were reported\n\nThe sprinkler system did not operate\, due to limited fire growth within the room of origin. Resulting in the predetermined temperature failing to be reached at the sprinkler head allowing its operation. \n\nIndustrial Manufacturing Fire\n\n\nDate of incident; 17 May 2024.\nTime of call; 03:39.\nLocation; Lancashire.\nUse of building; Industrial Manufacturing.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Other.(Manually Operated)\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled the fire.\nNumber of heads operated; Unknown.\n\nThe Incident \n\nA fire involving plant machinery used to produce felt was tackled by staff using water hose reels who proceeded to activate the manual sprinkler system which contained\, controlled the fire.\nOn arrival LFRS used handheld jets to extinguish the fire\, cool remaining hot spots identified using a thermal image camera.\nThe cause of the fire was accidental due to the production process which had malfunctioned producing friction due to the machinery jamming causing smouldering which caught light.\nFire damage sustained to 100m by 3m length of felt backed underlay\, no juries were reported\n\n\nWarehouse/bulk storage fire\n\n\nDate of incident; 8 June 2024.\nTime of call; 07:30.\nLocation; Lancashire.\nUse of building; Warehouse/bulk storage.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Other .(Heat detectors did not actuate due to not reaching required temp.)\nNumber of heads operated; N/A.\n\nThe Incident \n\nLFRS were mobilised to a fire involving a stack of 250-300 tonnes household waste.\nFire crews used onsite machinery to turnover the waste which was subsequently extinguished using firefighting media.\n5 tonnes of waste damaged by fire which was contained within a concrete sided waste storage bay.\nAll fire water run off contained within the waste facilities.\nNo fire water run-off is reported entering any external water courses.\n\nDue to insufficient heat\, the premises AFSS (heat detectors) did not activate resulting in the premises suppression system not operating. \n\nEntertainment/Culture Complex Kitchen Storeroom Sprinkler Activation \n\n\nDate of incident; 9 June 2024.\nTime of call; 02:00.\nLocation; Lancashire.\nUse of building; Entertainment/culture complex.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of heads operated; 1.\n\nThe Incident \n\nSmall fire involving a food hydrator within a kitchen storeroom.\nThe fire was successfully contained to the room of origin by the activation of 1 sprinkler head which extinguished the fire\, no injuries were reported.\n\n\nMinimal inconvenience for the business was reported with the kitchen offline for 4 hours.\nCause of the fire\, accidental.\n\n\nIndustrial Manufacturing Sprinkler Activation\n\n\nDate of incident; 9 June 2024.\nTime of call; 20:22.\nLocation; Lancashire.\nUse of building; Industrial manufacturing.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of heads operated; 2.\n\nThe Incident \n\nDuring routine maintenance of the sprinkler diesel fire pumps a fire was reported within the sprinkler pump room outbuilding.\nSuccessfully extinguished by the operation of two sprinkler heads in addition to maintenance staff tackling the fire with handheld firefighting media.\nCause of the fire\, accidental with minor damage sustained to one diesel fire pump.\nMinor business disruption until the reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\n\nThis incident clearly identifies the importance of sprinkler protecting the sprinkler pump room. \nBenefits of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems \nEach of these stories highlight real\, tangible incidents reinforcing that the operation of a correctly designed and installed AFSS installed to the appropriate codes\, standards can reduce the rate of production of heat and smoke assisting businesses to be more resilient to fire incidents. \nIf it was not for the presence\, activation of the AFSS\, the outcome of these incidents could have had devastating consequences for the businesses. These incidents provides further evidence that having sprinklers fitted make buildings and businesses resilient to the impact of fire because that contain/control or in some cases extinguish the fire. \nThe impact of fire is indiscriminate\, March 2018 a fire destroyed the Gardmen gardening supplies warehouse in Daventry which had recently commenced trading\, sprinklers were not fitted. Further information on this incident can be found in comprehensive case study  available to view on the Business Sprinkler Alliance website. \nIf you want to find out more on the benefits of AFSS for business contact the Business Sprinkler Alliance a coalition of leading fire organisations and experts which aims to. \n\nEnsure that more of the UK’s industrial and commercial buildings are protected from fire with AFSS.\nDriving a culture change so that sprinklers are better understood and accepted as the norm for UK business by raising awareness of the benefits they can bring\n\nReporting Sprinkler Activations \nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance……To make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire.If you hear of a save report it using this link. \nSources/links \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 5\nLFRS Our response to AFA\nBSA\, Coalition of leading fire safety organisations and experts\nBSA Written evidence to the HCLG Select Committee\nDaventry new warehouse destroyed by blaze BSA case study\n\n  \n           
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lancashire-frs-sprinkler-activation-quarterly-update-number-2/
LOCATION:Lancashire
CATEGORIES:Industrial
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240330T213000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240331T213000
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240607T133223Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240705T074008Z
UID:10000377-1711834200-1711920600@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Nottingham Tall Building Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit Image Nottinghamshire Fire& Rescue Service (NFRS) \nThe image kindly provided by NFRS provides further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \n\nDate of incident; 30 March 2024.\nTine of call; 21:30.\nTime of stop; 02;00.\nLocation; Nottingham.\nUse of building; Purpose built block of flats 10 floors and above.\nIncident; fire.\nLocation of fire; Hallway.\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service. (NFRS\n\nBackground \nNottingham City Council should be applauded for their decision to implement an £8.4 million programme protecting their tenants from fire by installing fire sprinklers into their 13 high rise residential block as part of a package of long-standing fire safety measures. Following the tragic events of the Grenfell fire\, Nottingham City Homes\, which manages the Council’s social housing\, conducted a review of fire safety in conjunction with NFRS. Where it was recommended that fire sprinklers should be fitted in all high-rise common ways and dwellings. \n This decision was clearly justified following a small fire within a flat which was successfully extinguished by the premises sprinkler system with no injuries reported \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of an automatic fire alarm sounding within a 22-storey residential block of flats.\nEn-route the incident was upgraded to a fire call\, persons reported.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment\, key tasks by the officer in charge (OIC) on arrival\, it was established that the building was fitted with a residential sprinkler system with the fire located on the16th floor within a dwelling.\nThe benefit of the sprinkler system allowed extra time for the OIC to implement a robust operational tactical plan for the incident.\n4-team breathing apparatus team was committed from the bridgehead to locate the resident\, extinguish the fire.\nUpon entry to the flat it was established that a fire within a room had been contained\, controlled by the activation of 1 sprinkler head located within the hallway.\nNo rapid-fire growth reported\, the fire was extinguished using 1 jet.\nThe resident self-evacuated their flat prior to the arrival of NFRS with no injuries reported.\nEnquires are ongoing to establish the cause of the fire.\nPremises Emergency Plan \n\nIt was reported following the incident that flats were affected by water\, it should be remembered that a robust emergency plan will allow the provision of vital information for the Fire Rescue Service to be shared by onsite representatives.\nClarifying the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems where present such as sprinklers and other forms of AFSS.\nAllowing  a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident  including consideration to  the reinstatement of the system.\n\nPremises Sprinkler System \n\nBS9251:2014 Category 3 system\nCoverage: flats\, common ways\, refuse chute room/bin store\n\nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2022/2023\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nFire Protection Association Press Release.\nMy Nottingham News\nNottinghamshire  Fire and Rescue Service AFSS Position Statement\nWesthampsted Square AFSS Activation Case Study\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n\n\n     
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/nottingham-tall-building-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Nottingham
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Nottingham-tall-builg-fire-image-2-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240330T192000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240330T200000
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240408T115456Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240408T120253Z
UID:10000461-1711826400-1711828800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Winchester Care Home Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit images Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire & Rescue Service \n\nDate of incident: 30 March 2024.\nTine of call; 19:20.\nTime of stop; 20:00.\nLocation; Winchester.\nUse of building; Residential Care Home.\nLocation of fire; Room.\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire & Rescue Service.\n\nHampshire County Council should be applauded for their position protecting their most vulnerable residents from fire by installing sprinklers into all their residential and nursing care homes as part of a package of long-standing fire safety measures following this positive news story reported by Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire & Rescue Service. \nA small fire within a residential and nursing care home for older adults some of whom are living with dementia was successfully extinguished by the premises sprinkler system. \nResidential care premises present a series of unique challenges with respect to fire safety. The needs of the occupants and the resources required to undertake an evacuation in these types of premises require careful consideration both in the design and ongoing operation of such buildings\, to ensure that an appropriate level of fire safety is provided. \nThe diminished senses that result from the ageing process may ultimately result in the occupants of residential care premises having a slower reaction time to raise an alarm\, and due to the residents’ reduced physical capabilities\, a slower response time to an alarm\, which may result in an increased evacuation time. All the above- mentioned factors combine to increase the risk of injury or fatality in a fire\, especially where assistance from carers may be restricted at night. \nwhere residents require assistance\, it is likely that the evacuation process will take longer\, and sprinklers provide significant benefits to address this risk. \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a fire following the activation of the premises automatic fire detection system\, sprinkler alarm.\nOn arrival it was identified that the premises emergency plan\, progressive horizontal evacuation had been implemented by staff moving residents away from the affected fire compartment with no injuries reported.\nUpon entry to the room of origin a small fire involving a plastic waste bin had been successfully contained\, extinguished by the activation of one sidewall sprinkler head located directly above the seat of the fire.\nNo further firefighting media was required with only minor fire\, smoke damage reported within the compartment of origin.\n\nIt should be remembered.  \n\nThe fire was extinguished\, controlled within the compartment of origin by the\n\n\nSprinkler system.\nPassive fire safety measures.\n\n(Providing effective fire protection requires both passive and active elements working in unison and complementing the roles of one another) \n\nMinimal fire damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required.\nThe sprinkler system maintained the care homes continuity of providing care to their residents with minimal disruption\, valuable community asset saved.\n\n  \n Emergency Plan \nA robust emergency plan was available allowing the provision of vital information for the Fire Rescue Service to be shared by onsite representatives. Clarifying the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems where present such as sprinklers and other forms of AFSS. The outcome of which will allow a robust onsite emergency response to be immediately actioned to assist the control of the sprinkler system during the fire incident and following a fire so that they can be reinstated. \nThe Sprinkler System \nCoverage was provided throughout the premises including the loft space\, water supply town mains\, dual pump. \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2022/2023\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nHampshire & Isle of Wight Fire & Rescue Service Press Release\nBAFSA Information File 14 Fire Sprinkler Systems in Care Homes\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging the FRS to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n  \n     
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/winchester-care-home-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Winchester
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Extinguished-waste-bin-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240328T192000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240328T202500
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240527T220927Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240527T220927Z
UID:10000372-1711653600-1711657500@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Care Home Sprinkler Activation Brighton
DESCRIPTION:Louisa Curtis\, East Sussex Fire and Rescue Fire Safety Team Leader for Brighton and Hove\, said:   \n“This incident demonstrates once again why we are calling for a law making the installation of sprinklers in Care Homes mandatory \nOlder people\, as well as people with mental health problems and those with mobility issues\, are the groups within society most at risk from fire. \nThis is why we want to see all new build residential care homes fitted with sprinklers. \nThe benefits of which were clearly identified following this fire\, which was contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of one sprinkler head before the arrival of the fire service. \nFurthermore\, no injuries were reported and it resulted in a valuable community asset being saved from fire.” \n“Sprinklers are a life safety system which can reduce the number of deaths and injuries from fire\, particularly in buildings housing our most vulnerable residents within our communities whilst also reducing the risks to firefighters from fire.” \n  \n \nThis is the second reported successful tangible sprinkler save reported to Sprinkler Saves Uk in the last 6 months where the fire has been contained\, extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system within a residential care home with no injuries\, casualties reported. Demonstrating once again the benefits of installing Automatic Fire Suppression Systems as part of a package of fire safety measures protecting our most vulnerable residents of our communities from fire. \nThe potential for multiple fatalities or injuries among staff in care homes is very high as demonstrated following the tragic fire that devastated a residential care home in Hertfordshire in 2017. Firefighters evacuated more than 30 residents but sadly two people lost their lives\, sprinklers were not fitted. \nThe above attached image clearly captures this tragic fire. \n\nThe inquest into the deaths concluded “inadequate compartmentation in the roof space had contributed to their deaths”.\nEvidence from the fire service and an independent fire safety expert highlighted. If a sprinkler system had been installed\, the two deaths were likely to have been prevented.\n\nReinforcing why England should follow the lead of both Scotland and Wales making the installation of AFSS mandatory.The British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association fully supports the government’s consultation for proposals to require sprinklers in new care homes\, this is a change that we and the fire sector have long been calling for\, we would also like this to be extended to the retrofitting of sprinkler systems in existing care homes. \nThis is a change that the fire sector\, fire rescue service has been calling for as these types of premises present a series of unique challenges with respect to fire safety. \n\nThe needs of the occupants and the resources required to undertake an evacuation in these types of premises require careful consideration both in the design and ongoing operation of such buildings\, to ensure that an appropriate level of fire safety is provided.\nThe diminished senses that result from the ageing process may ultimately result in the occupants of residential care premises having a slower reaction time to raise an alarm\, and due to the residents’ reduced physical capabilities\, a slower response time to an alarm\, which may result in an increased evacuation time.\nSignificantly reduced staff numbers\, particularly at night\, and may be unable to undertake a safe and effective evacuation of residents.\n\nAll the above- mentioned factors combine to increase the risk of injury or fatality in a fire\, especially where assistance from carers may be restricted at night. Where residents require assistance\, it is likely that the evacuation process will take longer. \nOur thanks to East Sussex Fire & Rescue Service for reporting this sprinkler save from Brighton which provides further evidence on why sprinklers should be installed in residential care homes\, making them the norm not the exception. \n Brighton Residential Care Home Sprinkler Activation  \n\nDate of incident;28 March 2024.\nTine of call; 19:20.\nTime of stop; 20:25.\nLocation; Brighton\nUse of building; Residential Care Home.\nLocation of fire; Laundry Room.\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; East Sussex Fire & Rescue Service (ESFRS)\n\nResidential\, nursing home of three floors and lower ground floor providing care for up to 80 residents some of whom are living with dementia. \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews from local stations were mobilised to reports of a fire within a laundry room.\nThe incident was designated\, 4-pump fire\, persons reported.\nThe location of the fire was identified to be within a laundry room on the lower ground floor.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by the Officer in Charge a breathing apparatus team were committed to locate\, extinguish the fire.\nUpon entry to the room of origin the seat of the fire was established to involve a clothing\, textiles which had been successfully contained\, extinguished by the activation of one sprinkler head located within the room of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required\, no rapid-fire growth reported.\nLimited fire damage was reported within the compartment of origin up to 5m²\nNo injuries\, casualties were reported\n\nSelf-heating\, spontaneous combustion \n It is reported that the cause of the fire was due to clothing textiles removed from an industrial tumble dryer that had been laundered and folded into a pile within a laundry basket whilst still hot. This is particularly relevant for oil-soaked items of laundry\, which process the inherent ability to self-heat\, particularly at elevated temperatures \n It should be remembered.  \n\nThis incident clearly identifies the benefits of sprinklers involving lower ground/basement fires for firefighters which can be a high-risk activity\, physically demanding caused by extreme temperatures.\nSprinkler activation reduces heat transfer\, toxic gases\, smoke\, and flashover allowing tenable conditions within the room of origin\, increasing escape time and keeps the fire contained\, controlled or in some cases extinguished before the arrival of the Fire Rescue Service\nMinimal fire damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nNo Injuries\, casualties reported.\n\nConclusion  \nThe provision of a sprinkler system forms part of a business resilience strategy on this occasion it maintained the care homes continuity of providing care to their residents with minimal disruption\, valuable community asset saved with no injuries\, casualties reported. \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler saves review 2023/24\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nKent residential care home sprinkler activation\nBAFSA Information File 14 Fire Sprinkler Systems in Care Homes\nNFCC Press release Families back NFCC’s Think Sprinkler campaign\nNewgrange Care Home case study Think Sprinkler Video\nLFB Consultation response Sprinklers in Care Homes\nESFRS; AFSS\nSelf-heating of oil-soaked towels\, Shropshire FRS\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n  \n       
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/care-home-sprinkler-activation-brighton/
LOCATION:Brighton
CATEGORIES:Residential
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240318
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240319
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240405T114344Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240405T114344Z
UID:10000460-1710720000-1710806399@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Derby Tall Building Kitchen Fire Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Date of incident; 18 March 2024\nTine of call; 13:54\nLocation; Derby\nUse of building; Purpose built Flat 10 or more stories.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen/lounge\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers\nFire Rescue Service; Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service (DFRS)\n\nDFRS have reported the above-mentioned incident involving a new purpose built residential tall building consisting of two residential blocks of 11 and 9 floors containing 259 studio\, 1 and 2 bedroom apartments. \nThe Incident \n\nDFRS mobilised 6 fire pumping appliances\, 1 aerial platform to reports of a fire.\nOn arrival the OIC established a fire within a dwelling involving the activation of the residential fire sprinkler system.\nUpon entry Breathing Apparatus Crews established that a kitchen fire involving an electric induction hob had been contained\, controlled\, and extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head.\nThe location of the sprinkler head was 1m from the seat of the fire.\nMinor fire damage was sustained to the extraction canopy cooker hood.\n\nSprinkler System Specification \n\nBS9251:2014\nCategory 2 System\nWater Supply: Cold water booster supply\nDuration: 60mins enhanced.\nPipework: CPVC Blazemaster\n\nIt should be remembered.  \n\nThe fire was extinguished\, controlled within the compartment of origin by the Sprinkler system.\nPassive fire safety measures.\n(Providing effective fire protection requires both passive and active elements working in unison and complementing the roles of one another)\nMinimal fire damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required.\nNo injuries reported.\n\nEmergency Plan \nIt was reported following the incident that flats were affected by water\, it should be remembered that a robust emergency plan will allow the provision of vital information for the Fire Rescue Service to be shared by onsite representatives. Clarifying the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems where present such as sprinklers and other forms of AFSS. The outcome of which will allow a robust onsite emergency response to be immediately actioned to assist the control of the sprinkler system during the fire incident and following a fire so that they can be reinstated. \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2022/2023\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nDerbyshire Fire and Rescue Service\nDerbyshire Live\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging the FRS to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n                 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/derby-tall-building-kitchen-fire-sprinkler-activation/
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240318
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240319
DTSTAMP:20260417T054041
CREATED:20240405T081539Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240509T160748Z
UID:10000459-1710720000-1710806399@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Oxford Tall Building Kitchen Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Date of incident; 18 March 2024\nTine of call; 13:00\nLocation; Oxford\nUse of building; Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers\nFire Rescue Service; Oxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service (OFRS)\n\nOxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service reported the above-mentioned incident\, identifying the benefits of retrofitting fire sprinkler systems within high rise residential tall buildings. Providing further evidence that fire sprinklers have been proven to have an excellent track record in reducing the impact of fire and in reducing harm and protecting people from fire. Supporting the findings contained in the most recent ¹UK research commissioned by The National Fire Chiefs Council National Fire Sprinkler Network and supported by British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. \nAcross all premises types:\n• Sprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\n• Sprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability \n Background \nThe decision by Oxford City Council in 2017 to retrofit sprinkler systems as part of a major refurbishment of the council’s stock of high-rise flats to improve fire safety as part of a package of fire safety measures\, reenforced following the successful activation of the residential sprinkler system following a kitchen fire within one of their blocks with no injuries reported. \n The Incident \n\n6 fire pumping appliances\, 1 aerial appliance mobilised from local stations to reports of a fire within a residential tall building.\nOn arrival it was established that the fire had broken out within a 10th floor flat of a 15-storey building\nUpon entry to the flat\, it was established that the fire had originated in the kitchen which had been successfully extinguished by the activation of one sprinkler head before the arrival of OFRS.\nNo further firefighting media was required by operational crews.\nThe cause of the fire was established to involve cooking located on top of the hob 0.5msq.\nFire damage was sustained directly behind the cooker\, plastic trunking at ceiling height.\n\n\nAt the conclusion of the incident\, it was noted water from the activated sprinkler head was successfully contained to the compartment of origin.\nProviding effective fire protection requires both passive and active elements working in unison and complementing the roles of one another. The use of a combined approach allowing the occupants of exiting the building safely/damage to the property is minimized.\n\nEmergency Plan \nA robust emergency plan will allow the provision of vital information for the FRS to be shared by onsite representatives. Clarifying the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems where present such as sprinklers and other forms of AFSS. The outcome of which will allow a robust onsite emergency response to be immediately actioned to assist the control of the sprinkler system during the fire incident and following a fire so that they can be reinstated. \nAFSS play a significant role\, as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures reducing the impact of fire on people\, property\, and the environment. \nThe Sprinkler System \n\nInstalled to BS9251\nWater supply designated tank\nCoverage dwellings\, flats\n\nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2022/2023\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nOxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data; May 2017\n\nyou want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, sprinkler industry we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging the FRS to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n     
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/oxford-tall-building-kitchen-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Oxford
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/report1.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR