BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sprinkler Saves - ECPv6.11.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Sprinkler Saves
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Sprinkler Saves
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250601T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250630T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20251112T072326Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260120T065725Z
UID:10000539-1748764800-1751302800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Dagenham Flat Kitchen Sprinklers Save
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nTriangle Fire Systems Ltd reported an incident involving a fire in a residential block of flats. The life safety sprinkler system was activated and effectively extinguished a cooking-related fire within one of the dwellings. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. This incident provides further evidence of the effectiveness\, benefits of sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy for a building. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC)\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nRevealed that across all premises types: – \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe incident  \n\nThe fire occurred in a sixth-floor flat of a nine-storey residential building.\n1 concealed pendent sprinkler head activated extinguishing the fire.\nContaining\, controlling fire growth to the room of origin.\nMinor water\, smoke damage was reported within the flat.\nThe premises emergency plan allowed the sprinkler contractors to be notified of the activation allowing the system to be recommissioned following the incident.\n\nThe benefits sprinklers \nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of installing a residential sprinkler system within a residential purpose-built block of flats. The outcome of which  \n\nRestricted the fire’s growth\, containing and controlling the fire to the room of origin.\nNo injuries were reported.\nPreventing conflagration that could challenge FRS maintaining a business-as-usual routine service.\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler saves autumn update\n¹Optimal economics report Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk: An analysis from fire service data\nTriangle Fire Systems Ltd\, Sprinkler Save\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance. \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link.
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/dagenham-flat-kitchen-sprinklers-save/
LOCATION:Dagenham
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250520
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250521
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250521T161232Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250522T074710Z
UID:10000515-1747699200-1747785599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Cleveland Retrofitted Tall Building Kitchen Saved By Sprinkler System
DESCRIPTION: Image credit CFB\n“This incident again demonstrates the dangers associated with the use of chip pans\, Cleveland Fire Brigade urge members of the public to switch to safer alternative methods of cooking.  We applaud the landords approach to ensuring the safety of its residents through the installation of sprinkler systems\, without these this incident could have been catastrophic.” Says Matty Stather\, Fire Engineering Station Manager at Cleveland Fire Brigade. \n“Sprinkler systems are a highly effective\, reliable and a cost-effective fire safety measure that can save lives\, reduce injuries\, protect our firefighters who attend incidents\, provide peace of mind for our residents\, and reduce property damage. Cleveland Fire Brigade is committed to reducing risk to its communities and the installation of sprinklers by residential properties\, businesses\, schools\, and care homes will help achieve this.” Continued Matty Stather \nSummary \nOur thanks to Cleveland Fire Brigade (CFB) for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler saves to Sprinkler Saves UK following a kitchen fire within a residential purpose-built block of flats extinguished by the operation of the premises residential sprinkler system. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. Each of these real-life individual tangible stories provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures. \n\nReducing the impact of fire on people\, property and the environment\, reducing the risks to firefighters.\nAddressing the myths\, misconceptions regarding their safety and efficiency\, providing evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect our communities from fire.\n\nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of \n\nRetrofitting a residential sprinkler system within the dwellings\, common ways of a single staircase purpose-built block of flats of 12 storeys.\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident\, which can lead to a significant strain on the operational resilience of Fire Rescue Service (FRS) resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service.\nIncorporating a robust emergency plan allowing for the immediate attendance of an on-call response team to reinstate the sprinkler system\nDebunking the myth that residential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on fires involving chip pans.\n\nThe benefit of retrofitting life safety sprinkler systems by the landlord within their residential tall building property portfolio was demonstrated following reports of an accidental fire involving a chip pan fire\, two persons were present in the dwelling at the time of the fire who self-evacuated with no injuries reported before the arrival of CFB. \nThe heat generated from the fire\, activated 1 sidewall sprinkler head within the kitchen\, located 1.5m away from the seat of the fire\, which allowed a fire signal to be transmitted to the remote alarm receiving centre allowing the appropriate emergency response. The operation of the sprinkler system restricted the growth of the fire\, extinguishing the fire before the arrival of CFB. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised by CFB fire control at 18:17 to a fire following an emergency call received from the landlord’s remote alarm receiving centre.\nResulting in the mobilisation of 4 pumping appliances\, 1 aerial appliance.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by the incident commander (IC) it was established that the sprinkler system on the 11 floor of the 12-storey building had operated with in a flat.\nThe provision of the sprinkler system provided extra time for the IC to implement a robust operational high rise tactical plan for the incident.\nUpon entry to the flat\, fire crews established that a fire within a kitchen had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 1 sidewall sprinkler head located within the room of origin.\nThe cause of the fire was cooking left unattended involving a chip pan which caught light\nMinimal fire/smoke damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required by CFB.\nThe sprinkler system for the individual flat was isolated by CFB following confirmation to the IC that the fire was all out.\nTwo residents self-evacuated before the arrival of CFB\, no injuries were reported.\nThe sprinkler system was reinstated at 22:13 hours\n\nAll images credit CFB        \n \nImage 1 Seat of the fire with limited smoke/fire damage.                             \n \n Image 2 Minor fire damage sustained to the ceiling  above the fire. \n \nImage 3 Position of sidewall sprinkler head.                    \n\n Image 4 Sidewall sprinkler head.                                     \n\n  Image 5 Concealed sidewall sprinkler cover plate.          \n \nImage 6 location of flat isolation valve located in ceiling void in the common ways above the flat front door.\nPremises emergency plan \nDue to the provision of a robust emergency plan protocols were in place allowing firefighters to interact with the sprinkler system allowing the system to be isolated following the orders of the IC when it was identified the fire was all out. \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler saves reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the FRS to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy. Debunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nDemonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or in this case extinguish a fire at an early stage of development. \nCFB maintaining a business-as-usual service \nAusterity\, cuts in public funding across the country have significantly impacted FRS resulting in a significant reduction to front line cover and prevention and protection activities putting a strain on resources impacting on public safety and service delivery. \nMajor protracted fire incidents therefore have a knock-on effect on local FRS resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service allowing an effective response to attend other emergencies. The benefits of installing sprinkler systems in the built environment for FRS should not be underestimated. \n\nReduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, limiting fire development preventing flash over providing the FRS.\n\n\nWith a further layer of protection for firefighters.\nCrucial time for the operational tactical plan to be implemented by the IC\, complete search and rescue operations.\nResources released earlier from the incident\, to attend other emergency incidents allowing a business-as-usual service to be maintained.\n\nFor FRS the early release of resources is paramount\, CFB have six whole time stations and 10 on call stations mainly in rural areas. For this incident 4 pumping appliances\, 1 aerial platform were  mobilised as part of the predetermined attendance. Due to the positive impact of the sprinkler system on the fire\, the incident stop message was sent 1 hour after the initial call allowing the release of all resources to be available to attend other emergencies. \nRetrofitting Sprinkler systems within tall residential buildings \nAt present there is no statutory legislation for the retrofitting of sprinklers within residential tall buildings. This incident demonstrates the benefits of installing\, retrofitting sprinklers within residential tall buildings\, demonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or for this incident extinguish the fire at an early stage of development. \nIn addition to providing attending crews with confidence when attending tall building fires which are sprinkler protected compared to other buildings which are not sprinkler protected. \n¹Optimal economics report\, Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk: An Analysis from fire service data \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler saves Spring Update No 7\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk\nCleveland Fire Brigade\nBAFSA video chip pan demonstration\, click here to open chip pan fire\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n      \n  \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/cleveland-retrofitted-tall-building-kitchen-saved-by-sprinkler-system/
LOCATION:cleveland
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Screenshot-2025-05-22-at-08.42.45.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250516
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250517
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250722T174413Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250731T152757Z
UID:10000524-1747353600-1747439999@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Cambridgeshire flat fire extinguished by sprinkler system
DESCRIPTION:Steve Flemming\, Fire Protection Manager  \n“Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue continue to support the National requirement for Sprinkler provision\, supporting their proven ability to save lives\, reduce fire damage\, and protect communities.” \n“Recent fire incidents have highlighted the devastating impact of fires that spread rapidly before emergency services arrive. The presence of sprinklers can drastically reduce fire-related injuries and fatalities.” \nSummary \nCambridgeshire Fire Rescue Service (CFRS) have reported a fire within a new purpose-built block of flats containing a mixture of 1- and 2-bedroom flats. The sprinkler system activated extinguishing the fire the cause of the fire was due to combustible material placed on the kitchen hob which had been accidentally turned on\, no injuries were reported. \nA sprinkler activation is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. This incident provides further evidence of the effectiveness\, benefits of sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nIf it was not for the change in regulatory guidance for England reducing the threshold height for the installation of sprinklers within purpose group 1a (residential block of flats) from 30m to 11m in November 2020. The outcome of this incident could have been so different. \nThe incident  \n\n 2 pumping appliances were mobilised to reports of a fire\, on arrival the incident commander (IC) established that the premises sprinkler system had activated on the second floor of the 3-storey building.\nUpon entry to the flat\, fire crews established that the heat generated from the fire activated two concealed sprinkler heads within the room of origin.\nExtinguishing the fire with minimal fire/smoke damage reported\, no further firefighting was required.\nThe sprinkler system was immediately isolated by CFRS following confirmation to the IC that the fire was out\, fortunately a contractor was onsite who directed the crews to the sprinkler pump room allowing the system to be isolated at the conclusion of the incident.\nCrews remained onsite at the conclusion of the incident to complete salvage operations assisting with the removal of water released following the activation of the sprinkler system.\n\nBusiness Recovery plan  \n Firefighters are increasingly likely to respond to incidents in buildings equipped with sprinkler systems\, it is therefore critical for building managers and duty holders to integrate an effective business recovery plan into the premises’ emergency protocols. The benefit of which will allow the fire service to efficiently manage water following sprinkler system activation during a fire or in the rare event of accidental discharge\, thereby mitigating potential disruptions to business operations or occupancy. This should include comprehensive\, clear and accessible onsite information to facilitate fire service engagement allowing the sprinkler system to be isolated following confirmation to the incident commander the fire is all out. \nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to assist evacuation\, effect rescue when necessary\nPrevent conflagration\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident\, which can lead to a significant strain on the operational resilience of Fire Rescue Service (FRS) resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service.\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 8\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for responsible persons and duty holder\n¹Optimal economics report Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk: An analysis from fire service data\nCambridgeshire FRS Sprinklers\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/cambridgeshire-flat-fire-extinguished-by-sprinkler-system/
LOCATION:Cambridgeshire
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250501T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250531T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250614T184832Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250622T133917Z
UID:10000520-1746086400-1748710800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Bristol Tall Building Air Fryer Kitchen Fire Saved By Sprinkler System
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nOur thanks to Avon Fire & Rescue Service (AFRS) for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler saves to Sprinkler Saves Uk following a kitchen fire involving an electric air fryer within a residential purpose-built block of flats extinguished by the operation of the premises residential sprinkler system with no injuries reported. \nThe air fryer is now a popular kitchen appliance with the number of dwelling fires in England with “air fryer “mentioned in the additional free text from statistics sourced from the ¹Home Office Incident recording system (IRS) increasing year on year between 2016-2024 with 146 fires reported for the year ending 2024. Due to the limitations of the Incident recording system\, it is not possible to record ‘air fryer’ as an ignition source for fires. \nThis is the second reported sprinkler activation reported to sprinkler Saves Uk involving a electric air fryer where the fire was contained\, controlled and extinguished by the sprinkler system containing the fire to the room of origin. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. The story around the incident provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect life\, firefighters\, and property from fire as part of a package of fire safety measures. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ²Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate\n\nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of Installing a residential life safety system within the dwellings of a residential tall building. \n\nReducing the spread of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nPreventing a major protracted incident\, which can compromise the operational resilience of Fire Rescue Services leading to challenges maintaining a business-as -usual service.\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to assist evacuation\, effect rescue when necessary\nPreventing the fire from spreading from the compartment of origin compromising the common ways.\nPrevent Conflagration\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to a confirmed fire following an emergency call received from AFRS fire control from the resident of the dwelling.\nUpon entry to the apartment firefighters established that the fire within the open plan flat had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 3 concealed sprinkler heads.\nMinor fire/smoke damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nFire damage was confined to the electric air fryer\, work top\, kitchen wall units located directly above the seat of the fire.\nNo further firefighting media was required by AFRS.\nNo injuries were reported\n\n \nIt is interesting looking at how the fire plume has developed\, firstly attaching itself to the wall\, proceeding to make contact with the underside of the wall unit\, spreading outwards to the front of wall units\, until it reaches the celling spreading outwards forming a smoke layer. Despite the fire being shielded by the kitchen wall units the sprinkler system was successful extinguishing the fire \n \nThe effects of the sprinkler system using water as an extinguishing medium \n The physical properties of the water should not be underestimated \n\nIt cools the fuel\, reducing further generation of flammable gases\nWater is converted to steam in the plume and the hot gases at ceiling level\, so cooling\, reducing the radiated heat\, heating the fuel\nOnce converted into steam\, it limits the amount of oxygen reaching the flames\, smothering them\nWater cools the compartment\, increasing the amount of heat it will absorb from the plume so cooling it further\n\nPrevious incident reported where sprinklers were present having an impact involving electric air fryer fire. \nNottinghamshire student accommodation tall building kitchen fire\, February 2025 \n\nFire within an open plan communal kitchen extinguished by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads\nContained to the room of origin\nMinor fire damage contained to the air fryer\, kitchen worktop\, wall units\n\nProviding further evidence that residential sprinkler systems can contain\, control and extinguish fires involving electric air fryers \nPremises Emergency Plan \n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents in buildings where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact.\nIt is essential that the building manager\, duty holder considers that the emergency planning for the building includes onsite response information allowing the emergency services to interact with the active fire protection measures.\nThe benefit of which will allow the fire service to assist in the management of water following the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy.\nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire.\nFurther guidance can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\n\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire\, to achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\nThe emergency plan\, provisions were in place allowing the sprinkler system to be reinstated at the conclusion of the incident.\n\nAir Fryers \n\nAre a relatively new cooking appliance being used in our homes\, Aviva insurance have published guidance urging people to exercise caution after a new survey revealed nearly one in five Uk adults (19%) have encountered potential or actual fire hazards in their homes due to air fryers.\nReaffirmed following recent reports of a recent fire involving an air fryer in Bournemouth extinguished by the activation of the premises sprinkler system. The cause of the fire was caused by its owner who set it alight trying a cleaning hack they saw on TikTok.\nFurther research of the incident primary fire data is required to identify a trend on the benefits of sprinklers involving air fryer fires attended by FRS in which sprinklers were present\, having an impact. Due to the limitations of the Incident recording system\, it is not possible to record ‘air fryer’ as an ignition source for fires.\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\n¹Number of dwelling fires in England with “air fryer” mentioned in the additional information free text (IRS primary fire data)\n²Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nAviva issues fire warning around air fryer habits\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\n\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n       \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/bristol-tall-building-air-fryer-kitchen-fire-saved-by-sprinkler-system/
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-12-at-08.59.55.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250501T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250531T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250614T180133Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250902T100240Z
UID:10000519-1746086400-1748710800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Bristol Residential Block of Flats E-Bicycle Sprinkler Save
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. Each of these real-life individual tangible stories provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures. \n\nReducing the impact of fire on people\, property and the environment\, reducing the risks to firefighters.\nAddressing the myths\, misconceptions regarding their safety and efficiency\, providing evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect our communities from fire.\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident\, which can lead to a significant strain on the operational resilience of Fire Rescue Service (FRS) resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service.\n\nThis is the third reported fire reported to Sprinkler Saves Uk involving a e-bike/scooter within a domestic dwelling\, on each occasion the fire was contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of the premises sprinkler system. \nAvon Fire Rescue Service (AFRS)\, report that a E-bicycle within the hallway of a four roomed flat close to the flat front door caught fire. \n\nPreventing the occupants from self-evacuating the dwelling to a place of safety.\n10 persons in the dwelling at the time of the fire sought refuge in a room until rescued by firefighters using an aerial ladder platform from the fourth floor of the building.\nThe heat generated from the fire activated 1 concealed sprinkler head directly above the seat of the fire which contained\, controlled and extinguished the fire before the arrival of AFRS.\nMinor injuries were reported for the residents rescued from the flat for smoke inhalation.\n\nFrom the two previous incidents reported. In one\, the family were unable to self-evacuate from their flat because the escape route was compromised by fire resulting in firefighters assisting\, rescuing them from their dwelling. \n\nApril 2023\, Birmingham retrofitted residential block of flats¹\n\n\nE-bicycle\, lithium-ion battery left on charge in the hallway of the flat which caught fire compromising the means of escape.\nFire extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system.\nFamily sought refuge on their external balcony until rescued by firefighters\nNo injuries reported.\n\nA West Midlands mum says her partner and her young son owe their lives to a sprinkler system \nafter it doused a fire in their high-rise home. She is quoted as saying in a West Midlands Fire & Rescue Service (WMFRS) media release: “We couldn’t get out. We were on the tenth floor. It was too high. I can tell you for sure that the sprinklers saved our lives. It is brilliant they were installed in the first place.” \n\nDecember 2024\, Gloucestershire house of multi occupancy² \n\n\nE-Bike\, lithium-ion battery left on charge within a studio flat which caught fire\n1 sprinkler head activated within the room of origin extinguishing the fire.\nResident self-evacuated the premises prior to the arrival of the FRS.\nNo injuries reported.\n\nObi Selassie\, Gloucestershire FRS Station Manager “If it was not for the activation of the sprinkler system extinguishing the fire before the arrival of the fire service\, we could be discussing a different outcome for this incident\, The benefits of sprinklers should not be underestimated they save lives and reduce injuries\, protect firefighters.” \nThe growing risk of e-bike and e-scooter fires involving lithium batteries should not be underestimated as these fires can spread rapidly and develop into larger fires within a short period of time\, potentially leading to significant uncontrollable runaway fires. Despite sprinkler protection of lithium batteries being outside the scope of current sprinkler design standards\, these incident(s) demonstrates that a sprinkler system can contain and help\, control a e-bike/scooter lithium battery fire. Reaffirming the importance of not charging batteries within your escape routes\, the dangers of lithium battery fires should not be underestimated as they can spread quickly out of control developing into significant fires within a short period of time. \nProviding further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing\, controlling the fire.\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin.\nFirefighters operated without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation.\nPrevent conflagration\n\nAdding further evidence to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted ³Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to a flat fire within a residential block of flats following an emergency call received by AFRS control.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment on arrival by the incident commander (IC) it was established that the sprinkler system on the 4 floor of the 6-storey building had operated within a 4 roomed flat.\nThe provision of the sprinkler system provided extra time for the IC to implement a robust operational tactical plan for the incident.\nUpon entry to the flat\, fire crews established that a fire within the flat hallway had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 1 concealed sprinkler head located directly above the seat of the fire.\nMinimal fire/smoke damage was reported within the hallway.\nNo further firefighting media was required by AFRS.\n10 residents were required to be rescued by firefighters via turntable ladder due to the location of the fire near the flat front door compromising the means of escape.\nCause of the fire\, accidental involving a E-bicycle.\nThe common ways of the premises were not compromised by the fire as the flat front door (FD30S) contained the fire to the flat of origin\n\n\nAll images credit AFRS\nThis incident demonstrates the benefits of installing\, sprinklers within residential tall buildings\, demonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system to BS9251 can detect\, raise the alarm\, control or extinguish the fire at an early stage of development. Providing attending crews with confidence when attending tall building fires which are sprinkler protected compared to other buildings which are not sprinkler protected. \nAFRS maintaining a business-as-usual service \nAusterity\, cuts in public funding across the country have significantly impacted FRS resulting in a significant reduction to front line cover and prevention and protection activities putting a strain on resources impacting on public safety and service delivery. Major protracted fire incidents therefore have a knock-on effect on local FRS resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service allowing an effective response to attend other emergencies. The benefits of installing sprinkler systems in the built environment for FRS should not be underestimated. \nReducing the rate of production of heat and smoke\, limiting fire development preventing flash over providing the FRS. \n\nWith a further layer pf protection for firefighters\nCrucial time for the operational tactical plan to be implemented by the IC\nTo complete search and rescue operations\nResources released earlier from the incident\, to attend other emergency incidents allowing a business-as-usual service to be maintained.\n\nDue to the positive impact following the operation of the sprinkler system\, the incident was scaled down by the IC\, allowing the release of resources to be available to attend other emergencies. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler saves Spring Update No 7\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nAvon Fire and Rescue Service\, sprinklers\n¹Sprinkler save review\, April 2023\, Birmingham retrofitted residential block of flats\n²Sprinkler Save review\, December 2024\, Gloucestershire house of multi occupancy\n³Optimal economics report\, efficiency and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link.
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/bristol-residential-block-of-flats-e-bicycle-sprinkler-save/
LOCATION:Bristol
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Flat-hallway-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250414T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250414T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250423T084052Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250429T170206Z
UID:10000511-1744617600-1744650000@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Reported Sprinkler Activations February-March 2025
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nOur gratitude to The London Fire Brigade (LFB) for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of fire sprinklers by the reporting of sprinkler activations\, rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. \nReporting incidents taken from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month(s) of February -March 2025 where Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) were reported as present\, having an impact in Greater London. Raising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of AFSS which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety benefits \nLondon Fire Brigade  \nLFB Is one of the largest\, firefighting\, community safety rescue services in the world protecting residents and property in Greater London as well as those who work or visit the capital. They report attending 126\,464 incidents of which 16\,120 were fires for the year 2023. \nLondon \nAs the capital of the United Kingdom\, London is also the largest city with a population of just over nine million and is projected to reach 10 million by 2035. It is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world. There are 32 boroughs in Greater London\, except for the City of London which is a county and government district. The risk from fire in the capital is diverse\, ranging from large industrial premises\, complex retail shopping centres\, major transport hubs\, and large high-rise residential developments. The latter is a key area as half of the population of London live in flats compared to less than 20% in the rest of the country. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of February/March 2025 where AFSS were reported as present\, having an impact in Greater London. \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role sprinklers and other forms of suppression play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler actuations from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nProviding further evidence reaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\nIncident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the Incident Commander (IC)of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups. For the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \n Each group contains questions in data fields with associated lists containing the appropriate answer options. Data collected about serious reportable fires include: \n\nTime and date of call\nFire Service or other geographical area\nType of building or vehicle\nMost likely motive (accidental or malicious)\nCause of fire (chip pan fires\, electrical\, etc.)\nSource of ignition (cigarettes\, cookers\, etc.)\nMaterials (furniture\, etc.)\nThe spread of fire (beyond room of origin\, etc.)\nThe nature of fire casualties\nRescue information and method of extinction\nThe effectiveness of automatic smoke detectors\nWere there any active safety systems present?\n\nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training\, experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene. \nThe use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. The provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nKey facts: – 13 Incidents reported. \n\n5 incidents\, where the fire was extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system\n2 incidents where the fire was contained/controlled by the activation of the sprinkler system\n1 incident where the fire was contained/controlled by the activation of the 3drencher system\n1 incident where the water mist system impact was recorded as ¹not know\n4 incidents reported where the sprinkler system did not operate\, due to\n\n\n1x Insufficient heat to operate the sprinkler system\n1x Not known\n2x Sprinkler system was not in the area where the fire occurred\n\n \nThese incidents provide further evidence\, supporting the UK research which was commissioned by The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC)\, National Fire Sprinkler Network (NFSN) and supported by BAFSA in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Across all premises types: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nIncidents AFSS were reported as present\, having an impact.  \nPost the Grenfell tower fire\, regulatory and sector changes relating to fire safety have occurred. One such change has been the increase in installations of sprinklers across the country with housing providers\, local authorities and developers committing to install sprinklers in purpose-built block of flats on a new and retrofit basis. \nOf the 13 AFSS activations reported\, 2 incidents involved\, Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys extinguished on both occasions by the operation of the sprinkler system\, providing further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling or even extinguishing the fire.\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin.\nFirefighters completing operational duties without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation.\nPrevent conflagration.\n\n1.Westminister Bus/coach station/garage \n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; corridor/hall\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nA fire involving the unsafe disposal of a cigarette within the corridor/hall of a bus station terminal was contained\, controlled by the activation of 1 sprinkler head which raised the alarm\, the fire was extinguished by crews using a 1x hose reel jet with fire spread limited to item first ignited. \n2.Westminister Takeaway\, fast food \n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Watermist\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\n2Number of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nIt is reported that a fire within the basement of a fast-food deep fat fryer restaurant was extinguished by the activation of the premises watermist system containing the fire to the room of origin. On arrival operational crews deployed a hose reel jet to extinguish remaining hotspots. \nFurther enquires would have to be made with LFB confirming the details recorded for the fixed firefighting system present\, having an impact. Typically\, the type of firefighting system found in commercial kitchens are wet chemical systems used for object protection\, kitchen areas\, fryers\, oil cookers etc and not used for area wide protection of a building. \nThe benefit of installing wet chemicals is that they provide excellent flame knockdown and surface cooling the scope of kitchen protection should include all appliances that are capable of catching fire and not just the deep fat fryers\, protection should cover ventilated ceilings/hoods\, plenums and duct entrances and should be activated simultaneously. \n2The number of water mist nozzles operated are not required to be recorded by the end user for watermist systems \n\n Kensington and Chelsea Converted Flat/Maisonettes – 3 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 2\n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a fire within a converted Victorian terraced building converted into flats\, on arrival the IC identified that the sprinkler system operated containing\, controlling the fire within a flat by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads. \nThe fire was extinguished by firefighters using 1 hose reel jet\, further enquires are ongoing to establish the cause of the fire. \n\n Southwark Restaurant/café\n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nIt is reported that the activation of 1 sprinkler head extinguished a fire within a commercial kitchen\, contained to the item first ignited with 5m² fire damage. No further firefighting was required. \n\n Waltham Forest House (single private dwelling)\n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nThe benefits of sprinklers as a life safety system reinforced following a kitchen fire involving a chip pan/deep fat fryer which was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head. Firefighters rescued two persons on arrival\,  fire spread was contained to the item first ignited with no further firefighting required by operational crews on arrival. \n6.Westminister Public House \n\nDate of Incident; March\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Drencher\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nA basement kitchen fire involving a cooking pan left unattended resulted in the attendance of 25 firefighters to control\, extinguish the fire which damaged the kitchen and the ducting. It is reported that a drencher system was present having an impact containing controlling the fire. \nThe benefits of fixed firefighting systems controlling a fire has been proven to protect property\, business and jobs with the impacted business operational within hours\, avoiding the economic and social costs. \nFurther enquires would have to be made with LFB regarding the IRS primary fire data recorded for this incident as a drencher system is designed primarily for exterior fire protection. Typically\, in commercial kitchens fixed firefighting systems such as wet chemical systems are used for object protection\, kitchen areas\, fryers\, oil cookers etc and not used for area wide protection of a building. \nThe benefit of installing wet chemicals is that they provide excellent flame knockdown and surface cooling the scope of kitchen protection should include all appliances that are capable of catching fire and not just the deep fat fryers\, protection should cover ventilated ceilings/hoods\, plenums and duct entrances and should be activated simultaneously. \n7 Newham Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys \n\nDate of Incident; March\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Living room\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 2\n\nLFB were mobilised to reports of a fire within a new purpose-built block of flats\, on arrival it was established that a living room fire within a flat had been extinguished by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads which contained\, controlled the fire to the room of origin. \nNo further firefighting was required\, the cause of the fire was reported to involve wiring\, cabling\, plugs. \n\n Westminster Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of Incident; March\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Other.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nThe benefits of installing sprinklers within a mixed-use development was reinforced following reports of a fire involving smoking materials within a flat which was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head which contained the fire to the room of origin\, no further firefighting was required by firefighters. \n4x incidents were reported where the sprinkler system did not activate which was due to either: – \n\nInsufficient heat to operate\, activate the sprinkler system.\nThe sprinkler system was not in the area where the fire\nFurther  enquiries would have to be made to establish the facts with LFB for  1 incident recorded as not known.\n\n\nCroydon Ford and drink processing\n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; 4Did not contain/control.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nIt is reported that a fire in an item of electrical equipment within a fast-food modular restaurant commercial kitchen was extinguished using a local water supply. Whilst a sprinkler system was installed no heads operated as the fire was in an area not covered by the system. \nFurther enquires would have to be made with LFB regarding the IRS primary fire data recorded for this incident as a sprinkler system is typically not found in these types of modular restaurants  Typically\, in commercial kitchens fixed firefighting systems such as wet chemical systems are used for object protection\, kitchen areas\, fryers\, oil cookers etc and not used for area wide protection of a building. \nThe benefit of installing wet chemicals is that they provide excellent flame knockdown and surface cooling the scope of kitchen protection should include all appliances that are capable of catching fire and not just the deep fat fryers\, protection should cover ventilated ceilings/hoods\, plenums and duct entrances and should be activated simultaneously. \n4Firefighting system impact\, did not contained/control the fire\, this is a typo error as the system did not activate \n\n Southwark self-contained sheltered housing \n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Not Known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nIt is reported that firefighters were called to a kitchen fire involving a microwave oven\, whilst a sprinkler system was installed within the premises it did not operate\, no firefighting was required as the heat source was removed. \n\n Kensington & Chelsea restaurant/cafe\n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Not Known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nFire crews were called to reports of a commercial kitchen fire involving a dishwasher\, no further firefighting was required on arrival with fire spread limited to item first ignited\, the sprinkler system did not operate due to insufficient heat. \n\n Hillingdon purpose-built flats/maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of Incident; March\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Not Known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nFirefighting crews were mobilised to reports of a flat kitchen fire\, it was established by the IC that no further firefighting was required as the item first ignited had been removed from the heat source. The retrofitted sprinkler system installed in 2020 within the dwellings did not activate due to insufficient heat. \n13.Wandsworth purpose-built flats/maisonettes – 10 or more storeys \n\nDate of Incident; March\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Not Known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nA small incident involving wiring\, cabling within a flat bedroom was successfully closed using a local water supply. The sprinkler system did not operate due to insufficient heat being generated by the fire within the room of origin. \nAdvice For Building Managers\, the following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. \nTo achieve this: – \n\nMaintenance\, the premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, the premises emergency plan should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system. Any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\n Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, it is a requirement of the Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures. \nFurther detailed guidance on sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, a guide for responsible persons and duty holder. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n             \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-reported-sprinkler-activations-february-march-2025/
CATEGORIES:Commercial,Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Screenshot-2025-02-23-at-21.24.20.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250401T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250630T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250914T201634Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250914T201634Z
UID:10000531-1743494400-1751302800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Greater Manchester Sprinkler Activations April- June 2025
DESCRIPTION:Scott Harrison\, Senior Fire Safety Inspector at Greater Manchester Fire & Rescue Service\, said \n“Fire sprinklers provide communities with an essential layer of fire protection. Their effectiveness is demonstrated by their role in saving lives\, reducing injuries\, and safeguarding businesses from fire-related losses.” \nIntroduction \n Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service (GMFRS) provided primary fire data from the ¹incident recording system and additional sources for the specified period\, documenting cases where Automatic Water Suppression Systems (AFSS) were present and had an impact within Greater Manchester. The term AWSS refers to sprinklers and watermist systems. \n(¹Incident recording system\, after an emergency fire call\, key incident details are entered daily into the IRS by the officer in charge.) \nA sprinkler save (activation) is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a fire. This review further substantiates the role and advantages of AWSS within the built environment. \nThe review  \n The incidents contained within this review provides additional evidence supporting the reliability and effectiveness of AWSS\, aligning with findings from the report conducted by ²Optimal Economics and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council and National Fire Sprinkler Network on the performance of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nKey facts -13 incidents reported \n\n8 AWSS activations were reported\, including 5 involving watermist systems.\nThe fire was:\n\n\nextinguished on two occasions\,\ncontained or controlled on five occasions\,\n\n\ncategorised as “other” once.\n5 incidents where AWSS did not activate:\n\n\nInsufficient heat to actuate the head\,\nFire located outside system coverage\,\nCause undetermined.\n\n \nCustodial premises and watermist \n The data in Table 1 is consistent with the ³Sprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\, showing that water mist systems are more commonly used than traditional sprinkler systems in custodial premises. \nBetween 2018/19 and 2023/2024\, data obtained through a freedom of information request from teams compiling primary fire incident data for England\, Scotland\, and Wales indicate that there were 298 recorded incidents in custodial premises where automatic water suppression systems (AWSS) had an impact. Of these\, water mist systems accounted for 255 activations\, while sprinkler systems accounted for 43. The data does not specify whether the water mist incidents involved mobile units or fixed installations. \nIncidents AFSS reported as present\, having an impact \nSupplementary evidence provided by GMFRS allowed full reviews to be completed for 2 incidents \n\nOldham supermarket sprinkler activation\, a  fire occurred in a refuse bin in the undercroft car park (21000m²) and was controlled after one sprinkler head activated; firefighters extinguished it with a water backpack. Following instructions from the incident commander\, the system was isolated\, and the store stayed closed until the sprinkler system was reinstated.\nStalybridge papermill sprinkler activation\, three pumping appliances\, one hose layer\, and an aerial platform responded to a fire at a paper mill. The incident commander identified that the fire was located on the first floor of a two-storey building and had been contained after four sprinkler heads from the premises’ sprinkler system were activated. 4x Firefighters wearing breathing apparatus were committed who proceeded to.\n\n\nExtinguish the fire with firefighting media (hose reel jets)\nVentilate the building by removing roof tiles\n\nThe outcome of this incident for the business may have been substantially different had the sprinkler system not been installed and activated\, as it played a crucial role in limiting the fire’s spread. This provided the GMFRS with essential time to implement a tactical response plan and establish a water supply to effectively extinguish the fire. The onsite private hydrants had been decommissioned\, and the nearest public water hydrants were not near the premises. \nFor context\, in August 2021\, a non-sprinklered warehouse fire in 4Coventry reported by the Business Sprinkler Alliance required ten fire appliances and seventy firefighters to suppress the blaze\, which ultimately destroyed the Ram Enterprise building at Prologis Park. The structure was demolished four days after the incident \nConclusion  \nThese two incidents provide further evidence that the main functional objectives of a sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of production of heat and smoke limiting fire growth and ultimately containing and controlling and\, in some cases\, extinguish the fire.\nPrevented a potentially extended incident that could have required considerable resources from GMFRS and impacted routine operations.\nLimited the development of the fire\, facilitating search and rescue efforts by firefighters and reducing risk to personnel.\nAverted the complete loss of the building due to fire.\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\n²Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data\n³Sprinkler Saves Review 2024/25\, This review showcases just how essential AWSS\, including sprinklers and watermist systems\, are in safeguarding our communities from the devastating effects of fire\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 8\n4Business Sprinkler Alliance\, fire destroys Coventry warehouse storing household products\nGMFRS\, Benefits of sprinklers\nGMFRS works with Biffa to highlight the benefit of sprinklers\n\n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/greater-manchester-sprinkler-activations-april-june-2025/
LOCATION:Greater Manchester
CATEGORIES:Industrial
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250401
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250501
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250902T100212Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250913T212110Z
UID:10000529-1743465600-1746057599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Lancashire Factory Fire Sprinkler Save
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nIn April 2025\, Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service (LFRS) attended a fire at an industrial manufacturing factory unit in Lancashire. The automatic water suppression system (sprinklers) was activated\, effectively containing and controlling the fire involving a printing machine and preventing further spread. Firefighters extinguished the blaze using appropriate firefighting media\, and no injuries were reported. \nThe incident  \n\nThree fire appliances were mobilised following reports of a factory fire\nOn arrival\, following the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by the incident.commander\, it was established that the premises sprinkler system had actuated on the ground floor.\n4 firefighters wearing breathing apparatus were committed\, establishing a fire involving an industrial printing machine\, which had been contained\, controlled by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads.\nFirefighting media was applied using 1 hose reel jet extinguishing the fire.\nDrone was deployed\, confirming no fire spread through exterior ducting which had been damaged by the fire.\nOn site engineers\, dismantled machinery parts from the printer allowing crews to identify that fire had been fully extinguished.\nNo injuries reported\, cause accidental due to friction igniting a build up of waste material.\nThe incident was resolved in three and a half hours.\n\nOutcome \nIn this instance\, the AFSS \n\nProvided support for firefighters by effectively containing the fire to the item first ignited playing a key role in mitigating risks for firefighter personnel.\nPreventing conflagration.\nCan safeguard assets\, minimise financial loss\, and bolster business resilience by controlling or extinguishing fires prior to the arrival of emergency services\, allowing for rapid resumption of normal operations and mitigating economic and social impacts.\n\nThis incident highlights the importance of AFSS as an active fire protection measure; research by the 1National Fire Sprinkler Network and National Fire Chief Council found that sprinklers functioned as intended in 94% of fire incidents and controlled or extinguished fires in 99% of cases across residential and non-residential buildings. \nConclusion \n\nWhat could have developed into a significant incident was resolved quickly due to the presence of the sprinkler system\, despite there being no regulatory requirement for such systems in factories.\nThis incident demonstrates the role of AWSS in comprehensive fire safety strategies\, contributing to the protection of lives\, property\, and the environment. It also supports continued efforts by the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) and the fire sector to advocate for stricter government regulations on sprinkler installation within the built environment.\nThe 2Business Sprinkler Alliance report fire crews in England attend an average of 341 industrial fires every year-nearly one a day\, fires do not discriminate whether it is a factory\, car park\, warehouse of office fires happen on a regular basis and will continue to do so in the future. AFSS can contain and extinguish fires\, safeguarding lives and businesses during critical times when they are most needed.\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 8\nNational Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) sprinkler position statement\nLancashire press release\, incident of interest\n1Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the United Kingdom: An analysis from fire service data\n2Business Sprinkler Alliance\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n  \n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lancashire-factory-fire-sprinkler-save/
LOCATION:Lancashire
CATEGORIES:Industrial
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250331
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250401
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250611T170237Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250731T152835Z
UID:10000514-1743379200-1743465599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Drencher System Saves Lancashire Business From Fire
DESCRIPTION:Credit LFRS\, Image taken from a drone capturing a major fire involving concentrated amounts of plastic stored in the open external yard.\n\n\nMatthew Hamer Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service Head of Prevention\, Protection and Road Safety \n“The presence of an automatic fire suppression system significantly influenced the outcome of this incident\, as fires continue to be a leading cause of commercial property loss. This incident required substantial effort from firefighters to prevent a major external fire from spreading to the primary building.” \n“The building was equipped with an external drencher system\, which assisted firefighting tactics and prevented the fire from spreading to the building. This incident demonstrates how an automatic water suppression system enhances the resilience of buildings and businesses against fire impact\, playing a crucial role in preventing major losses and ensuring safety.” \n\n\n“Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service support that automatic water suppression systems play a significant role in reducing the impact of fire on people\, property and the environment along with reducing the risk to firefighters.” \n\n\n\n\nIntroduction \nSignificant and costly fires can be prevented through a combination of fire strategies\, one such strategy is the use of Automatic Water Suppression Systems (AWSS) which can contain and control or in some cases extinguish a building fire before the arrival of the Fire Rescue Service. (FRS) \n\n\nThis case review demonstrates that incorporating Automatic Water Sprinkler Systems (AWSS) as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy can offer long-term protection for businesses by reducing the consequences of extensive fires. This improves the resilience of buildings and businesses against fire damage.  \n\n\nThis incident reported by Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service (LFRS) involving an external fire on an industrial estate provides further evidence that the inclusion of an AWSS\, in this case a drencher system protecting the external facade of the primary building can assist in suppressing an external fire preventing major financial losses\, minimizing the wider impact of unmanageable fires\, reducing costs to business and the economy. \n\nThe Premises \nIndustrial building with associated outbuildings\, external storage facilities protected by AWSS consisting of a premises drencher\, commercial sprinkler system. \nThe Incident \n In March 2025\, LFRS were mobilized to a well-developed fire involving concentrated amounts of plastic (Polypropylene\, a highly flammable material) stored in the open external yard area adjacent to the primary building on an industrial estate. At its height 50 firefighters\, 10 Fire Appliances\, 2 Aerial ladder platforms (ALP)\, a firefighting robot\, high volume pump were required to contain\, control and extinguish the fire. \n\nConcerns were raised by LFRS that the intense and radiated heat from the fire\, with temperatures recorded as high as 700°C\, could spread compromising the primary building housing further materials with a high fire loading. Due to the intense heat\, firefighters were initially unable to approach the building to apply firefighting medium until the fire had been contained\, controlled\, and extinguished in the external yard. \n\n\nThe manual activation of the buildings drencher system served as a crucial line of defense protecting the building’s exterior surfaces\, particularly walls\, roofs\, windows\, soffits and facia boarding\, from radiated heat and direct flame impingement from the fire. These systems can employ medium-velocity spray nozzles or specially selected nozzles for a uniform distribution of water over the protected surface. \n\n\nThe presence\, operation of the drencher system provided a crucial time frame for the incident commander to implement an operational tactical plan to establish a 300mm water-main via high volume pump to establish a water supply to tackle the fire with firefighting media. \n\n\nTwo aerial ladder platforms were used as water monitors\, in addition to main jets to contain\, control and extinguish the fire to prevent it from spreading to the primary building. Due to the extreme temperatures the building sprinkler system operated which had the benefit of wetting the building and reducing the temperature within the building. \n\n \nImage credit LFRS\n\n\nThis image shows a thermal/standard image allowing you to appreciate the intensity of the fire and its proximity to the primary building. At this point\, the fire temperature adjacent to the building was recorded at 700°C. \n\n\nThe benefits of the drencher system prevented the fire from spreading to the primary building despite the lateral elevation of the building cladding sustaining substantial fire damage because of radiated heat although this heat did transfer internally\, it did not cause the fire to spread to the interior of the building with smoke damage reported within the building. \nDue to the intense heat from the fire the building sprinkler system operated which had the extra benefit of cooling the temperature\, wetting the contents preventing further fire spread. LFRS are currently investigating the cause of the fire. \nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence of the benefits of AWSS as part of a package of fire safety measures. \n\nPreventing major financial and equipment losses for businesses.\nProtecting critical elements of its operation\, in this case saving the primary building from fire.\nProviding valuable time for FRS to implement an operational tactical action plan to extinguish the fire.\nReducing the impact of major fires\, allowing FRS to maintain normal operations\, allocating resources to other emergencies.\n\nIf it was not for the drencher/sprinkler system\, we could be reporting on another industrial fire where the premises was lost to fire with the business facing an uncertain future. \nThe Business Sprinkler Alliance report that in the year 2021/22 the FRS attended a total of 1\,842 industrial fires\, fires do not discriminate whether it is a factory\, car park\, warehouse of office fires happen on a regular basis and will continue to do so in the future. \nFires are indiscriminate\, occurring in various settings such as railway stations\, factories\, car parks\, warehouses\, and offices. They are a recurring occurrence and will likely continue to do so in the future. \nRegardless of the cause or the building\, systems like sprinklers can contain and extinguish fires\, safeguarding lives and businesses during critical times when they are most needed. \nSource \nFurther Reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data\nBusiness Sprinkler Alliance\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. The outcome of which will influence policy makers in government for change advocating the use of AWSS in all buildings\, we are concerned about. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n\n\n\n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lancashire-industrial-manufacturing-drencher-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Lancashire
CATEGORIES:Industrial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Plastics-yard-fire-after-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250301T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250331T000000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250605T133316Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250731T152901Z
UID:10000518-1740787200-1743379200@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Lancashire Recycling Centre Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Lancashire Fire Rescue Service (LFRS) have reported the following activation where the Automatic Water Suppression System (AWSS) was recorded as being present and operated having an impact. \nOperational crews were mobilised to a fire within a recycling centre building containing waste shredded plastic\, on arrival it was identified that the fire was contained within a bay in one corner of the building\, The heat from the fire activated 1 sprinkler head. \nThe fire was extinguished by using a site digger to excavate the waste turning it over dampening it down with water from 1 main jet. Half a ton of waste was destroyed by the fire with smoke damage sustained to the building \nThe National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) have reported that UK Fire and Rescue Services (FRS) attend around 300 significant fires in waste sites each year which are often difficult to extinguish requiring multiple FRS resources for significant periods of time which can have a serious impact on the local community in the short or long term\, including: \n\nThe Environmental Impact\nPublic health impacts on responders and communities\nLarge scale financial loses and disruption.\nRoad closures\nHigh demand on FRS and other agency resources\n\nFRS are fully aware of the environmental impacts of fire publishing sustainability\, environmental reports with further guidance published by the government on environmental protection\, providing further guidance for FRS on preventing and dealing with incidents with the potential to pollute. \nActive fire protection systems\, specifically AWSS should be seen as part of a holistic approach minimising fire damage as part of a greener approach from the fire sector\, which is currently overlooked. The Waste Industry Safety and Health Forum (WISH) published “Reducing Fire Risk at Waste Management Sites” good practice guidance on the latest research and information available to achieve good fire risk management which includes an appendix focusing on suppression/extinguishing/fighting systems focusing on \n\nImportance of seeking competent advice for the installation of a fire suppression system\nThe system should be proportionate to the nature and scale of waste management activities completed and associated risks.\nChoosing the appropriate fire suppression system which may include.\n\n\nSprinklers\nManual open deluge system\nDeluge/water spray systems\nMobile foam trolley\nWater monitors/cannons/curtains\n\n\nThe design\, installation and maintenance of the proposed system is covered by an appropriate UKAS-accredited third-party certification scheme.\nImportance of liaising with insurers who may have specific requirements for fire suppression systems.\n\nThe London\, Herne Hill Waste Transfer Station Fire 8 September 2023\, clearly reminds us of the dangers these types of fires can bring to the local community\, sprinklers were not fitted. \nIt is reported that. \n\n100% of the building was alight with a partial collapse.\nLFB Mobilised 15 fire appliances requiring 100 firefighters.\n2x 32 metre turntable ladders used as water towers.\nThe fire had a significant impact on the local communities.\nFire suppression was not installed.\n\n  \n       \nImages credit LFB Twitter \nDeputy Assistant Commissioner for the Southwest London Area\, Nick Davis\, said: “Firefighters have been continually tackling the fire at the waste transfer station in Herne Hill since it started on Friday morning. Controlled demolition on site allowed us to safely make progress and the fire was fully extinguished this morning\, which I know will come of huge relief to local residents. \n“This fire has had a significant impact on the communities in the surrounding area and I know how difficult it has been for people to keep their doors and windows closed during the heatwave. Local senior fire officers and members of our Community Engagement team are continuing to give advice to local residents and provide support. We are carrying out an investigation into the fire and we are fully supporting the Metropolitan Police Service’s investigation. \n“The challenging nature of the fire on site means that firefighters from across London have attended over the weekend. I would like to thank our operational staff\, control officers and enabling teams for their work to maintain our presence on site for over 80 hours and counting. \nFurther Reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 7\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. The outcome of which will influence policy makers in government for change advocating the use of AWSS in all buildings\, we are concerned about. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n        
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lancashire-recycling-centre-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Lancashire
CATEGORIES:Industrial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250221T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250221T235900
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250221T162923Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250222T090715Z
UID:10000505-1740096000-1740182340@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Reported Sprinkler Activations December 2024 -  January 2025
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nOur gratitude to The London Fire Brigade (LFB) for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of fire sprinklers by the reporting of sprinkler activations\, rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. \nReporting incidents taken from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of December 2024/January 2025 where sprinklers/watermist were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \nRaising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety benefits \nLondon Fire Brigade  \nLFB Is one of the largest\, firefighting\, community safety rescue services in the world protecting residents and property in Greater London as well as those who work or visit the capital. They report attending 126\,464 incidents of which 16\,120 were fires for the year 2023. \nLondon \nAs the capital of the United Kingdom\, London is also the largest city with a population of just over nine million and is projected to reach 10 million by 2035. It is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world. There are 32 boroughs in Greater London\, except for the City of London which is a county and government district. The risk from fire in the capital is diverse\, ranging from large industrial premises\, complex retail shopping centres\, major transport hubs\, and large high-rise residential developments. The latter is a key area as half of the population of London live in flats compared to less than 20% in the rest of the country. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of December 2024/January 2025 where AFSS were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role AFSS play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler actuations from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nProviding further evidence reaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\n Incident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the officer in charge of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups. For the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \nEach group contains questions in data fields with associated lists containing the appropriate answer options. Data collected about serious reportable fires include: \n\nTime and date of call\nFire Service or other geographical area\nType of building or vehicle\nMost likely motive (accidental or malicious)\nCause of fire (chip pan fires\, electrical\, etc.)\nSource of ignition (cigarettes\, cookers\, etc.)\nMaterials (furniture\, etc.)\nThe spread of fire (beyond room of origin\, etc.)\nThe nature of fire casualties\nRescue information and method of extinction\nThe effectiveness of automatic smoke detectors\nWere there any active safety systems present?\n\nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training\, experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene. \n The use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nKey facts  \n\n15x Incidents reported where AFSS were present.\n8x incidents where the fire was extinguished by the activation of a sprinkler system\n1x incident where the fire was contained/controlled by the activation of a sprinkler system\n1x incident where the water mist system impact was recorded as ¹not known\n5x incidents reported where the sprinkler system did not operate\, due to\n\n\nInsufficient heat to operate the sprinkler system\nSprinkler system was turned off\nSprinkler system was not in the area where the fire occurred\n\n \nThese incidents provide further evidence\, supporting the most recent UK research which was commissioned by The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC)\, National Fire Sprinkler Network (NFSN) and supported by BAFSA in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Across all premises types: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nIncidents where sprinklers\, water mist were reported as present\, having an impact.  \nPost the Grenfell tower fire\, regulatory and sector changes relating to fire safety have occurred. One such change has been the increase in installations of sprinklers across the country with housing providers\, local authorities and developers committing to install sprinklers in purpose-built block of flats on a new and retrofit basis. \nOf the 10 sprinkler/water mist activations reported\, two incidents involved tall residential building flat fires\, extinguished on both occasions by the operation of the sprinkler system\, providing further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling the fire\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin.\nFirefighters completing operational duties without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation.\nPrevent conflagration.\n\n1.Ealing Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 4 to 9 storeys \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nA flat kitchen fire involving cooking\, extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head with fire spread limited to room of origin with up to 5% fire damage reported. No further firefighting media was required by operational crews on arrival. \n\n Tower Hamlets Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 2.\n\nA fire within a flat living room was extinguished by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads\, the cause of the fire involved candle/tealights accidently knocked onto an item of furniture. No further fighting media was required by operational crews to extinguish the fire. Fire spread was limited to item first ignited with up to 5sqm fire damage reported within the dwelling. \n3.Brent self-contained sheltered housing  \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nThis incident identifies why the English government should be looking to install sprinklers into all new specialised and supported housing. If it was not for the operation of the sprinkler system\, the outcome of this incident could have been so much different. \nThe demographic change in specialised and supported housing population has resulted in an increase in the occurrence of mobility difficulties\, reduced sensory capability and cognitive difficulties\, all of which bring greater risk from fire\, in terms of likelihood of fire and vulnerability in the event of a fire. \nThe study analysis of national ³fire data\, an in-depth review of fire-related fatalities and severe casualties in England\, 2010/11 to 2018/19 referenced that while there is a lack of recent research on fatal fires\, the available studies consistently identified age\, the presence of an impairment such as physical disability\, smoking\, and alcohol use as key factors on the outcome of the fire\, as they will be less able to respond to a fire. \nA bedroom fire involving smoking materials was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head\, limiting fire damage to item first ignited with 6-10sqm of fire damage reported. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued\, The provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nFire protection is dependent on both passive and active fire systems such as sprinklers working in unison providing a further layer of safety from fire as part of a package of fire safety measures\, in reducing the impact of fire on people\, firefighters\, property and the environment. \n4/5.Camden Hospital \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nHospitals are a vital community asset\, yet at present there is no statutory requirements for sprinklers to be provided in hospitals in England except for high rise (more than 30m) and in certain commercial enterprises contained within hospital buildings. \nThe National Fire Chiefs Council report that the Department of Health and Social Care in England’s Health Technical Memorandum (HTM) 05-02: Fire risk in management in healthcare premises recommends the installation of sprinkler systems in hospitals. This document encourages sprinklers but does not mandate them\, a recommendation that hospitals are choosing to ignore. \nIt is therefore refreshing to report that the benefits of sprinklers in hospitals were clearly demonstrated following two fires within two days in the same large NHS Hospital involving batteries or generators which were extinguished on both occasions by the operation of one sprinkler head limiting fire damage to the room of origin on both occasions. \nCompare this to the events of 2008/09 which saw five significant fires at NHS sites in London which required the evacuation of part or whole of the building.  Resulting in a report to be published by NHS London “Review of five London Hospital fires and their management” to identify the lessons identified from the incidents allowing the ongoing development for the planning for the evacuation and shelter of people in healthcare premises. \nDisappointingly no reference is made within the publication regarding the benefits of sprinklers for healthcare premises as part of a package of fire safety measures. \n.6. Havering recycling plant  \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Water mist.\nImpact of AFSS; Not known.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; Not known.\n\nOn a regular basis the national press report multi-agency responses to large fires involving waste sites\, recycling plants impacting the local community\, environment. The outcome road closures\, residents required to close windows doors due to harmful smoke containing harmful contaminants resulting in a major environmental impact. \nWhen you compare this to the above-mentioned incident involving a water mist system that operated following a fire involving industrial equipment limiting fire damage to item first ignited with up to 5sqm fire damage\, the fire was extinguished by operational crews using a hose reel jet via pumping appliance. \nThis incident reinforces that one of the most effective strategies for containing\, controlling or extinguishing these types of fires is by the operation of an AFSS the benefit: – \n\nMinimise the impact of unmanageable fires.\nReducing costs to business/economy.\nPrevent conflagration.\nReduce the environmental impact.\n\n7. City of London Shopping Centre \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 2.\n\nA fire within a commercial unit kitchen involving cooking was extinguished by the operation of two sprinkler heads\, fire spread was limited to item first ignited with no further firefighting required by operational crews. \nBusiness continuity\, due the positive impact of the sprinkler system\, the commercial unit opened the following day for business. \nIn shopping centres\, it is common practice to protect the commercial unit/shop unit with fire sprinklers to contain the fire. Fire sprinklers are not normally installed in the malls due to the limited combustible loading allowed in these zones. Fires have significant impact on business continuity which can lead to business closures\, major impact on the local environment\, requiring major FRS resources. \nFor example\, a fire that occurred in July 2019 at the Walthamstow Mall requiring over 20 fire appliances and more than 110 firefighters to extinguish the fire. The shopping centre remained closed for two months with the damaged portion of the mall reopening in October 2020. \nShopping centres are complex buildings that often include a variety of uses within them\, leisure areas\, hotels\, apartments\, cinemas and offices. Therefore\, retail centres require a high standard of management compared to other building uses. \nWhich extends to ensuring the premises fire safety systems are operable in the event of a fire including fire sprinklers\, fire alarm system\, dry/wet risers\, smoke extraction units and fire curtains. To highlight this\, LFB published an open letter in 2020\, to those responsible for fire safety in shopping centres. Highlighting the importance of maintaining fire safety systems including the premises fire sprinkler system. \n\n Hillingdon Other Residential Home\n\n\nDate of incident; January 2025.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nThis incident provides further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system installed\, maintained in accordance with the appropriate codes and standards reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nA bedroom fire within a 3-storey building was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head which contained the fire to room of origin\, fire damage limited to item first ignited enquires are ongoing to identify the cause of the fire. \n\n City of London Pub/Wine bar/bar\n\n\nDate of incident; January 2025.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nA fire involving a faulty fan heater electrical appliance was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head which extinguished the fire\, no further firefighting media was required by LFB. \n\n Ealing Other Industrial Plant \n\n\nDate of incident; January 2025.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained and control.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nA fire involving a laundry warehouse was contained/controlled by the activation of 4 sprinkler heads on the first floor before the arrival of LFB. The fire was extinguished by operational crews wearing Breathing Apparatus using a high-pressure hose reel. \nAn area approximately covering two square metres was damaged by fire\, smoke damaged one hundred percent of the upper floor\, there were no reports of any injuries. The fire is believed to have been accidental caused by the self-heating of textiles which often become contaminated with oil\, most commonly linseed massage and cooking oil on tea towels\, tablecloths. \nWhen you compare this to a major blaze reported by the Business Sprinkler Alliance at the K Laundry in Ramsgate in 2024 where the 1\,800m² laundry facility was destroyed in the blaze. The loss of the building will cause major disruption for the established business\, The premises was not sprinkler protected. \nIncidents where sprinklers were present\, not having an impact  \n5x incidents were reported where the sprinkler system did not activate which was due to either: – \n\nInsufficient heat to operate\, activate the sprinkler system.\nThe system was not operational as it had been turned off.\nThe sprinkler system was not in the area where the fire occurred.\n\n11.Kingston Upon Thames Other Entertainment Venue \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; N/A\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated\, N/A\n\nA fire involving a white goods appliance\, dishwasher was confined to the item first ignited with limited fire damage reported\, no firefighting action was required with the electrical connection to the appliance disconnected. \nThe premises sprinkler system did not operate which was due to insufficient heat generated by the fire allowing the nearest head to operate. \n12.Southwark Recycling Plant \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; N/A.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A.\n\nA fire involving an appliance or equipment was extinguished by one main branch/jet with fire spread limited to the room of origin. The premises sprinkler system did not activate as the system was turned off at the time of the fire. \n\n Recycling Plant\n\n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; N/A.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A.\n\nA fire in a canteen microwave was extinguished with a handheld fire extinguisher\, containing the fire to the room of origin. The sprinkler system located on the same floor as the fire did not activate due to insufficient heat from the fire. \n\n City of London Underground car park\n\n\nDate of incident; January 2025.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; N/A.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A.\n\nA fire involving batteries/generators within a parking garage was extinguished by the application of a dry powder extinguisher\, fire spread to item first ignited. The premises sprinkler system did not operate as insufficient heat was generated to activate the nearest sprinkler head. \n\n Southwark Restaurant/Cafe\n\n\nDate of incident; January 2025.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; N/A.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A.\n\nA kitchen fire involving cooking was extinguished by the application of a handheld fire extinguisher with one person suffering a minor injury The sprinkler system did not operate as the location of the fire was not in an area protected by the system.   \nAdvice For Building Managers\, the following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. \nTo achieve this: – \n\nMaintenance\, the premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, the premises emergency plan should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system. Any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\n Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, it is a requirement of the Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures. \nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk\nReview of five hospital fires and their management\nBAFSA Information file technical guidance No 3 Using water mist in buildings and structures\nMRW publication\, Ian Cox Waste sites need sprinkler protection\n³Fire data\, an in-depth review of fire-related fatalities and severe casualties in England\, 2010/11 to 2018/19\nBusiness Sprinkler Alliance\, blaze destroys century old Kent laundry\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n                 \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-reported-sprinkler-activations-december-2024-january-2025/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250211
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250212
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250224T082208Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250408T055541Z
UID:10000506-1739232000-1739318399@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Nottinghamshire Student Accommodation Saved By Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit image Nationwide Fire Sprinklers Ltd\nGroup Manager Chris Emmott\, Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue \n“Sprinklers are one of the most effective methods of fire protection\, offering automatic activation to suppress fires before they spread. \n“We are thankful that this building had a working sprinkler system in place. This could have been a much worse situation\, but thanks to the prompt response from the sprinklers\, we were able to extinguish the fire quickly and keep everyone safe.” \nWhile the sprinkler system helped mitigate the damage\, this incident serves as a reminder of the importance of fire safety in the kitchen. \n “Many families across Nottinghamshire own an air fryer\, so it is crucial that users are aware of the fire risks that may come with it. We are seeing an increase in fires involving air friers\, and we have attended nine in the last ten months\, so we are urging families to use them safely.” \n“Appliances such as air fryers should never be left unattended when in use\, and when using them\, we advise that they are in a ventilated area and not used under a cupboard or overhead cabinet.” \n“Never overfill them\, clean it after every use\, and never plug an air fryer\, or any appliance for that matter\, into an extension lead.” \n“Finally\, I want to remind occupants to never fight a fire themselves – get out\, stay out\, and call 999.” \nIntroduction  \nThe British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) is the UK’s leading professional trade association for the fire sprinkler industry. Our primary objectives include providing authoritative information on the benefits of fire sprinkler systems and how fire sprinklers can play a significant role in saving life and property from the devastating effects of fire. \nOne way to achieve this is to demonstrate the vital role sprinklers play in fire safety arrangements by highlighting real tangible examples of where they have actuated and in doing so\, saved life and property from fire. The outcome of which will entice others in the housing sector or providing sleeping accommodation to install fire sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures reducing the impact of fire on people\, property\, and the environment. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. The story around the incident provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect life\, firefighters\, and property from fire. \nThe most recent ¹UK research commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network and supported by British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Key data revealed that across all premises types: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThis reported sprinkler activation involving student accommodation supports this evidence. \nOur gratitude to Nottingham Fire Rescue Service\, Nationwide Sprinklers Ltd for rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council to collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk. The outcome of which will allow a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their essential role is suppressing and/or extinguishing the fire. \nDemonstrating the vital role sprinklers play in fire safety arrangements by highlighting real life tangible examples of where they have actuated and in doing so saved life and protected property. The resources will benefit the collective aim of enhancing protection against fire through the increased acceptance and installation of fire sprinklers\, driving a culture of change so they are understood and become a more widespread protection measure across the UK. \nIt cannot be stressed how important active systems such as fire sprinklers are providing effective fire protection requires a balanced approach to the provision of passive and active elements. The use of a combined approach plays a significant role reducing the impact of fire on people\, reduce the risk to firefighters\, property and the environment and increase sustainability. \nBackground \nThis is the fourth reported sprinkler save reported by Nottingham Fire Rescue Service in the past 12 months with 3 of the incidents involving student accommodation. On each occasion the fire was contained/controlled or extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system providing further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential life safety sprinkler system installed\, maintained in accordance with the appropriate codes and standards reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape or be rescued. \nStudent Accommodation  \nThe danger of student accommodation fires cannot be underestimated as this was clearly demonstrated following the fire in Bolton involving the premises known as the ‘Cube’ November 2019. The speed with which the fire took hold and the devastating impact it had on the building was shocking\, sprinklers were not fitted. Student accommodation Is undoubtedly a challenging environment from a fire safety perspective with their own individual challenges. The student’s lifestyle is typically associated with a reduced level of caution when it comes to appreciating risk. \nLondon Fire Brigade reported that over the past 5 years London firefighters have attended more than 1\,200 cooking-related fires and false alarms in university students’ halls involving kitchen activities\, unattended cooking which can escalate into a fire. \nLegislation \nRegulatory guidance for England includes a specific requirement to install sprinklers in purpose group 1a (residential block of flats) with a top floor height of 11 metres above ground level this guidance does not apply to student halls of residence regardless of height. \nEngland’s national building and fire safety regulations trail behind its neighbours\, governments in other UK jurisdictions who have set lower mandatory thresholds for the installation of sprinklers in new purpose-built student accommodation. Following the introduction of new fire regulations within Northern Ireland\, fire sprinklers are now required in within student accommodation with a storey more than 11m above ground level which will come into effect on 6 May 2025 \nIt is the view of British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) and the National Fire Chiefs Council that sprinklers should be installed in all new student accommodation regardless of height\, as well as existing buildings undergoing refurbishment. The Government should be looking to emulate the policies in the devolved governments to support unitary policy across nations by lowering or removing the acceptable height\, floor area\, or occupancy threshold dependent on building type. \nThe premises/sprinkler system \n\nNottinghamshire Student accommodation (timber framed construction) of 4 floor\nProtected by a life safety residential sprinkler system as part of a package of fire safety measures.\nSpecification\, BS9251:2005\n\nSprinkler head VK457 concealed pendent sprinkler\nWater supply Pump/tank 30-minute suppl\n\n\n\nImage of one of the VK457 concealed sprinkler pendant heads which actuated \n \nThe Incident  \n\nFirefighters were mobilised to a student accommodation block fire.\nOn arrival firefighters established the fire involved an electric air fryer\nExtinguished by the activation of two sprinkler heads located within the open plan communal kitchen.\nThe occupants self-evacuated with one casualty treated on the scene for smoke inhalation.\nThe intensity of the heat from the fire activated a further sprinkler head disengaging the cover plate only.\nFire damage was contained to the air fryer\, kitchen worktop\, cupboard area due to the activation of the sprinkler system which prevented the fire from spreading from the compartment of origin.\n1x Carbon dioxide extinguish was used to extinguish a hot spot located beneath the kitchen cupboard\n\n             \nImages credit Nationwide Sprinklers Ltd\nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling the fire\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin\nFirefighters operated without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation\nPrevent conflagration\n\nWhen comparing this incident to a similar air fryer kitchen fire in Weymouth in December 2024 where the premises was not sprinkler protected\, the difference is startling\, the kitchen was severely damaged by the fire. \nNo Sprinklers                                                                        Sprinklers \n           \nImage credit Dorset and Wiltshire FRS                                                                 image credit Nationwide Fire Sprinklers Ltd\nThe images reaffirm the benefits of installing a residential life safety sprinkler system for sleeping accommodation preventing the fire from spreading from the compartment of origin. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nIt was refreshing that that the emergency plan for this incident allowed for an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy. \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire\, to achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\nThe emergency plan\, provisions were in place allowing the sprinkler system to be reinstated at the conclusion of the incident.\n\nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to assist evacuation\, effect rescue when necessary\nPrevent conflagration\n\nAir Fryers \nAre a relatively new cooking appliance being used in our homes\, Aviva insurance have published guidance urging people to exercise caution after a new survey revealed nearly one in five Uk adults (19%) have encountered potential or actual fire hazards in their homes due to air fryers. \nReaffirmed following recent reports of a recent fire involving an air fryer in Bournemouth extinguished by the activation of the premises sprinkler system. The cause of the fire was caused by its owner who set it alight trying a cleaning hack they saw on TikTok. \nFurther research of the incident primary fire data is required to identify a trend on the benefits of sprinklers involving air fryer fires attended by FRS in which sprinklers were present\, having an impact. Due to the limitations of the Incident recording system\, it is not possible to record ‘air fryer’ as an ignition source for fires. \nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nNFCC AFSS Position Statement\nDorset and Wiltshire FRS kitchen air fryer fire\nLFB Press release 1200 Cooking related fires and false alarms in student accommodation\nBBC TikTok air fryer ‘hack’ blamed for fire\nAviva issues fire warning around air fryer habits\nNFRS Press Release\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n       
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/nottinghamshire-student-accommodation-saved-by-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Nottinghamshire
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/5d07fa9e-a3d9-417e-b0ec-502cae20fdb1.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250202T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250202T120000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250210T093353Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250224T082233Z
UID:10000499-1738454400-1738497600@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Fleet Residential Electrical Cupboard Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit Image Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service \nIntroduction \nThe British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) is the UK’s leading professional trade association for the fire sprinkler industry. Our primary objectives include providing authoritative information on the benefits of fire sprinkler systems and how fire sprinklers can play a significant role in saving life and property from the devastating effects of fire. \nOne way to achieve this is to demonstrate the vital role sprinklers play in fire safety arrangements by highlighting real tangible examples of where they have actuated and in doing so\, saved life and property from fire. The outcome of which will entice others in the housing sector or providing sleeping accommodation to install fire sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures reducing the impact of fire on people\, property\, and the environment. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. The story around the incident provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect life\, firefighters\, and property from fire. \nThe most recent ¹UK research commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network and supported by British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Key data revealed that across all premises types: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\n \nThis post fire review supports this evidence. \nOur gratitude to Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service for rising the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council to collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk. The outcome of which will allow a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their essential role is suppressing and/or extinguishing the fire. \nThe resources will benefit the collective aim of enhancing protection against fire through the increased acceptance and installation of fire sprinklers\, driving a culture of change so they are understood and become a more widespread protection measure across the UK. \nIt cannot be stressed how important active systems such as fire sprinklers are. Providing effective fire protection requires a balanced approach to the provision of passive and active elements. The use of a combined approach plays a significant role reducing the impact of fire on people\, reduce the risk to firefighters\, property and the environment and increase sustainability. \n The Premises\, low rise residential block of flats of 4 floors containing 22 flats. \nDescription of incident  \nA small fire within a flat electrical cupboard contained\, controlled by the provision of both the passive and active fire safety measures playing a combined approach\, completing the roles of one another. The electrical cupboard fire door was in the closed position at the time of the incident which prevented the fire from spreading from the compartment of origin compromising the means of escape. One concealed sprinkler head located within the cupboard activated which extinguished the fire before the arrival of the emergency services. \nThe images of the incident clearly demonstrate the benefits of sprinklers as a life safety system. \n        \nCredit images Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service \nKey Facts  \n\nThe fire was extinguished\, controlled within the compartment of origin\, no direct fire damage reported within the dwelling.\nThe activation of the sprinkler system reduced the heat output from the fire by reducing its growth\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nNo further firefighting media was required by the emergency services\nThe sprinkler system provided vital protection for the residents dwelling\, belongings\, personal processions.\nNo injuries were reported.\n\nDebunking the myths: – When one sprinkler activates\, they all activate. Fact\, only the sprinkler head(s) directly affected by the fire is activated. \n When you compare this incident to a similar electrical flat cupboard fire in London in May 2021 involving a residential tall building where sprinklers were not installed the outcome was far different.  The fire spread from the compartment of origin on the eight-floor resulting in a 20-pump fire  \n\nFire spread to the exterior of the building affecting balconies directly above\nFlat of origin 80% damaged by fire\n67 residents’ self-evacuated prior to arrival of the FRS\nMajor incident declared mass evacuation of the block implemented\n22 smoke hoods used to rescue residents\n34 residents rescued\n\nFurther details on the incident can be found in. the LFB\, New Providence Wharf fire report. \n\n  This review provides further evidence that a correctly designed and installed life safety sprinkler system. \n\n\nCan detect and control a fire at an early stage of development and activate an alarm.\nOperation of the system rapidly reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nAssist firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development\, which significantly reduces the risk to firefighters.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nLinks/sources \n\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data In support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Winter Update No 6\nHampshire& Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service press release\nLFB\, New Providence Wharf report\nBAFSA Information file\, a guide for responsible persons and duty holder\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging the FRS to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n         
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/fleet-residential-electrical-cupboard-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Fleet
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/20250201_171238-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250201T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250228T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250408T055449Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250509T070804Z
UID:10000510-1738396800-1740762000@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Devon Residential Tall Building Kitchen Saved By Sprinkler System
DESCRIPTION:Julia Aylott\, Devon & Somerset Fire Rescue Service Fire Safety Manager  \n\n\n“This is another good example of where retrofitting a sprinkler system into a higher risk building (HRB) gives many benefits.  As a Regulator\, Fire Rescue Services are uncovering more and more building defects within HRBs in our communities. Automatic fire suppression systems as part of a package of fire safety measures are the focus of remediation due to the benefits they provide\, saving lives\, reducing injuries protecting firefighters.” \n\n\nSummary \n\nOur thanks to Devon & Somerset Fire Rescue Service (DSFRS) and Plymouth Community Homes (PCH) for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler saves to Sprinkler Saves UK following a small kitchen fire within a residential purpose-built block of flats extinguished by the operation of the premises residential sprinkler system. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. Each of these real-life individual tangible stories provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures. \n\nReducing the impact of fire on people\, property and the environment\, reducing the risks to firefighters.\nAddressing the myths\, misconceptions regarding their safety and efficiency\, providing evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect our communities from fire.\n\nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of \n\nRetrofitting a residential sprinkler system within the dwellings\, common ways of a single staircase purpose-built block of flats of 16 storeys.\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident\, which can lead to a significant strain on the operational resilience of Fire Rescue Service (FRS) resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service.\n\n\nThe decision by PCH to  retrofit  life safety sprinkler systems within their residential tall building property portfolio was demonstrated following reports of an accidental kitchen flat fire involving a freestanding electric cooker/hob which was accidentally switched on setting light to household items which had been left on top of the hob\, no persons were present in the dwelling at the time of the fire with no injuries reported. \n\nThe heat generated from the fire\, activated 1 sidewall sprinkler head within the kitchen which immediately allowed a fire signal to be transmitted to the remote alarm receiving centre allowing the appropriate emergency response from DSFRS.The operation of the sprinkler system restricted the growth of the fire\, extinguishing the fire before the arrival of DSFRS. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n The Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to a confirmed fire following an emergency call received from PCH remote alarm receiving centre\, resulting in a high rise pre-determined attendance mobilised by DSFRS fire control.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by the incident commander (IC) on arrival\, it was established that the building fire alarm indicator panel located on the ground floor foyer had activated\, confirming the operation of the premises sprinkler system on the 15 floor of the 16-storey building.\nThe provision of the sprinkler system provided extra time for the IC to implement a robust operational high rise tactical plan for the incident.\nUpon entry to the flat\, fire crews established that a fire within a kitchen had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 1 sidewall sprinkler head located within the room of origin.\nMinimal fire/smoke damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nFire damage was confined to the household items located on the hob at the time of the fire.\nNo further firefighting media was required by DSFRS.\nThe sprinkler system for the individual flat was isolated by DSFRS following confirmation to the IC that the fire was all out.\nNo injuries were reported.\n\nImage of the activated sidewall kitchen sprinkler head \n \nThe danger of fires within the kitchen was demonstrated following a recent fire in Weymouth involving an electric air fryer\, the kitchen was severely damaged by the fire as the premises was not protected by a sprinklers system \n  \nImage credit Dorset and Wiltshire FRS\nResidential Sprinkler Specification \n\nInstalled to BS9251:2014\nCategory 3 system enhanced to provide a 60-minute minimum duration of supply\nWater supplies designated tank\nCoverage\, flats and communal areas\nIsolation valves installed for each dwelling/floor\nResilience: Back up pump\, UPS back up power supply\n\nObservations \nDFRS maintaining a business-as-usual service \nAusterity\, cuts in public funding across the country have significantly impacted FRS resulting in a significant reduction to front line cover and prevention and protection activities putting a strain on resources impacting on public safety and service delivery. \nMajor protracted fire incidents therefore have a knock-on effect on local FRS resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service allowing an effective response to attend other emergencies. The benefits of installing sprinkler systems in the built environment for FRS should not be underestimated. \n\nReduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, limiting fire development preventing flash over.\n\nProviding the FRS. \n\nWith a further layer pf protection for firefighters allowing search\, rescue operations to be completed\nCrucial time for the operational tactical plan to be implemented by the IC\nThe facility to release resources earlier from the incident\, to attend other emergency incidents allowing a business-as-usual service to be maintained.\n\nFor FRS such as DSFRS\, the early release of resources is paramount as it only has two wholetime stations and 10 stations with both wholetime and on call crews with 69 on call stations. For this incident DSFRS\, required 18 resources which included 40 firefighters/officers to be mobilised as part of the predetermined attendance for a high-rise fire. \nDue to the positive impact following the operation of the sprinkler system\, the incident was scaled down by the IC\, allowing the early release of multiple resources to be available for other emergencies. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler saves reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the FRS to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy. Debunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nBenefits of Joint Working  \nPCH should be acknowledged for having the forefront to focus on business continuity management. Joint familiarisation visits completed with DSFRS allowing the appropriate information for the IC to plan and respond to an incident within a high-rise building. The outcome of which allowed the location and provision of the sprinkler system to be identified allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned on arrival. \nRetrofitting Sprinkler systems within tall residential buildings \nAt present there is no statutory legislation for the retrofitting of sprinklers within residential tall buildings. This incident demonstrates the benefits of installing\, retrofitting sprinklers within residential tall buildings\, demonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or for this incident extinguish the fire at an early stage of development. In addition to providing attending crews with confidence when attending tall building fires which are sprinkler protected compared to other buildings which are not sprinkler protected. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler saves Spring Update No 7\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk\nDSFRS Sprinklers\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n             \n\n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/devon-residential-tall-building-kitchen-saved-by-sprinkler-system/
LOCATION:Devon
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Screenshot-2025-04-04-at-11.26.08.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250108
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250109
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250214T103257Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250221T162101Z
UID:10000502-1736294400-1736380799@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Wales Primary School Sprinkler Activation Save
DESCRIPTION:Overview \nWhen you read real life tangible examples of where fire sprinklers have actuated containing\, controlling or even in some cases extinguishing school fires\, you ask yourself why are sprinklers still not mandatory for newly constructed school buildings in England with the benefits they bring protecting: – \n\nThe school\, in terms of life safety/property.\nThe environment reducing Co2 emissions.\nStudents course work\, teachers teaching aids\, resources\nVital local community resource.\n\nIn a recent article contained with in RICS Journal by Ian Cox\,  Chairman of the Business Sprinkler Alliance\, Ian references “when you consider the huge costs associated with school fires-such as rebuilding\, temporary relocation\, loss of equipment and pupils work\, as well as the emotional and physical upheaval- we are still not learning the lessons about fire and its impact when schools are built without sprinkler systems. \nIt is a requirement in Scotland and a condition of government funding in Wales\, but despite the rising number of school fires since the lockdowns of 2020/21 there is no requirement in England or Northern Ireland for the installation of sprinklers. \nThe National Fire Chiefs Council report that in May 2021\, the government announced a proposal to make the installation of sprinklers mandatory in new schools over 11m in height\, However\, given that only a few schools currently meet this threshold\, the benefits of this proposal are likely to be limited. When replying to the consultation on these proposals\, NFCC was clear that their strongly held belief is that they constitute a lessening of standards from previous guidance. \nThe original guidance\, when first released in 2007\, acknowledged the important role of sprinklers and stated that “all new schools should have fire sprinklers installed except in a few low-risk schools.” The proposed changes in the guidance are a retrograde step and represent a real lessening of standards in this area. \nNow approaching 4 years since the government first consulted on a revised version of Building Bulletin 100: design for fire safety in schools\, we are still waiting for a decision to be announced. \nOur thanks to Mid & West Wales Fire & Rescue Service rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council encouraging FRSs to collate report sprinkler activations to sprinkler saves uk.  In this case promoting a primary school fire which was extinguished by the activation of the premises fire sprinkler system. \nIf it was not for the decision by the Welsh government for sprinklers to be installed in schools\, we could be discussing a different outcome for this incident. \nThe Incident \n\nDate of incident; January 2025\nLocation; Wales\nUse of building; Primary School\nNumber of floors; 2\nLocation of fire; Storeroom\nAutomatic fire suppression system; Sprinklers\nFire Rescue Service; Mid & West Wales Fire & Rescue Service (MAWWFRS)\n\nIt is reported that following a malicious act\, 5% of a classroom storeroom was damaged by fire which was successfully contained\, controlled and extinguished within the room of origin by the activation of 1 sprinkler head with no injuries reported. \nNo further firefighting media was required by the fire service on arrival\, the school was closed following the fire\,  opening fully the following day with only minimal fire damage sustained to the classroom storeroom\, with no impact on the student’s education. \nThe outcome of this fire could have been so much different if this incident had been in England. When you compare this to the three major school fires in Derbyshire that were all severely damaged by fire in May/October 2020\, where sprinklers were not fitted. \n\nHarrington Junior school fire 28 May 2020\nRavensdale Infant School\, 5 October 2020\nSt Mary’s Catholic Voluntary Academy\, in Darley Abbey\, 3 October 2020\n\n \nCredit image Derbyshire Fire Rescue Service Ravensdale Infant School \nThese fires have resulted in the agreement of a statement of intent\, between Derbyshire Fire and Rescue\, and Derbyshire County Council for sprinklers to be installed in new-build schools and those undergoing renovation\, which should be applauded. \nThis incident clearly demonstrates the importance of protecting educational premises with sprinklers. \n\nMinimal fire damage within the compartment of origin.\nBusiness continuity\, the school opened fully the following day.\nMinimal impact on the students education.\nNo injuries reported.\n\nWithout the fire sprinkler system\, there would have been significant damage to the school\, potential risk of injury to members of staff\, firefighters. \nFurther case studies where fire sprinklers were reported as present and having a impact in educational premises is referenced in the BAFSA report (link below) focusing on :- \n\n10 sprinkler saves involving schools between the period November 2021 to May 2023.\nCompound fire data\, identifying 65 educational activations for the period 2018/19 to 2021/22 where sprinklers were present\, operated by floor\, location identifying:\n\n\nSecondary schools accounted for the highest number of incidents.\nHalf of the incidents were malicious acts involving toilets/changing rooms\, reinforcing the problem of arson in schools.\n\nLinks \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nMid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service Sprinklers\nSprinkler Saves Update No 2 link to the NFCC Sprinkler Saves UK report\nReporting a sprinkler save\nRICS Journals article by Ian Cox Chairman Business Sprinkler Alliance ‘Why isn’t England Mandating School Sprinklers”\nNFCC\, Automatic Water Suppression Systems Policy Statement
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/wales-primary-school-sprinkler-activation-save/
CATEGORIES:Commercial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250101T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250131T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250205T112020Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250205T112020Z
UID:10000501-1735718400-1738342800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Warwickshire Supermarket Superstore Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Matthew Pardoe\, Warwickshire Fire Rescue Service Station Manager \n“If it was not for the prompt activation of the store sprinkler system containing\, controlling and in this case extinguishing the fire\, we could be discussing a different outcome for this incident. These types of premises contain high fire loading with unique fire hazards due to the large amounts of stock stored on site increasing the risk of rapid fire spread in the event of a fire. The benefits of sprinklers should not be underestimated they save lives and reduce injuries\, protect firefighters.” \nOur gratitude to Warwickshire Fire and Rescue Service for rising the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council to collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk. The outcome of which will allow a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their essential role is suppressing and/or extinguishing the fire. \nThe resources will benefit the collective aim of enhancing protection against fire through the increased acceptance and installation of fire sprinklers\, driving a culture of change so they are understood and become a more widespread protection measure across the UK. \nThe Incident  \n\nDate of Incident January 2025\nProperty type; Shop and Commercial (Large Supermarket)\nIncident; Fire\nLocation of fire; toilet area\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers\n\nTwo fire appliances were mobilised following the manual activation of the premises fire alarm by staff who discovered a fire adjacent to the first-floor toilets. The premises emergency plan was immediately implemented with the store evacuated with no injuries reported before the arrival of Warwickshire Fire and Rescue Service. \nOn arrival\, the incident commander completed a dynamic risk assessment establishing that a fire had been extinguished on the first floor of the premises by the premises sprinkler system\, further firefighting media was not required to be applied by operational crews. Enquires are ongoing by Warwickshire Police to establish the cause of the fire. \nDisappointingly\, once again no mention was made in the local press regarding the positive role of the sprinkler system which allowed a successful conclusion to this incident. The danger of supermarket fires should not be underestimated\, firefighters in Gloucester were put at risk when tackling superstore fire in 1996 in Staple Hill which sadly resulted in the loss of life firefighter Fleur Bard\, on this occasion sprinklers were not fitted. \nAt present it is still not compulsory to install fire sprinkler systems in new single-storey supermarkets and superstores\, Part B of the building regulations requires the installation of sprinklers in uncompartmented areas of shops or self-storage buildings of more than 2000 square metres. \nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\nWarwickshire Fire and Rescue Service\, Fire safety sprinkler systems\nNFCC Sprinkler Saves\n\n     
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/warwickshire-supermarket-superstore-sprinkler-activation/
CATEGORIES:Commercial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250101
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250501
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250603T083956Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250731T152933Z
UID:10000513-1735689600-1746057599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:West Midlands Fire Service Sprinkler Activations January-April 2025
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nSix incidents have been reported by West Midlands Fire Service (WMFS) where sprinklers were present\, having an impact for the above-mentioned period. Raising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Water Suppression Systems (AWSS) which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures. \nEmbracing the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) who actively encourage fire services to collate\, promote case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK to promote the effectiveness of sprinklers in operating and controlling and in some cases extinguishing the fire. The outcome of which will continue to promote a better understanding of the benefits of AFSS in the wider community\, fire safety sector in general as an effective and reliable fire protection measure as part of a package of fire safety measures protecting life and property from fire. \nProviding further evidence as part of our campaign driving change so AWSS are understood and accepted as the norm and not the exception\, the outcome of which will. \n\nInfluence policy makers to strengthen AWSS requirements\, England’s sprinkler fire safety regulations trail behind its neighbours.\nGovernments in other UK jurisdictions have set lower mandatory thresholds for the installation of sprinklers.\nEntice housing provider stakeholders and\, others to install sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures providing a further layer of protection from fire for our communities.\n\nWest Midlands Fire Service¹ \nIs the second largest in England\, operates 38 stations and various emergency response vehicles staffed by more than 1\,350 firefighters and officers. In 2023\, it responded to 30\,000 incidents. \nActively promotes the installation of AWSS in high-risk areas. \nRegulatory and sector changes relating to fire safety have occurred since the Grenfell tower fire. One such change has been the increase of sprinkler installations across the country with housing providers\, local authorities and developers committing to install sprinklers in purpose-built block of flats on a new and retrofit basis. In 2017\, Birmingham City Council (BCC) decided to retrofit fire sprinklers in 213 purpose-built blocks of flats to enhance resident safety. Previously\, they had installed sprinklers in all communal bin areas of their residential tower blocks. \nKey fact \n\nSix incidents were reported. In five cases\, the sprinkler system extinguished the fire upon activation\, and in the remaining case\, the activation contained and controlled the fire.\n\n \nProviding further evidence of the reliability and effectiveness of AWSS\, supporting the UK research² which was commissioned by the NFCC\, National Fire Sprinkler Network and supported by British Automatic Sprinkler Association. (BAFSA) \nThe report found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nIncidents AWSS were reported as present\, having an impact \n Key facts \n\nFour incidents involved purpose-built flats that had been retrofitted with a sprinkler system as part of the Birmingham City Council sprinkler projects.\nThese incidents were either contained\, controlled\, or extinguished.\n\nProviding further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling or even extinguishing the fire.\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin.\nFirefighters completing operational duties without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation.\nPrevent conflagration.\nAllowing the business-as-usual service to be maintained within WMFS by reducing the impact of major fire incidents allowing the release of resources to provide an effective response to attend other emergencies\n\n\nPurpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of Incident; 6 January 2025\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Living room\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\n\nA sprinkler system extinguished a sofa fire in a 10th-floor flat of a 20-storey building containing the fire to the initial item ignited. The resident self-evacuate before the arrival of WMFS. \n       2/3. Purpose built Flats/Maisonettes 4-9 storeys \n\nDate of Incident(s); 17 January/6 March 2025\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire(s); Refuse/bin store\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled/extinguished\n\nTwo refuse bin chute room fires were contained\, controlled\, or extinguished by the premises sprinkler system requiring minimal intervention by the fire service. \nThe risk of refuse/bin store fires should not be underestimated\, these fires can significantly impact resident safety\, especially where bin chutes open onto protected corridors\, lobbies\, and stairs\, increasing the risk of fire and smoke spreading to common escape routes. \nData from Fire Rescue services for 2018/19 to 2023/24 shows the impact of these fires in purpose-built block of flats in England\, Scotland\, and Wales where AWSS were present\, having an impact. \nIt was identified that. \n\nRefuse/bin stores recorded the highest number of incidents with 327 activations.\nWhat cannot be defined by the data is whether the installation of AWSS within buildings is limited to these refuse/bin stores alone or extended to the occupied flat areas.\n\n \nAnalysis of the data reveals that of the 327 refuse store fires where sprinklers were present having an impact\, WMFS dominated the figures with 157 which should be of no surprise following the decision by BCC to install sprinklers in all communal bin areas of their residential tower blocks. \n \nWhat the data is unable to confirm is the rationale behind why a small majority of AWSS fire incidents were identified as not containing/controlling the fire or recorded as unknown. Further interrogation of the IRS data fields would be required to explore this anomaly. \n\n Commercial Fire\n\n\nDate of Incident; 22 February 2025\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\n\nA fire in an electrical deep fat fryer was extinguished by the sprinkler system. Fixed firefighting systems have proven to protect property\, business\, and jobs\, allowing the impacted business to resume operations within hours and avoid economic and social costs. \nTypically\, in commercial kitchens fixed firefighting systems such as wet chemical systems are used for object protection\, kitchen areas\, fryers\, oil cookers etc and not used for area wide protection of a building. \nThe benefit of installing wet chemicals is that they provide excellent flame knockdown and surface cooling the scope of kitchen protection should include all appliances that are capable of catching fire and not just the deep fat fryers\, protection should cover ventilated ceilings/hoods\, plenums and duct entrances and should be activated simultaneously. \n\n Purpose built Flats/Maisonettes 4-9 storeys\n\n\nDate of Incident; 18 April 2025\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Bedroom\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\n\nA fire involving a mattress and bedding was contained by the residential sprinkler system. The flat’s occupants evacuated safely before WMFS arrived\, and no injuries were reported. Smoking materials was the likely cause of the fire. \nThe benefit of sprinklers should not be underestimated\, the image of a similar bedroom fire reported by South Yorkshire Fire Service (SYFS) speaks a thousand words. \nThe fire was extinguished before the arrival of SYFR by the activation of 1 residential sprinkler head within the flat. No further firefighting media were required from SYFR\, and no injuries were reported. \n \nImage credit SYFS\n\n Student halls of residence\n\n\nDate of Incident; 22 April 2025\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\n\nA cooking pan kitchen fire within a flat on the 12th floor of a 17-storey building was extinguished by the residential sprinkler system with fire damage to the item first ignited. No further interaction by the fire service was required. \nIt is no surprise that kitchen fires accounted for the highest number of fires following the findings identified by London Fire Brigade³ for cooking related fires for this occupancy who reported that over the past 5 years London firefighters have attended more than 1\,200 cooking-related fires and false alarms in university students’ halls involving kitchen activities\, People living in rented or shared accommodation are seven times more likely to have a fire involving unattended cooking. \nThe benefits of installing sprinklers for this type of occupancy was reinforced following three fires reported to Sprinkler Saves UK by Nottinghamshire Fire & Rescue Service (NFRS) within the space of 12 months which were either cooking related or involved incense candles. On each occasion the fire was contained\, controlled or extinguished by the sprinkler system\, demonstrating the benefits of sprinklers. \nNottingham Kitchen fire involving an electric air fryer \n \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely AWSS.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy. Debunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder \nConclusion \nThis collection of incidents highlights the benefits of AWSS\, within the community and fire safety sector as an effective\, reliable fire protection measure for safeguarding life and property as part of a package of fire safety measures. Demonstrating that the functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling the fire\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin\nFirefighters operated without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation\nPrevent conflagration\nAllowing the business-as-usual service to be maintained by reducing the impact of major fire incidents allowing the release of resources to provide an effective response to attend other emergencies\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 7 \nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in The United Kingdom: An Analysis From Fire Service Data\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\n\n  \n\n¹Source WMFS Community Risk Management Plan (CRMP)\n²Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data – Optimal Economics 2017\n³Source LFB press release Cooking related fires in London student halls
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/west-midlands-fire-service-sprinkler-activations-january-april-2025/
LOCATION:West Midlands
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250101
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250102
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250526T195346Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250605T133720Z
UID:10000516-1735689600-1735775999@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Brentwood Factory Sprinkler Activation 1936
DESCRIPTION:Source believed to be a Brentwood local newspaper cutting for August 28 1936 \nMy thanks to Maurice Fisher for reporting a manufacturing factory fire which occurred in the film winding department at Ilford Ltd’s Selo factory\, Woodman Road\, Brentwood\, which activated the premises automatic sprinkler system on Tuesday 25 August 1936. \nProviding further evidence on the resilience\, benefits of sprinkler systems even though this incident took place 89 years ago. According to a newspaper cutting\, it is reported that a piece of factory machinery burst into flames resulting in one member of staff sustaining burns whilst using a fire extinguisher to tackle the fire\, with further several men overcome by smoke and fumes and gas masks required by members of Brentwood Fire Brigade \nThe premises automatic sprinkler system came into operation and was of great assistance subduing the fire. The fire was overcome by Brentwood Fire Brigade within 1 hour after their arrival. The Selo factory which has now been demolished for housing was constructed in the 1920’s which may indicate that the sprinkler system was installed over one hundred years ago. \nFurther information on the history of Selo Factory can be found on the Photomemorabilia website\, by clicking this link. \nIf you hear of a save report it\, it makes a difference.
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/brentwood-factory-sprinkler-activation-1936/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Brentwood.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20241201
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250101
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250109T141454Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250509T070836Z
UID:10000494-1733011200-1735689599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Wales Extra Care Housing Sprinkler Save
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nThis incident clearly identifies why the English government should be looking to install sprinklers into all new specialised and supported housing\, if it was not for the decision taken by the National Assembly for Wales passing new regulations in October 2013 that require a fire sprinkler system to be installed in registered group homes and sheltered housing we could be discussing a different outcome for this incident. \nThe demographic change in specialised and supported housing population has resulted in an increase in the occurrence of mobility difficulties\, reduced sensory capability and cognitive difficulties\, all of which bring greater risk from fire\, in terms of likelihood of fire and vulnerability in the event of a fire. \nThe study analysis of national ¹fire data\, an in-depth review of fire-related fatalities and severe casualties in England\, 2010/11 to 2018/19 referenced that while there is a lack of recent research on fatal fires\, the available studies consistently identified age\, the presence of an impairment such as physical disability\, smoking\, and alcohol use as key factors on the outcome of the fire\, as they will be less able to respond to a fire. \nMid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service reported that a fire within an Extra Care Housing Scheme was successfully contained\, controlled following the activation of 1 concealed sprinkler head within a flat following a fire involving an electric toaster. The sprinkler system contained and controlled the fire allowing the resident to be rescued from their property by firefighters. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued\, The provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire \nFire protection is dependent on both passive and active fire systems such as sprinklers working in unison providing a further layer of safety from fire as part of a package of fire safety measures\, in reducing the impact of fire on people\, firefighters\, property and the environment. \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling the fire\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin\nFirefighters operated without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation\nPrevent conflagration\n\nAdding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted ²Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association has welcomed the recent announcement that sprinklers will be made mandatory in all new residential care homes within England regardless of height from March 2025\, but would urge government to make the provision of sprinklers into all new specialised and supported housing mandatory. \nThe Incident  \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAddress; Wales\nOccupancy: Purpose-Specialised Housing (Extra -Care)\nLocation of fire; Living room.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nSummary of Incident  \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a confirmed fire following an emergency call received from a remote monitoring telecare provider.\nOn arrival the incident commander established that the seat of the fire was within a flat\nUpon entry\, firefighters wearing breathing apparatus established that\n\n\n1 Concealed pendent sprinkler head had activated within the room of origin\, containing/controlling the fire.\nLight smoke staining\, fire/heat damage was sustained to the area in vicinity of the seat of the fire where the electric toaster was located\n\n\nFirefighting media\, 1 hose reel jet was used to extinguish remaining hot spots\nThe resident was rescued by fire crews with no injuries reported requiring only a precautionary check.\nIn accordance with the premises emergency plan “Stay Put” only the flat of origin required to be evacuated.\nThe evacuation strategy for this type of occupancy is such that only those at immediate risk need to escape those in the flat of origin\, but those remote and unaffected by the fire can remain in their flats.\nOnsite information was available allowing firefighters to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system allowing the isolation of the sprinkler isolation valve.\nThe emergency plan allowed the sprinkler system to be reinstated\, operational on the same day as the fire by the sprinkler contractor.\nMajor protracted incident everted allowing FRS resources to be released\, redeployed to attend emergency incidents.\n\nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\n¹An in-depth review of fire-related fatalities and severe casualties in England\, 2010 to 2018/19\n²Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\nMid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service Sprinklers\nEssex County Fire and Rescue Service facebook\, Sheltered Housing fire 23 October 2023\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \nCredit to Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service for reporting this incident allowing the benefits of sprinklers to be reported to a wider audience raising awareness of the good work that sprinklers do and help in our continued campaign to lobby government to introduce tougher sprinkler rules making the installation and retrofitting of sprinklers mandatory in all buildings we are particularly concerned about: \n\nBuildings housing vulnerable residents\nResidential buildings\nSchools\nCarparks\nStorage and warehouses\nHospitals\n\n         
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/welsh-extra-care-housing-sprinkler-save/
LOCATION:Mid Wales
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Screenshot-2024-12-30-at-17.09.31.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20241201
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250101
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250106T140300Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250106T140300Z
UID:10000496-1733011200-1735689599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Gloucestershire Lithium Battery HMO Sprinkler Save
DESCRIPTION:Obi Selassie\, GFRS Station Manager “If it was not for the activation of the sprinkler system extinguishing the fire before the arrival of the fire service\, we could be discussing a different outcome for this incident\, The benefits of sprinklers should not be underestimated they save lives and reduce injuries\, protect firefighters.” \n Summary \nGloucestershire Fire and Rescue Service (GFRS) have reported that a fire at a house of multi occupancy (HMO) in December 2024 was successfully extinguished by the activation of the premises residential sprinkler system\, believed to have been caused by the failure of a e-bike lithium battery which was on charge within a ground floor studio flat with no injuries reported. \nLithium battery fires can spread quickly out of control developing into large fires within a short period of time. If it was not for the foresight of the landlord to retrofit a residential sprinkler system as part of a package of fire safety measures the outcome of this incident could have been so different. HMO accommodation is undoubtedly a challenging environment from a fire safety perspective with their own individual challenges when a property is let to multiple individual tenants due to the higher fire risk. \nA similar incident reported by London Fire Brigade (LFB) resulted in a e-bike battery explosion which destroyed a family home days before Christmas identifying the catastrophic consequences that can occur if e-bikes and e-scooters are not charged or stored safely\, sprinklers were not installed. \nFootage from a doorbell camera captures how quickly the property became engulfed in fire\, three people were inside the house when the e-bike battery burst into flames on the first floor. One person escaped unharmed through the front door\, but two others in a converted loft were forced to climb through a skylight on to the roof. One male fell from the roof and suffered serious injuries\, while a woman slipped but was caught by a firefighter and later treated for smoke inhalation. \n \nThe growing risk of e-bike and e-scooter involving lithium battery fires should not be underestimated which can develop into significant and unstoppable runaway fires. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nFire protection is dependent on both passive and active fire systems such as sprinklers working in unison providing a further layer of safety from fire as part of a package of fire safety measures\, in reducing the impact of fire on people\, firefighters\, property and the environment. \nFurther guidance on suppression and extinguishing can be found in the Fire Industry Association Guidance Note on Lithium-Ion battery fires\, which references that sprinkler protection of lithium-ion batteries is outside the scope of current sprinkler design standards\, specialist standards are being developed such as NPFA 855. \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling the fire\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin\nFirefighters operated without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation\nPrevent conflagration\n\nAdding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe Incident  \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAddress; Gloucestershire\nOccupancy: House of multi occupancy\nLocation of fire; Bedsit.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nSummary of Incident  \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a confirmed fire following an emergency call 999 call.\nOn arrival the incident commander established that the seat of the fire was within a ground floor studio bedsit.\nUpon entry\, firefighters wearing breathing apparatus established that\n\n\n1 sprinkler head had activated within the room of origin\, containing/controlling and extinguishing the fire.\n10% fire/heat and smoke damage sustained to the area in vicinity of the seat of the fire.\n\n\nThe resident self-evacuated the premises prior to the arrival of the emergency services.\n\n\nThe fire was contained to the room of origin\, allowing tenable conditions for the remaining occupants within the property to make their way to a final place of safety via the common ways.\nThe cause of the fire involved a e-bike lithium battery which was on charge.\nFirefighting media\, 1 hose reel jet was used to extinguish remaining hot spots.\n\n\nOnsite information was not available allowing firefighters to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system allowing the isolation of the sprinkler isolation valve.\nMajor protracted incident everted allowing FRS resources to be released\, redeployed to attend emergency incidents.\nThe building was reoccupied at the conclusion of the incident\nAlternative accommodation was required for the tenant whilst minor redecoration works were completed to their accommodation.\n\n The following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\nGFRS\, Sprinklers\nYou tube London family home destroyed by e-bike battery days before Christmas\nLFB Charge safe e-bike and e scooter safety advice\nE bike house fire\, LFB/X\nGuidance note FIA Guidance on Lithium-Ion Battery Fires.\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \nCredit to GFRS for reporting this incident allowing the benefits of sprinklers to be reported to a wider audience raising awareness of the good work that sprinklers do and help in our continued campaign to lobby government to introduce tougher sprinkler rules making the installation and retrofitting of sprinklers mandatory in all buildings we are particularly concerned about: \n\nBuildings housing vulnerable residents\nResidential buildings\nSchools\nCarparks\nStorage and warehouses\nHospitals\n\n      \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/gloucestershire-lithium-battery-hmo-sprinkler-save/
LOCATION:Gloucestershire
CATEGORIES:Residential
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20241126
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20241127
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20241211T085345Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241211T184107Z
UID:10000490-1732579200-1732665599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Doncaster Residential Tall Building Bedroom Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit image SYFRS\nRoger Brason\, South Yorkshire Fire & Rescue (SYFR) sprinkler advocate\, “We’ve championed the use of sprinklers\, particularly in high-rise buildings\, for quite some time\, so we’re delighted that all of the blocks in Doncaster now have them.” \n“These devices not only help protect life\, but help protect property too. In most cases\, they will extinguish a fire completely and prevent it from spreading any further. The fact that people living in high-rise buildings across Doncaster now have such a high level of fire protection really is excellent news. \nOverview \nThe benefits of retrofitting a life safety residential sprinkler system were clearly identified following a bedroom fire within a general needs residential block of flats housing a diverse range of tenants. Reducing the impact of fire as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures on people\, firefighters\, property and the environment. The fire was extinguished before the arrival of SYFR by the activation of 1 residential sprinkler head within the flat with no further firefighting media required from SYFS\, no injuries were reported. \nProviding further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential sprinkler system installed\, maintained in accordance with the appropriate codes and standards. \n\nReduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nAssist firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development\, which significantly reduces the risk to firefighters.\nContain/control or in some cases extinguish the fire.\nAre reliable and effective\, providing adding further weight to the recent report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\nThe report found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe premises \n\n14 storey tower development containing 83 flats.\n\nBackground \nFollowing the tragic events of the Grenfell Fire tragedy\, St Ledger homes of Doncaster working with Doncaster Council took the decision to retrofit residential sprinkler systems into its 9 tall building residential blocks as part of a package of fire safety measures to improve fire safety across its housing stock at a cost of £6m\, with the sprinkler installation accounting for over half of the total spend. As part of this project SYFRS match funded this initiative by contributing £200\,000 for the retrofitting of sprinklers within one of the blocks from their safer stronger communities’ reserve fund which should be applauded. \nThe Incident  \n\nDate of incident; November 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAddress; Doncaster\nOccupancy: Purpose-Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\nLocation of fire; bedroom flat.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nSummary of Incident  \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a confirmed fire within a tall residential building.\nOn arrival the incident commander established that the seat of the fire was within a 3rd floor flat.\nFire survival guidance was provided by SYFR control who advised the occupants to take refuge on the external balcony as their means of escape was compromised by the fire.\nUpon entry to the flat\, firefighters wearing breathing apparatus established that\n\n\n1 sprinkler head had activated extinguishing the fire within the bedroom.\nThe fire was contained to the room of origin involving bedding/mattress\n\n\nMinor superficial fire\, heat damage was sustained to the bedding/mattress with light smoke damage.\nNo further firefighting media was required\,\nThe occupants were led to a final place of safety by fire crews with no injuries reported.\nPassive fire safety measures working in unison with the sprinkler system maintained tenable conditions.\nThe cause of the fire was established to involve an electric heater which was located to close to the bed/bedding.\nThe sprinkler isolation valve was located outside the flat within the common ways allowing isolation at the conclusion of the incident preventing unnecessary water egress.\nMajor protracted incident everted allowing FRS resources to be released\, redeployed to attend emergency incidents.\n\nBenefits of the sprinkler system \nThe outcome of this incident could have been so much different if the decision to retrofit sprinklers had not been taken providing further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety maintaining tenable conditions.\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to assist evacuation/effect rescue when necessary\n\n\nPrevent conflagration.\n\nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy. Debunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder. \nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to\n\n\nAssist evacuation when necessary\nEffect rescue when necessary\nPrevent conflagration\n\nCredit to SYFRS for reporting this incident allowing the benefits of sprinklers to be reported to a wider audience raising awareness of the good work that sprinklers do and help in our continued campaign to lobby government to introduce tougher sprinkler rules making the installation and retrofitting of sprinklers mandatory in all buildings we are particularly concerned about: \n\nBuildings housing vulnerable residents\nResidential buildings\nSchools\nCarparks\nStorage and warehouses\nHospitals\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\nSYFRS\, Fire service to launch sprinkler safety fund\nFire Industry Association\, Housing provider installs sprinklers into nine high buildings to improve fire safety\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n          \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/doncaster-residential-tall-building-bedroom-activation/
LOCATION:Docaster
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Sandbeck-House-26-11.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20241105
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20241106
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20241212T093647Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241218T170932Z
UID:10000491-1730764800-1730851199@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Greater Manchester Tall Building Kitchen Activation
DESCRIPTION:Image credit Uk Sprinklers Ltd\n  \nThe benefits of installing a life safety residential sprinkler system reducing the impact of fire as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures on people\, property and the environment was clearly identified following an apartment kitchen fire within a tall building tower development. \nExtinguished by the activation of 1 concealed pendent residential sprinkler head with no further firefighting required from Greater Manchester Fire Rescue Service with no injuries reported.Providing further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential sprinkler system installed\, maintained in accordance with the appropriate codes and standards. \n\nReduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nAssist firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development\, which significantly reduces the risk to firefighters.\nContain/control or in some cases extinguish the fire.\nAre reliable and effective\, providing adding further weight to the recent report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\nThe report found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe premises\, 35 storey tower development containing 466 studio\, one\, two and three-bed apartments with ground floor commercial space. \nThe Incident  \n\nDate of incident; November 2024.\nTime of call; 12:34.\nIncident; Fire.\nAddress; Greater Manchester.\nLocation of fire; Apartment\, kitchen.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\nFire Rescue Service; Greater Manchester Fire Rescue Service. (GMFRS)\n\nSummary of Incident  \n\nGMFRS mobilised to reports of a confirmed fire\nThe incident commander established that the seat of the fire was within a one-bedroom apartment on the 17-storey involving a pan of oil which caught light on the cooker hob.\nThe occupants self-evacuated their apartment with no injuries reported.\n1 concealed residential sprinkler head activated\nMaintaining tenable conditions.\nExtinguishing the fire before the arrival of operational crews\nContaining the fire to the room of origin.\nMajor protracted incident everted allowing FRS resources to be released\, redeployed to attend emergency incidents.\n\nThe images of the incident\, confirm that minor superficial fire\, heat\, and light smoke damage was contained to the room of origin. \n                                        \nCredit images Uk Sprinklers Ltd\,\nSprinkler System \n\nBS9251:2014\nCategory 2\, 60 min run time\nCoverage\, apartments only\n\nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder. \nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to\n\n\nAssist evacuation when necessary\nEffect rescue when necessary\n\n\nPrevent conflagration\nDebunking the myth\, residential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on\n\nFires containing cooking oils\, BAFSA have released a comprehensive video that demonstrates the clear benefits of sprinklers involving chip pan fires\, click here to open.  Fire statistical data collated from incidents attended by fire and rescue service involving dwellings for the financial year 2019/20 confirmed that 1494 incidents took place involving chip pan fires \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\nGMFRS Benefits of Sprinklers\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n Credit to both GMFRS\, Uk Sprinklers for reporting this incident allowing the benefits of sprinklers to be reported to a wider audience raising awareness of the good work that sprinklers do and help in our continued campaign to lobby government to introduce tougher sprinkler rules making the
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/greater-manchester-tall-building-kitchen-activation/
LOCATION:Greater Manchester
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/GM-image-1-1.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20241101
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20241201
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20250109T185434Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250110T183554Z
UID:10000497-1730419200-1733011199@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Dundee Housing Development Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit image Discovery Fire Sprinklers Ltd \nIntroduction \nMany thanks to Discovery Fire Sprinklers Ltd for reporting this positive news story demonstrating the benefits of installing sprinklers\,as part of a package of fire safety measures protecting our communities from fire. \nBackground \nThe foresight of Dundee City Council committing to install sprinkler systems in all new build properties since 2016 was clearly vindicated following a fire involving a ground floor terraced flat which was extinguished by the activation of the premises sprinkler system which should be applauded\, the outcome could have been so much different if sprinklers had not been installed. This major housing development was completed in October 2024 providing more than 298 affordable homes including a mix of modern flats\, detached\, and terraced homes installed with sprinklers. \nThe detail of this activation provides further evidence of the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems and adds further weight to the recent report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe report found that: \n1.Sprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\n2. Sprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate. \nThe Incident  \n\nDate of incident; November 2024.\nTOC 15:13\nIncident; Fire.\nAddress; Dundee.\nLocation of fire; Bedroom.\nAFSS; BS9251:2014.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\nFire Rescue Service; Scottish Fire Rescue Service.\n\n   \n                       \nCredit image Discovery Fire Sprinklers Ltd \nSummary of Incident  \n\n3 fire appliances were mobilised to reports of a confirmed fire.\nThe seat of the fire was identified to involve the ground floor flat bedroom.\nThe fire was contained/controlled in the room of origin by the activation of 1 concealed pendent sprinkler head\nRemaining hot spots extinguished using 1 hose reel jet\nNo injuries were reported.\n20% fire damage to the room of origin with smoke staining on the walls.\nMajor protracted incident everted allowing FRS resources to be released\, redeployed to attend emergency incidents.\nEnquires are ongoing to identify the cause of the fire.\n\nThe benefit of local knowledge to isolate the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the incident was clearly demonstrated\, by coincidence as the incident was unfolding engineers representing Discovery Fire Sprinklers Ltd who installed the sprinkler system were driving pass the incident. Who had the foresight to stop and assist the fire service to identify the sprinkler isolation valve\, returning the following day to reinstate the system. \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety.\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to: –\n\n\nAssist evacuation when necessary.\nEffect rescue when necessary.\n\n\nPrevent conflagration.\n\nDesign & Install Sprinkler System Criteria \n\nBS9251:2014\nCat 2\n2 6000 litre storage Tanks\n2 1700 litre underground storage Tanks\n4 fire pump sets\n98 units – mixed dwellings\n98 ICVs\n98 Alarm systems\n1200 sprinklers\nUpgraded pump monitoring\n\nAdvice For Building Managers\, the following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. \nTo achieve this: – \n\nMaintenance\, the premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, the premises emergency plan should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system. Any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nRegulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, it is a requirement of the Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures. \nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to\n\n\nAssist evacuation when necessary\nEffect rescue when necessary\n\n\nPrevent conflagration\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nDiscovery Fire Sprinklers Ltd Project Specification\nSFRS Fire Sprinkler Systems\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \nCredit to both Discovery Fire Sprinklers/SFRS for reporting this incident allowing the benefits of sprinklers to be reported to a wider audience raising awareness of the good work that sprinklers do and help in our continued campaign to lobby government to introduce tougher sprinkler rules making the installation and retrofitting of sprinklers mandatory in all buildings we are particularly concerned about: \n\nBuildings housing vulnerable residents\nResidential buildings\nSchools\nCarparks\nStorage and warehouses\nHospitals\n\n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/dundee-housing-development-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Dundee
CATEGORIES:Domestic
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Screenshot-2025-01-09-at-18.48.39.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241101T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241130T000000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20241218T170849Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250103T122118Z
UID:10000492-1730419200-1732924800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Reported Sprinkler Activations November 2024
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nOur gratitude to The London Fire Brigade (LFB) for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of fire sprinklers by the reporting of sprinkler activations\, rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. \nReporting incidents taken from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of November 2024 where sprinklers were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \nRaising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety benefits \nLondon Fire Brigade  \nLFB Is one of the largest\, firefighting\, community safety rescue services in the world protecting residents and property in Greater London as well as those who work or visit the capital. They report attending 126\,464 incidents of which 16\,120 were fires for the year 2023. \nLondon \nAs the capital of the United Kingdom\, London is also the largest city with a population of just over nine million and is projected to reach 10 million by 2035. It is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world. There are 32 boroughs in Greater London\, except for the City of London which is a county and government district. The risk from fire in the capital is diverse\, ranging from large industrial premises\, complex retail shopping centres\, major transport hubs\, and large high-rise residential developments. The latter is a key area as half of the population of London live in flats compared to less than 20% in the rest of the country. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of November where AFSS were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role sprinklers play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler actuations from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\n\n\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nProviding further evidence reaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\n Incident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the officer in charge of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups. For the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \n Each group contains questions in data fields with associated lists containing the appropriate answer options. Data collected about serious reportable fires include: \n\nTime and date of call\nFire Service or other geographical area\nType of building or vehicle\nMost likely motive (accidental or malicious)\nCause of fire (chip pan fires\, electrical\, etc.)\nSource of ignition (cigarettes\, cookers\, etc.)\nMaterials (furniture\, etc.)\nThe spread of fire (beyond room of origin\, etc.)\nThe nature of fire casualties\nRescue information and method of extinction\nThe effectiveness of automatic smoke detectors\nWere there any active safety systems present?\n\nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training\, experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene. \nThe use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n4x Incidents were reported for the above-mentioned period where Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) were present of which 2 activations were reported which extinguished the fire. (AFSS) \n\n1x within a Purpose-Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n1x within a single shop\n\n \nReference is made within table 1 that the firefighting system impact was not known in 2 of the incidents\, supplementary Information from the LFB provided further context allowing the rationale for this anomaly. It was reported there was insufficient heat from the fire to activate the sprinkler head. \nReported Incidents  \n\nLambeth Single shop\n\n\nDate of incident; 8 November 2024.\nTime of call; 20:25\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 2\n\nOn arrival the incident commander identified that the fire was located on the shop floor which had been extinguished by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads with fire spread limited to Item 1st ignited with total fire damage reported to be 21-50m2. \n2.Southwark Recycling Plant  \n\nDate of incident; 18 November 2024.\nTime of call; 12:31.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Not known.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0.\n\nA fire involving non-metal waste and scrap within the process/production room was limited to the room of origin with the fire extinguished by fire crews using firefighting media. The sprinkler system located in the room of origin did not operate due to insufficient heat to activate generated to activate the sprinkler heads. \n3.Newham Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys \n\nDate of incident; 19 November 2024\nTime of call; 22:29\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nIt is reported that a fire within a modern purpose residential development apartment kitchen involving cooking was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head which contained the fire to item first ignited\, no firefighting was required by operational crews. \n\n Hillingdon Airport Terminal \n\n\nDate of incident; 25 November 2024.\nTime of call; 14:30.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Lift/Lift shaft/Motor room\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Not applicable\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0.\n\nOn arrival the incident commander established that a small fire within a retail unit involving batteries/generators required no further firefighting action\, the sprinkler system within the room of origin did not operate due to insufficient heat to activate generated to activate the sprinkler heads. \nObservations\, comments \nThe two reported sprinkler activations provide further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety.\nFirefighters can operate without due risk\, assist evacuation\, effect rescue when necessary.\nPrevent conflagration.\n\n Advice For Building Managers\, the following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. \nTo achieve this: – \n\nMaintenance\, the premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, the premises emergency plan should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system. Any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nRegulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, it is a requirement of the Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures. \nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n           \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-reported-sprinkler-activations-november-2024/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241028T204800
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241028T220100
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20241121T205108Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241121T205709Z
UID:10000480-1730148480-1730152860@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Nottinghamshire Student Accommodation Kitchen Activation
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nThis the second successful reported student accommodation sprinkler activation reported by Nottingham Fire and Rescues Service (NFRS) within a 3-month period\, on both occasions the fire was either contained/controlled or extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head with no injuries reported. \nDemonstrating the vital role sprinklers play in fire safety arrangements by highlighting real tangible examples of where they have actuated and in doing so saved life and protected property. Providing further evidence of the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems adding further weight to the recent report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe report found that:\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate. \n  \n         \nStudent accommodation is undoubtedly a challenging environment from a fire safety perspective with their own individual challenges. The student’s lifestyle is typically associated with a reduced level of caution when it comes to appreciating risk. Demonstrated on this occasion by the students lack urgency\, understanding of the premises emergency plan (simultaneous evacuation) on the actions that should be taken in the event of the premises fire alarm actuating resulting in a considerable delay evacuating the building. \nIf it was not for the proactive approach of the landlord to install sprinklers within their property portfolio\, we could be discussing a totally different outcome following this fire. It should be remembered that the recent amendments to sprinkler provisions within Approved Document B for a reduction in the height threshold for sprinklers in purpose group 1a (residential block of flats) from 30m to 11m disappointingly this does not include student accommodation. \nEngland’s national building and fire safety regulations trial behind its neighbours\, governments in other UK jurisdictions who have set lower mandatory thresholds for the installation of sprinklers in new purpose-built student accommodation. Following the introduction of new fire regulations within Northern Ireland\, fire sprinklers are now required in within student accommodation with a storey more than 11m above ground level which will come into effect on 6 May 2025. \nIt is the view of British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) and the National Fire Chiefs Council that sprinklers should be installed in all new student accommodation regardless of height\, as well as existing buildings undergoing refurbishment. The Government should be looking to emulate the policies in the devolved governments to support unitary policy across nations by lowering or removing the acceptable height\, floor area\, or occupancy threshold dependent on building type. \nThis incident provides further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential sprinkler system installed\, maintained in accordance with the appropriate codes and standards reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nThe premises \n\nGround floor plus 3 and basement\, office block converted into student accommodation.\n\n The Incident  \n\nDate of incident; 28 October 2024.\nTime of call; 20:48.\nTime of stop; 21:29\nIncident closed 22:01.\nIncident; Fire.\nAddress; Nottinghamshire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen flat\nAFSS; BS9251:2014\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\nFire Rescue Service; Nottinghamshire Fire Rescue Service.\n\nSummary of Incident  \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a confirmed fire.\nThe seat of the fire was identified to be within a flat involving an electrical cooking extractor hood.\nThe fire was extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system in the room of origin before the arrival of operational crews.\nSuperficial fire\, heat\, and smoke damage sustained within the room of origin\n\n\nMajor protracted incident everted allowing FRS resources to be released\, redeployed to attend emergency incidents.\n\nThe images below are taken from the previous fire reported by NFRS involving student accommodation which was successfully contained/controlled by the activation of 1 sprinkler head within a bedroom\, identifying the benefits of installing a residential sprinkler system  \n                              \n Credit Nationwide fire sprinklers                             Credit NFRS                                                                     Credit NFRS\nThe danger of student accommodation fires cannot be underestimated clearly demonstrated following the fire in Bolton involving the premises known as the ‘Cube’ November 2019. The speed with which the fire took hold and the devastating impact it had on the building was shocking. The Greater Manchester Fire Rescue Service (GMFRS) press release states that due to the full and immediate evacuation of the premises many lives were saved. \nFull details on the incident are contained in the GMFRS Cube Incident Report (click the link in the resources section\, sprinklers were not fitted. \nSprinkler System \n\nBS9251:2014\nCategory 2\, 30 min run time\nWater supply boosted cold water mains fed sprinkler system.\nInstalled Sprinkler Heads: RFC 49 74c\nAlarm: Link to fire alarm panel\nSupply Details: Lowara 5SV07 pump set fed by a 32mm mains water supply\n\nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building  \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\nThe system was reinstated within 60 minutes from the time the sprinkler contractor received the call to attend the incident.\n\nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to\n\n\nAssist evacuation when necessary\nEffect rescue when necessary\n\n\nPrevent conflagration\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nNFRS AFSS Position Statement\nSeptember Nottingham Student accommodation fire\nManchester Fire and Rescue Service Cube Fire Report\nNFCC AWSS Policy Statement\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n                 \n  \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/nottinghamshire-student-accommodation-kitchen-activation/
LOCATION:Nottinhamshire
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20241001
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20241101
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20241123T134014Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250103T122151Z
UID:10000483-1727740800-1730419199@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Reported Sprinkler Activations October 2024
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nOur gratitude to The London Fire Brigade (LFB) for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of fire sprinklers by the reporting of sprinkler activations\, rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire rescue services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. Reporting incidents taken from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of October 2024 where sprinklers were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \nRaising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety benefits. \nLondon Fire Brigade  \nLFB Is one of the largest\, firefighting\, community safety rescue services in the world protecting residents and property in Greater London as well as those who work or visit the capital. They report attending 126\,464 incidents of which 16\,120 were fires for the year 2023. \nLondon \nAs the capital of the United Kingdom\, London is also the largest city with a population of just over nine million and is projected to reach 10 million by 2035. It is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world. There are 32 boroughs in Greater London\, except for the City of London which is a county and government district. The risk from fire in the capital is diverse\, ranging from large industrial premises\, complex retail shopping centres\, major transport hubs\, and large high-rise residential developments. The latter is a key area as half of the population of London live in flats compared to less than 20% in the rest of the country. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of October where AFSS were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role sprinklers play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler actuations from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\n\n\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nProviding further evidence reaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\n Incident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the officer in charge of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups. For the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \n Each group contains questions in data fields with associated lists containing the appropriate answer options. Data collected about serious reportable fires include: \n\nTime and date of call\nFire Service or other geographical area\nType of building or vehicle\nMost likely motive (accidental or malicious)\nCause of fire (chip pan fires\, electrical\, etc.)\nSource of ignition (cigarettes\, cookers\, etc.)\nMaterials (furniture\, etc.)\nThe spread of fire (beyond room of origin\, etc.)\nThe nature of fire casualties\nRescue information and method of extinction\nThe effectiveness of automatic smoke detectors\nWere there any active safety systems present?\n\nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training\, experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene. \n The use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n6x Incidents were reported for the above-mentioned period where Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) were present of which 2 activations were reported which extinguished the fire on both occasions. (AFSS) \n\n1x within a Purpose-Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n1x within a boarding house/B&B\n\n \nTable 1\, IRS Primary fire data where sprinklers were present\, having an impact\n\nReference is made within table 1 that the firefighting system impact was either not known or did not contain/control in 4 of the incidents.\nSupplementary Information from the LFB provided further context allowing the rationale for these anomalies identifying 2 areas.\n\n\nSprinkler system coverage was not provided within the fire affected area\nInsufficient heat from the fire to activate the sprinkler head\n\nReported Incidents  \n\nHillingdon Airport Terminal\n\n\nDate of incident; 8 October 2024.\nTime of call; 06:46.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Not known.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0.\n\nThe seat of the fire was identified to involve an electrical consumer unit which was left to burn out with fire spread limited to item 1st ignited. Due to insufficient heat from the fire\, the sprinkler head located in the room of origin of the fire did not activate. \n\nCity of London Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 12 October 2024.\nTime of call; 04:48.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Not known.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0.\n\nA fire involving a private balcony was extinguished using water from a bucket/container with fire spread limited to the floor of origin. Sprinkler coverage was provided within the residential flat(s) which did not actuate as coverage did not include the external balcony. Guidance contained in BS9251 states\, residential external balconies permanently open to the outside may be omitted unless required by a fire strategy or risk assessment. \n\nSouthwark Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 16 October 2024\nTime of call; 13:24\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Bathroom/toilet\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Not Known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nIt is reported that a fire within a bathroom/toilet was extinguished by the tenant using a handheld fire extinguisher to extinguish the fire before the arrival of the LFB\, enquires are ongoing to establish the cause of the fire. Due to insufficient heat from the fire\, the sprinkler head located in the room of origin of the fire did not activate. \n\nHillingdon Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 4 to 9 storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 19 October 2024.\nTime of call; 21:07.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nOn arrival the officer in charge established that the fire was located within a flat kitchen\, involving a chip pan that had caught light which had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of one sprinkler head. No further firefighting was required with total fire damage reported to be up to 5sqm. \nThis incident once again\, debunks the myth\, residential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on chip pan fires. \nIn England cooking fires were the most common type of accidental fires reported for the period 2013/2014 to 2022/2023 with over 1100 fires. \nWe still see reports from Fire Rescue Service(s) that where the occupant is present at the time of a chip pan fire\, efforts have been to extinguish the fire themselves by placing the oil pan under the tap in the kitchen sink or throw water on the pan causing the oil to explode causing serious injury allowing further fire to spread. \nSprinkler Saves UK have reported multiple incidents involving chip pan fires on each occasion the fire was extinguished\, contained/controlled. \n\nLincoln\, 7 August 2021\nTonypandy\, Rhondda\, 29 December 2021\nFlint 3 June 2021\nSouth Yorkshire 26 August 2022\nLondon 21 August 2023\nNewport July 2024\nStockport 26 July 2024\n\nBAFSA have released a comprehensive video that demonstrates the clear benefits of sprinklers involving chip pan fires\, click here to open.   Fire statistical data collated from incidents attended by fire and rescue service involving dwellings for the financial year 2019/20 confirmed that 1494 incidents took place involving chip pan fires \n\nHillingdon Recycling Plant\n\n\nDate of incident; 28 October 2024.\nTime of call; 23:00.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Process/Production room.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control.\nNumber of nozzle heads operated; 0.\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire involving plant machinery/appliance which was contained to room of origin\, extinguished using 1 main jet. The premises sprinkler system did not actuate as there was Insufficient heat from the fire to activate the sprinkler head(s) in the vicinity of the fire. \n\nWandsworth Boarding House/B&B other (Temporary Housing)\n\n\nDate of incident; 31 October 2024.\nTime of call; 21:09.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nThe benefits of sprinklers for protecting our most vulnerable residents of our communities clearly identified following a kitchen fire involving cooking which was contained to the room of origin following the activation of 1 sprinkler head which extinguished the fire with no injuries reported. \nObservations\, comments \nThe two reported sprinkler activations provide further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety.\nFirefighters can operate without due risk\, assist evacuation\, effect rescue when necessary.\nPrevent conflagration.\n\n Advice For Building Managers\, the following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. \nTo achieve this: – \n\nMaintenance\, the premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, the premises emergency plan should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system. Any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\nRegulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, it is a requirement of the Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures. \nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n       \n  \n  \n  \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-reported-sprinkler-activations-october-2024/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240901T102800
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240930T145300
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20241003T143234Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241013T193324Z
UID:10000476-1725186480-1727707980@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Nottinghamshire Tall Building Student Accommodation Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit image Nationwide Fire Sprinklers \nIntroduction \nOur thanks to both Nottinghamshire Fire Rescue Service (NFRS) and Nationwide Fire Sprinklers for reporting a fire involving an incense candle within a student accommodation tall building which was successfully contained within a cluster flat by the activation of 1 concealed sprinkler head with no injuries reported. \nThe details of this activation provides further evidence of the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems and adds further weight to the recent report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe report found that:\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate. \nIf it was not for the amendments to sprinkler provisions within Approved Document B (ADB) for a reduction in the height threshold for sprinklers in purpose group 1a (residential block of flats) from 30m to 11m introduced in 2020\, the outcome of this incident could have been so different if sprinklers had not been fitted. \nA fire that spread through the Cube high-rise student accommodation in 2019 is a reminder that our new 11m sprinkler threshold for high rise residential buildings does not apply to student accommodation regardless of height. \nDuring the building process\, the decision was made by the developer to change the use\, occupancy of the of the building to purpose group 2b\, halls of residence which benefitted from the previous decision for the installation of a residential sprinkler system to comply with building regulations. \nStudent accommodation is undoubtedly a challenging environment from a fire safety perspective with their own individual challenges. The student’s lifestyle is typically associated with a reduced level of caution when it comes to appreciating risk.It is the view of BAFSA and the National Fire Chiefs Council that sprinklers should be installed in all new student accommodation regardless of height\, as well as existing buildings undergoing refurbishment\, regardless of height providing a further layer of safety from fire. \nThis incident provides further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential sprinkler system installed\, maintained in accordance with the appropriate codes and standards reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nThe Incident  \n\nDate of incident; September 2024.\nTime of call; 10:28.\nTime of stop; 11:53.\nIncident Closed 14:53.\nIncident; Fire.\nAddress; Nottinghamshire.\nLocation of fire; bedroom within cluster flat.\nAFSS; BS9251:2021.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\nFire Rescue Service; Nottinghamshire Fire Rescue Service.\n\nThe premises \n\nGround floor plus 5 floors\, purpose-built student accommodation building containing cluster flats accommodating up to 60 residents.\n\nSummary of Incident  \n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a confirmed fire.\nThe seat of the fire was identified to be within a cluster flat bedroom.\nCause of ignition\, lit incense candle.\nUnknown to the tenant embers from the stubbed-out candle were blown on to clothes within a washing basket which caught light.\nThe tenant who was in the flat at the time was unaware of the fire until the bedroom door containing the seat of the fire was opened.\nThe sprinkler system activated containing/controlling the fire allowing tenable conditions allowing the tenant to make their way to a final place of safety.\nMinimal Firefighting media was required by the Fire Rescue Service (FRS) to extinguish the fire\nSuperficial fire\, heat\, and smoke damage sustained within the room of origin\nMajor protracted incident everted allowing FRS resources to be released\, redeployed to attend other emergency incidents.\nThe system was reinstated within 60 minutes from the time the sprinkler contractor received the call to attend the incident.\n\nThe images clearly identify the benefits of installing a residential sprinkler system \n                   \n Credit Nationwide fire sprinklers                                    Credit NFRS                                                           Credit NFRS \n       1x RFC 49 Concealed Sprinkler Head activated \n      \nCredit Nationwide fire sprinklers \nSprinkler System \n\nBS9251:2021\nCategory 3\nWater supply Dedicated pump and tank\nIsolation valves located on each floor\nCoverage Flats and common ways\n\nGroup Manager Jonathan Holford Head of Fire Protection – \n“Nottinghamshire Fire & Rescue Service supported the 2020 changes to Approved Document B requiring sprinklers to be installed in all residential buildings over 11m. The benefits of these changes were seen at a recent incident in a medium rise residential building in Nottingham.A small accidental fire was contained to the room of origin allowing our crew to extinguish the fire with minimal equipment. This reduced the hazard to our Firefighters whilst also creating a significantly safer environment for occupants to evacuate promptly. NFRS also welcome the publicised changes to ADB coming into force on 2nd March 2025 requiring sprinklers to be installed in all new care homes.” \nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building  \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\nThe system was reinstated within 60 minutes from the time the sprinkler contractor received the call to attend the incident.\n\nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to\n\n\nAssist evacuation when necessary\nEffect rescue when necessary\n\n\nPrevent conflagration\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 5\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nNFRS AFSS Position Statement\nBS5306-0\nBS9251;2021\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n         
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/nottinghamshire-tall-building-student-accommodation-activation/
LOCATION:Nottinghamshire
CATEGORIES:Commercial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Bedroom-view-NFRS.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240901T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240930T000000
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20241010T132325Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250103T122343Z
UID:10000477-1725148800-1727654400@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Reported Sprinkler Activations September 2024 Review
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nOur gratitude to The London Fire Brigade (LFB) for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of fire sprinklers by the reporting of sprinkler activations\, rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. Reporting incidents taken from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of September  where sprinklers were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \nRaising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses. \nLondon Fire Brigade \nLFB Is one of the largest\, firefighting\, community safety rescue services in the world protecting residents and property in Greater London as well as those who work or visit the capital. They report attending 126\,464 incidents of which 16\,120 were fires for the year 2023. \nLondon \nAs the capital of the United Kingdom\, London is also the largest city with a population of just over nine million and is projected to reach 10 million by 2035. It is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world. There are 32 boroughs in Greater London\, except for the City of London which is a county and government district. The risk from fire in the capital is diverse\, ranging from large industrial premises\, complex retail shopping centres\, major transport hubs\, and large high-rise residential developments. The latter is a key area as half of the population of London live in flats compared to less than 20% in the rest of the country. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of September where AFSS were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role sprinklers play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler actuations from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nProviding further evidence reaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\nIncident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the officer in charge of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups. \nFor the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \n Each group contains questions in data fields with associated lists containing the appropriate answer options. Data collected about serious reportable fires include: \n\nTime and date of call\nFire Service or other geographical area\nType of building or vehicle\nMost likely motive (accidental or malicious)\nCause of fire (chip pan fires\, electrical\, etc.)\nSource of ignition (cigarettes\, cookers\, etc.)\nMaterials (furniture\, etc.)\nThe spread of fire (beyond room of origin\, etc.)\nThe nature of fire casualties\nRescue information and method of extinction\nThe effectiveness of automatic smoke detectors\nWere there any active safety systems present?\n\nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training\, experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene. \nThe use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development \nWater as an extinguishing media for sprinkler systems \n The physical properties of water produce a wide range of benefits\, effects in a compartment fire. \n\nDirectly cools the fuel to reduce further generation of flammable gases\nWater is converted into steam in the plume and the hot gases at ceiling level\, absorbing heat\, so cooling them and reducing the radiation heating the fuel\nOnce converted into steam\, water limits the amount of oxygen reducing the flames\, smothering them\nOnce concerted into steam\, water expands rapidly driving the products of combustion out of the compartment\nWater cools the rest of the apartment\, increasing the amount of heat it will absorb from the plume\, so cooling it further\n\nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. The provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n9x Incidents were reported for the month of September where Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS)were present of which two had a impact. \n\n2x Having an impact within Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n4x Did not contain/control the fire\n3x Not known\n\n \n\nReference is made within table 1 that the firefighting system impact was either not known or did not contain/control in 7 of the incidents.\nSupplementary Information from LFB provided further context allowing the rationale for these anomalies identifying 3 areas.\n\n\nSprinkler system coverage was not provided within the fire affected area\nFault in the AFSS\ninsufficient heat from the fire to activate the sprinkler head\n\nReported Incidents  \n\n Havering Purpose-Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; 1 September 2024\nTime of call; 00:55\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire within a flat on the 2nd floor of a 10-storey high rise residential building containing 54 dwellings. On arrival fire crews established that a fire within the living room had been extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head although a hose reel jet from the tank was utilised. The cause of the fire was identified to involve a tea light/candle setting light to textiles with fire spread confined to item 1st ignited\, 1 person received minor injuries. \n2. Lambeth Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys \n\nDate of incident; 3 September 2024\nTime of call; 21:37\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nIt is reported that an apartment fire on the second floor was contained/controlled by the activation of 1 concealed sprinkler head before the arrival of fire crews\, the fire was extinguished using a main jet. The seat of the fire was identified to be within a cupboard and thought to be electrical in origin with fire spread limited to item 1st ignited. \n3. Brent Hotel \n\nDate of incident; 4 September 2024\nTime of call; 15:03\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Corridor/hall\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Fire in area not covered by system\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nIt is reported that the electrical supply to a magnetic door holding device fitted to a corridor door was isolated following reports of smoke issuing from the device\, no further firefighting media was required. Sprinkler system coverage was not provided within the fire affected area \n4. Islington Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys \n\nDate of incident; 6 September 2024\nTime of call; 03:51\nIncident; Fire.\nUse of premises; Student Accommodation\nLocation of fire; Bedroom\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Fire in area not covered by system\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nStudent accommodation is undoubtedly a challenging environment from a fire safety perspective with their own individual challenges. The student’s lifestyle is typically associated with a reduced level of caution when it comes to appreciating risk. It is the view of BAFSA and the National Fire Chiefs Council that sprinklers should be installed in all new student accommodation regardless of height\, as well as existing buildings undergoing refurbishment\, regardless of height providing a further layer of safety from fire. \nIt is reported that fire crews were mobilised to a small fire involving audio equipment located within a purpose-built mixed development bedroom housing student accommodation which was out on arrival. \nIRS data references\, the sprinkler system coverage was not provided within the fire affected area which is surprising as guidance within in the specific codes/standards would require sprinkler coverage to include the bedrooms. \nThe benefits of installing sprinklers for student accommodation was clearly identified following a fire within a Nottinghamshire high rise student accommodation block involving an incense candle which was successfully contained\, extinguished within a cluster flat bedroom by the activation of 1 concealed sprinkler head with no injuries reported. The provided images clearly demonstrate the benefits of sprinklers \nClick here for further details \n  \n                               \nCredit images Nationwide fire sprinklers.                      Credit Nottinghamshire FRS                                       Credit Nottinghamshire FRS \n5. Brent Food and drink processing \n\nDate of incident; 12 September 2024\nTime of call; 20:10\nIncident; Fire\nProperty type: Food and drink processing\nLocation of fire; Process/Production room\nAFSS; Water mist\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control (Fault in system)\nNumber of nozzle heads operated; 0\n\n6 pumping appliances were mobilised to a fire within a ground floor commercial kitchen within a purpose-built retail warehouse of 3 floors measuring 80m by 50m. On arrival\, the officer in charge was provided with an overview of the incident by the maintenance manager who confirmed the fire involved a deep fat fryer which was protected by a water mist system. Due to a fault on the water mist system\, the fire was not contained/controlled before the arrival of LFB\, the fire was extinguished by operational crews using firefighting media including a dry powder extinguisher\, hose reel and main jet\, the fire was under control at 22:31. \n6. Bexley Factory  \n\nDate of incident; 16 September 2024\nTime of call; 09:52\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Process production room\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire involving an industrial conveyor belt system which was contained within the system therefore insufficient heat was created allowing the operation of the sprinkler system. The fire was extinguished by firefighters using a hose reel jet. \n7. Towe Hamlets Purpose Built Office  \n\nDate of incident; 16 September 2024\nTime of call; 15:03\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Office\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nSmall fire reported within an office involving an electrical storage heater\, fire spread was limited to item first ignited. Due to insufficient heat from the fire\, the sprinkler head located in the room of origin of the fire did not activate. The fire was out on arrival with no firefighting media required. \n8. Lambeth Student Halls of residence \n\nDate of incident; 16 September 2024\nTime of call; 23:34\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Bedroom\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Not known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nSmall fire within a bedroom confined to an item of electrical equipment as part of the building structure. A small amount of damage occurred\, due to insufficient heat from the fire\, the sprinkler head located in the room of origin of the fire did not activate. \n9. Croydon Specialised housing  \n\nDate of incident; 22 September 2024\nTime of call; 13:20\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Did not contain/control\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nFire crews were mobilised to a kitchen fire\, no sprinkler heads actuated due to the size of the fire involving a microwave oven no firefighting was required. \nObservations\, comments \n The two reported sprinkler activations within the residential tall buildings provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk\, assist evacuation \, effect rescue when necessary\nPrevent conflagration\n\nAdvice For Building Managers\, The following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. To achieve this \n\nMaintenance\, The premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, Arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system\, any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, It is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 5\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nLFB Sprinkler activations May 2024\nLFB Sprinkler activations December 2023\nLFB Sprinkler activations October-November 2023\nLFB Sprinkler Activations March 2023 \nLFB Sprinkler Activations April 2023\n\nFurther details on speccific sprinkler activations within the Greater London are available to view on the sprinkler saves main website \nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n               
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-reported-sprinkler-activations-september-2024-review/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Commercial,Residential
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240810
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240811
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20240821T095216Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241101T124603Z
UID:10000473-1723248000-1723334399@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Brighton Assisted Living Complex Sprinkler Save
DESCRIPTION:Image Credit ESFR\n\nFire Rescue Service; East Sussex Fire & Rescue Service (ESFRS)\nDate of Incident; August 2024\nTime of call: 03:51\nPremises; Assisted Living Complex\nLocation; Brighton\nType of fire; Electrical fire\nAutomatic Fire Sprinkler System; Wet Pipe (Sprinkler)\n\nStation Manager Louisa Curtis\, of East Sussex Fire Rescue Service\,  Brighton & Hove Fire Safety Team Manager\, said: \n“ESFRS have consistently promoted for the installation of sprinklers\, it is a simple\, cost-effective way to save more lives and reduce the risks to firefighters. Fire sprinklers are the only active fire system which detects a fire\, suppresses a fire and raises the alarm. This incident demonstrates sprinklers provide protection from fire damage but most importantly provide time for people to safely self-evacuate if there is a fire.” \nSummary \nOur thanks to ESFRS for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk allowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK sprinkler firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry. \nIn this case the benefits of \n\nInstalling a residential sprinkler system within an assisted living complex containing 45 flats.\nProviding a further layer of safety from fire as part of a package of fire safety measures protecting our most vulnerable community members.\nIdentifying the fire safety risks of using emollient and skin creams in the home.\n\nThis is the third reported flat fire within the complex in the space of 29 months on each occasion the fire was contained\, controlled or extinguished with limited fire damage\, no injuries reported. \nWe could be discussing a totally different outcome for this  incident if sprinklers had not been fitted following an electrical fire involving a heat pad which came into contact with bedding contaminated with emollient. \nIt is reported 1 concealed residential sprinkler head activated within the bedroom which contained/controlled the fire. Reinforcing that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential sprinkler system installed to the appropriate codes\, standards reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nPromoting further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n The Incident  \n\nFire appliances were mobilised to a flat fire within a six-storey assisted living complex.\nPrior to the arrival of ESFRS the premises emergency plan was implemented.\nThe resident had been evacuated from their flat by a carer\, prior to the arrival of ESFRS.\nOn arrival the OIC committed a breathing apparatus team with firefighting media to extinguish the fire within the flat\, where it was established that the fire was within a bedroom.\nIt was established the fire had been contained/controlled by the activation of 1 sprinkler head.\nThe seat of the fire involved the bed mattress/linen which was still smouldering extinguished by firefighters using firefighting media.\n\nThe fire had been contained\, controlled by the activation of one concealed sprinkler head containing the fire to the room of origin. \n         \nSeat of the fire contained to the bed mattress/linen with no fire damage visible to the surrounding area with minor smoke damage. \n It was established the cause of the fire was due to an electrical fault involving an electric heat pad which caught fire Igniting the bedding /mattress. \nEmollient creams \nNFCC’s/MHRA’s Know The Fire Risk campaign encourages FRS to ensure people are aware of the potential fire risks when using  emollient creams within their local communities. When in contact with a heat source or naked flame fabric with emollients dried on can result in serious or fatal injuries from fire. \n\nIt was identified that the resident used emollients which are easily transferred from skin on to clothing and items such as towels.\nThe risk occurs when they are absorbed into fabrics and are then exposed to naked flames or heat source.\nScientific testing shows that fabric burns quicker and hotter when contaminated with emollients. These fabrics include clothing\, towelling\, bandages or bedding.\nAnglia Ruskin University conducted an experiment to show the effects emollient creams on ignition rates. The following video experiment shows just how flammable materials with emollient residue on them are and how much hotter they cause fires to burn. (link to video can be found in the links/sources section)\n\nBenefit of the sprinkler system  \n\nReduced the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for\n\n\nThe occupants to escape to safety or be rescued\nThe officer in charge crucial time to implement their operational tactical plan.\nAllowing firefighters to complete search and rescue operations by limiting fire development\, which significantly reduces the risk of flashover.\n\n\nFire contained within the compartment of origin.\nIntegrity of the means of escape\, maintained.\n\nThis incident demonstrates that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or in this case extinguish a fire at an early stage of development and activate an alarm. \nImpairment of active fire protection system \n\nWhere buildings and equipment are provided with active fire protection measures such as a sprinkler system protecting life and in some cases property protection.\nIt is essential that the fire protection measures in a building can function effectively in the event of a fire.\nArrangements are in place to ensure the responsible person\, building manager for the premises is aware that following the activation of an active system such as a sprinkler system provisions are in place allowing for the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system following a fire.\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\nESFRS\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 5\nExperiment conducted by Anglia Ruskin University researchers- YouTube\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data In support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\n\n          \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/brighton-assisted-living-complex-sprinkler-save/
LOCATION:Brighton
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Screenshot-2024-08-15-at-18.34.00.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240801T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240801T235900
DTSTAMP:20260417T033447
CREATED:20240812T204933Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241101T124344Z
UID:10000471-1722470400-1722556740@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Devon Tall Building Bathroom Emollient Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Date of incident; Summer 2024.\nLocation; Devon.\nUse of building; Purpose built block of flats 10 floors and above.\nIncident; fire.\nLocation of fire; Bathroom.\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers.\nFire Rescue Service; Devon & Somerset Fire Rescue Service. (DSFRS)\n\nSummary \nOur thanks to DSFRS for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk allowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK sprinkler firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry. In this case the \n\nBenefits of retrofitting a residential sprinkler system within a residential tall building.\nImportance of sprinkler coverage within bathrooms\, shower rooms and toilets.\nFire safety risks\, if you use emollient and skin creams in the home.\n\nIf it was not for the decision taken by the social housing landlord to retrofit residential sprinkler systems following the tragic events of the Grenfell Fire throughout their high-rise residential blocks of flats property portfolio\, we could be discussing a totally different outcome following an accidental fire involving a naked flame (lite cigarette) which came into contact with a bathroom towel contaminated with emollient. Resulting in the fire burning quickly and intensely activating 1 sidewall sprinkler head within the bathroom which extinguished the fire. \nThe outcome of this sprinkler review will improve fire safety awareness providing further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential sprinkler system reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. Providing further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to a fire following an emergency call received from the remote alarm receiving centre\, resulting in several appliances being mobilised by DSFRS fire control.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment\, key task by the officer in charge (OIC) on arrival\, it was established that the building was fitted with a residential sprinkler system with the fire reported within a flat.\nThe provision of the sprinkler system allowed extra time for the OIC to implement a robust operational high rise tactical plan for the incident.\nUpon entry to the flat operational fire crews established that a fire within a bathroom had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 1 sidewall sprinkler head located within the room of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required\nMinimal fire damage was reported within the compartment of origin\nNo injuries were reported.\n\nIt was established that the cause of the fire was \n\nA lit cigarette that made contact with a bathroom towel which was hanging on the back of the bathroom door which dislodged falling onto the lit cigarette being held in the hand of the resident.\nThe towel immediately ignited burning quickly and intensely\, the resident immediately made their way to a place of safety closing the bathroom door as he left preventing the fire spreading from the room of origin.\nThe sidewall sprinkle head located directly above the inside of the door directly below the seat of the fire activated extinguishing the fire.\n\nEmollient creams \nNFCC’s/MHRA’s Know The Fire Risk campaign encourages FRS to ensure people are aware of the potential fire risks when using  emollient creams within their local communities. When in contact with a heat source or naked flame fabric with emollients dried on can result in serious or fatal injuries from fire. \n\nIt was identified that the resident used emollients which are easily transferred from skin on to clothing and items such as towels.\nThe risk occurs when they are absorbed into fabrics and are then exposed to naked flames or heat source.\nScientific testing shows that fabric burns quicker and hotter when contaminated with emollients. These fabrics include clothing\, towelling\, bandages or bedding.\nAnglia Ruskin University conducted an experiment to show the effects emollient creams on ignition rates. The following video experiment shows just how flammable materials with emollient residue on them are and how much hotter they cause fires to burn. (link to video can be found in the links/sources section)\n\nResidential Sprinkler Specification \nInstalled to BS9251:2014 \n\nCategory 3 system\nCoverage\, flats and communal areas\nIsolation valves installed for each dwelling/floor\nFirefighter inlet valve provided allowing the sprinkler supply to be augmented\nUPS back up power supply\n\nThe decision taken by the social housing landlord to include sprinkler protection for the bathrooms within the flats as part of the specification for the sprinkler system is clearly vindicated following the outcome of this incident despite the guidance contained within BS9251:2014 that bathrooms with a floor area of less than 5m² may be excluded unless required by a fire strategy or risk assessment. \nFollowing the review\, publication of BS9251:2021 Bathrooms\, shower rooms and toilets with a floor area less than 5m2 are now only exempt if they have “linings conforming to BS EN 13501-1:2018 Class A1\, A2-s3\,d2 and B-s3\,d2\, and which are not prepared for white goods\, such as washing machines\, dryers\, electric showers or water heaters;”.Therefore\, bathrooms under 5m2 may now require sprinkler protection based on the updated wording. \nBest practice \nThe social housing provider should be acknowledged for having the forefront focusing on the following areas which allowed a successful outcome for business continuity management. \n\nJoint Working with DSFRS\n\nCompleting joint familiarisation visits to provide the appropriate information to plan and respond to an incident within a high-rise building. The outcome of which allowed DSFRS to identify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems where present such as sprinklers on arrival. \nAllowing a robust onsite emergency response to be immediately actioned. \n\nAssisting in the control of the sprinkler system during the fire incident and following the fire.\nAttendance of the sprinkler company to reinstate the sprinkler system within under 4 hours from time of activation\n\nConclusion \nIf it was not for the sprinkler system\, we could be discussing a fully developed potential major fire within the premises. This incident demonstrates once again the benefits of installing sprinklers within residential tall buildings for both the residents and firefighter safety. \n\nRapidly reducing the rate of production of heat and smoke\nAllowing the fire officer crucial time to implement the operational tactical plan.\nAllowing firefighters to complete search and rescue operations by limiting fire development\, which significantly reduces the risk of flashover.\nIntegrity of the means of escape\, maintained.\nFire contained within the compartment of origin.\n\nDemonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or in this case extinguish a fire at an early stage of development. \nLinks/sources \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 4\nWesthampsted Square AFSS Activation Case Study\nExperiments conducted by Anglian Ruskin University researches-you tube\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data In support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n  \n       
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/devon-tall-building-bathroom-emollient-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Devon
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR