BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sprinkler Saves - ECPv6.11.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Sprinkler Saves
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250812
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250813
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250815T161140Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250815T162413Z
UID:10000528-1754956800-1755043199@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Sprinklers extinguish fire in Southampton scissor design residential block
DESCRIPTION:Incident Commander Mark Caplen said \n\n\n“The sprinklers in the flats operated exactly as intended\, containing the fire to a single room and preventing it from becoming a far more serious incident. The occupier was already safely outside when we arrived\, while other residents followed the building’s ‘stay put’ policy and guidance from our Control team. The building performed exactly as designed during the fire. This incident highlights the importance of having robust fire safety measures in place.” \nSummary \nOn 12 August 2025\, the Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire & Rescue Service (HIWFRS) responded to a fire incident in a Southampton purpose-built ¹scissor block residential flat. The retrofitted residential sprinkler system was activated\, effectively containing\, controlling\, and extinguishing a fire involving textiles that had been accidentally left on a cooking hob. There were no reported injuries. \nA sprinkler activation is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. This incident provides further evidence of the effectiveness\, benefits of sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ²Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nRevealed that across all premises types: – \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nSouthampton City Council demonstrated its commitment to fire safety by agreeing\, in June 2017\, to fund the retrofitting of residential sprinklers within its twenty high-rise buildings as part of a phased programme\, in response to the Grenfell Tower fire. This initiative was undertaken in close collaboration with HIWFRS. \nPriority will be given first to the blocks known as scissor blocks\, followed by the tallest blocks featuring single staircases\, with the remainder prioritised according to height. Such a commitment is essential; without it\, the outcomes of similar incidents could be significantly different. \nBAFSA welcomed the government’s November 2020 decision to lower the height threshold for mandatory sprinklers in purpose group 1a (residential blocks of flats) from 30 metres to 11 metres. Nevertheless\, concerns persist regarding the lack of requirements to retrofit existing residential buildings with sprinklers. \nIn alignment with the 4National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) sprinkler position statement\, The British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association advocate for government action to mandate the retrofitting of sprinklers in high-rise residential buildings. Retrofitting should apply to all existing residential buildings over 18 metres in height\, or those with at least seven storeys served by a single staircase\, as well as all existing residential buildings exceeding 11 metres\, based on risk assessments. \n¹ scissor block residential flats\, consist of interlocking designs consisting of up flats and down flats. served at alternate floors by a common corridor\, which are difficult to understand when performing firefighting duties. \nThe incident  \n\nFire crews responded to a reported fire in a residential tall building.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by the incident commander\, (IC)\nIt was established that the premises sprinkler system had operated on the 3rd floor of the 15-storey building within a flat.\nThe activation of the sprinkler system allowed extra time for the IC to implement a robust high rise tactical plan for the incident.\nFirefighting crews wearing breathing apparatus were committed\, establishing that the fire within the kitchen had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head.\nFirefighting media was applied for turning over and dampening down remaining hot spots.\nFire damage was sustained to the item first ignited on the cooking hob with smoke damage reported throughout the flat.\nThe resident self-evacuated the dwelling prior to the arrival of HIWFRS with no injuries reported\, two cats were rescued.\nCause of the fire\,  textiles accidentally left on a cooking hob.\nThe common ways were not compromised by fire\, smoke.\nPreplanning using up to date risk information (72d) gathered by operational crews allowed the  sprinkler system to be isolated\, following confirmation the fire had been extinguished.\n\nConclusion \nThis incident underscores the benefits of installing residential sprinkler systems in high-rise tall buildings. In this instance\, the systems \n\nProvided support to firefighters operating within a complex building featuring a scissor block design by effectively containing fire spread\, extinguishing the fire playing a key role in mitigating risks for firefighting personnel.\nProvided valuable time for the occupier to self-evacuate from the dwelling to a place of safety\nPrevented conflagration\nIdentified the importance of active fire protection systems minimising fire-related risks.\n\nFurthermore\, this incident illustrates that AWSS are integral to a thorough fire safety strategy\, protecting lives\, property\, and the environment. It also strengthens ongoing advocacy efforts by the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) and stakeholders within the fire sector for more rigorous government regulations regarding the retrofitting of sprinklers in existing buildings. \nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 8\n² Optimal economics report Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk: An analysis from fire service data.\n³Southampton city council\, overview and scrutiny management committee 9 November 2017\n4National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) sprinkler position statement\nHampshire & Isle of Wight Fire & Rescue Service incident of interest\n\n\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n\n           \n\n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/sprinklers-extinguish-fire-in-southampton-tall-building/
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Screenshot-2025-08-15-at-07.23.28.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250801T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250831T235900
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250925T191040Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251011T150424Z
UID:10000532-1754006400-1756684740@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Sprinkler Save London Underground Station
DESCRIPTION:Summary \n\nLondon Fire Brigade (LFB) reported  a sub-surface fire involving an electrical motor in a London Underground escalator plant room.\nAfter conducting a dynamic risk assessment\, the incident commander determined that the escalator water suppression system (EWSS) had been activated within one of the station escalator chambers. \nFirefighters wearing breathing apparatus entered the area and confirmed that the fire had been controlled and contained due to the activation of the EWSS.\nThe remaining fire was extinguished by firefighters using appropriate firefighting media. No injuries occurred. \nThe investigation found that the fire resulted from a heated motor brake drum igniting accumulated debris. \nThe station was reopened shortly after the incident was resolved.\n\nEscalator Water Suppression System  \nA bespoke¹ fire suppression system\, specifically engineered for the London Underground\, designed to safeguard escalators within sub-surface stations from fire. This solution provides full coverage along the entire incline\, including upper and lower tread areas\, machinery\, dust trays\, and the open spaces surrounding the sides of the escalators. \nEach system comprises of range pipes divided into fire zones\, (dry pipe system) terminating in open sprinkler heads\, the heads are directed into the escalator machinery to suppress the risk. \nEach zone is controlled by a multiple Jet Control valve\, which incorporates glass bulb type mechanical detection device and an electrically operated detonator fuse. Distribution pipes connect the system to a suitable water supply usually ²town’s main system. \nIn the system standby condition\, water is stopped from entering the range pipework by the multiple jet control valves. (MJC) \nAn MJC will only allow water to flow\, into the zone that it controls\, when it is either; triggered by an independent automatic fire detection system or subjected to sufficient heat to operate the mechanical detection glass bulb. \nThe fire detection system is managed by a dedicated fire panel monitoring a linear heat cable positioned in the escalator truss work. Should a fire affect a fire zone an adjacent zone of the EWSS will operate. The hydraulic calculations were based on supplying two zones simultaneously. \nKings Cross Underground Escalator Fire \n37 years ago\, a fire at Kings Cross underground station claimed the lives of 31 people which also started in an escalator. It is reported that a lit match fell through a gap on a wooden escalator and set fire to the grease and litter beneath the steps. \nA subsequent investigation revealed a lethal combination of flashover\, a rapid air-borne fire spread due to intense heat\, and the trench effect\, a newly identified phenomenon on steep surfaces\, as the reasons behind the disaster. \nFollowing a public enquiry by Sir Desmond Fennell published in December 1988\, 157 recommendations were made which included banning smoking to all station areas\, replacing of wooden escalators. \nMajor stations underwent comprehensive fire safety upgrades\, including the gradual replacement of ³275 wooden escalators with metal ones\, installation of heat detectors and escalator water suppression systems beneath escalators\, accompanied by enhancements in radio communication and staff emergency training for the London Underground. \nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence on the benefits of fitting automatic water suppression systems in London underground sub stations\, providing a further layer of safety from fire for passengers\, staff and firefighters as part of a package of fire safety measures through early detection and suppression minimising disruption from fire. \n\n¹There is no British or European Standard which deals directly with EWSS\n²EWSS are required to be a secure supply conforming to the requirements of BS5306 and BSEN12845 for duplicate or superior single water supplies\n³Uk Parliament\, London underground: Escalator maintenance debate July 1989\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 8\nLFB\, The kings Cross fire\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance. \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/sprinkler-save-london-victoria-underground-station/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Commercial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/C82D0661-CC1B-46CE-ABC3-84588716FE33_1_102_o.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250801
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250802
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250813T093547Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250813T093547Z
UID:10000526-1754006400-1754092799@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Staffordshire warehouse saved by sprinklers
DESCRIPTION:Head of Prevent\, Protect and Partnerships\, Ian Read\, said: “At Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service\, we champion the use of automatic sprinklers. As shown in the incident at a warehouse on 1 August \, the fire was contained and extinguished by the installed water suppression system\, which are an invaluable resource for our crews. “We would encourage all businesses to consider the equipment they have installed to help reduce risk should the worst happen.” \nSummary \nStaffordshire Fire & Rescue Service (SFRS) reported a fire within a single-story warehouse which was contained\, controlled and extinguished through the activation of the automatic water suppression system\, (AWSS) on this occasion  a sprinkler system. \nA sprinkler save (activation) is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. This review further substantiates the role and advantages of sprinkler systems within the built environment. \nFor this incident\, the operation of the AWSS\, inside the facility led to the following outcomes: \n\nReduce the rate of production of heat and smoke limiting fire growth and ultimately containing and controlling and extinguished the fire.\nPrevented a potentially extended incident that could have required considerable resources from SFRS and impacted routine operations.\nLimited the development of the fire\, facilitating search and rescue efforts by firefighters and reducing risk to personnel.\nAverted the complete loss of the building due to fire.\n\nThis incident provides additional evidence supporting the reliability and effectiveness of AWSS\, aligning with findings from the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council and National Fire Sprinkler Network on the performance of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires \nThe incident \n\nAugust 2025\, SFRS despatched 3 pumping appliances to a warehouse fire on an industrial estate.\nUpon arrival the incident commander established that the fire was located on the ground floor of the single storey warehouse involving an industrial forklift.\nThe fire was contained and controlled through the combined action of four activated sprinkler heads and the presence of ²firewalls within the premises.\nFirefighters equipped with breathing apparatus confirmed the extinguishment of a fire involving a forklift lead-acid battery\, attributed to the sprinkler system’s activation.\nThe affected area damaged by fire covered approximately 25m².\nFire damage to the lead-acid battery and subsequent exposure to sprinkler water initiated an exothermic reaction with the sulphuric acid\, while recorded temperatures did not exceed 80°C\n\nConclusion \n\nThe incident highlights the critical importance of active fire protection systems\, notably AWSS\, demonstrating their effectiveness when integrated with passive measures such as firewalls. Together\, these elements constitute a robust framework aimed at minimising fire-related risks to people\, property\, and the environment.\nAn event with the potential for significant escalation was resolved swiftly\, resulting in only minor disruption due to the effective operation of the sprinkler system.\nIncorporating sprinkler systems can safeguard assets\, minimise financial loss\, and bolster business resilience by controlling or extinguishing fires prior to the arrival of emergency services\, allowing for rapid resumption of normal operations and mitigating economic and social impacts.\n\nFor context\, in August 2021\, a non-sprinklered warehouse fire in Coventry reported by the Business Sprinkler Alliance required ten fire appliances and seventy firefighters to suppress the blaze\, which ultimately destroyed the Ram Enterprise building at Prologis Park. The structure was demolished four days after the incident. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/25\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 8\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data\nBusiness Sprinkler Alliance\, case study Coventry warehouse fire\n²Firewalls\, is a fire‐resistant structure which restricts the spread of fire and extends continuously from the foundation to or through the roof with sufficient structural stability under fire conditions to allow the collapse of the existing construction on either side of the wall to occur without allowing the collapse of the wall.\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance. \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n          \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/staffordshire-warehouse-saved-by-sprinklers/
LOCATION:Staffordshire
CATEGORIES:Commercial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250717
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250718
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250913T212022Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250925T191151Z
UID:10000530-1752710400-1752796799@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Manchester Flat Fire Sprinkler Save
DESCRIPTION:Summary \n17 July 2025\, Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service (GMFRS) reported a fire in a purpose-built residential block of flats. The retrofitted life safety residential sprinkler system was activated and successfully extinguished a fire involving upholstered furniture. No injuries were reported. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. This incident provides further evidence of the effectiveness\, benefits of sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy for a building. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC)\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nRevealed that across all premises types: – \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe 4Guinness Partnership\, one of England’s largest providers of affordable housing\, has demonstrated its commitment to enhanced fire safety by pledging to retrofit residential sprinklers in all buildings exceeding 18 metres in height\, following the Grenfell tragedy. Such a commitment is vital; without it\, the outcomes of similar incidents within their property portfolio could be significantly different. \nThe British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) welcomed the government’s decision on November 2020 to lower the height threshold for mandatory sprinklers in purpose group 1a (residential blocks of flats) from 30 metres to 11 metres. Nevertheless\, concerns persist regarding the lack of requirements to retrofit existing residential buildings with sprinklers. In alignment with the 2NFCC AWSS position statement\, we advocate for government action to mandate the retrofitting of sprinklers in high-rise residential buildings. Retrofitting should apply to all existing residential buildings over 18 metres in height\, or those with at least seven storeys served by a single staircase\, as well as all existing residential buildings exceeding 11 metres\, based on risk assessments. \nThe incident  \n\nFire crews responded to a reported fire within a 15-storey building.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by the incident commander.\nIt was established that the fire involved a flat on the eleventh floor.\nFirefighters were committed to extinguish the fire who established upon entry that the fire had been contained\, controlled and extinguished within the room of origin by the activation of 1 sprinkler head.\nUp to 5sqm fire damage was reported for within the room of origin.\nThe cause of the fire\, careless disposal of smoking materials.\nNo injuries were reported.\n\nThe benefits sprinklers \nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of retrofitting a residential sprinkler system within the dwellings of a single staircase purpose-built block of flats of 15 storeys. The outcome of which \n\nRestricted the fire’s growth\, containing and controlling the fire to the room of origin.\nExtinguished the fire before the arrival of GMFRS\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident that could challenge FRS maintaining a business-as-usual routine service.\n\nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence on the benefits of retrofitting a life safety residential sprinkler system in high rise residential buildings supporting the calls from the NFCC and the fire sector urging government to introduce further regulations for the installation of retrofitting sprinklers in the built environment. \nWhen comparing this incident to a similar 3high-rise building fire in Salford in December 2022\, where sprinklers were not installed\, the outcomes were markedly different. The GMFRS press release regarding the Salford incident highlights the significant impact that the absence of a life safety residential sprinkler system can have on the building\, residents. \nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 8\n¹Optimal economics report Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk: An analysis from fire service data\n²NFCC Sprinkler position statement\n3Salford high rise building fire December 2022 (GMFRS press release)\n4Inside housing\, The Guiness partnership revels progress on sprinkler retrofits\nGMFRS Benefits of sprinklers\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance. \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n     
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/manchester-flat-fire-sprinklers-save/
LOCATION:Greater Manchester
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250711
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250712
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250722T085131Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250722T085206Z
UID:10000523-1752192000-1752278399@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:London studio flat sprinkler save
DESCRIPTION:   Image credit Nationwide sprinklers\nSummary  \nThis is the ¹second reported activation of the sprinkler system within 19 months at a former six-storey office block converted to provide 62 one roomed studio flats. In both Instances the fire was contained\, controlled or extinguished by the sprinkler system. \nA sprinkler activation is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have operated to contain\, control\, or extinguish a building fire. These incidents provides evidence of the effectiveness of sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy. \nIn this particular incident\, the presence of a residential sprinkler system in a tall residential building. Resulted in the following outcomes. \n\nThe fire’s growth was limited and extinguished in the room of origin\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident that could strain the operational resilience of the LFB resources and challenge maintaining routine services.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not eliminate the need for other fire safety measures\, especially for individuals at higher-than-average risk from fire and those unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nThe Incident  \nOn 11 July 2025\, a fire involving a charging laptop inside a studio flat was extinguished after one sprinkler head was activated. Damage was confined to the item first ignited and light smoke damage occurred within the dwelling. No injuries were reported. \nSprinkler System  \nThis incident demonstrates that a correctly designed\, installed\, and maintained residential sprinkler system\, in line with applicable codes and standards\, can reduce the rate of heat and smoke production\, providing more time for occupants to leave safely or be assisted. \n\nBS93251:14\, Category 2 system\nWater supply Tank/Pump\, 30-minute duration\nSprinkler isolation valves for each floor\n\nConclusion \nThe outcome of this incident could have been so much different if sprinklers had not been fitted. Providing further evidence on the benefits of sprinklers supporting calls from the ²National Fire Chiefs Council and the fire sector urging the government to introduce further regulations for the installation of sprinklers in the built environment. \nWe acknowledge the recent government proposals requiring sprinklers to be installed \n\nIn all new care homes.\nReducing the threshold height for high rise residential sprinklers to 11m from 30m\n\nBut we are concerned there is still no requirement to install sprinklers in all \n\nHomes where vulnerable people live.\nBuildings housing vulnerable residents such sheltered accommodation\, hostels\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\n¹Previous incident December 2023\, fire involving combustibles inside a studio flat was contained\, controlled by the activation of 1 sprinkler head in the room of origin before the arrival of LFB\, limiting spread to the room of origin.\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/25\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 8\n²NFCC Sprinkler Position Statement\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n  \n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/london-studio-flat-sprinkler-save/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/WhatsApp-Image-2025-07-12-at-09.05.43.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250704
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250705
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20251209T052450Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260114T141149Z
UID:10000543-1751587200-1751673599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Birmingham student cluster flat kitchen fire
DESCRIPTION:Mark Serdetschniy\, West Midlands Fire Service\, said: \n“The sprinkler system played a crucial role in preventing the fire from becoming far more serious. By slowing the spread of flames\, it gave firefighters enough time to put out the blaze swiftly\, resulting in no injuries.” \nSummary  \nAt 20:00 on Wednesday\, 4 July 2025\, West Midlands Fire Service responded to a kitchen fire within a communal cluster flat located on the 12th floor of a 15-storey student accommodation building. The building’s sprinkler system was activated\, effectively containing and controlling the fire\, which originated from unattended cooking. Firefighters equipped with breathing apparatus extinguished the fire using CO₂ extinguishers. Fire damage was minimal; however\, water egress affected floors below the scene of the fire. No injuries were reported. \nA sprinkler activation is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. This incident provides further evidence of the effectiveness\, benefits of sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy. \nRaising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Water Suppresion (AWSS) Which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures. \nEmbracing the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) who actively encourage fire services to collate\, promote case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK to promote the effectiveness of sprinklers in operating and controlling and in some cases extinguishing the fire. \nThe outcome of which will continue to promote a better understanding of the benefits of AFSS in the wider community\, fire safety sector in general as an effective and reliable fire protection measure as part of a package of fire safety measures protecting life and property from fire. \nProviding further evidence as part of our campaign driving change so AWSS are understood and accepted as the norm and not the exception\, the outcome of which will. \n\nInfluence policy makers to strengthen AWSS requirements\, England’s sprinkler fire safety regulations trail behind its neighbours in other jurisdictions where governments have set lower mandatory thresholds for the installation of sprinklers.\nEntice housing provider stakeholders and\, others to install sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures providing a further layer of protection from fire for our communities.\n\nStudent accommodation \nStudent accommodation Is undoubtedly a challenging environment from a fire safety perspective with their own individual challenges. The student’s lifestyle is typically associated with a reduced level of caution when it comes to appreciating risk. \nThe dangers of student accommodation were demonstrated following the fire in Bolton involving the premises known as the ‘Cube’ on 15 November 2019. The Cube incident report completed by Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service identifies\, the speed of which the fire took hold and the devastating impact it had on the building was shocking\, two residents were trapped by heat and smoke and required to be rescued by firefighters\, sprinklers were not fitted. \nLegislation \nRegulatory guidance for England includes a specific requirement to install sprinklers in purpose group 1a (residential block of flats) with a top floor height of 11 metres above ground level this guidance does not apply to student halls of residence regardless of height. \nEngland’s national building and fire safety regulations trail behind its neighbours\, governments in other UK jurisdictions who have set lower mandatory thresholds for the installation of sprinklers in new purpose-built student accommodation. \nFollowing the introduction of new fire regulations within Northern Ireland\, fire sprinklers are now required in within student accommodation with a storey more than 11m above ground level which will came into effect on 6 May 2025 \nIt is the view of the BAFSA and the 1NFCC that sprinklers should be installed in all new student accommodation regardless of height\, as well as existing buildings undergoing refurbishment. The Government should be looking to emulate the policies in the devolved governments to support unitary policy across nations by lowering or removing the acceptable height\, floor area\, or occupancy threshold dependent on building type. \nConclusion \nThis incident highlights the value of residential sprinkler systems in student accommodation. In this case\, the system: \n\nProvided support to firefighters reducing fire growth.\nControlling the fire in its early stages\, reducing contribution to fire spread made by combustible construction materials.\nProvided valuable time for the occupiers to self-evacuate from the dwelling to a place of safety.\nPrevented conflagration.\nAllowed prompt incident resolution and earlier release of resources\, supporting continued emergency response\n\nThis incident illustrates that sprinklers are integral to a thorough fire safety strategy\, protecting lives\, firefighters\, property\, and the environment. It also strengthens ongoing advocacy efforts by the NFCC and stakeholders within the fire sector for more rigorous government regulations regarding the installation of AWSS in the built environment. \nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler Saves winter update\n1National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) sprinkler position statement\nThe Cube Incident report and key observations\nNational Fire Sprinkler Network newsletter\n\nEffective advocacy and policy lobbying require the collection of robust supporting evidence. If you have knowledge of a sprinkler incident that may contribute to this initiative\, please provide the pertinent details using the sprinkler activation reporting form available at www.sprinklersaves.co.uk. \n  \n       
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/birmingham-student-cluster-flat-kitchen-fire/
LOCATION:Birmingham
CATEGORIES:Residential
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250703
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250704
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250731T152730Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250813T093621Z
UID:10000525-1751500800-1751587199@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Staffordshire factory saved by sprinklers
DESCRIPTION:Head of Prevent\, Protect and Partnerships\, Ian Read\, said: “At Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service\, we champion the use of automatic sprinklers. As shown in the incident at a factory on 3 July\, the fire was contained and extinguished by the installed water suppression system\, which are an invaluable resource for our crews. “We would encourage all businesses to consider the equipment they have installed to help reduce risk should the worst happen.” \nSummary  \nStaffordshire Fire & Rescue Service (SFRS) reported that a fire within a factory and was contained\, controlled and extinguished by the installed automatic water suppression system. (Sprinklers) \nA sprinkler activation is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. This incident provides additional data regarding the role and benefits of sprinklers as part of a broader fire safety approach. \nFor this incident\, the operation of the AWSS inside the factory led to the following outcomes. \n\nReduce the rate of production of heat and smoke limiting the fire’s growth\, containing and controlling and in this case extinguished the fire.\nThe response prevented a potentially prolonged incident that might have demanded significant resources from SFRS and affected routine operations.\nLimited fire development assisted firefighters in search and rescue efforts and reduced risk to those personnel.\nPreventing the total loss of the factory due to fire.\n\nThe Incident  \n\n3 July 2025\, SFRS despatched 3 fire appliances to a fire inside an open plan factory. Upon arrival the incident commander (IC) completed a dynamic risk assessment and determined that the fire involved a large industrial oven had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of three sprinkler heads.\nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of AWSS following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\nConclusion \n\nThe fire was attributed to an electrical fault related to a large industrial oven. Firefighters wearing breathing apparatus were committed who confirmed the fire had been extinguished by the sprinkler system\, proceeded to ventilate the building\, isolate the sprinkler system. Five individuals required hospital treatment for smoke inhalation.\nAs a result\, what could have developed into a significant incident was resolved quickly and was only a minor inconvenience due to the presence of the sprinkler system\, despite there being no regulatory requirement for such systems in factories.\n\nFor comparison\, an unsprinklered carpet warehouse fire in Kidderminster in December 2021\, reported by the Business Sprinkler Alliance resulted in a different outcome. The business experienced substantial disruption and now faces uncertainty. Containment\, control\, and extinguishment of that fire required substantial resources from Hereford Fire and Rescue Service\, causing extensive disruption to local businesses and schools due to road closures. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/25\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 8\nStaffordshire Fire & Rescue press release\nBusiness Sprinkler Alliance\, Lutterworth Warehouse saves by sprinklers\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance. \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n                 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/staffordshire-factory-saved-by-sprinklers/
LOCATION:Staffordshire
CATEGORIES:Industrial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250701T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250831T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20251011T150344Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251031T083527Z
UID:10000534-1751356800-1756659600@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Greater Manchester Sprinkler Activations July-August 2025
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nGreater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service (GMFRS) provided primary fire data from the ¹incident recording system and additional sources for the specified period\, documenting cases where Automatic Water Suppression Systems (AWSS) were present\, having an impact within Greater Manchester. \n The review  \nThe incidents contained within this review provides additional evidence supporting the reliability and effectiveness of AWSS\, aligning with findings from the report conducted by ²Optimal Economics and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council and National Fire Sprinkler Network on the performance of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \n5 incidents reported for July-August 2025 \nOf the five reported sprinkler incidents reported\, three were extinguished\, one was contained and controlled\, and the remaining incident was classified as “other.” In the latter case\, the system did not activate because only fumes were released. \n \nInformation was provided allowing a full review to be published for one of the 3 incidents involving purpose-built block of flats providing further evidence on the benefits of retrofitting a life safety residential sprinkler system in high rise residential buildings supporting the calls from the NFCC and the fire sector urging government to introduce further regulations for the installation of retrofitting sprinklers in the built environment. \nIf it was not for the foresight of the Guinness Partnership\, one of England’s largest providers of affordable housing to retrofit residential sprinklers in all buildings exceeding 18 metres in height\, following the Grenfell tragedy\, the outcome of this incident could have been significantly different. \nThe incident  \n\nFire crews responded to a reported fire within a 15-storey building.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by the incident commander.\nIt was established that the fire involved a flat on the eleventh floor.\nFirefighters were committed to extinguish the fire who established upon entry that the fire had been contained\, controlled and extinguished within the room of origin by the activation of 1 sprinkler head.\nUp to 5sqm fire damage was reported for within the room of origin.\nThe cause of the fire\, careless disposal of smoking materials.\nNo injuries were reported.\n\nThe benefits sprinklers \nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of retrofitting a residential sprinkler system within the dwellings of a single staircase purpose-built block of flats. The outcome of which \n\nRestricted the fire’s growth\, containing and controlling the fire to the room of origin.\nExtinguished the fire before the arrival of GMFRS\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident that could challenge FRS maintaining a business-as-usual routine service.\n\nOf the remaining two residential tall building fires\, the fire was extinguished within the room of origin by the activation of 1 sprinkler head. \nConclusion \nThese incidents illustrate that AWSS are integral to a thorough fire safety strategy\, protecting lives\, property\, and the environment. It also strengthens ongoing advocacy efforts by the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) and stakeholders within the fire sector for more rigorous government regulations regarding the retrofitting of sprinklers in existing buildings. \nBAFSA welcomed the government’s November 2020 decision to lower the height threshold for mandatory sprinklers in purpose group 1a (residential blocks of flats) from 30 metres to 11 metres. Nevertheless\, concerns persist regarding the lack of requirements to retrofit existing residential buildings with sprinklers. \nIn alignment with the 4National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) sprinkler position statement\, The British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association advocate for government action to mandate the retrofitting of sprinklers in high-rise residential buildings. Retrofitting should apply to all existing residential buildings over 18 metres in height\, or those with at least seven storeys served by a single staircase\, as well as all existing residential buildings exceeding 11 metres\, based on risk assessments. \nSources/further reading.  \n\n¹Incident recording system\, after an emergency fire call\, key incident details are entered daily into the IRS by the officer in charge.)\n²Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data\n³Sprinkler Saves Review 2024/25\, This review showcases just how essential AWSS\, including sprinklers and watermist systems\, are in safeguarding our communities from the devastating effects of fire\n4National Fire Chiefs Council AWSS Position Statement \n\n  \n       
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/greater-manchester-sprinkler-activations-july-august-2025/
LOCATION:Greater Manchester
CATEGORIES:Residential
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250701
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250702
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250720T092620Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250720T092620Z
UID:10000522-1751328000-1751414399@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Doncaster tall building kitchen fire extinguished by sprinklers
DESCRIPTION:Roger Brason\, South Yorkshire Fire & Rescue’s sprinkler advocate: \n\n\n“We’ve championed the use of sprinklers\, particularly in high-rise buildings\, for quite some time\, so we’re delighted that all of the blocks in Doncaster now have them.” \n\n\n“These devices not only help protect life but help protect property too. In most cases\, they will extinguish a fire completely and prevent it from spreading any further. The fact that people living in high-rise buildings across Doncaster now have such a high level of fire protection really is excellent news.” \nOverview of the incident  \nThe decision by  St Ledger Homes of Doncaster working with both Doncaster Council and South Yorkshire Fire Rescue (SYFR) to improve fire safety arrangements installing sprinklers within this residential block of flats should be applauded following an accidental chip pan fire which was extinguished by the activation of the retrofitted sprinkler system. \nIt is reported heat generated from the fire\, activated 1 sidewall sprinkler head within the kitchen\, raising the alarm by transmitting a fire signal to the remote alarm receiving centre allowing the appropriate emergency response.The operation of the sprinkler system restricted the growth of the fire\, extinguishing the fire before the arrival of SYFR.  Minor fire damage was sustained to the adjacent kitchen cupboards\, worktop\, 1 person required to be assisted from the dwelling by firefighters with no injuries reported. \nDebunking the myth that residential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on fires involving chip pans. \n¹Optimal economics report \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nLegislation  \nAt present there is no statutory legislation for the retrofitting of sprinklers with purpose-built block of flats\, this incident demonstrates the benefits of installing sprinklers within tall buildings\, demonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or for this incident extinguish the fire at an early stage of development. In addition to providing attending crews with confidence when attending tall building fires which are sprinkler protected compared to other buildings which are not sprinkler protected. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Annual Review 2024/25\nSprinkler saves Spring Update No 8\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk\nFire Industry Association Article 2 January 2020\nBAFSA video chip pan demonstration\, click here to open chip pan fire\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n             
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/doncaster-tall-building-kitchen-fire-extinguished-by-sprinklers/
LOCATION:Doncaster
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250701
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20260101
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20260114T141112Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260120T065647Z
UID:10000544-1751328000-1767225599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Sprinkler systems extinguish fires in extra-care living accommodation in Croydon and Abergavenny\, strengthening the argument for making them statutory.
DESCRIPTION:Background \nThe benefit of installing Automatic Water Suppression Systems (AWSS) protecting the most vulnerable residents of our communities was clearly demonstrated following reported dwelling kitchen fires by the London Fire Brigade and South Wales Fire and Rescue Service involving extra care living accommodation\, a form of specialised housing. \nFor both incidents the fire was contained\, controlled and extinguished by the operation of the building’s AWSS with no injuries reported. Demonstrating the effectiveness of AWSS in controlling fires at an early stage\, significantly reducing the risk to life\, limiting fire spread\, and minimising property damage\, preventing the fire from spreading further and enabled a swift\, safe resolution. \nSpecialised housing\, extra care housing schemes has seen demographic shifts\, with people living longer lives. This rise in life expectancy means more residents face mobility issues\, reduced sensory abilities\, and cognitive challenges\, which all heighten both the chances of fire and the risk to individuals during such emergencies. \nThe BAFSA welcomed the government’s announcement that\, starting in March 2025\, all newly built care homes must have sprinklers installed. However\, we are still concerned that this requirement does not extend to specialised housing\, where residents often face similar risks as those in care homes. Fire safety guidance is provided by the National Fire Chiefs Council for specialised housing\, advocating the use of AWSS\, but it’s not statutory. In England\, the regulations covering AWSS trail behind the rest of the UK\, In Scotland and Wales sprinklers are mandatory for new build specialised housing. \nThis concern was reiterated in the ¹Coroners report aimed at preventing future deaths\, which was sent to the then Rt Hon Michael Gove\, Secretary of State for Levelling Up\, Housing and Communities in March 2023. The report followed the investigation conducted by the coroner into the death of Mr Brian George Harefield aged 85\, who was overcome by smoke\, found unconscious in his flat\, and sadly lost his life. \nThe study\, analysis of ²national fire data\, an in-depth review of fire-related fatalities and severe casualties in England\, 2010/11 to 2018/19 referenced that while there is a lack of recent research on fatal fires\, the available studies consistently identified age\, the presence of an impairment such as physical disability\, smoking\, and alcohol use as key factors on the outcome of the fire\, as they will be less able to respond to a fire. \nThe report raised concerns regarding the lack of mandatory sprinkler systems and other fire-safety measures in extra care and retirement housing particularly for older people with reduced mobility. It acknowledges the government consultation undertaken about sprinklers in care homes\, but the scope of this consultation does not cover to specific risks to those in extra care facilities. \nIn the response from the Secretary of State for Levelling up\, Housing and Communities\, it was acknowledged more evidence is needed on the benefits of sprinklers and other fire protection measures in specialised housing such as extra care facilities. \nA research programme is underway to access whether sprinklers are more effective than alternatives such as improved fire detection alarms or compartmentation\, stage 1 of this research supported requiring sprinklers in all new care homes stage 2 will focus on specialised housing\, including extra care. \nThe findings for stage 2 of this 3research was published in December 2025. The study was considered inclusive\, reflecting a wide range of building types and the project’s complexity and scope. The report also made several recommendations for further research\, including a review of sprinkler system provisions in all types and heights of buildings\, especially within the specialised housing and care home sector \nThe incidents \n\nDecember 2025\, Abergavenny extra care living accommodation \n\nOn Thursday\, 18 December 2025\, crews from South Wales Fire and Rescue Service attended a fire at a residential retirement complex. On arrival\, it was confirmed that a small fire had occurred within the kitchen area of a flat. \nit was found that the fire had already been extinguished by the building’s automatic sprinkler system\, highlighting the benefits to the flat’s occupants\, other residents of the building\, and the responding emergency services. All residents were accounted for\, with no injuries reported \nSouth Wales Fire and Rescue Service\, Area Manager Mike Wyatt said; \n“This incident clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of fire sprinkler systems in controlling fires at an early stage\, significantly reducing the risk to life\, limiting fire spread\, and minimising property damage. In this case\, the sprinkler system prevented the fire from spreading further and enabled a swift\, safe resolution.” \n“South Wales Fire and Rescue Service continues to support the use of sprinklers\, particularly in residential areas and specialised housing\, as proven measures to enhance fire safety and protect vulnerable occupants.” \n\nJuly 2025\, Croydon extra care\, extra care living accommodation\n\nMore than ten years after Croydon Council retrofitted sprinkler systems across its six extra-care housing complexes\, a kitchen fire occurred originating from a cooker. The fire was effectively contained and extinguished by the activation of a single sprinkler head\, eliminating the need for further firefighting\, no injuries were reported. \nIn September 2015\, the Fire Industry Association documented an earlier event at Truscott House one of Croydon’s extra-care housing complexes\, where a kitchen fire caused by a toaster was successfully extinguished by the sprinkler system. The activation of the sprinklers prevented the fire from reaching the resident’s bedroom while he was asleep\, thus ensuring his safety. The decision by Croydon Council to install sprinklers in all their extra-care housing facilities proved decisive in limiting the impact of these incident. \n \nConclusion                                                                    \nThese collection of incidents reinforces why the BAFSA\, The National Fire Sprinkler Network and the National Fire Chiefs Council has long advocated for the use of sprinklers in specialised housing and why\, Government should follow the lead of Scotland and Wales expanding sprinkler requirements to include specialised housing. \nProviding further supporting evidence to under pin BAFSA’s advocacy\, turning operational evidence into persuasive tools for policy and parliamentary engagement\, and reinforcing the case for wider sprinkler inclusion within national building policy. \nIn comparison the fire that burnt down the Beechmere extra-care retirement village in Crewe in August 2019 housing 132 apartments for some of our most vulnerable members of our communities\, is a reminder on the danger of fires for this sector. No lives were lost but over 150 residents lost their homes. \nSprinklers were not fitted as it was not a statutory requirement under the building regulations. \nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler saves review 2025/25\nSprinkler Saves winter review\nNFSN Newsletter\nFire Industry Association\, Care home fire sparks call for sprinkler systems\n¹Coroners report to prevent future deaths\n2An in-depth review of fire related fatalities and severe casualties in England\, 2010/11 to 2018/19\n3Research and analysis Fire Safety: Specialised housing and care homes\nNews on the block\, six years after Beechmere-The fire safety gap remains\, BSA Tom Roche BSA\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance. \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n           
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/sprinkler-systems-extinguish-fires-in-extra-care-living-accommodation-in-croydon-and-abergavenny-strengthening-the-argument-for-making-them-statutory/
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Screenshot-2025-12-02-at-18.05.48.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250630
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250701
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20251028T081927Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251114T044416Z
UID:10000535-1751241600-1751327999@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Dagenham Flat Kitchen Fire Sprinklers Save
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nTriangle Fire Systems Ltd reported an incident involving a fire in a residential block of flats. The life safety sprinkler system was activated and effectively extinguished a cooking-related fire within one of the dwellings. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. This incident provides further evidence of the effectiveness\, benefits of sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy for a building. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC)\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nRevealed that across all premises types: – \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe incident  \n\nThe fire occurred in a sixth-floor flat of a nine-storey residential building.\n1 concealed sprinkler head activated extinguishing the fire.\nContaining\, controlling fire growth to the room of origin.\nMinor water\, smoke damage was reported within the flat\nThe premises emergency plan allowed Triangle Fire to be notified of the activation allowing the system to be recommissioned\n\nThe benefits sprinklers \nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of installing a residential sprinkler system within a residential purpose-built block of flats. The outcome of which \n\nRestricted the fire’s growth\, containing and controlling the fire to the room of origin.\nNo injuries were reported.\nPreventing conflagration that could challenge FRS maintaining a business-as-usual routine service.\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler saves autumn update\n¹Optimal economics report Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk: An analysis from fire service data\nTriangle Fire Systems Ltd\, Sprinkler Save\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance. \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n  \n             
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/dagenham-flat-kitchen-fire-sprinklers-save/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250604
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250605
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250715T114409Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250715T122110Z
UID:10000521-1748995200-1749081599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Bedfordshire Tall Building Bedroom Fire Saved By Retrofitted Sprinkler System
DESCRIPTION:Image credit BM Sprinklers/Triangle\nGroup Commander Mark Garrett\, responsible for fire safety at Bedfordshire Fire & Rescue Service (BFRS)\, said: “This incident shows exactly how sprinklers save lives. The system worked perfectly\, stopping the fire before it could spread. Our partnership with bpha helps keep residents safe. \nSummary  \nBFRS have reported that on Wednesday 4 June at 10:33pm fire crews were mobilised to a dwelling bedroom fire within a residential purpose-built block of flats\, caused by a lit cigarette extinguished by the operation of the premises’ retrofitted residential sprinkler system. \nA sprinkler activation is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. Each of these incidents provides evidence of the effectiveness of sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy. \nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of retrofitting a residential sprinkler system within the dwellings of a single staircase purpose-built block of flats of 12 floors. The outcome of which \n\nRestricted the fire’s growth\, containing and controlling the fire to the room of origin.\nExtinguished the fire before the arrival of BFRS.\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident that could strain the operational resilience of BFRS resources and challenge maintaining routine services.\n\nThe Incident  \nOn arrival the incident commander established that a bedroom fire caused by a lit cigarette had been contained\, controlled and extinguished following the activation of 1 sidewall sprinkler head before the arrival of BFRS. No injuries were reported\, the resident self-evacuated the flat following the actuation of the domestic smoke detector \nImage credit BM Sprinklers/Triangle\nImage 1                                                           Image 2 \n           \nImage 1\, Activated sidewall sprinkler head\, located 3m from the seat of the fire which contained\, controlled and extinguished the fire. \nImage 2\, Identifies that the seat of the fire was in the vicinity below the head rest involving bed linen/textiles with smoke staining visible on the wall from the plume of the fire. \nOnsite information allowed firefighters to interact with the building sprinkler system allowing the system to be isolated at the conclusion of the incident. Minor water escape was reported affecting adjacent properties which was dealt with by bpha contractors in a timely manner. \nbpha should be recognised for their fire safety review within their residential high-rise building portfolio allowing the retrofitting of sprinklers on a case-by-case basis. \nLegislation \nThe outcome of this incident could have been so much different if sprinklers had not been fitted. Providing further evidence supporting calls from the ¹National Fire Chiefs Council urging the government to introduce regulations mandating sprinklers in England and specifically to mandate the retrofitting of sprinklers in all existing residential buildings over 11 metres in height based on risk assessments. Currently\, there is no statutory legislation for the retrofitting of sprinklers within residential tall buildings. \nThis incident demonstrates the benefits of installing and retrofitting sprinklers in such buildings\, showing that a properly designed and installed sprinkler system to BS9251:21 can detect\, raise the alarm\, and control or extinguish a fire at an early stage. \nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not eliminate the need for other fire safety measures\, especially for individuals at higher-than-average risk from fire and those unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/25\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 8\n1NFCC Sprinkler Position Statement\nBedfordshire Fire & Rescue Service\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n        \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/bedfordshire-retrofitted-tall-building-bedroom-fire-saved-by-sprinkler-system/
LOCATION:Bedfordshire
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Picture-1.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250601T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250630T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20251112T072326Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260120T065725Z
UID:10000539-1748764800-1751302800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Dagenham Flat Kitchen Sprinklers Save
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nTriangle Fire Systems Ltd reported an incident involving a fire in a residential block of flats. The life safety sprinkler system was activated and effectively extinguished a cooking-related fire within one of the dwellings. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. This incident provides further evidence of the effectiveness\, benefits of sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy for a building. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC)\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nRevealed that across all premises types: – \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe incident  \n\nThe fire occurred in a sixth-floor flat of a nine-storey residential building.\n1 concealed pendent sprinkler head activated extinguishing the fire.\nContaining\, controlling fire growth to the room of origin.\nMinor water\, smoke damage was reported within the flat.\nThe premises emergency plan allowed the sprinkler contractors to be notified of the activation allowing the system to be recommissioned following the incident.\n\nThe benefits sprinklers \nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of installing a residential sprinkler system within a residential purpose-built block of flats. The outcome of which  \n\nRestricted the fire’s growth\, containing and controlling the fire to the room of origin.\nNo injuries were reported.\nPreventing conflagration that could challenge FRS maintaining a business-as-usual routine service.\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler saves autumn update\n¹Optimal economics report Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk: An analysis from fire service data\nTriangle Fire Systems Ltd\, Sprinkler Save\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance. \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link.
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/dagenham-flat-kitchen-sprinklers-save/
LOCATION:Dagenham
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250520
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250521
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250521T161232Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250522T074710Z
UID:10000515-1747699200-1747785599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Cleveland Retrofitted Tall Building Kitchen Saved By Sprinkler System
DESCRIPTION: Image credit CFB\n“This incident again demonstrates the dangers associated with the use of chip pans\, Cleveland Fire Brigade urge members of the public to switch to safer alternative methods of cooking.  We applaud the landords approach to ensuring the safety of its residents through the installation of sprinkler systems\, without these this incident could have been catastrophic.” Says Matty Stather\, Fire Engineering Station Manager at Cleveland Fire Brigade. \n“Sprinkler systems are a highly effective\, reliable and a cost-effective fire safety measure that can save lives\, reduce injuries\, protect our firefighters who attend incidents\, provide peace of mind for our residents\, and reduce property damage. Cleveland Fire Brigade is committed to reducing risk to its communities and the installation of sprinklers by residential properties\, businesses\, schools\, and care homes will help achieve this.” Continued Matty Stather \nSummary \nOur thanks to Cleveland Fire Brigade (CFB) for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler saves to Sprinkler Saves UK following a kitchen fire within a residential purpose-built block of flats extinguished by the operation of the premises residential sprinkler system. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. Each of these real-life individual tangible stories provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures. \n\nReducing the impact of fire on people\, property and the environment\, reducing the risks to firefighters.\nAddressing the myths\, misconceptions regarding their safety and efficiency\, providing evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect our communities from fire.\n\nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of \n\nRetrofitting a residential sprinkler system within the dwellings\, common ways of a single staircase purpose-built block of flats of 12 storeys.\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident\, which can lead to a significant strain on the operational resilience of Fire Rescue Service (FRS) resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service.\nIncorporating a robust emergency plan allowing for the immediate attendance of an on-call response team to reinstate the sprinkler system\nDebunking the myth that residential sprinklers as an extinguishing media should not be used on fires involving chip pans.\n\nThe benefit of retrofitting life safety sprinkler systems by the landlord within their residential tall building property portfolio was demonstrated following reports of an accidental fire involving a chip pan fire\, two persons were present in the dwelling at the time of the fire who self-evacuated with no injuries reported before the arrival of CFB. \nThe heat generated from the fire\, activated 1 sidewall sprinkler head within the kitchen\, located 1.5m away from the seat of the fire\, which allowed a fire signal to be transmitted to the remote alarm receiving centre allowing the appropriate emergency response. The operation of the sprinkler system restricted the growth of the fire\, extinguishing the fire before the arrival of CFB. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised by CFB fire control at 18:17 to a fire following an emergency call received from the landlord’s remote alarm receiving centre.\nResulting in the mobilisation of 4 pumping appliances\, 1 aerial appliance.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by the incident commander (IC) it was established that the sprinkler system on the 11 floor of the 12-storey building had operated with in a flat.\nThe provision of the sprinkler system provided extra time for the IC to implement a robust operational high rise tactical plan for the incident.\nUpon entry to the flat\, fire crews established that a fire within a kitchen had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 1 sidewall sprinkler head located within the room of origin.\nThe cause of the fire was cooking left unattended involving a chip pan which caught light\nMinimal fire/smoke damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nNo further firefighting media was required by CFB.\nThe sprinkler system for the individual flat was isolated by CFB following confirmation to the IC that the fire was all out.\nTwo residents self-evacuated before the arrival of CFB\, no injuries were reported.\nThe sprinkler system was reinstated at 22:13 hours\n\nAll images credit CFB        \n \nImage 1 Seat of the fire with limited smoke/fire damage.                             \n \n Image 2 Minor fire damage sustained to the ceiling  above the fire. \n \nImage 3 Position of sidewall sprinkler head.                    \n\n Image 4 Sidewall sprinkler head.                                     \n\n  Image 5 Concealed sidewall sprinkler cover plate.          \n \nImage 6 location of flat isolation valve located in ceiling void in the common ways above the flat front door.\nPremises emergency plan \nDue to the provision of a robust emergency plan protocols were in place allowing firefighters to interact with the sprinkler system allowing the system to be isolated following the orders of the IC when it was identified the fire was all out. \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler saves reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the FRS to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy. Debunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nDemonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or in this case extinguish a fire at an early stage of development. \nCFB maintaining a business-as-usual service \nAusterity\, cuts in public funding across the country have significantly impacted FRS resulting in a significant reduction to front line cover and prevention and protection activities putting a strain on resources impacting on public safety and service delivery. \nMajor protracted fire incidents therefore have a knock-on effect on local FRS resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service allowing an effective response to attend other emergencies. The benefits of installing sprinkler systems in the built environment for FRS should not be underestimated. \n\nReduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, limiting fire development preventing flash over providing the FRS.\n\n\nWith a further layer of protection for firefighters.\nCrucial time for the operational tactical plan to be implemented by the IC\, complete search and rescue operations.\nResources released earlier from the incident\, to attend other emergency incidents allowing a business-as-usual service to be maintained.\n\nFor FRS the early release of resources is paramount\, CFB have six whole time stations and 10 on call stations mainly in rural areas. For this incident 4 pumping appliances\, 1 aerial platform were  mobilised as part of the predetermined attendance. Due to the positive impact of the sprinkler system on the fire\, the incident stop message was sent 1 hour after the initial call allowing the release of all resources to be available to attend other emergencies. \nRetrofitting Sprinkler systems within tall residential buildings \nAt present there is no statutory legislation for the retrofitting of sprinklers within residential tall buildings. This incident demonstrates the benefits of installing\, retrofitting sprinklers within residential tall buildings\, demonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or for this incident extinguish the fire at an early stage of development. \nIn addition to providing attending crews with confidence when attending tall building fires which are sprinkler protected compared to other buildings which are not sprinkler protected. \n¹Optimal economics report\, Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk: An Analysis from fire service data \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler saves Spring Update No 7\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk\nCleveland Fire Brigade\nBAFSA video chip pan demonstration\, click here to open chip pan fire\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n      \n  \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/cleveland-retrofitted-tall-building-kitchen-saved-by-sprinkler-system/
LOCATION:cleveland
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Screenshot-2025-05-22-at-08.42.45.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250516
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250517
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250722T174413Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250731T152757Z
UID:10000524-1747353600-1747439999@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Cambridgeshire flat fire extinguished by sprinkler system
DESCRIPTION:Steve Flemming\, Fire Protection Manager  \n“Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue continue to support the National requirement for Sprinkler provision\, supporting their proven ability to save lives\, reduce fire damage\, and protect communities.” \n“Recent fire incidents have highlighted the devastating impact of fires that spread rapidly before emergency services arrive. The presence of sprinklers can drastically reduce fire-related injuries and fatalities.” \nSummary \nCambridgeshire Fire Rescue Service (CFRS) have reported a fire within a new purpose-built block of flats containing a mixture of 1- and 2-bedroom flats. The sprinkler system activated extinguishing the fire the cause of the fire was due to combustible material placed on the kitchen hob which had been accidentally turned on\, no injuries were reported. \nA sprinkler activation is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. This incident provides further evidence of the effectiveness\, benefits of sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nIf it was not for the change in regulatory guidance for England reducing the threshold height for the installation of sprinklers within purpose group 1a (residential block of flats) from 30m to 11m in November 2020. The outcome of this incident could have been so different. \nThe incident  \n\n 2 pumping appliances were mobilised to reports of a fire\, on arrival the incident commander (IC) established that the premises sprinkler system had activated on the second floor of the 3-storey building.\nUpon entry to the flat\, fire crews established that the heat generated from the fire activated two concealed sprinkler heads within the room of origin.\nExtinguishing the fire with minimal fire/smoke damage reported\, no further firefighting was required.\nThe sprinkler system was immediately isolated by CFRS following confirmation to the IC that the fire was out\, fortunately a contractor was onsite who directed the crews to the sprinkler pump room allowing the system to be isolated at the conclusion of the incident.\nCrews remained onsite at the conclusion of the incident to complete salvage operations assisting with the removal of water released following the activation of the sprinkler system.\n\nBusiness Recovery plan  \n Firefighters are increasingly likely to respond to incidents in buildings equipped with sprinkler systems\, it is therefore critical for building managers and duty holders to integrate an effective business recovery plan into the premises’ emergency protocols. The benefit of which will allow the fire service to efficiently manage water following sprinkler system activation during a fire or in the rare event of accidental discharge\, thereby mitigating potential disruptions to business operations or occupancy. This should include comprehensive\, clear and accessible onsite information to facilitate fire service engagement allowing the sprinkler system to be isolated following confirmation to the incident commander the fire is all out. \nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to assist evacuation\, effect rescue when necessary\nPrevent conflagration\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident\, which can lead to a significant strain on the operational resilience of Fire Rescue Service (FRS) resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service.\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 8\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for responsible persons and duty holder\n¹Optimal economics report Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk: An analysis from fire service data\nCambridgeshire FRS Sprinklers\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/cambridgeshire-flat-fire-extinguished-by-sprinkler-system/
LOCATION:Cambridgeshire
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250501T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250531T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250614T184832Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250622T133917Z
UID:10000520-1746086400-1748710800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Bristol Tall Building Air Fryer Kitchen Fire Saved By Sprinkler System
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nOur thanks to Avon Fire & Rescue Service (AFRS) for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler saves to Sprinkler Saves Uk following a kitchen fire involving an electric air fryer within a residential purpose-built block of flats extinguished by the operation of the premises residential sprinkler system with no injuries reported. \nThe air fryer is now a popular kitchen appliance with the number of dwelling fires in England with “air fryer “mentioned in the additional free text from statistics sourced from the ¹Home Office Incident recording system (IRS) increasing year on year between 2016-2024 with 146 fires reported for the year ending 2024. Due to the limitations of the Incident recording system\, it is not possible to record ‘air fryer’ as an ignition source for fires. \nThis is the second reported sprinkler activation reported to sprinkler Saves Uk involving a electric air fryer where the fire was contained\, controlled and extinguished by the sprinkler system containing the fire to the room of origin. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. The story around the incident provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect life\, firefighters\, and property from fire as part of a package of fire safety measures. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ²Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate\n\nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of Installing a residential life safety system within the dwellings of a residential tall building. \n\nReducing the spread of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nPreventing a major protracted incident\, which can compromise the operational resilience of Fire Rescue Services leading to challenges maintaining a business-as -usual service.\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to assist evacuation\, effect rescue when necessary\nPreventing the fire from spreading from the compartment of origin compromising the common ways.\nPrevent Conflagration\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to a confirmed fire following an emergency call received from AFRS fire control from the resident of the dwelling.\nUpon entry to the apartment firefighters established that the fire within the open plan flat had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 3 concealed sprinkler heads.\nMinor fire/smoke damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nFire damage was confined to the electric air fryer\, work top\, kitchen wall units located directly above the seat of the fire.\nNo further firefighting media was required by AFRS.\nNo injuries were reported\n\n \nIt is interesting looking at how the fire plume has developed\, firstly attaching itself to the wall\, proceeding to make contact with the underside of the wall unit\, spreading outwards to the front of wall units\, until it reaches the celling spreading outwards forming a smoke layer. Despite the fire being shielded by the kitchen wall units the sprinkler system was successful extinguishing the fire \n \nThe effects of the sprinkler system using water as an extinguishing medium \n The physical properties of the water should not be underestimated \n\nIt cools the fuel\, reducing further generation of flammable gases\nWater is converted to steam in the plume and the hot gases at ceiling level\, so cooling\, reducing the radiated heat\, heating the fuel\nOnce converted into steam\, it limits the amount of oxygen reaching the flames\, smothering them\nWater cools the compartment\, increasing the amount of heat it will absorb from the plume so cooling it further\n\nPrevious incident reported where sprinklers were present having an impact involving electric air fryer fire. \nNottinghamshire student accommodation tall building kitchen fire\, February 2025 \n\nFire within an open plan communal kitchen extinguished by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads\nContained to the room of origin\nMinor fire damage contained to the air fryer\, kitchen worktop\, wall units\n\nProviding further evidence that residential sprinkler systems can contain\, control and extinguish fires involving electric air fryers \nPremises Emergency Plan \n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents in buildings where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact.\nIt is essential that the building manager\, duty holder considers that the emergency planning for the building includes onsite response information allowing the emergency services to interact with the active fire protection measures.\nThe benefit of which will allow the fire service to assist in the management of water following the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy.\nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire.\nFurther guidance can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\n\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire\, to achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\nThe emergency plan\, provisions were in place allowing the sprinkler system to be reinstated at the conclusion of the incident.\n\nAir Fryers \n\nAre a relatively new cooking appliance being used in our homes\, Aviva insurance have published guidance urging people to exercise caution after a new survey revealed nearly one in five Uk adults (19%) have encountered potential or actual fire hazards in their homes due to air fryers.\nReaffirmed following recent reports of a recent fire involving an air fryer in Bournemouth extinguished by the activation of the premises sprinkler system. The cause of the fire was caused by its owner who set it alight trying a cleaning hack they saw on TikTok.\nFurther research of the incident primary fire data is required to identify a trend on the benefits of sprinklers involving air fryer fires attended by FRS in which sprinklers were present\, having an impact. Due to the limitations of the Incident recording system\, it is not possible to record ‘air fryer’ as an ignition source for fires.\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\n¹Number of dwelling fires in England with “air fryer” mentioned in the additional information free text (IRS primary fire data)\n²Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nAviva issues fire warning around air fryer habits\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\n\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n       \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/bristol-tall-building-air-fryer-kitchen-fire-saved-by-sprinkler-system/
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-12-at-08.59.55.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250501T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250531T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250614T180133Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250902T100240Z
UID:10000519-1746086400-1748710800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Bristol Residential Block of Flats E-Bicycle Sprinkler Save
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. Each of these real-life individual tangible stories provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures. \n\nReducing the impact of fire on people\, property and the environment\, reducing the risks to firefighters.\nAddressing the myths\, misconceptions regarding their safety and efficiency\, providing evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect our communities from fire.\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident\, which can lead to a significant strain on the operational resilience of Fire Rescue Service (FRS) resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service.\n\nThis is the third reported fire reported to Sprinkler Saves Uk involving a e-bike/scooter within a domestic dwelling\, on each occasion the fire was contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of the premises sprinkler system. \nAvon Fire Rescue Service (AFRS)\, report that a E-bicycle within the hallway of a four roomed flat close to the flat front door caught fire. \n\nPreventing the occupants from self-evacuating the dwelling to a place of safety.\n10 persons in the dwelling at the time of the fire sought refuge in a room until rescued by firefighters using an aerial ladder platform from the fourth floor of the building.\nThe heat generated from the fire activated 1 concealed sprinkler head directly above the seat of the fire which contained\, controlled and extinguished the fire before the arrival of AFRS.\nMinor injuries were reported for the residents rescued from the flat for smoke inhalation.\n\nFrom the two previous incidents reported. In one\, the family were unable to self-evacuate from their flat because the escape route was compromised by fire resulting in firefighters assisting\, rescuing them from their dwelling. \n\nApril 2023\, Birmingham retrofitted residential block of flats¹\n\n\nE-bicycle\, lithium-ion battery left on charge in the hallway of the flat which caught fire compromising the means of escape.\nFire extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system.\nFamily sought refuge on their external balcony until rescued by firefighters\nNo injuries reported.\n\nA West Midlands mum says her partner and her young son owe their lives to a sprinkler system \nafter it doused a fire in their high-rise home. She is quoted as saying in a West Midlands Fire & Rescue Service (WMFRS) media release: “We couldn’t get out. We were on the tenth floor. It was too high. I can tell you for sure that the sprinklers saved our lives. It is brilliant they were installed in the first place.” \n\nDecember 2024\, Gloucestershire house of multi occupancy² \n\n\nE-Bike\, lithium-ion battery left on charge within a studio flat which caught fire\n1 sprinkler head activated within the room of origin extinguishing the fire.\nResident self-evacuated the premises prior to the arrival of the FRS.\nNo injuries reported.\n\nObi Selassie\, Gloucestershire FRS Station Manager “If it was not for the activation of the sprinkler system extinguishing the fire before the arrival of the fire service\, we could be discussing a different outcome for this incident\, The benefits of sprinklers should not be underestimated they save lives and reduce injuries\, protect firefighters.” \nThe growing risk of e-bike and e-scooter fires involving lithium batteries should not be underestimated as these fires can spread rapidly and develop into larger fires within a short period of time\, potentially leading to significant uncontrollable runaway fires. Despite sprinkler protection of lithium batteries being outside the scope of current sprinkler design standards\, these incident(s) demonstrates that a sprinkler system can contain and help\, control a e-bike/scooter lithium battery fire. Reaffirming the importance of not charging batteries within your escape routes\, the dangers of lithium battery fires should not be underestimated as they can spread quickly out of control developing into significant fires within a short period of time. \nProviding further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing\, controlling the fire.\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin.\nFirefighters operated without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation.\nPrevent conflagration\n\nAdding further evidence to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two recent reports conducted ³Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nThe Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to a flat fire within a residential block of flats following an emergency call received by AFRS control.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment on arrival by the incident commander (IC) it was established that the sprinkler system on the 4 floor of the 6-storey building had operated within a 4 roomed flat.\nThe provision of the sprinkler system provided extra time for the IC to implement a robust operational tactical plan for the incident.\nUpon entry to the flat\, fire crews established that a fire within the flat hallway had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 1 concealed sprinkler head located directly above the seat of the fire.\nMinimal fire/smoke damage was reported within the hallway.\nNo further firefighting media was required by AFRS.\n10 residents were required to be rescued by firefighters via turntable ladder due to the location of the fire near the flat front door compromising the means of escape.\nCause of the fire\, accidental involving a E-bicycle.\nThe common ways of the premises were not compromised by the fire as the flat front door (FD30S) contained the fire to the flat of origin\n\n\nAll images credit AFRS\nThis incident demonstrates the benefits of installing\, sprinklers within residential tall buildings\, demonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system to BS9251 can detect\, raise the alarm\, control or extinguish the fire at an early stage of development. Providing attending crews with confidence when attending tall building fires which are sprinkler protected compared to other buildings which are not sprinkler protected. \nAFRS maintaining a business-as-usual service \nAusterity\, cuts in public funding across the country have significantly impacted FRS resulting in a significant reduction to front line cover and prevention and protection activities putting a strain on resources impacting on public safety and service delivery. Major protracted fire incidents therefore have a knock-on effect on local FRS resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service allowing an effective response to attend other emergencies. The benefits of installing sprinkler systems in the built environment for FRS should not be underestimated. \nReducing the rate of production of heat and smoke\, limiting fire development preventing flash over providing the FRS. \n\nWith a further layer pf protection for firefighters\nCrucial time for the operational tactical plan to be implemented by the IC\nTo complete search and rescue operations\nResources released earlier from the incident\, to attend other emergency incidents allowing a business-as-usual service to be maintained.\n\nDue to the positive impact following the operation of the sprinkler system\, the incident was scaled down by the IC\, allowing the release of resources to be available to attend other emergencies. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler saves Spring Update No 7\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nAvon Fire and Rescue Service\, sprinklers\n¹Sprinkler save review\, April 2023\, Birmingham retrofitted residential block of flats\n²Sprinkler Save review\, December 2024\, Gloucestershire house of multi occupancy\n³Optimal economics report\, efficiency and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link.
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/bristol-residential-block-of-flats-e-bicycle-sprinkler-save/
LOCATION:Bristol
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Flat-hallway-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250414T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250414T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250423T084052Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250429T170206Z
UID:10000511-1744617600-1744650000@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Reported Sprinkler Activations February-March 2025
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nOur gratitude to The London Fire Brigade (LFB) for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of fire sprinklers by the reporting of sprinkler activations\, rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. \nReporting incidents taken from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month(s) of February -March 2025 where Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) were reported as present\, having an impact in Greater London. Raising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of AFSS which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety benefits \nLondon Fire Brigade  \nLFB Is one of the largest\, firefighting\, community safety rescue services in the world protecting residents and property in Greater London as well as those who work or visit the capital. They report attending 126\,464 incidents of which 16\,120 were fires for the year 2023. \nLondon \nAs the capital of the United Kingdom\, London is also the largest city with a population of just over nine million and is projected to reach 10 million by 2035. It is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world. There are 32 boroughs in Greater London\, except for the City of London which is a county and government district. The risk from fire in the capital is diverse\, ranging from large industrial premises\, complex retail shopping centres\, major transport hubs\, and large high-rise residential developments. The latter is a key area as half of the population of London live in flats compared to less than 20% in the rest of the country. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of February/March 2025 where AFSS were reported as present\, having an impact in Greater London. \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role sprinklers and other forms of suppression play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler actuations from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nProviding further evidence reaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\nIncident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the Incident Commander (IC)of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups. For the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \n Each group contains questions in data fields with associated lists containing the appropriate answer options. Data collected about serious reportable fires include: \n\nTime and date of call\nFire Service or other geographical area\nType of building or vehicle\nMost likely motive (accidental or malicious)\nCause of fire (chip pan fires\, electrical\, etc.)\nSource of ignition (cigarettes\, cookers\, etc.)\nMaterials (furniture\, etc.)\nThe spread of fire (beyond room of origin\, etc.)\nThe nature of fire casualties\nRescue information and method of extinction\nThe effectiveness of automatic smoke detectors\nWere there any active safety systems present?\n\nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training\, experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene. \nThe use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. The provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nKey facts: – 13 Incidents reported. \n\n5 incidents\, where the fire was extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system\n2 incidents where the fire was contained/controlled by the activation of the sprinkler system\n1 incident where the fire was contained/controlled by the activation of the 3drencher system\n1 incident where the water mist system impact was recorded as ¹not know\n4 incidents reported where the sprinkler system did not operate\, due to\n\n\n1x Insufficient heat to operate the sprinkler system\n1x Not known\n2x Sprinkler system was not in the area where the fire occurred\n\n \nThese incidents provide further evidence\, supporting the UK research which was commissioned by The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC)\, National Fire Sprinkler Network (NFSN) and supported by BAFSA in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Across all premises types: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nIncidents AFSS were reported as present\, having an impact.  \nPost the Grenfell tower fire\, regulatory and sector changes relating to fire safety have occurred. One such change has been the increase in installations of sprinklers across the country with housing providers\, local authorities and developers committing to install sprinklers in purpose-built block of flats on a new and retrofit basis. \nOf the 13 AFSS activations reported\, 2 incidents involved\, Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys extinguished on both occasions by the operation of the sprinkler system\, providing further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling or even extinguishing the fire.\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin.\nFirefighters completing operational duties without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation.\nPrevent conflagration.\n\n1.Westminister Bus/coach station/garage \n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; corridor/hall\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nA fire involving the unsafe disposal of a cigarette within the corridor/hall of a bus station terminal was contained\, controlled by the activation of 1 sprinkler head which raised the alarm\, the fire was extinguished by crews using a 1x hose reel jet with fire spread limited to item first ignited. \n2.Westminister Takeaway\, fast food \n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Watermist\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\n2Number of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nIt is reported that a fire within the basement of a fast-food deep fat fryer restaurant was extinguished by the activation of the premises watermist system containing the fire to the room of origin. On arrival operational crews deployed a hose reel jet to extinguish remaining hotspots. \nFurther enquires would have to be made with LFB confirming the details recorded for the fixed firefighting system present\, having an impact. Typically\, the type of firefighting system found in commercial kitchens are wet chemical systems used for object protection\, kitchen areas\, fryers\, oil cookers etc and not used for area wide protection of a building. \nThe benefit of installing wet chemicals is that they provide excellent flame knockdown and surface cooling the scope of kitchen protection should include all appliances that are capable of catching fire and not just the deep fat fryers\, protection should cover ventilated ceilings/hoods\, plenums and duct entrances and should be activated simultaneously. \n2The number of water mist nozzles operated are not required to be recorded by the end user for watermist systems \n\n Kensington and Chelsea Converted Flat/Maisonettes – 3 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 2\n\nFire crews were mobilised to reports of a fire within a converted Victorian terraced building converted into flats\, on arrival the IC identified that the sprinkler system operated containing\, controlling the fire within a flat by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads. \nThe fire was extinguished by firefighters using 1 hose reel jet\, further enquires are ongoing to establish the cause of the fire. \n\n Southwark Restaurant/café\n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nIt is reported that the activation of 1 sprinkler head extinguished a fire within a commercial kitchen\, contained to the item first ignited with 5m² fire damage. No further firefighting was required. \n\n Waltham Forest House (single private dwelling)\n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nThe benefits of sprinklers as a life safety system reinforced following a kitchen fire involving a chip pan/deep fat fryer which was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head. Firefighters rescued two persons on arrival\,  fire spread was contained to the item first ignited with no further firefighting required by operational crews on arrival. \n6.Westminister Public House \n\nDate of Incident; March\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Drencher\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nA basement kitchen fire involving a cooking pan left unattended resulted in the attendance of 25 firefighters to control\, extinguish the fire which damaged the kitchen and the ducting. It is reported that a drencher system was present having an impact containing controlling the fire. \nThe benefits of fixed firefighting systems controlling a fire has been proven to protect property\, business and jobs with the impacted business operational within hours\, avoiding the economic and social costs. \nFurther enquires would have to be made with LFB regarding the IRS primary fire data recorded for this incident as a drencher system is designed primarily for exterior fire protection. Typically\, in commercial kitchens fixed firefighting systems such as wet chemical systems are used for object protection\, kitchen areas\, fryers\, oil cookers etc and not used for area wide protection of a building. \nThe benefit of installing wet chemicals is that they provide excellent flame knockdown and surface cooling the scope of kitchen protection should include all appliances that are capable of catching fire and not just the deep fat fryers\, protection should cover ventilated ceilings/hoods\, plenums and duct entrances and should be activated simultaneously. \n7 Newham Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys \n\nDate of Incident; March\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Living room\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 2\n\nLFB were mobilised to reports of a fire within a new purpose-built block of flats\, on arrival it was established that a living room fire within a flat had been extinguished by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads which contained\, controlled the fire to the room of origin. \nNo further firefighting was required\, the cause of the fire was reported to involve wiring\, cabling\, plugs. \n\n Westminster Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of Incident; March\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Other.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1\n\nThe benefits of installing sprinklers within a mixed-use development was reinforced following reports of a fire involving smoking materials within a flat which was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head which contained the fire to the room of origin\, no further firefighting was required by firefighters. \n4x incidents were reported where the sprinkler system did not activate which was due to either: – \n\nInsufficient heat to operate\, activate the sprinkler system.\nThe sprinkler system was not in the area where the fire\nFurther  enquiries would have to be made to establish the facts with LFB for  1 incident recorded as not known.\n\n\nCroydon Ford and drink processing\n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; 4Did not contain/control.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nIt is reported that a fire in an item of electrical equipment within a fast-food modular restaurant commercial kitchen was extinguished using a local water supply. Whilst a sprinkler system was installed no heads operated as the fire was in an area not covered by the system. \nFurther enquires would have to be made with LFB regarding the IRS primary fire data recorded for this incident as a sprinkler system is typically not found in these types of modular restaurants  Typically\, in commercial kitchens fixed firefighting systems such as wet chemical systems are used for object protection\, kitchen areas\, fryers\, oil cookers etc and not used for area wide protection of a building. \nThe benefit of installing wet chemicals is that they provide excellent flame knockdown and surface cooling the scope of kitchen protection should include all appliances that are capable of catching fire and not just the deep fat fryers\, protection should cover ventilated ceilings/hoods\, plenums and duct entrances and should be activated simultaneously. \n4Firefighting system impact\, did not contained/control the fire\, this is a typo error as the system did not activate \n\n Southwark self-contained sheltered housing \n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Not Known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nIt is reported that firefighters were called to a kitchen fire involving a microwave oven\, whilst a sprinkler system was installed within the premises it did not operate\, no firefighting was required as the heat source was removed. \n\n Kensington & Chelsea restaurant/cafe\n\n\nDate of Incident; February\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Not Known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nFire crews were called to reports of a commercial kitchen fire involving a dishwasher\, no further firefighting was required on arrival with fire spread limited to item first ignited\, the sprinkler system did not operate due to insufficient heat. \n\n Hillingdon purpose-built flats/maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of Incident; March\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Not Known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nFirefighting crews were mobilised to reports of a flat kitchen fire\, it was established by the IC that no further firefighting was required as the item first ignited had been removed from the heat source. The retrofitted sprinkler system installed in 2020 within the dwellings did not activate due to insufficient heat. \n13.Wandsworth purpose-built flats/maisonettes – 10 or more storeys \n\nDate of Incident; March\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers\nImpact of AFSS; Not Known\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 0\n\nA small incident involving wiring\, cabling within a flat bedroom was successfully closed using a local water supply. The sprinkler system did not operate due to insufficient heat being generated by the fire within the room of origin. \nAdvice For Building Managers\, the following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. \nTo achieve this: – \n\nMaintenance\, the premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, the premises emergency plan should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system. Any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\n Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, it is a requirement of the Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures. \nFurther detailed guidance on sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, a guide for responsible persons and duty holder. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n             \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-reported-sprinkler-activations-february-march-2025/
CATEGORIES:Commercial,Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Screenshot-2025-02-23-at-21.24.20.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250401T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250630T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250914T201634Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250914T201634Z
UID:10000531-1743494400-1751302800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Greater Manchester Sprinkler Activations April- June 2025
DESCRIPTION:Scott Harrison\, Senior Fire Safety Inspector at Greater Manchester Fire & Rescue Service\, said \n“Fire sprinklers provide communities with an essential layer of fire protection. Their effectiveness is demonstrated by their role in saving lives\, reducing injuries\, and safeguarding businesses from fire-related losses.” \nIntroduction \n Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service (GMFRS) provided primary fire data from the ¹incident recording system and additional sources for the specified period\, documenting cases where Automatic Water Suppression Systems (AFSS) were present and had an impact within Greater Manchester. The term AWSS refers to sprinklers and watermist systems. \n(¹Incident recording system\, after an emergency fire call\, key incident details are entered daily into the IRS by the officer in charge.) \nA sprinkler save (activation) is categorised as an event where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled\, or\, in some cases\, extinguished a fire. This review further substantiates the role and advantages of AWSS within the built environment. \nThe review  \n The incidents contained within this review provides additional evidence supporting the reliability and effectiveness of AWSS\, aligning with findings from the report conducted by ²Optimal Economics and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council and National Fire Sprinkler Network on the performance of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires. \nKey facts -13 incidents reported \n\n8 AWSS activations were reported\, including 5 involving watermist systems.\nThe fire was:\n\n\nextinguished on two occasions\,\ncontained or controlled on five occasions\,\n\n\ncategorised as “other” once.\n5 incidents where AWSS did not activate:\n\n\nInsufficient heat to actuate the head\,\nFire located outside system coverage\,\nCause undetermined.\n\n \nCustodial premises and watermist \n The data in Table 1 is consistent with the ³Sprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\, showing that water mist systems are more commonly used than traditional sprinkler systems in custodial premises. \nBetween 2018/19 and 2023/2024\, data obtained through a freedom of information request from teams compiling primary fire incident data for England\, Scotland\, and Wales indicate that there were 298 recorded incidents in custodial premises where automatic water suppression systems (AWSS) had an impact. Of these\, water mist systems accounted for 255 activations\, while sprinkler systems accounted for 43. The data does not specify whether the water mist incidents involved mobile units or fixed installations. \nIncidents AFSS reported as present\, having an impact \nSupplementary evidence provided by GMFRS allowed full reviews to be completed for 2 incidents \n\nOldham supermarket sprinkler activation\, a  fire occurred in a refuse bin in the undercroft car park (21000m²) and was controlled after one sprinkler head activated; firefighters extinguished it with a water backpack. Following instructions from the incident commander\, the system was isolated\, and the store stayed closed until the sprinkler system was reinstated.\nStalybridge papermill sprinkler activation\, three pumping appliances\, one hose layer\, and an aerial platform responded to a fire at a paper mill. The incident commander identified that the fire was located on the first floor of a two-storey building and had been contained after four sprinkler heads from the premises’ sprinkler system were activated. 4x Firefighters wearing breathing apparatus were committed who proceeded to.\n\n\nExtinguish the fire with firefighting media (hose reel jets)\nVentilate the building by removing roof tiles\n\nThe outcome of this incident for the business may have been substantially different had the sprinkler system not been installed and activated\, as it played a crucial role in limiting the fire’s spread. This provided the GMFRS with essential time to implement a tactical response plan and establish a water supply to effectively extinguish the fire. The onsite private hydrants had been decommissioned\, and the nearest public water hydrants were not near the premises. \nFor context\, in August 2021\, a non-sprinklered warehouse fire in 4Coventry reported by the Business Sprinkler Alliance required ten fire appliances and seventy firefighters to suppress the blaze\, which ultimately destroyed the Ram Enterprise building at Prologis Park. The structure was demolished four days after the incident \nConclusion  \nThese two incidents provide further evidence that the main functional objectives of a sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of production of heat and smoke limiting fire growth and ultimately containing and controlling and\, in some cases\, extinguish the fire.\nPrevented a potentially extended incident that could have required considerable resources from GMFRS and impacted routine operations.\nLimited the development of the fire\, facilitating search and rescue efforts by firefighters and reducing risk to personnel.\nAverted the complete loss of the building due to fire.\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\n²Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data\n³Sprinkler Saves Review 2024/25\, This review showcases just how essential AWSS\, including sprinklers and watermist systems\, are in safeguarding our communities from the devastating effects of fire\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 8\n4Business Sprinkler Alliance\, fire destroys Coventry warehouse storing household products\nGMFRS\, Benefits of sprinklers\nGMFRS works with Biffa to highlight the benefit of sprinklers\n\n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/greater-manchester-sprinkler-activations-april-june-2025/
LOCATION:Greater Manchester
CATEGORIES:Industrial
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250401
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250501
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250902T100212Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250913T212110Z
UID:10000529-1743465600-1746057599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Lancashire Factory Fire Sprinkler Save
DESCRIPTION:Summary \nIn April 2025\, Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service (LFRS) attended a fire at an industrial manufacturing factory unit in Lancashire. The automatic water suppression system (sprinklers) was activated\, effectively containing and controlling the fire involving a printing machine and preventing further spread. Firefighters extinguished the blaze using appropriate firefighting media\, and no injuries were reported. \nThe incident  \n\nThree fire appliances were mobilised following reports of a factory fire\nOn arrival\, following the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by the incident.commander\, it was established that the premises sprinkler system had actuated on the ground floor.\n4 firefighters wearing breathing apparatus were committed\, establishing a fire involving an industrial printing machine\, which had been contained\, controlled by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads.\nFirefighting media was applied using 1 hose reel jet extinguishing the fire.\nDrone was deployed\, confirming no fire spread through exterior ducting which had been damaged by the fire.\nOn site engineers\, dismantled machinery parts from the printer allowing crews to identify that fire had been fully extinguished.\nNo injuries reported\, cause accidental due to friction igniting a build up of waste material.\nThe incident was resolved in three and a half hours.\n\nOutcome \nIn this instance\, the AFSS \n\nProvided support for firefighters by effectively containing the fire to the item first ignited playing a key role in mitigating risks for firefighter personnel.\nPreventing conflagration.\nCan safeguard assets\, minimise financial loss\, and bolster business resilience by controlling or extinguishing fires prior to the arrival of emergency services\, allowing for rapid resumption of normal operations and mitigating economic and social impacts.\n\nThis incident highlights the importance of AFSS as an active fire protection measure; research by the 1National Fire Sprinkler Network and National Fire Chief Council found that sprinklers functioned as intended in 94% of fire incidents and controlled or extinguished fires in 99% of cases across residential and non-residential buildings. \nConclusion \n\nWhat could have developed into a significant incident was resolved quickly due to the presence of the sprinkler system\, despite there being no regulatory requirement for such systems in factories.\nThis incident demonstrates the role of AWSS in comprehensive fire safety strategies\, contributing to the protection of lives\, property\, and the environment. It also supports continued efforts by the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) and the fire sector to advocate for stricter government regulations on sprinkler installation within the built environment.\nThe 2Business Sprinkler Alliance report fire crews in England attend an average of 341 industrial fires every year-nearly one a day\, fires do not discriminate whether it is a factory\, car park\, warehouse of office fires happen on a regular basis and will continue to do so in the future. AFSS can contain and extinguish fires\, safeguarding lives and businesses during critical times when they are most needed.\n\nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2024/2025\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 8\nNational Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) sprinkler position statement\nLancashire press release\, incident of interest\n1Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the United Kingdom: An analysis from fire service data\n2Business Sprinkler Alliance\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n  \n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lancashire-factory-fire-sprinkler-save/
LOCATION:Lancashire
CATEGORIES:Industrial
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250331
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250401
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250611T170237Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250731T152835Z
UID:10000514-1743379200-1743465599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Drencher System Saves Lancashire Business From Fire
DESCRIPTION:Credit LFRS\, Image taken from a drone capturing a major fire involving concentrated amounts of plastic stored in the open external yard.\n\n\nMatthew Hamer Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service Head of Prevention\, Protection and Road Safety \n“The presence of an automatic fire suppression system significantly influenced the outcome of this incident\, as fires continue to be a leading cause of commercial property loss. This incident required substantial effort from firefighters to prevent a major external fire from spreading to the primary building.” \n“The building was equipped with an external drencher system\, which assisted firefighting tactics and prevented the fire from spreading to the building. This incident demonstrates how an automatic water suppression system enhances the resilience of buildings and businesses against fire impact\, playing a crucial role in preventing major losses and ensuring safety.” \n\n\n“Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service support that automatic water suppression systems play a significant role in reducing the impact of fire on people\, property and the environment along with reducing the risk to firefighters.” \n\n\n\n\nIntroduction \nSignificant and costly fires can be prevented through a combination of fire strategies\, one such strategy is the use of Automatic Water Suppression Systems (AWSS) which can contain and control or in some cases extinguish a building fire before the arrival of the Fire Rescue Service. (FRS) \n\n\nThis case review demonstrates that incorporating Automatic Water Sprinkler Systems (AWSS) as part of a comprehensive fire safety strategy can offer long-term protection for businesses by reducing the consequences of extensive fires. This improves the resilience of buildings and businesses against fire damage.  \n\n\nThis incident reported by Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service (LFRS) involving an external fire on an industrial estate provides further evidence that the inclusion of an AWSS\, in this case a drencher system protecting the external facade of the primary building can assist in suppressing an external fire preventing major financial losses\, minimizing the wider impact of unmanageable fires\, reducing costs to business and the economy. \n\nThe Premises \nIndustrial building with associated outbuildings\, external storage facilities protected by AWSS consisting of a premises drencher\, commercial sprinkler system. \nThe Incident \n In March 2025\, LFRS were mobilized to a well-developed fire involving concentrated amounts of plastic (Polypropylene\, a highly flammable material) stored in the open external yard area adjacent to the primary building on an industrial estate. At its height 50 firefighters\, 10 Fire Appliances\, 2 Aerial ladder platforms (ALP)\, a firefighting robot\, high volume pump were required to contain\, control and extinguish the fire. \n\nConcerns were raised by LFRS that the intense and radiated heat from the fire\, with temperatures recorded as high as 700°C\, could spread compromising the primary building housing further materials with a high fire loading. Due to the intense heat\, firefighters were initially unable to approach the building to apply firefighting medium until the fire had been contained\, controlled\, and extinguished in the external yard. \n\n\nThe manual activation of the buildings drencher system served as a crucial line of defense protecting the building’s exterior surfaces\, particularly walls\, roofs\, windows\, soffits and facia boarding\, from radiated heat and direct flame impingement from the fire. These systems can employ medium-velocity spray nozzles or specially selected nozzles for a uniform distribution of water over the protected surface. \n\n\nThe presence\, operation of the drencher system provided a crucial time frame for the incident commander to implement an operational tactical plan to establish a 300mm water-main via high volume pump to establish a water supply to tackle the fire with firefighting media. \n\n\nTwo aerial ladder platforms were used as water monitors\, in addition to main jets to contain\, control and extinguish the fire to prevent it from spreading to the primary building. Due to the extreme temperatures the building sprinkler system operated which had the benefit of wetting the building and reducing the temperature within the building. \n\n \nImage credit LFRS\n\n\nThis image shows a thermal/standard image allowing you to appreciate the intensity of the fire and its proximity to the primary building. At this point\, the fire temperature adjacent to the building was recorded at 700°C. \n\n\nThe benefits of the drencher system prevented the fire from spreading to the primary building despite the lateral elevation of the building cladding sustaining substantial fire damage because of radiated heat although this heat did transfer internally\, it did not cause the fire to spread to the interior of the building with smoke damage reported within the building. \nDue to the intense heat from the fire the building sprinkler system operated which had the extra benefit of cooling the temperature\, wetting the contents preventing further fire spread. LFRS are currently investigating the cause of the fire. \nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence of the benefits of AWSS as part of a package of fire safety measures. \n\nPreventing major financial and equipment losses for businesses.\nProtecting critical elements of its operation\, in this case saving the primary building from fire.\nProviding valuable time for FRS to implement an operational tactical action plan to extinguish the fire.\nReducing the impact of major fires\, allowing FRS to maintain normal operations\, allocating resources to other emergencies.\n\nIf it was not for the drencher/sprinkler system\, we could be reporting on another industrial fire where the premises was lost to fire with the business facing an uncertain future. \nThe Business Sprinkler Alliance report that in the year 2021/22 the FRS attended a total of 1\,842 industrial fires\, fires do not discriminate whether it is a factory\, car park\, warehouse of office fires happen on a regular basis and will continue to do so in the future. \nFires are indiscriminate\, occurring in various settings such as railway stations\, factories\, car parks\, warehouses\, and offices. They are a recurring occurrence and will likely continue to do so in the future. \nRegardless of the cause or the building\, systems like sprinklers can contain and extinguish fires\, safeguarding lives and businesses during critical times when they are most needed. \nSource \nFurther Reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data\nBusiness Sprinkler Alliance\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. The outcome of which will influence policy makers in government for change advocating the use of AWSS in all buildings\, we are concerned about. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n\n\n\n   
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lancashire-industrial-manufacturing-drencher-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Lancashire
CATEGORIES:Industrial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Plastics-yard-fire-after-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250301T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250331T000000
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250605T133316Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250731T152901Z
UID:10000518-1740787200-1743379200@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Lancashire Recycling Centre Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Lancashire Fire Rescue Service (LFRS) have reported the following activation where the Automatic Water Suppression System (AWSS) was recorded as being present and operated having an impact. \nOperational crews were mobilised to a fire within a recycling centre building containing waste shredded plastic\, on arrival it was identified that the fire was contained within a bay in one corner of the building\, The heat from the fire activated 1 sprinkler head. \nThe fire was extinguished by using a site digger to excavate the waste turning it over dampening it down with water from 1 main jet. Half a ton of waste was destroyed by the fire with smoke damage sustained to the building \nThe National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) have reported that UK Fire and Rescue Services (FRS) attend around 300 significant fires in waste sites each year which are often difficult to extinguish requiring multiple FRS resources for significant periods of time which can have a serious impact on the local community in the short or long term\, including: \n\nThe Environmental Impact\nPublic health impacts on responders and communities\nLarge scale financial loses and disruption.\nRoad closures\nHigh demand on FRS and other agency resources\n\nFRS are fully aware of the environmental impacts of fire publishing sustainability\, environmental reports with further guidance published by the government on environmental protection\, providing further guidance for FRS on preventing and dealing with incidents with the potential to pollute. \nActive fire protection systems\, specifically AWSS should be seen as part of a holistic approach minimising fire damage as part of a greener approach from the fire sector\, which is currently overlooked. The Waste Industry Safety and Health Forum (WISH) published “Reducing Fire Risk at Waste Management Sites” good practice guidance on the latest research and information available to achieve good fire risk management which includes an appendix focusing on suppression/extinguishing/fighting systems focusing on \n\nImportance of seeking competent advice for the installation of a fire suppression system\nThe system should be proportionate to the nature and scale of waste management activities completed and associated risks.\nChoosing the appropriate fire suppression system which may include.\n\n\nSprinklers\nManual open deluge system\nDeluge/water spray systems\nMobile foam trolley\nWater monitors/cannons/curtains\n\n\nThe design\, installation and maintenance of the proposed system is covered by an appropriate UKAS-accredited third-party certification scheme.\nImportance of liaising with insurers who may have specific requirements for fire suppression systems.\n\nThe London\, Herne Hill Waste Transfer Station Fire 8 September 2023\, clearly reminds us of the dangers these types of fires can bring to the local community\, sprinklers were not fitted. \nIt is reported that. \n\n100% of the building was alight with a partial collapse.\nLFB Mobilised 15 fire appliances requiring 100 firefighters.\n2x 32 metre turntable ladders used as water towers.\nThe fire had a significant impact on the local communities.\nFire suppression was not installed.\n\n  \n       \nImages credit LFB Twitter \nDeputy Assistant Commissioner for the Southwest London Area\, Nick Davis\, said: “Firefighters have been continually tackling the fire at the waste transfer station in Herne Hill since it started on Friday morning. Controlled demolition on site allowed us to safely make progress and the fire was fully extinguished this morning\, which I know will come of huge relief to local residents. \n“This fire has had a significant impact on the communities in the surrounding area and I know how difficult it has been for people to keep their doors and windows closed during the heatwave. Local senior fire officers and members of our Community Engagement team are continuing to give advice to local residents and provide support. We are carrying out an investigation into the fire and we are fully supporting the Metropolitan Police Service’s investigation. \n“The challenging nature of the fire on site means that firefighters from across London have attended over the weekend. I would like to thank our operational staff\, control officers and enabling teams for their work to maintain our presence on site for over 80 hours and counting. \nFurther Reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 7\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. The outcome of which will influence policy makers in government for change advocating the use of AWSS in all buildings\, we are concerned about. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n        
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lancashire-recycling-centre-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Lancashire
CATEGORIES:Industrial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250221T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250221T235900
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250221T162923Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250222T090715Z
UID:10000505-1740096000-1740182340@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:LFB Reported Sprinkler Activations December 2024 -  January 2025
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nOur gratitude to The London Fire Brigade (LFB) for their ongoing support\, playing a key leadership role in promoting the benefits of fire sprinklers by the reporting of sprinkler activations\, rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council who actively encourage fire services to collate\, provide fire data and case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK. \nReporting incidents taken from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of December 2024/January 2025 where sprinklers/watermist were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \nRaising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Fire Suppression Systems (AFSS) which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety benefits \nLondon Fire Brigade  \nLFB Is one of the largest\, firefighting\, community safety rescue services in the world protecting residents and property in Greater London as well as those who work or visit the capital. They report attending 126\,464 incidents of which 16\,120 were fires for the year 2023. \nLondon \nAs the capital of the United Kingdom\, London is also the largest city with a population of just over nine million and is projected to reach 10 million by 2035. It is home to one of the most ethnically diverse populations in the world. There are 32 boroughs in Greater London\, except for the City of London which is a county and government district. The risk from fire in the capital is diverse\, ranging from large industrial premises\, complex retail shopping centres\, major transport hubs\, and large high-rise residential developments. The latter is a key area as half of the population of London live in flats compared to less than 20% in the rest of the country. \nThe Review \nThe incidents contained within this review are collated from the Incident Recording System (IRS) for the month of December 2024/January 2025 where AFSS were reported as present and having an impact in Greater London. \n\nProviding evidence on the vital role AFSS play by highlighting real\, tangible examples of where they have actuated.\nRaising awareness of the importance of collating sprinkler actuations from across the United Kingdom so societal awareness of the true value of sprinklers can be increased.\nAllowing trends\, anomalies to be identified in the emerging UK AFSS firefighting industry allowing the continued review of technical standards ensuring best practice within the sprinkler\, fire industry.\nProviding further evidence reaffirming the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the two reports conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires.\n\n Incident Recording System (IRS) \nWhen a household or business has made an emergency fire call\, key information around the incident is captured\, inputted daily into the IRS by the officer in charge of the incident using software forms structured into logical groups. For the most severe fire incidents the senior fire investigation officer compiles a report that details the findings of the investigation and the most likely origin and cause. Once completed\, this officer reviews and where necessary updates the IRS record to reflect the findings of the investigation. \nEach group contains questions in data fields with associated lists containing the appropriate answer options. Data collected about serious reportable fires include: \n\nTime and date of call\nFire Service or other geographical area\nType of building or vehicle\nMost likely motive (accidental or malicious)\nCause of fire (chip pan fires\, electrical\, etc.)\nSource of ignition (cigarettes\, cookers\, etc.)\nMaterials (furniture\, etc.)\nThe spread of fire (beyond room of origin\, etc.)\nThe nature of fire casualties\nRescue information and method of extinction\nThe effectiveness of automatic smoke detectors\nWere there any active safety systems present?\n\nThe importance of monitoring AFSS incident data has been acknowledged by the inclusion of the active safety system field focusing on the following performance characteristics of AFSS fire data. \n\nType of active safety system present\nLocation of active safety systems in relation to fire\nDid the system operate\nHow many operated\nImpact upon fire\nReason system did not function as intended\n\nThe IRS data captured is dependent on the fire officer who inputs the data and their training\, experience of AFSS and commitment to complete reporting. Not all fire officers might be able to identify the difference between a sprinkler or water mist system or take the time to count the number of sprinkler head activations before leaving the scene. \n The use of IRS data plays an important role in promoting the benefits of AFSS as part of a combination of fire safety measures to reduce the impact of fire on our communities\, property and the environment\, while assisting fire firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nKey facts  \n\n15x Incidents reported where AFSS were present.\n8x incidents where the fire was extinguished by the activation of a sprinkler system\n1x incident where the fire was contained/controlled by the activation of a sprinkler system\n1x incident where the water mist system impact was recorded as ¹not known\n5x incidents reported where the sprinkler system did not operate\, due to\n\n\nInsufficient heat to operate the sprinkler system\nSprinkler system was turned off\nSprinkler system was not in the area where the fire occurred\n\n \nThese incidents provide further evidence\, supporting the most recent UK research which was commissioned by The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC)\, National Fire Sprinkler Network (NFSN) and supported by BAFSA in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Across all premises types: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nIncidents where sprinklers\, water mist were reported as present\, having an impact.  \nPost the Grenfell tower fire\, regulatory and sector changes relating to fire safety have occurred. One such change has been the increase in installations of sprinklers across the country with housing providers\, local authorities and developers committing to install sprinklers in purpose-built block of flats on a new and retrofit basis. \nOf the 10 sprinkler/water mist activations reported\, two incidents involved tall residential building flat fires\, extinguished on both occasions by the operation of the sprinkler system\, providing further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling the fire\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin.\nFirefighters completing operational duties without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation.\nPrevent conflagration.\n\n1.Ealing Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 4 to 9 storeys \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nA flat kitchen fire involving cooking\, extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head with fire spread limited to room of origin with up to 5% fire damage reported. No further firefighting media was required by operational crews on arrival. \n\n Tower Hamlets Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 2.\n\nA fire within a flat living room was extinguished by the activation of 2 sprinkler heads\, the cause of the fire involved candle/tealights accidently knocked onto an item of furniture. No further fighting media was required by operational crews to extinguish the fire. Fire spread was limited to item first ignited with up to 5sqm fire damage reported within the dwelling. \n3.Brent self-contained sheltered housing  \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nThis incident identifies why the English government should be looking to install sprinklers into all new specialised and supported housing. If it was not for the operation of the sprinkler system\, the outcome of this incident could have been so much different. \nThe demographic change in specialised and supported housing population has resulted in an increase in the occurrence of mobility difficulties\, reduced sensory capability and cognitive difficulties\, all of which bring greater risk from fire\, in terms of likelihood of fire and vulnerability in the event of a fire. \nThe study analysis of national ³fire data\, an in-depth review of fire-related fatalities and severe casualties in England\, 2010/11 to 2018/19 referenced that while there is a lack of recent research on fatal fires\, the available studies consistently identified age\, the presence of an impairment such as physical disability\, smoking\, and alcohol use as key factors on the outcome of the fire\, as they will be less able to respond to a fire. \nA bedroom fire involving smoking materials was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head\, limiting fire damage to item first ignited with 6-10sqm of fire damage reported. \nIt should be remembered the installation of a life safety sprinkler system is to reduce the rate of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued\, The provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nFire protection is dependent on both passive and active fire systems such as sprinklers working in unison providing a further layer of safety from fire as part of a package of fire safety measures\, in reducing the impact of fire on people\, firefighters\, property and the environment. \n4/5.Camden Hospital \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nHospitals are a vital community asset\, yet at present there is no statutory requirements for sprinklers to be provided in hospitals in England except for high rise (more than 30m) and in certain commercial enterprises contained within hospital buildings. \nThe National Fire Chiefs Council report that the Department of Health and Social Care in England’s Health Technical Memorandum (HTM) 05-02: Fire risk in management in healthcare premises recommends the installation of sprinkler systems in hospitals. This document encourages sprinklers but does not mandate them\, a recommendation that hospitals are choosing to ignore. \nIt is therefore refreshing to report that the benefits of sprinklers in hospitals were clearly demonstrated following two fires within two days in the same large NHS Hospital involving batteries or generators which were extinguished on both occasions by the operation of one sprinkler head limiting fire damage to the room of origin on both occasions. \nCompare this to the events of 2008/09 which saw five significant fires at NHS sites in London which required the evacuation of part or whole of the building.  Resulting in a report to be published by NHS London “Review of five London Hospital fires and their management” to identify the lessons identified from the incidents allowing the ongoing development for the planning for the evacuation and shelter of people in healthcare premises. \nDisappointingly no reference is made within the publication regarding the benefits of sprinklers for healthcare premises as part of a package of fire safety measures. \n.6. Havering recycling plant  \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Water mist.\nImpact of AFSS; Not known.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; Not known.\n\nOn a regular basis the national press report multi-agency responses to large fires involving waste sites\, recycling plants impacting the local community\, environment. The outcome road closures\, residents required to close windows doors due to harmful smoke containing harmful contaminants resulting in a major environmental impact. \nWhen you compare this to the above-mentioned incident involving a water mist system that operated following a fire involving industrial equipment limiting fire damage to item first ignited with up to 5sqm fire damage\, the fire was extinguished by operational crews using a hose reel jet via pumping appliance. \nThis incident reinforces that one of the most effective strategies for containing\, controlling or extinguishing these types of fires is by the operation of an AFSS the benefit: – \n\nMinimise the impact of unmanageable fires.\nReducing costs to business/economy.\nPrevent conflagration.\nReduce the environmental impact.\n\n7. City of London Shopping Centre \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 2.\n\nA fire within a commercial unit kitchen involving cooking was extinguished by the operation of two sprinkler heads\, fire spread was limited to item first ignited with no further firefighting required by operational crews. \nBusiness continuity\, due the positive impact of the sprinkler system\, the commercial unit opened the following day for business. \nIn shopping centres\, it is common practice to protect the commercial unit/shop unit with fire sprinklers to contain the fire. Fire sprinklers are not normally installed in the malls due to the limited combustible loading allowed in these zones. Fires have significant impact on business continuity which can lead to business closures\, major impact on the local environment\, requiring major FRS resources. \nFor example\, a fire that occurred in July 2019 at the Walthamstow Mall requiring over 20 fire appliances and more than 110 firefighters to extinguish the fire. The shopping centre remained closed for two months with the damaged portion of the mall reopening in October 2020. \nShopping centres are complex buildings that often include a variety of uses within them\, leisure areas\, hotels\, apartments\, cinemas and offices. Therefore\, retail centres require a high standard of management compared to other building uses. \nWhich extends to ensuring the premises fire safety systems are operable in the event of a fire including fire sprinklers\, fire alarm system\, dry/wet risers\, smoke extraction units and fire curtains. To highlight this\, LFB published an open letter in 2020\, to those responsible for fire safety in shopping centres. Highlighting the importance of maintaining fire safety systems including the premises fire sprinkler system. \n\n Hillingdon Other Residential Home\n\n\nDate of incident; January 2025.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nThis incident provides further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system installed\, maintained in accordance with the appropriate codes and standards reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued. \nA bedroom fire within a 3-storey building was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head which contained the fire to room of origin\, fire damage limited to item first ignited enquires are ongoing to identify the cause of the fire. \n\n City of London Pub/Wine bar/bar\n\n\nDate of incident; January 2025.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nA fire involving a faulty fan heater electrical appliance was extinguished by the activation of 1 sprinkler head which extinguished the fire\, no further firefighting media was required by LFB. \n\n Ealing Other Industrial Plant \n\n\nDate of incident; January 2025.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained and control.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; 1.\n\nA fire involving a laundry warehouse was contained/controlled by the activation of 4 sprinkler heads on the first floor before the arrival of LFB. The fire was extinguished by operational crews wearing Breathing Apparatus using a high-pressure hose reel. \nAn area approximately covering two square metres was damaged by fire\, smoke damaged one hundred percent of the upper floor\, there were no reports of any injuries. The fire is believed to have been accidental caused by the self-heating of textiles which often become contaminated with oil\, most commonly linseed massage and cooking oil on tea towels\, tablecloths. \nWhen you compare this to a major blaze reported by the Business Sprinkler Alliance at the K Laundry in Ramsgate in 2024 where the 1\,800m² laundry facility was destroyed in the blaze. The loss of the building will cause major disruption for the established business\, The premises was not sprinkler protected. \nIncidents where sprinklers were present\, not having an impact  \n5x incidents were reported where the sprinkler system did not activate which was due to either: – \n\nInsufficient heat to operate\, activate the sprinkler system.\nThe system was not operational as it had been turned off.\nThe sprinkler system was not in the area where the fire occurred.\n\n11.Kingston Upon Thames Other Entertainment Venue \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; N/A\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated\, N/A\n\nA fire involving a white goods appliance\, dishwasher was confined to the item first ignited with limited fire damage reported\, no firefighting action was required with the electrical connection to the appliance disconnected. \nThe premises sprinkler system did not operate which was due to insufficient heat generated by the fire allowing the nearest head to operate. \n12.Southwark Recycling Plant \n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; N/A.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A.\n\nA fire involving an appliance or equipment was extinguished by one main branch/jet with fire spread limited to the room of origin. The premises sprinkler system did not activate as the system was turned off at the time of the fire. \n\n Recycling Plant\n\n\nDate of incident; December 2024.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; N/A.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A.\n\nA fire in a canteen microwave was extinguished with a handheld fire extinguisher\, containing the fire to the room of origin. The sprinkler system located on the same floor as the fire did not activate due to insufficient heat from the fire. \n\n City of London Underground car park\n\n\nDate of incident; January 2025.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; N/A.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A.\n\nA fire involving batteries/generators within a parking garage was extinguished by the application of a dry powder extinguisher\, fire spread to item first ignited. The premises sprinkler system did not operate as insufficient heat was generated to activate the nearest sprinkler head. \n\n Southwark Restaurant/Cafe\n\n\nDate of incident; January 2025.\nIncident; Fire.\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; N/A.\nNumber of sprinkler heads operated; N/A.\n\nA kitchen fire involving cooking was extinguished by the application of a handheld fire extinguisher with one person suffering a minor injury The sprinkler system did not operate as the location of the fire was not in an area protected by the system.   \nAdvice For Building Managers\, the following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. It is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire. \nTo achieve this: – \n\nMaintenance\, the premises fire protection measures should be maintained periodically in accordance with the relevant standards and codes\, to ensure they are always operational and available.\nEmergency Plan\, the premises emergency plan should include Information onsite for the Fire Rescue Service to clarify the location and provision of key elements of the active fire safety systems. Allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned to assist with the control of the sprinkler system at the conclusion of the fire incident.\nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures\, arrangements should be in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system. Any delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\n\n Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order\, it is a requirement of the Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures. \nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nLFB sprinklers and other types of AFSS\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk\nReview of five hospital fires and their management\nBAFSA Information file technical guidance No 3 Using water mist in buildings and structures\nMRW publication\, Ian Cox Waste sites need sprinkler protection\n³Fire data\, an in-depth review of fire-related fatalities and severe casualties in England\, 2010/11 to 2018/19\nBusiness Sprinkler Alliance\, blaze destroys century old Kent laundry\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n                 \n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/lfb-reported-sprinkler-activations-december-2024-january-2025/
LOCATION:Greater London
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250211
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250212
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250224T082208Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250408T055541Z
UID:10000506-1739232000-1739318399@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Nottinghamshire Student Accommodation Saved By Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit image Nationwide Fire Sprinklers Ltd\nGroup Manager Chris Emmott\, Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue \n“Sprinklers are one of the most effective methods of fire protection\, offering automatic activation to suppress fires before they spread. \n“We are thankful that this building had a working sprinkler system in place. This could have been a much worse situation\, but thanks to the prompt response from the sprinklers\, we were able to extinguish the fire quickly and keep everyone safe.” \nWhile the sprinkler system helped mitigate the damage\, this incident serves as a reminder of the importance of fire safety in the kitchen. \n “Many families across Nottinghamshire own an air fryer\, so it is crucial that users are aware of the fire risks that may come with it. We are seeing an increase in fires involving air friers\, and we have attended nine in the last ten months\, so we are urging families to use them safely.” \n“Appliances such as air fryers should never be left unattended when in use\, and when using them\, we advise that they are in a ventilated area and not used under a cupboard or overhead cabinet.” \n“Never overfill them\, clean it after every use\, and never plug an air fryer\, or any appliance for that matter\, into an extension lead.” \n“Finally\, I want to remind occupants to never fight a fire themselves – get out\, stay out\, and call 999.” \nIntroduction  \nThe British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) is the UK’s leading professional trade association for the fire sprinkler industry. Our primary objectives include providing authoritative information on the benefits of fire sprinkler systems and how fire sprinklers can play a significant role in saving life and property from the devastating effects of fire. \nOne way to achieve this is to demonstrate the vital role sprinklers play in fire safety arrangements by highlighting real tangible examples of where they have actuated and in doing so\, saved life and property from fire. The outcome of which will entice others in the housing sector or providing sleeping accommodation to install fire sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures reducing the impact of fire on people\, property\, and the environment. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. The story around the incident provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect life\, firefighters\, and property from fire. \nThe most recent ¹UK research commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network and supported by British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Key data revealed that across all premises types: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThis reported sprinkler activation involving student accommodation supports this evidence. \nOur gratitude to Nottingham Fire Rescue Service\, Nationwide Sprinklers Ltd for rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council to collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk. The outcome of which will allow a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their essential role is suppressing and/or extinguishing the fire. \nDemonstrating the vital role sprinklers play in fire safety arrangements by highlighting real life tangible examples of where they have actuated and in doing so saved life and protected property. The resources will benefit the collective aim of enhancing protection against fire through the increased acceptance and installation of fire sprinklers\, driving a culture of change so they are understood and become a more widespread protection measure across the UK. \nIt cannot be stressed how important active systems such as fire sprinklers are providing effective fire protection requires a balanced approach to the provision of passive and active elements. The use of a combined approach plays a significant role reducing the impact of fire on people\, reduce the risk to firefighters\, property and the environment and increase sustainability. \nBackground \nThis is the fourth reported sprinkler save reported by Nottingham Fire Rescue Service in the past 12 months with 3 of the incidents involving student accommodation. On each occasion the fire was contained/controlled or extinguished by the activation of the sprinkler system providing further evidence that the operation of a correctly designed and installed residential life safety sprinkler system installed\, maintained in accordance with the appropriate codes and standards reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape or be rescued. \nStudent Accommodation  \nThe danger of student accommodation fires cannot be underestimated as this was clearly demonstrated following the fire in Bolton involving the premises known as the ‘Cube’ November 2019. The speed with which the fire took hold and the devastating impact it had on the building was shocking\, sprinklers were not fitted. Student accommodation Is undoubtedly a challenging environment from a fire safety perspective with their own individual challenges. The student’s lifestyle is typically associated with a reduced level of caution when it comes to appreciating risk. \nLondon Fire Brigade reported that over the past 5 years London firefighters have attended more than 1\,200 cooking-related fires and false alarms in university students’ halls involving kitchen activities\, unattended cooking which can escalate into a fire. \nLegislation \nRegulatory guidance for England includes a specific requirement to install sprinklers in purpose group 1a (residential block of flats) with a top floor height of 11 metres above ground level this guidance does not apply to student halls of residence regardless of height. \nEngland’s national building and fire safety regulations trail behind its neighbours\, governments in other UK jurisdictions who have set lower mandatory thresholds for the installation of sprinklers in new purpose-built student accommodation. Following the introduction of new fire regulations within Northern Ireland\, fire sprinklers are now required in within student accommodation with a storey more than 11m above ground level which will come into effect on 6 May 2025 \nIt is the view of British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) and the National Fire Chiefs Council that sprinklers should be installed in all new student accommodation regardless of height\, as well as existing buildings undergoing refurbishment. The Government should be looking to emulate the policies in the devolved governments to support unitary policy across nations by lowering or removing the acceptable height\, floor area\, or occupancy threshold dependent on building type. \nThe premises/sprinkler system \n\nNottinghamshire Student accommodation (timber framed construction) of 4 floor\nProtected by a life safety residential sprinkler system as part of a package of fire safety measures.\nSpecification\, BS9251:2005\n\nSprinkler head VK457 concealed pendent sprinkler\nWater supply Pump/tank 30-minute suppl\n\n\n\nImage of one of the VK457 concealed sprinkler pendant heads which actuated \n \nThe Incident  \n\nFirefighters were mobilised to a student accommodation block fire.\nOn arrival firefighters established the fire involved an electric air fryer\nExtinguished by the activation of two sprinkler heads located within the open plan communal kitchen.\nThe occupants self-evacuated with one casualty treated on the scene for smoke inhalation.\nThe intensity of the heat from the fire activated a further sprinkler head disengaging the cover plate only.\nFire damage was contained to the air fryer\, kitchen worktop\, cupboard area due to the activation of the sprinkler system which prevented the fire from spreading from the compartment of origin.\n1x Carbon dioxide extinguish was used to extinguish a hot spot located beneath the kitchen cupboard\n\n             \nImages credit Nationwide Sprinklers Ltd\nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling the fire\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin\nFirefighters operated without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation\nPrevent conflagration\n\nWhen comparing this incident to a similar air fryer kitchen fire in Weymouth in December 2024 where the premises was not sprinkler protected\, the difference is startling\, the kitchen was severely damaged by the fire. \nNo Sprinklers                                                                        Sprinklers \n           \nImage credit Dorset and Wiltshire FRS                                                                 image credit Nationwide Fire Sprinklers Ltd\nThe images reaffirm the benefits of installing a residential life safety sprinkler system for sleeping accommodation preventing the fire from spreading from the compartment of origin. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nIt was refreshing that that the emergency plan for this incident allowed for an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy. \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nReinstatement of the Fire Protection Measures \n\nIt is paramount that fire protection measures in buildings can function effectively in the event of a fire\, to achieve this the premises emergency plan should include that arrangements are in place allowing the immediate reinstatement of the sprinkler system.\nIt is a requirement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order for the responsible person to implement the appropriate arrangements for the effective planning\, organisation\, control\, monitoring of the preventive and protective measures.\nAny delay could compromise the safety of the occupants in the event of a further fire within the building due to the sprinkler system being offline.\nThe emergency plan\, provisions were in place allowing the sprinkler system to be reinstated at the conclusion of the incident.\n\nConclusion \nThis incident provides further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved \n\nThe occupants were able to leave the building in reasonable safety\nFirefighters can operate without due risk to assist evacuation\, effect rescue when necessary\nPrevent conflagration\n\nAir Fryers \nAre a relatively new cooking appliance being used in our homes\, Aviva insurance have published guidance urging people to exercise caution after a new survey revealed nearly one in five Uk adults (19%) have encountered potential or actual fire hazards in their homes due to air fryers. \nReaffirmed following recent reports of a recent fire involving an air fryer in Bournemouth extinguished by the activation of the premises sprinkler system. The cause of the fire was caused by its owner who set it alight trying a cleaning hack they saw on TikTok. \nFurther research of the incident primary fire data is required to identify a trend on the benefits of sprinklers involving air fryer fires attended by FRS in which sprinklers were present\, having an impact. Due to the limitations of the Incident recording system\, it is not possible to record ‘air fryer’ as an ignition source for fires. \nSources/further reading \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data \nNFCC AFSS Position Statement\nDorset and Wiltshire FRS kitchen air fryer fire\nLFB Press release 1200 Cooking related fires and false alarms in student accommodation\nBBC TikTok air fryer ‘hack’ blamed for fire\nAviva issues fire warning around air fryer habits\nNFRS Press Release\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n       
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/nottinghamshire-student-accommodation-saved-by-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Nottinghamshire
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/5d07fa9e-a3d9-417e-b0ec-502cae20fdb1.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250202T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250202T120000
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250210T093353Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250224T082233Z
UID:10000499-1738454400-1738497600@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Fleet Residential Electrical Cupboard Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Credit Image Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service \nIntroduction \nThe British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA) is the UK’s leading professional trade association for the fire sprinkler industry. Our primary objectives include providing authoritative information on the benefits of fire sprinkler systems and how fire sprinklers can play a significant role in saving life and property from the devastating effects of fire. \nOne way to achieve this is to demonstrate the vital role sprinklers play in fire safety arrangements by highlighting real tangible examples of where they have actuated and in doing so\, saved life and property from fire. The outcome of which will entice others in the housing sector or providing sleeping accommodation to install fire sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures reducing the impact of fire on people\, property\, and the environment. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. The story around the incident provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect life\, firefighters\, and property from fire. \nThe most recent ¹UK research commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network and supported by British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association in the publication\, “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data”. Key data revealed that across all premises types: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\n \nThis post fire review supports this evidence. \nOur gratitude to Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service for rising the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council to collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk. The outcome of which will allow a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their essential role is suppressing and/or extinguishing the fire. \nThe resources will benefit the collective aim of enhancing protection against fire through the increased acceptance and installation of fire sprinklers\, driving a culture of change so they are understood and become a more widespread protection measure across the UK. \nIt cannot be stressed how important active systems such as fire sprinklers are. Providing effective fire protection requires a balanced approach to the provision of passive and active elements. The use of a combined approach plays a significant role reducing the impact of fire on people\, reduce the risk to firefighters\, property and the environment and increase sustainability. \n The Premises\, low rise residential block of flats of 4 floors containing 22 flats. \nDescription of incident  \nA small fire within a flat electrical cupboard contained\, controlled by the provision of both the passive and active fire safety measures playing a combined approach\, completing the roles of one another. The electrical cupboard fire door was in the closed position at the time of the incident which prevented the fire from spreading from the compartment of origin compromising the means of escape. One concealed sprinkler head located within the cupboard activated which extinguished the fire before the arrival of the emergency services. \nThe images of the incident clearly demonstrate the benefits of sprinklers as a life safety system. \n        \nCredit images Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service \nKey Facts  \n\nThe fire was extinguished\, controlled within the compartment of origin\, no direct fire damage reported within the dwelling.\nThe activation of the sprinkler system reduced the heat output from the fire by reducing its growth\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nNo further firefighting media was required by the emergency services\nThe sprinkler system provided vital protection for the residents dwelling\, belongings\, personal processions.\nNo injuries were reported.\n\nDebunking the myths: – When one sprinkler activates\, they all activate. Fact\, only the sprinkler head(s) directly affected by the fire is activated. \n When you compare this incident to a similar electrical flat cupboard fire in London in May 2021 involving a residential tall building where sprinklers were not installed the outcome was far different.  The fire spread from the compartment of origin on the eight-floor resulting in a 20-pump fire  \n\nFire spread to the exterior of the building affecting balconies directly above\nFlat of origin 80% damaged by fire\n67 residents’ self-evacuated prior to arrival of the FRS\nMajor incident declared mass evacuation of the block implemented\n22 smoke hoods used to rescue residents\n34 residents rescued\n\nFurther details on the incident can be found in. the LFB\, New Providence Wharf fire report. \n\n  This review provides further evidence that a correctly designed and installed life safety sprinkler system. \n\n\nCan detect and control a fire at an early stage of development and activate an alarm.\nOperation of the system rapidly reduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, allowing more time for the occupants to escape to safety or be rescued.\nAssist firefighters in carrying out search and rescue operations by limiting fire development\, which significantly reduces the risk to firefighters.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nLinks/sources \n\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data In support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Winter Update No 6\nHampshire& Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service press release\nLFB\, New Providence Wharf report\nBAFSA Information file\, a guide for responsible persons and duty holder\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging the FRS to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link \n         
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/fleet-residential-electrical-cupboard-sprinkler-activation/
LOCATION:Fleet
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/20250201_171238-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250201T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250228T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250408T055449Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250509T070804Z
UID:10000510-1738396800-1740762000@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Devon Residential Tall Building Kitchen Saved By Sprinkler System
DESCRIPTION:Julia Aylott\, Devon & Somerset Fire Rescue Service Fire Safety Manager  \n\n\n“This is another good example of where retrofitting a sprinkler system into a higher risk building (HRB) gives many benefits.  As a Regulator\, Fire Rescue Services are uncovering more and more building defects within HRBs in our communities. Automatic fire suppression systems as part of a package of fire safety measures are the focus of remediation due to the benefits they provide\, saving lives\, reducing injuries protecting firefighters.” \n\n\nSummary \n\nOur thanks to Devon & Somerset Fire Rescue Service (DSFRS) and Plymouth Community Homes (PCH) for reporting this positive news story reaffirming the importance of reporting sprinkler saves to Sprinkler Saves UK following a small kitchen fire within a residential purpose-built block of flats extinguished by the operation of the premises residential sprinkler system. \nA sprinkler save is categorised as where one or more sprinkler heads have activated and contained\, controlled or in some cases\, extinguished a building fire. Each of these real-life individual tangible stories provides powerful evidence of the ability of sprinklers as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures. \n\nReducing the impact of fire on people\, property and the environment\, reducing the risks to firefighters.\nAddressing the myths\, misconceptions regarding their safety and efficiency\, providing evidence of the ability of sprinklers to protect our communities from fire.\n\nFor this reported fire\, the benefits of \n\nRetrofitting a residential sprinkler system within the dwellings\, common ways of a single staircase purpose-built block of flats of 16 storeys.\nPreventing a potential major protracted incident\, which can lead to a significant strain on the operational resilience of Fire Rescue Service (FRS) resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service.\n\n\nThe decision by PCH to  retrofit  life safety sprinkler systems within their residential tall building property portfolio was demonstrated following reports of an accidental kitchen flat fire involving a freestanding electric cooker/hob which was accidentally switched on setting light to household items which had been left on top of the hob\, no persons were present in the dwelling at the time of the fire with no injuries reported. \n\nThe heat generated from the fire\, activated 1 sidewall sprinkler head within the kitchen which immediately allowed a fire signal to be transmitted to the remote alarm receiving centre allowing the appropriate emergency response from DSFRS.The operation of the sprinkler system restricted the growth of the fire\, extinguishing the fire before the arrival of DSFRS. \nProviding further weight to the reliability and effectiveness of sprinkler systems following the report conducted by ¹Optimal Economics\, and commissioned by the National Fire Chiefs Council\, National Fire Sprinkler Network into the performance\, reliability\, and effectiveness of sprinkler systems in controlling and extinguishing fires \nThe reports found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nThe provision of a sprinkler system does not neglect the need for other fire practical precautions or provisions where the person is at higher-than-average risk from fire\, unable to self-evacuate in the event of a fire. \n The Incident \n\nFire crews were mobilised to a confirmed fire following an emergency call received from PCH remote alarm receiving centre\, resulting in a high rise pre-determined attendance mobilised by DSFRS fire control.\nFollowing the completion of a dynamic risk assessment by the incident commander (IC) on arrival\, it was established that the building fire alarm indicator panel located on the ground floor foyer had activated\, confirming the operation of the premises sprinkler system on the 15 floor of the 16-storey building.\nThe provision of the sprinkler system provided extra time for the IC to implement a robust operational high rise tactical plan for the incident.\nUpon entry to the flat\, fire crews established that a fire within a kitchen had been contained\, controlled and extinguished by the activation of 1 sidewall sprinkler head located within the room of origin.\nMinimal fire/smoke damage was reported within the compartment of origin.\nFire damage was confined to the household items located on the hob at the time of the fire.\nNo further firefighting media was required by DSFRS.\nThe sprinkler system for the individual flat was isolated by DSFRS following confirmation to the IC that the fire was all out.\nNo injuries were reported.\n\nImage of the activated sidewall kitchen sprinkler head \n \nThe danger of fires within the kitchen was demonstrated following a recent fire in Weymouth involving an electric air fryer\, the kitchen was severely damaged by the fire as the premises was not protected by a sprinklers system \n  \nImage credit Dorset and Wiltshire FRS\nResidential Sprinkler Specification \n\nInstalled to BS9251:2014\nCategory 3 system enhanced to provide a 60-minute minimum duration of supply\nWater supplies designated tank\nCoverage\, flats and communal areas\nIsolation valves installed for each dwelling/floor\nResilience: Back up pump\, UPS back up power supply\n\nObservations \nDFRS maintaining a business-as-usual service \nAusterity\, cuts in public funding across the country have significantly impacted FRS resulting in a significant reduction to front line cover and prevention and protection activities putting a strain on resources impacting on public safety and service delivery. \nMajor protracted fire incidents therefore have a knock-on effect on local FRS resources\, leading to challenges maintaining a business-as-usual service allowing an effective response to attend other emergencies. The benefits of installing sprinkler systems in the built environment for FRS should not be underestimated. \n\nReduces the rate of production of heat and smoke\, limiting fire development preventing flash over.\n\nProviding the FRS. \n\nWith a further layer pf protection for firefighters allowing search\, rescue operations to be completed\nCrucial time for the operational tactical plan to be implemented by the IC\nThe facility to release resources earlier from the incident\, to attend other emergency incidents allowing a business-as-usual service to be maintained.\n\nFor FRS such as DSFRS\, the early release of resources is paramount as it only has two wholetime stations and 10 stations with both wholetime and on call crews with 69 on call stations. For this incident DSFRS\, required 18 resources which included 40 firefighters/officers to be mobilised as part of the predetermined attendance for a high-rise fire. \nDue to the positive impact following the operation of the sprinkler system\, the incident was scaled down by the IC\, allowing the early release of multiple resources to be available for other emergencies. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler saves reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the FRS to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy. Debunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nBenefits of Joint Working  \nPCH should be acknowledged for having the forefront to focus on business continuity management. Joint familiarisation visits completed with DSFRS allowing the appropriate information for the IC to plan and respond to an incident within a high-rise building. The outcome of which allowed the location and provision of the sprinkler system to be identified allowing a robust onsite emergency response to be actioned on arrival. \nRetrofitting Sprinkler systems within tall residential buildings \nAt present there is no statutory legislation for the retrofitting of sprinklers within residential tall buildings. This incident demonstrates the benefits of installing\, retrofitting sprinklers within residential tall buildings\, demonstrating that a correctly designed and installed sprinkler system can detect\, raise the alarm and control or for this incident extinguish the fire at an early stage of development. In addition to providing attending crews with confidence when attending tall building fires which are sprinkler protected compared to other buildings which are not sprinkler protected. \nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler saves Spring Update No 7\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\n¹Efficiency and Effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the Uk\nDSFRS Sprinklers\n\nIf you want to make a difference working in the fire sector\, we need your assistance…… \nTo make sprinklers the norm and not the exception – we need the evidence. Encouraging FRS and those in the sprinkler community to promote\, collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves UK which will help to create a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their role in containing/controlling or extinguishing the fire. \nIf you hear of a save report it using this link. \n             \n\n 
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/devon-residential-tall-building-kitchen-saved-by-sprinkler-system/
LOCATION:Devon
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Screenshot-2025-04-04-at-11.26.08.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250108
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250109
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250214T103257Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250221T162101Z
UID:10000502-1736294400-1736380799@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Wales Primary School Sprinkler Activation Save
DESCRIPTION:Overview \nWhen you read real life tangible examples of where fire sprinklers have actuated containing\, controlling or even in some cases extinguishing school fires\, you ask yourself why are sprinklers still not mandatory for newly constructed school buildings in England with the benefits they bring protecting: – \n\nThe school\, in terms of life safety/property.\nThe environment reducing Co2 emissions.\nStudents course work\, teachers teaching aids\, resources\nVital local community resource.\n\nIn a recent article contained with in RICS Journal by Ian Cox\,  Chairman of the Business Sprinkler Alliance\, Ian references “when you consider the huge costs associated with school fires-such as rebuilding\, temporary relocation\, loss of equipment and pupils work\, as well as the emotional and physical upheaval- we are still not learning the lessons about fire and its impact when schools are built without sprinkler systems. \nIt is a requirement in Scotland and a condition of government funding in Wales\, but despite the rising number of school fires since the lockdowns of 2020/21 there is no requirement in England or Northern Ireland for the installation of sprinklers. \nThe National Fire Chiefs Council report that in May 2021\, the government announced a proposal to make the installation of sprinklers mandatory in new schools over 11m in height\, However\, given that only a few schools currently meet this threshold\, the benefits of this proposal are likely to be limited. When replying to the consultation on these proposals\, NFCC was clear that their strongly held belief is that they constitute a lessening of standards from previous guidance. \nThe original guidance\, when first released in 2007\, acknowledged the important role of sprinklers and stated that “all new schools should have fire sprinklers installed except in a few low-risk schools.” The proposed changes in the guidance are a retrograde step and represent a real lessening of standards in this area. \nNow approaching 4 years since the government first consulted on a revised version of Building Bulletin 100: design for fire safety in schools\, we are still waiting for a decision to be announced. \nOur thanks to Mid & West Wales Fire & Rescue Service rising to the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council encouraging FRSs to collate report sprinkler activations to sprinkler saves uk.  In this case promoting a primary school fire which was extinguished by the activation of the premises fire sprinkler system. \nIf it was not for the decision by the Welsh government for sprinklers to be installed in schools\, we could be discussing a different outcome for this incident. \nThe Incident \n\nDate of incident; January 2025\nLocation; Wales\nUse of building; Primary School\nNumber of floors; 2\nLocation of fire; Storeroom\nAutomatic fire suppression system; Sprinklers\nFire Rescue Service; Mid & West Wales Fire & Rescue Service (MAWWFRS)\n\nIt is reported that following a malicious act\, 5% of a classroom storeroom was damaged by fire which was successfully contained\, controlled and extinguished within the room of origin by the activation of 1 sprinkler head with no injuries reported. \nNo further firefighting media was required by the fire service on arrival\, the school was closed following the fire\,  opening fully the following day with only minimal fire damage sustained to the classroom storeroom\, with no impact on the student’s education. \nThe outcome of this fire could have been so much different if this incident had been in England. When you compare this to the three major school fires in Derbyshire that were all severely damaged by fire in May/October 2020\, where sprinklers were not fitted. \n\nHarrington Junior school fire 28 May 2020\nRavensdale Infant School\, 5 October 2020\nSt Mary’s Catholic Voluntary Academy\, in Darley Abbey\, 3 October 2020\n\n \nCredit image Derbyshire Fire Rescue Service Ravensdale Infant School \nThese fires have resulted in the agreement of a statement of intent\, between Derbyshire Fire and Rescue\, and Derbyshire County Council for sprinklers to be installed in new-build schools and those undergoing renovation\, which should be applauded. \nThis incident clearly demonstrates the importance of protecting educational premises with sprinklers. \n\nMinimal fire damage within the compartment of origin.\nBusiness continuity\, the school opened fully the following day.\nMinimal impact on the students education.\nNo injuries reported.\n\nWithout the fire sprinkler system\, there would have been significant damage to the school\, potential risk of injury to members of staff\, firefighters. \nFurther case studies where fire sprinklers were reported as present and having a impact in educational premises is referenced in the BAFSA report (link below) focusing on :- \n\n10 sprinkler saves involving schools between the period November 2021 to May 2023.\nCompound fire data\, identifying 65 educational activations for the period 2018/19 to 2021/22 where sprinklers were present\, operated by floor\, location identifying:\n\n\nSecondary schools accounted for the highest number of incidents.\nHalf of the incidents were malicious acts involving toilets/changing rooms\, reinforcing the problem of arson in schools.\n\nLinks \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nMid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service Sprinklers\nSprinkler Saves Update No 2 link to the NFCC Sprinkler Saves UK report\nReporting a sprinkler save\nRICS Journals article by Ian Cox Chairman Business Sprinkler Alliance ‘Why isn’t England Mandating School Sprinklers”\nNFCC\, Automatic Water Suppression Systems Policy Statement
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/wales-primary-school-sprinkler-activation-save/
CATEGORIES:Commercial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/heic:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IMG_2302.heic
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250101T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250131T170000
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250205T112020Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250205T112020Z
UID:10000501-1735718400-1738342800@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Warwickshire Supermarket Superstore Sprinkler Activation
DESCRIPTION:Matthew Pardoe\, Warwickshire Fire Rescue Service Station Manager \n“If it was not for the prompt activation of the store sprinkler system containing\, controlling and in this case extinguishing the fire\, we could be discussing a different outcome for this incident. These types of premises contain high fire loading with unique fire hazards due to the large amounts of stock stored on site increasing the risk of rapid fire spread in the event of a fire. The benefits of sprinklers should not be underestimated they save lives and reduce injuries\, protect firefighters.” \nOur gratitude to Warwickshire Fire and Rescue Service for rising the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council to collate\, report sprinkler activations to Sprinkler Saves Uk. The outcome of which will allow a central and comprehensive record of fire incidents where sprinklers played their essential role is suppressing and/or extinguishing the fire. \nThe resources will benefit the collective aim of enhancing protection against fire through the increased acceptance and installation of fire sprinklers\, driving a culture of change so they are understood and become a more widespread protection measure across the UK. \nThe Incident  \n\nDate of Incident January 2025\nProperty type; Shop and Commercial (Large Supermarket)\nIncident; Fire\nLocation of fire; toilet area\nAutomatic Fire Suppression System; Sprinklers\n\nTwo fire appliances were mobilised following the manual activation of the premises fire alarm by staff who discovered a fire adjacent to the first-floor toilets. The premises emergency plan was immediately implemented with the store evacuated with no injuries reported before the arrival of Warwickshire Fire and Rescue Service. \nOn arrival\, the incident commander completed a dynamic risk assessment establishing that a fire had been extinguished on the first floor of the premises by the premises sprinkler system\, further firefighting media was not required to be applied by operational crews. Enquires are ongoing by Warwickshire Police to establish the cause of the fire. \nDisappointingly\, once again no mention was made in the local press regarding the positive role of the sprinkler system which allowed a successful conclusion to this incident. The danger of supermarket fires should not be underestimated\, firefighters in Gloucester were put at risk when tackling superstore fire in 1996 in Staple Hill which sadly resulted in the loss of life firefighter Fleur Bard\, on this occasion sprinklers were not fitted. \nAt present it is still not compulsory to install fire sprinkler systems in new single-storey supermarkets and superstores\, Part B of the building regulations requires the installation of sprinklers in uncompartmented areas of shops or self-storage buildings of more than 2000 square metres. \nThe following advice is intended for building managers\, individuals who have responsibility for fire safety within a building. \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely automatic water fire suppression systems.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy \nDebunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Summer Update No 6\nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder.\nWarwickshire Fire and Rescue Service\, Fire safety sprinkler systems\nNFCC Sprinkler Saves\n\n     
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/warwickshire-supermarket-superstore-sprinkler-activation/
CATEGORIES:Commercial
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250101
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250501
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250603T083956Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250731T152933Z
UID:10000513-1735689600-1746057599@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:West Midlands Fire Service Sprinkler Activations January-April 2025
DESCRIPTION:Introduction \nSix incidents have been reported by West Midlands Fire Service (WMFS) where sprinklers were present\, having an impact for the above-mentioned period. Raising awareness of how the destructive effects of fire can be mitigated\, and in most cases\, be prevented through the enhanced use of sprinklers\, and other forms of Automatic Water Suppression Systems (AWSS) which save lives\, protect firefighters\, homes and businesses as part of an appropriate package of fire safety measures. \nEmbracing the call from the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) who actively encourage fire services to collate\, promote case studies to Sprinkler Saves UK to promote the effectiveness of sprinklers in operating and controlling and in some cases extinguishing the fire. The outcome of which will continue to promote a better understanding of the benefits of AFSS in the wider community\, fire safety sector in general as an effective and reliable fire protection measure as part of a package of fire safety measures protecting life and property from fire. \nProviding further evidence as part of our campaign driving change so AWSS are understood and accepted as the norm and not the exception\, the outcome of which will. \n\nInfluence policy makers to strengthen AWSS requirements\, England’s sprinkler fire safety regulations trail behind its neighbours.\nGovernments in other UK jurisdictions have set lower mandatory thresholds for the installation of sprinklers.\nEntice housing provider stakeholders and\, others to install sprinklers as part of a package of fire safety measures providing a further layer of protection from fire for our communities.\n\nWest Midlands Fire Service¹ \nIs the second largest in England\, operates 38 stations and various emergency response vehicles staffed by more than 1\,350 firefighters and officers. In 2023\, it responded to 30\,000 incidents. \nActively promotes the installation of AWSS in high-risk areas. \nRegulatory and sector changes relating to fire safety have occurred since the Grenfell tower fire. One such change has been the increase of sprinkler installations across the country with housing providers\, local authorities and developers committing to install sprinklers in purpose-built block of flats on a new and retrofit basis. In 2017\, Birmingham City Council (BCC) decided to retrofit fire sprinklers in 213 purpose-built blocks of flats to enhance resident safety. Previously\, they had installed sprinklers in all communal bin areas of their residential tower blocks. \nKey fact \n\nSix incidents were reported. In five cases\, the sprinkler system extinguished the fire upon activation\, and in the remaining case\, the activation contained and controlled the fire.\n\n \nProviding further evidence of the reliability and effectiveness of AWSS\, supporting the UK research² which was commissioned by the NFCC\, National Fire Sprinkler Network and supported by British Automatic Sprinkler Association. (BAFSA) \nThe report found that: \n\nSprinklers are 99% efficient in extinguishing or controlling a fire.\nSprinklers are 94% efficient in their ability to operate.\n\nIncidents AWSS were reported as present\, having an impact \n Key facts \n\nFour incidents involved purpose-built flats that had been retrofitted with a sprinkler system as part of the Birmingham City Council sprinkler projects.\nThese incidents were either contained\, controlled\, or extinguished.\n\nProviding further evidence that the main functional objectives of a life safety system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling or even extinguishing the fire.\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin.\nFirefighters completing operational duties without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation.\nPrevent conflagration.\nAllowing the business-as-usual service to be maintained within WMFS by reducing the impact of major fire incidents allowing the release of resources to provide an effective response to attend other emergencies\n\n\nPurpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys\n\n\nDate of Incident; 6 January 2025\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Living room\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\n\nA sprinkler system extinguished a sofa fire in a 10th-floor flat of a 20-storey building containing the fire to the initial item ignited. The resident self-evacuate before the arrival of WMFS. \n       2/3. Purpose built Flats/Maisonettes 4-9 storeys \n\nDate of Incident(s); 17 January/6 March 2025\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire(s); Refuse/bin store\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Contained/controlled/extinguished\n\nTwo refuse bin chute room fires were contained\, controlled\, or extinguished by the premises sprinkler system requiring minimal intervention by the fire service. \nThe risk of refuse/bin store fires should not be underestimated\, these fires can significantly impact resident safety\, especially where bin chutes open onto protected corridors\, lobbies\, and stairs\, increasing the risk of fire and smoke spreading to common escape routes. \nData from Fire Rescue services for 2018/19 to 2023/24 shows the impact of these fires in purpose-built block of flats in England\, Scotland\, and Wales where AWSS were present\, having an impact. \nIt was identified that. \n\nRefuse/bin stores recorded the highest number of incidents with 327 activations.\nWhat cannot be defined by the data is whether the installation of AWSS within buildings is limited to these refuse/bin stores alone or extended to the occupied flat areas.\n\n \nAnalysis of the data reveals that of the 327 refuse store fires where sprinklers were present having an impact\, WMFS dominated the figures with 157 which should be of no surprise following the decision by BCC to install sprinklers in all communal bin areas of their residential tower blocks. \n \nWhat the data is unable to confirm is the rationale behind why a small majority of AWSS fire incidents were identified as not containing/controlling the fire or recorded as unknown. Further interrogation of the IRS data fields would be required to explore this anomaly. \n\n Commercial Fire\n\n\nDate of Incident; 22 February 2025\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\n\nA fire in an electrical deep fat fryer was extinguished by the sprinkler system. Fixed firefighting systems have proven to protect property\, business\, and jobs\, allowing the impacted business to resume operations within hours and avoid economic and social costs. \nTypically\, in commercial kitchens fixed firefighting systems such as wet chemical systems are used for object protection\, kitchen areas\, fryers\, oil cookers etc and not used for area wide protection of a building. \nThe benefit of installing wet chemicals is that they provide excellent flame knockdown and surface cooling the scope of kitchen protection should include all appliances that are capable of catching fire and not just the deep fat fryers\, protection should cover ventilated ceilings/hoods\, plenums and duct entrances and should be activated simultaneously. \n\n Purpose built Flats/Maisonettes 4-9 storeys\n\n\nDate of Incident; 18 April 2025\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Bedroom\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\n\nA fire involving a mattress and bedding was contained by the residential sprinkler system. The flat’s occupants evacuated safely before WMFS arrived\, and no injuries were reported. Smoking materials was the likely cause of the fire. \nThe benefit of sprinklers should not be underestimated\, the image of a similar bedroom fire reported by South Yorkshire Fire Service (SYFS) speaks a thousand words. \nThe fire was extinguished before the arrival of SYFR by the activation of 1 residential sprinkler head within the flat. No further firefighting media were required from SYFR\, and no injuries were reported. \n \nImage credit SYFS\n\n Student halls of residence\n\n\nDate of Incident; 22 April 2025\nIncident; Fire.\nLocation of fire; Kitchen\nAFSS; Sprinklers.\nImpact of AFSS; Extinguished\n\nA cooking pan kitchen fire within a flat on the 12th floor of a 17-storey building was extinguished by the residential sprinkler system with fire damage to the item first ignited. No further interaction by the fire service was required. \nIt is no surprise that kitchen fires accounted for the highest number of fires following the findings identified by London Fire Brigade³ for cooking related fires for this occupancy who reported that over the past 5 years London firefighters have attended more than 1\,200 cooking-related fires and false alarms in university students’ halls involving kitchen activities\, People living in rented or shared accommodation are seven times more likely to have a fire involving unattended cooking. \nThe benefits of installing sprinklers for this type of occupancy was reinforced following three fires reported to Sprinkler Saves UK by Nottinghamshire Fire & Rescue Service (NFRS) within the space of 12 months which were either cooking related or involved incense candles. On each occasion the fire was contained\, controlled or extinguished by the sprinkler system\, demonstrating the benefits of sprinklers. \nNottingham Kitchen fire involving an electric air fryer \n \nPremises Emergency Plan \nThe problem\, post fire sprinkler activations reported where buildings have been identified as affected by water egress following the successful activation of the sprinkler system containing\, controlling or in some cases extinguishing the fire\, predominately due to. \n\nPoor business continuity management\, inadequate onsite emergency planning by the building manager or responsible person for the fire safety arrangements within a building.\nAllowing onsite information to be available for firefighters to interact with the building active fire safety measures namely AWSS.\n\nThere is now a high probability that firefighters will attend a variety of incidents where sprinklers systems are reported as present and having an impact within these types of buildings. \nThe provision of a robust emergency plan will allow an immediate emergency response to be actioned by the fire rescue service to assist in the management of water from the activation of the sprinkler system following a fire or even following the unlikely likelihood of un-intentional release of water\, due to the knock-on effect this can have on a business or occupancy. Debunking the myth that water damage following the actuation of the sprinkler system will be more expensive than the actual damage resulting from the fire. \nFurther detailed guidance on Sprinkler protected buildings can be found in the BAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder \nConclusion \nThis collection of incidents highlights the benefits of AWSS\, within the community and fire safety sector as an effective\, reliable fire protection measure for safeguarding life and property as part of a package of fire safety measures. Demonstrating that the functional objectives of a life safety sprinkler system were achieved. \n\nReducing the rate of heat and smoke\, containing and controlling the fire\nReducing the likelihood of a fire spreading beyond the room of origin\nFirefighters operated without due risk to either effect rescue or assist evacuation\nPrevent conflagration\nAllowing the business-as-usual service to be maintained by reducing the impact of major fire incidents allowing the release of resources to provide an effective response to attend other emergencies\n\nSources/further reading.  \n\nSprinkler Saves Review 2023/2024\nSprinkler Saves Spring Update No 7 \nBAFSA Information file\, A guide for Responsible Persons and Duty Holder\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in The United Kingdom: An Analysis From Fire Service Data\nEfficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service data in support of this publication a supplementary publication Incidence of Deaths and Injuries in sprinklered buildings was published\n\n  \n\n¹Source WMFS Community Risk Management Plan (CRMP)\n²Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sprinkler Systems in the United Kingdom: An Analysis from Fire Service Data – Optimal Economics 2017\n³Source LFB press release Cooking related fires in London student halls
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/west-midlands-fire-service-sprinkler-activations-january-april-2025/
LOCATION:West Midlands
CATEGORIES:Residential
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Picture-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250101
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250102
DTSTAMP:20260417T022403
CREATED:20250526T195346Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250605T133720Z
UID:10000516-1735689600-1735775999@www.sprinklersaves.co.uk
SUMMARY:Brentwood Factory Sprinkler Activation 1936
DESCRIPTION:Source believed to be a Brentwood local newspaper cutting for August 28 1936 \nMy thanks to Maurice Fisher for reporting a manufacturing factory fire which occurred in the film winding department at Ilford Ltd’s Selo factory\, Woodman Road\, Brentwood\, which activated the premises automatic sprinkler system on Tuesday 25 August 1936. \nProviding further evidence on the resilience\, benefits of sprinkler systems even though this incident took place 89 years ago. According to a newspaper cutting\, it is reported that a piece of factory machinery burst into flames resulting in one member of staff sustaining burns whilst using a fire extinguisher to tackle the fire\, with further several men overcome by smoke and fumes and gas masks required by members of Brentwood Fire Brigade \nThe premises automatic sprinkler system came into operation and was of great assistance subduing the fire. The fire was overcome by Brentwood Fire Brigade within 1 hour after their arrival. The Selo factory which has now been demolished for housing was constructed in the 1920’s which may indicate that the sprinkler system was installed over one hundred years ago. \nFurther information on the history of Selo Factory can be found on the Photomemorabilia website\, by clicking this link. \nIf you hear of a save report it\, it makes a difference.
URL:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/saves/brentwood-factory-sprinkler-activation-1936/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.sprinklersaves.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Brentwood.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR